► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Rick Perry’

Meaningless Statistical Analysis And Other Annoying Democrat Talking Points.

by Flyovercountry ( 70 Comments › )
Filed under Politics at September 8th, 2011 - 8:30 am

When I was a kid, and a female friend wanted to join the mostly male dominated conversation, which was of course about sports. The female friend stated with confidence that Babe Ruth had in fact pitched 118 perfect games. The rest of us at the table did not wait to burst into laughter. It was not because of an innate streak of cruelty, or even a desire to shun the girl from future conversations. It was simply because we could not help it. The statistic, even in as much as baseball was invented exclusively for those of us wonkish enough to enjoy statistic analysis, was so preposterous, that uncontrollable laughter was the only choice our brains gave us.

Over the last couple of days, I have seen some of the most misleading goofy statistics parroted from the Soros talking point memos as though they were some sort of original thought. What amuses me most about these repetitions is hard to say. Is it the fact that the statistics are either flat out laughably false or misleading? Is it that I will hear or read the stats and talking points from a veritable montage of people as if they developed the argument themselves? (Oddly enough, those same people are the ones who’s chief rebuttal to the arguments that I lay out will invariably be, “quit watching/listening to Fox News, Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, what have you.) Is it the complete randomness of the talking point as if its author were just flailing about hoping some piece of dirt would eventually stick?

This morning, from about 17 different places, Rick Perry is the latest recipient of the honor of the baloney statistic. Today I learned that Governor Perry cut firefighting funding in Texas by 75%. When you stop laughing, please continue, I’ll give you a minute. This figure is so idiotic, comment on it seems juvenile. Conservatives, feel free to skip to the next paragraph, for you liberals, I’ll be happy to indulge you in this debate. Do you really believe that any budget anywhere in the known universe is capable of being slashed by 75%. In a time and age in our country when half of our political leaders whine like toddlers when talk is put forward of slashing budgets by as much as 0.63%, do you think it is possible to cut a municipal budget by as much as say, 3%, let alone 75%? The figure is laughable just on its face.

Now that the Conservatives have rejoined us, we’ll continue our argument. First off, the whole fire department thing is a local endeavor in every other community on the planet. Local municipalities are responsible for providing their own police and fire. I have heard not one thing ever from any of my friends in Texas which would lead me to believe that this fact of life is any different there. Texans, feel free to correct me if I am mistaken. Secondly, when ever a fiscal conservative attempts to shut the spigots off in terms of money hemorrhaging from the public largess, why is it always the vital services which are affected and not the pet projects that carry no actual value. I am certain that there is some Cowboy Poetry Festival in Texas which can be shut down before we fire almost every fire fighter in the state. We have a volunteer fire department in my community, and we also raise our own local taxes to support our own department. Ohio contributes not one penny. Why should the folks in Hamilton County be responsible for paying for the fire protection for Lorain County. The residents of Elyria, Ohio should not be asked to support the residents of Cleveland. Each community is responsible for their own affairs. Texas is no different.

That the state of Texas ever used state funds to support local fire departments is the real story here. This brings up another point. Once something gets itself added to the public dole, it is considered off limits for discontinuation. Every year we have a national debate about budgets and deficits. States and municipalities have the same thing. Every year, when people notice that our spending is insane, we will have some pundit smugly ask, where are you going to cut, as if we were financial lemmings, locked into our current national suicide pact. Yesterday, Joe Scarborough, as though it were the dumbest thing he had ever heard, blasted Michelle Bachman for suggesting that we should shut down the Department of Education. He stated as a matter of fact that this made Bachman extreme. The Department of Education did not exist prior to Jimmy Carter’s disastrous 4 years as President. It has not in any measurable way succeeded at anything. The state of our educational system has rapidly deteriorated under the governance of this relatively new directorate. Yet, according to Scarborough, it is considered as something which should be held as untouchable, merely since it is already on the budget. The only spending mentioned in the U.S. Constitution is defense spending. How’s that for extreme? With the money Perry saves by not spending the state’s funds on something clearly not within the realm of the state’s responsibility, he will be able to tax the citizens of Texas less. With the money saved, Texans will be able to determine how much of that they wish to spend on their fire protection. That is their business, and not the business of George Soros, who by the way does not live in Texas.

Side note: If this is the best you Democrats have to throw at Governor Perry, you are in deep dodo.

Cross Posted at Musings of a Mad Conservative.

If Obama has lost the Hamptons

by Mojambo ( 127 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Elections 2012, Mitt Romney, Politics, Progressives at September 7th, 2011 - 5:00 pm

Richard Cohen – as close as you are going to get to a Liberal with some intellectual integrity – states what many of us have noted, that Barack Obama is rapidly turning into Jimmy Carter  as 2011 eerily is starting to remind people  (old enough to remember) of 1979.  When the liberal phonies of The Hamptons (a series of tony beach communities – Southampton, East Hampton, Sag Harbor, West Hampton, etc. – all the way out on Suffolk County where people such as Steven Spielberg, Alec Baldwin, et al have summer homes), no longer wax enthusiastic about Obama, then he is in trouble. This is not to imply that they will not vote for him next year – the majority of them  will vote Democratic, however the enthusiasm is gone and many of them will be like I was in 2008  voting for McCain, not very happy and going through the motions.

by Richard Cohen

Barack Obama has lost the Hamptons.

That sentence is a fat target for ridicule, I know, since the Hamptons are often reviled as the playground of the ridiculously rich and the promiscuously silly — hardly the working-class Democratic base. As is usually the case, there’s some truth to the stereotype, but enough exceptions to that rule to make the White House pay attention. The Hamptons is where the Democratic energy, money and intellectual firepower of Manhattan goes for R&R. It’s just not another beach.

[…]

Let me call the roll. I am talking about are writers and editors, lawyers and shrinks, Wall Street tycoons and freelance photographers, hedge funders and academics, run-of-the-mill Democrats and Democratic activists. They were all politically sophisticated, and just a year ago some of them were still vociferous Obama supporters. No more.

Frankly, I was surprised. The Hamptons are a redoubt of New York liberalism. It is to campaign money what the Outer Banks are to fishermen. I expected more than a few people to defend the president. No one did. Everyone — and I do mean everyone — expressed disappointment in him as a leader. In that area, they thought he was a bust. Some articulated detailed critiques — the nature of his stimulus program, for instance. They argued that more money should have gone into long-term infrastructure programs. Most, though, skipped the details and just registered dismay: Where had their “change” agent gone?

[…]

I grant you that the Hamptons are not America, and I grant you further that some of these people will scurry back to the Democratic fold when they have to choose between Obama and, say, Rick Perry. (Jon Huntsman or Mitt Romney is a different matter.) In the meantime, though, these opinion leaders, these political activists, these people with influence and, yes, money, have bailed on Obama — not just some of them, not just a few of them, but all of them. The early returns are in: Obama has lost the Hamptons.

Read the rest: It’s no longer Obama-land in the Hamptons

Karl Rove attacks Rick Perry over Social Security

by Phantom Ace ( 19 Comments › )
Filed under Elections 2012, Headlines, Progressives, Republican Party, Tranzis at September 7th, 2011 - 9:51 am

Progressive Republican Karl Rove clearly has a hard on (in more ways than one) on Rick Perry. He attacks him on a regular basis in interviews. His latest smear on Perry is claiming that his proposal to reform Social Security as toxic. Keep in mind, Rove back in 2005 had Bush half heatedly propose Social Security reform. Now he goes after Perry for the same idea.

On “GMA” this morning, Karl Rove noted that new GOP frontrunner has many strengths, but Rick Perry’s thoughts on Social Security are not among them.

Perry’s campaign has not backed away from what Perry wrote in his book “Fed Up”  — that Social Security is a “Ponzi scheme,” a “failure,” “something we have been forced to accept for more than 70 years now,” and one of many New Deal programs that have “never died, and like a bad disease, they have spread.”  

But Rove pulled no punches today, calling that stance “inadequate.” 

“They are going to have to find a way to deal with these things,” Rove said.

Karl Rove’s manhood may be inadequate, but to describe Perry’s  Social Security view in that manner is really juvenile. Clearly Karl Rove has PHD, Perry Hater Disease. He will do all he can to sabotage Perry. Rove wants Jeb Bush in 2016 and doesn’t care if the nation is in ruined status by then.

The Left is now embarrassing Karl Rove as a wise man. They can have him. He’s a Leftist anyway and should be purged from the GOP.

UPDATE: Rick Perry Will Attend the Debate.

by huckfunn ( 24 Comments › )
Filed under Elections 2012, Headlines, Politics, Republican Party at September 6th, 2011 - 3:40 pm

UPDATE: Perry plans to attend GOP debate.  Hat tip The Osprey.

 

A spokesman for Texas Gov. Rick Perry says he plans to attend the GOP presidential debate tomorrow.

Mark Miner, Perry’s spokesman, just said so in a one-line e-mail to USA TODAY’s Jackie Kucinich.

In an appearance earlier today on CBS’ The Early Show, the Texas governor said he did not know whether the wildfires would force him to skip the debate. He said that his focus is on the latest fires, including a devastating one in Bastrop County near Austin.

CNN is reporting that Governor Rick Perry has returned to Texas to deal with the wild fires. The Perry camp had tried to make arrangements to participate remotely, but apparently this will not happen.

Texas on Fire: