► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Sarah Palin’

The ‘Texas Republican Option’ and Rick Perry

by Mojambo ( 112 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Elections 2010, Elections 2012, George W. Bush at May 24th, 2011 - 11:30 am

I am not surprised that the GOP Establishment and the remnants of the failed McCain campaign are looking to Jon Huntsman to be the sacrificial lamb for Obama next year. Rick Perry annihilated the Bush clan (father and son) and all their running dogs (Karl Rove, Dick Cheney, Karen Hughes) when he destroyed RINO Kay Baily Hutchison in 2010.  We all know that Obama plans on running against George W. Bush next year, well Rick Perry ran against Bush (actually a proxy of Bush’s – KBH) and was completely victorious. Rick  Perry has a job creation record in the Lonestar State  that other governors can only dream about.

by Stewart Lawrence

Should the Republican Party draft Texas Gov. Rick Perry as its presidential standard-bearer in 2012?

With the recent exits of Mike Huckabee and Mitch Daniels, Newt Gingrich’s seemingly endless gaffes and pratfalls, and the steadfast refusal of other GOP favorites like former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush and New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie to join the race, conservatives are beginning to whisper loudly about Perry.

Officially, the 61-year-old native Texan, who was just re-elected to his third full term, isn’t running. Unofficially, it’s obvious he’s interested — in fact, his top aides are quietly putting out feelers. But, like George W. Bush in 1999, Perry wants the GOP to ask him to run — or perhaps “beg” would be a better word.

And if current trends hold, it well might — and soon.

Consider what Perry would bring to the race:Jobs. Perry has already transformed Texas into the largest job incubator in the nation at a time when President Obama and the Democrats are being blamed for failing to reduce near-record level joblessness. Perry has offered special tax breaks to companies willing to relocate and open production facilities in his state — and they’ve responded in droves. Other GOP candidates — like the recently departed Daniels — can boast a track record tackling the deficit. But none has Perry’s standing on jobs.

Obamacare. Perry has been a steadfast critic of Obamacare and has refused to entertain compromises of the kind that may well doom the candidacies of Gingrich and Mitt Romney. And unlike two other Southern governors, Bobby Jindal in Louisiana and Nathan Deal in Georgia, who’ve tried to hedge their bets politically, Perry has discouraged Texas legislators from even introducing legislation to support a state-based Obamacare health benefits exchange. Perry’s tough position will place him squarely in the conservative Tea Party camp, alongside of Michele Bachmann and Tim Pawlenty.

[…]

The border. Perry is a border hawk, but he’s managed to craft a nuanced position that allows him to draw in a wide range of political constituencies. Unlike much of the GOP, he opposes an Arizona-style crackdown law, saying it’s not needed in Texas. He’s also criticized the U.S.-Mexico border fence, which many conservative landowners with affected properties along the border also oppose. Instead, Perry advocates stepped-up use of the National Guard and border patrol agents, as well as the introduction of Predator drones to maintain better surveillance of illegal immigrants and drug gangs. He opposes Obama’s “amnesty” plan, including the more limited DREAM Act.

[…]

And then there’s the “Bush” factor itself. Though Perry, like Bush, is a protégé of Karl Rove, he’s broken with the Bush circle, especially after they backed his GOP primary opponent, Kay Bailey Hutchison. Perry cleverly pivoted, and won the endorsement of Sarah Palin, which helped him defeat Hutchison, before going on to defeat the Democratic mayor of Houston, Bill White, by double digits. And despite Palin’s support, Perry bested White 59-36 percent among independents, a clear sign of his enormous crossover appeal.

[…]

But will it happen? That probably depends on how fragmented the current GOP field remains after the Iowa straw poll in August. With Daniels out, some GOP establishment figures, including veterans of John McCain’s 2008 campaign, and McCain himself, are plainly hoping that the pro-life Huntsman, a fiscal hawk with a stellar conservative governing record in Utah and serious foreign policy chops, can somehow steal the grassroots thunder of Bachmann and Pawlenty while wooing establishment funders still leery of investing in Romney’s already divisive candidacy.

[…]

Read the rest: Rick Perry and the GOP’s ‘Texas Option’

Friday with the ‘hammer – The Republican racing form for 2012

by Mojambo ( 107 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Elections 2010, Elections 2012, Republican Party at April 22nd, 2011 - 2:00 pm

Interesting that Dr. K. thinks that Sarah Palin will not run as he believes that  she knows that she has little chance of getting the nomination and even a smaller one at winning the whole thing. I am glad to see Dr. K. (a trained psychiatrist by the way)  agrees with me that the Republican “bench” (for 2016) with Rubio, Haley, Ryan and Christie is super strong!  Keep in mind that Dr. K. is not analyzing or advocating for anyone.

by Charles Krauthammer

Unified Field Theory of 2012, Axiom One: The more the Republicans can make the 2012 election like 2010, the better their chances of winning.

The 2010 Democratic shellacking had the distinction of being the most ideological election in 30 years. It was driven by one central argument in its several parts: the size and reach of government, spending and debt and, most fundamentally, the nature of the American social contract. The 2010 election was a referendum on President Obama‘s experiment in hyper-liberalism. It lost resoundingly.

Of course, presidential elections are not arguments in the abstract but arguments with a face. Hence, Axiom Two: The less attention the Republican candidate draws to him/herself, the better the chances of winning. To the extent that 2012 is about ideas, about the case for smaller government, Republicans have a decided edge. If it’s a referendum on the fitness and soundness of the Republican candidate – advantage Obama.

Which suggests Axiom Three: No baggage and no need for flash. Having tried charisma in 2008, the electorate is not looking for a thrill up the leg in 2012. It’s looking for solid, stable, sober and, above all, not scary.

Given these Euclidean truths, here’s the early line. (Remember: This is analysis, not advocacy.)

Long shots

Michele Bachmann: Tea Party favorite. Appeals to Palinites. Could do well in Iowa. Hard to see how she makes her way through the rest of the primaries. A strong showing in debates and a respectable finish would increase her stature for 2016. But for now: 20-1 to win the nomination.

Donald Trump: He’s not a candidate, he’s a spectacle. He’s also not a conservative. With a wink and a smile, Muhammad Ali showed that self-promoting obnoxiousness could be charming. Trump shows that it can be merely vulgar. A provocateur and a clown, the Republicans’ Al Sharpton.

The major candidates

Mitt Romney: Serious guy. Pre-vetted (2008). Tons of private- and public-sector executive experience. If not for one thing, he’d be the prohibitive front-runner. Unfortunately, the one thing is a big thing: Massachusetts‘ Romneycare. For an election in which the main issue is excessive government (see Axiom One), that’s a huge liability. Every sentient Republican has been trying to figure out how to explain it away. I’ve heard no reports of any success. Romney is Secretariat at Belmont, but ridden by Minnesota Fats. He goes out at 5-1.

Newt Gingrich: Smart guy. A fountain of ideas. No, a Vesuvius of ideas. Some brilliance, lots of lava. Architect of a historic Republican victory in 1994. Rocky speakership. Unfortunate personal baggage. 12-1.

[…]

Likely not running

Mike Huckabee: Has a good life – hosting a popular TV show, making money, building his dream house in Florida. He’d be crazy to run. Doesn’t look crazy to me.

Sarah Palin: Same deal. Showed her power in 2010 as kingmaker and opinion shaper. Must know (I think) she has little chance at the nomination and none in the general election. Why risk it, and the inevitable diminishment defeat would bring?

Even less likely to run – the 2016 bench

A remarkable class of up-and-comers includes Paul Ryan, Chris Christie, Marco Rubio, Nikki Haley.

[…]

One problem: Ryan has zero inclination to run. Wants to continue what he’s doing right now. Would have to be drafted. That would require persuasion. Can anyone rustle up a posse?

Read the rest here: Will it be Pawlentey or Palin? Romney or Trump? Handicapping the 2012 presidential odds.

Palin supports Trump’s Obama investigation

by Phantom Ace ( 14 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Elections 2012, Headlines, Progressives, Republican Party at April 10th, 2011 - 10:48 am

Donald Trump is spending real money on investigators trying to get the truth about Obama’s Birth Certificate. The issue here isn’t where Obama was born, it’s why does he not have to show a birth certificate. A cloud of mystery surrounds Obama’s past. Donald Trump wants to lift the veil off this mystery. one person supporting this investigation is none other than Sarah Palin.

Sarah Palin was interviewed live today on Fox News’ Justice with Judge Jeanine, and was asked to weigh in on the rather sudden addition of Donald Trump’s voice to the “Birther movement“, as well as the money “The Donald” is devoting to researching the existence of the president’s birth certificate. Palin’s answer? She noted it wasn’t that unthinkable for Trump to be curious about Obama’s birth certificate, as it was an issue that has transfixed a sizable segment of the body politic.

[….]

Palin also expressed hope that Trump’s money and resources could counter the $2 million she claims Obama has spent to keep the certificate hidden from the public. Her attitude suggested a quiet, but not overt, encouragement of Trump’s investigation.

The real reason for this investigation is to exposed what Obama is hiding. Once exposed, even if its something minor like who his real father is the damage will be huge. Obama’s 2012 campaign is premised on one thing, his personality. If it turns out he’s lying, people will no longer view Obama’s personality favorably. This will take away one of his key political weapon.

Without his personality, Obama can’t run on his policies. Hence 2012 will come to down to a Tea Party Conservatism vs. Transnational Progressivism. That is a battle our side can win.

Bachmann to Replace Palin?

by Iron Fist ( 16 Comments › )
Filed under Headlines at April 5th, 2011 - 9:47 am

Experienced blacksmiths know, you have to strike while the iron is hot. The same is true in politics, in that an oppertunity rarely comes along twice. Thus it is with the seeming off-again, on-again candidacy of Sarah Palin. Will she run? That question is increasingly less meaningful. Another strong Republican woman is vying for the Presidency:

The vacuum created by former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin’s (R) absence from the 2012 campaign trail presents a major opportunity for the woman she once hinted might share a presidential ticket with her: Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.).

With strategists and conservative activists increasingly convinced that Palin won’t make a run for the White House next year, she is losing some clout among her contingent of grassroots devotees who are eager to hit the 2012 campaign trail and rally behind an alternative to President Obama.

Bachmann, who is mulling a 2012 run, is the most obvious choice to supplant Palin in next year’s presidential contest. The Minnesota Republican is positioning herself to take up the anti-establishment mantle that vaulted Palin to Tea Party stardom.

And polls reflect Bachmann’s growing cachet. The three-term lawmaker came in second in last week’s Gallup poll that measured GOP voters’ level of intensity about the 2012 hopefuls. Palin was sixth. The poll also found that Palin had a higher unfavorable rating, 8 percent, than Bachmann, who had a 4 percent disapproval rate.

This came just a week after a Gallup poll found Palin has the highest level of name recognition among potential Republican presidential contenders, with 92 percent. Bachmann was sixth with 52 percent.

That isn’t bad name recognition as a place to start. If Sarah won’t run, perhaps it is time to look to a credible successor. One with impeccable credentials and less baggage. The Elites of both Parties will still hate her, but they haven’t spent the last two years demonizing her. The time to strike is when the Oppertunity presents itself. It seems that Michelle Bachmann knows this axiom.