First time visitor? Learn more.
  • No content found in .

  • Sunday Sports Spectacular – NFL Week 2

    by The Barbarian ( 103 Comments › )
    Filed under Uncategorized at September 16th, 2018 - 10:00 am

    Jimmy G preparing to make a Vikings defensive player very VERY happy…..

    (At least CW didn’t have wait this week).

    The first week of the NFL season produced some good games, some blowouts, and the Cleveland Browns eeking out a well-won tie against the mighty team from Pittsburgh. Personally, I think the Steelers just took pity on them at this point. I could be wrong. I have been before.

    Saint Jimmy Garapalo of the 49ers found out in his game against the Vikings that things change in the off season when team defensive coordinators finally get some film on you. and can plan accordingly. Three interceptions, Jimmy? However, I don’t think you have to worry yet – get concerned if the York family places a call to the Krapperdick.

    Ryan Fitzpatrick turned in a beauty of a game against the Saints, whose defense was looking like they phoned it in. And I’m starting to think the offense was on the other end of the line. Guys – the entire team can’t be Drew Brees and Alvin Kamara on offense – you aren’t out there for window dressing. And if I were the suspended Jameis Winston of Tampa Bay, I’d be concerned about getting my starter job back.

    All in all not a bad week. Two asshats from Miami took the knee and were mostly ignored. I’m sure Marshawn Lynch sat his ass on the bench at the Raider game on Monday but at this point, I don’t give a crap what that idiot does.  I’d like him to tell people that he went to STANFORD, however.

    As for the week in politics, let me just say that nothing is going to make me happier than voting the smarmy Dianne Feinstein out of office in November. Her lead’s already down to single digits.

    So….here are the lineups today and I need to get the Noodle dressed up in her Saints gear for the game. Never too early to teach a child how to handle disappointment…..

    The NFL Matchups:
    Panthers @ Falcons
    Colts @ Redskins
    Texans @ Titans
    Eagles @ Buccaneers
    Chiefs @ Steelers
    Dolphins @ Jets
    Chargers @ Bills
    Vikings @ Packers
    Browns @ Saints
    Lions @ 49ers
    Cardinals @ Rams
    Patriots @ Jaguars
    Raiders @ Broncos
    Giants @ Cowboys

    Monday’s Game
    Seahawks @ Bears

    In the MLB, the season is of course in it’s waning days.  The only team to have clinched a playoff berth is the Red Sox.  But many games today as everyone still in the hunt is in playoff push mode.  Check your local listings or what the hell – if the weather’s good and you have the bucks – GO!

    White Sox @ Orioles
    Mets @ Red Sox
    Blue Jays @ Yankees
    Tigers @ Indians
    Athletics @ Rays
    Marlins @ Phillies
    Nationals @ Braves
    D-Backs @ Astros
    Pirates @ Brewers
    Twins @ Royals
    Reds @ Cubs
    Rockies @ Giants
    Mariners @ Angels
    Rangers @ Padres
    Dodgers @ Cardinals

    In NASCAR, the “playoffs” such as it is, will begin this week.  NASCAR has added a second race in Las Vegas and as a fan of that track, can’t tell you how pleased I am to see that there may be a fall option for visiting Sin City.  Only the top 16 drivers will compete for the championship – Kyle Busch, Kevin Harvick, Martin Truex Jr., Brad Kesolowski, Clint Boyer, Joey Logano, Kurt Busch, Chase Elliott, Ryan Blaney, Erik Jones, Austin Dillon, Kyle Larson, Denny Hamlin, Aric Almirola, Jimmie Johnson and Alex Bowman.  Lot of new names in that group – the young Turks are coming of age.  Amazing that it was only yesterday that moniker applied to both Busch brothers, Harvick, Kesolowski and Hamlin.  Now they are the grizzled veterans.  Will it work to their advantage?  We’ll see.   Race starts at 3:00 p.m. Eastern.

    In the PGA, the PGA Tour Champions are at the Ally Challenge in Warwick Hills, Michigan, which is a Pro-Am, which always brings a nice sense of fun.  Why I have never attended the AT&T Pebble Beach is beyond me…it’s a 3-hour drive from my house along what may be the most beautiful stretch of highway in California – the PCH….

    Comments

    Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

    Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

    Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

    We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

    Play nice!

    103 Responses to “Sunday Sports Spectacular – NFL Week 2”
    ( jump to bottom )

    1. RIX
      1 | September 16, 2018 10:11 am

      https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2018/09/15/cynthia-nixon-on-her-failed-primary-challenge-i-lostbecause-people-voted-n2519031
      @ Town Hall
      Barbarian, sorry to go off topic, but this is good.
      Cynthia Nixon blames her primary loss on , wait for it…………….large voter turnout!
      That’s right it was that pesky voting that did her in. She is a wizard in civics.


    2. RIX
      3 | September 16, 2018 4:49 pm

      @ coldwarrior:
      I can respect that in a woman.


    3. coldwarrior
      4 | September 16, 2018 4:57 pm

      It’s ON!

      https://www.cplt20.com/fixtures

      the biggest party in sports!

      *makes a rum drink and some jerk chicken, mon!*


    4. lobo91
      5 | September 16, 2018 9:05 pm

      I think Judge Jeanine has finally had enough of Diane Feinstein’s crap: “What were you thinking? Are you stupid?”


    5. eaglesoars
      6 | September 16, 2018 9:06 pm

      RIX wrote:

      That’s right it was that pesky voting that did her in. She is a wizard in civics.

      don’t laugh. That was a 2-parter, the 2nd part is:

      and a desire on the part of prime Democratic voters to send a message to [President] Trump for the first time since his election.”

      If she’s right – and she may be – it does not bode well for the mid-terms.


    6. eaglesoars
      7 | September 16, 2018 9:17 pm

      lobo91 wrote:

      “What were you thinking? Are you stupid?”

      no, she’s not stupid. This was timed to hold up the hearings, if not to derail the hearings completely hoping Kavanaugh will cave and stand as a cautionary tale to anyone else Trump may nominate.

      You can look thru all the stuff that’s come out today, Zip’s place has it pretty well covered. My take is that she alleges she got shoved down on a bed by a 17 yr old drunk kid and groped when she was 15, until a friend tumbled him off and that’s she’s been traumatized by it her entire life.

      And I call bullshit. This is not PTSD territory by a long shot. This is you kick the guy in the balls and go from there, including telling everybody about what a total asshole that guy from Geotwn prep is. Including the guy you marry if you’re so traumatized. Apparently her husband didn’t know until about 2012. This woman is now a shrink of some sort. If she’s truly traumatized, she’s far too fragile to be in that profession counseling other fragile people.

      I’ll stipulate that it happened, that it was Kavanaugh who did it and I still say “That’s it? That’s all you got?”

      As for Jeff Flake, I like the timing. Well coordinated with the lackwit infant Kristol’s ‘war machine’ to find somebody to run against Trump. A candidate who leaves office because he can’t get re-elected in his own district.

      Effing brilliant.


    7. eaglesoars
      8 | September 16, 2018 9:24 pm

      Here is Feinstein’s statement today. She wants the FBI to investigate. They already said ‘meh’

      https://www.feinstein.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/press-releases?id=95D4AA46-369F-4F0F-BF00-008FFAAC23D7


    8. 9 | September 16, 2018 9:30 pm

      eaglesoars wrote:

      Here is Feinstein’s statement today. She wants the FBI to investigate. They already said ‘meh’

      https://www.feinstein.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/press-releases?id=95D4AA46-369F-4F0F-BF00-008FFAAC23D7

      Nothing but political theater. Maryland, the state where it happened has a 1 year statue of limitation on misdemeanor sex crimes. But more importantly, that crime has to be brought to the police within 300 days of its occurring or Maryland will not even consider prosecution.

      Her failure to report it for 35 years means that no crime has been committed according to Maryland State Law.


    9. eaglesoars
      10 | September 16, 2018 9:48 pm

      @ doriangrey:

      Given that she ALREADY gave the FBI the info and they declined to do anything with it, I don’t know what she thinks has changed. Because nothing has.

      I’m not here to denigrate what this woman says happened to her, but I mean, come on. I don’t recall a party I went to during that age when we didn’t get groped, all of us. Boys are jerks, fact of life. Somebody should ask her what she did during spring break in college. Let the FBI investigate THAT.


    10. AZfederalist
      11 | September 16, 2018 10:14 pm

      eaglesoars wrote:

      don’t laugh. That was a 2-parter, the 2nd part is:

      and a desire on the part of prime Democratic voters to send a message to [President] Trump for the first time since his election.”

      If she’s right – and she may be – it does not bode well for the mid-terms.

      She was a winner in a blue district that isn’t even running a Republican challenger. So she is going to win the election. The only thing this is showing is the deep divide in the country where far left districts have completely moved from being democrats to being communists. Bolshevik communists to boot.


    11. eaglesoars
      12 | September 16, 2018 10:26 pm

      AZfederalist wrote:

      She was a winner in a blue district that isn’t even running a Republican challenger. So she is going to win the election.

      no, this is Cynthia Nixon. She lost.


    12. 13 | September 16, 2018 10:31 pm

      eaglesoars wrote:

      @ doriangrey:

      Given that she ALREADY gave the FBI the info and they declined to do anything with it, I don’t know what she thinks has changed. Because nothing has.

      I’m not here to denigrate what this woman says happened to her, but I mean, come on. I don’t recall a party I went to during that age when we didn’t get groped, all of us. Boys are jerks, fact of life. Somebody should ask her what she did during spring break in college. Let the FBI investigate THAT.

      Check her teacher rating…

      https://twitter.com/VermillionRich/status/1041502973799669760

      She is a straight up psycho.


    13. eaglesoars
      14 | September 16, 2018 10:49 pm

      @ doriangrey:

      NICE CATCH!!


    14. AZfederalist
      15 | September 16, 2018 11:08 pm

      eaglesoars wrote:

      no, this is Cynthia Nixon. She lost.

      I should have been more clear — I meant her challenger. The ultra-libs in Nixon’s blue district went for a more communist liberal.


    15. AZfederalist
      16 | September 16, 2018 11:21 pm

      doriangrey wrote:

      Check her teacher rating…

      https://twitter.com/VermillionRich/status/1041502973799669760

      She is a straight up psycho.

      … and apparently “rate my professor” has been scrubbed as well. Somebody is working to remove Ford’s internet history.

      They say they internet is forever. Unless of course, you are a psycho lib seeking to derail a Supreme Court nominee.


    16. eaglesoars
      17 | September 16, 2018 11:22 pm

      AZfederalist wrote:

      I meant her challenger.

      oh. I’m confused then. I thought she ran against Cuomo? You think he’s ‘more communist’? I think she makes him look like a parson.


    17. eaglesoars
      18 | September 16, 2018 11:23 pm

      AZfederalist wrote:

      and apparently “rate my professor” has been scrubbed as well.

      too late. Everybody already has it.


    18. eaglesoars
      19 | September 16, 2018 11:28 pm

      TOUGH GRADER
      This professor has an agenda that’s anti-50%(male) of our students and aims make them second class citizens within society and in the class room. She is also dishonest and will make things up to advance her political belief. How can this college keep her on the payroll when she doesn’t even focus on the subject that she was hired for?

      It’s not scrubbed yet

      https://www.ratemyprofessors.com/ShowRatings.jsp?tid=1352705


    19. eaglesoars
      20 | September 16, 2018 11:36 pm

      Things that make you go hmmmmmmmmm….

      Did this woman run across an article naming Kavanaugh as a possible SCOTUS nominee in a Romney admin in 2012 and set the stage back then?

      http://www.bookwormroom.com/2018/09/16/accusation-kavanaugh-plan-2012/

      ok, bedtime


    20. 21 | September 17, 2018 2:05 am

      @ eaglesoars:
      Heh. I got groped by girls, didn’t bother me a bit.
      Hell, one grabbed my crackerbockles just to get my attention, and she did.

      https://youtu.be/GW0zsiNUrz8


    21. RIX
      22 | September 17, 2018 5:48 am

      https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/09/developing-writer-of-confidential-kavanaugh-letter-speaks-out-shes-a-far-left-activist/
      @ Gateway Pundit
      Good morning. Hmmm, Kavanaugh accuser is a far leftwing activist and university prof.


    22. rain of lead
      23 | September 17, 2018 7:30 am

      morning y’all


    23. eaglesoars
    24. coldwarrior
      26 | September 17, 2018 9:01 am

      @ eaglesoars:
      Well, well, well.

      Mmmhmmmm


    25. eaglesoars
      27 | September 17, 2018 9:14 am

      @ coldwarrior:

      I’m not sure it’s significant, but it is a data point.


    26. 28 | September 17, 2018 9:15 am

      This, ladies and gentlemen, was the “script” from the beginning. It’s a rework of Anita Hill. Accuser comes forward at the last minute. Requests anonymity. Then, in dramatic fashion, reveals her identity. Claims to have passed a polygraph. Assuming one she paid for or her attorney paid for.

      Okay, let’s play. Ask her if she’s willing to submit to polygraph administered by the FBI (in fairness, ask Kavanaugh and Judge if they are also willing). Feinstein can’t object – after all, didn’t she WANT them to investigate?


    27. eaglesoars
      29 | September 17, 2018 9:23 am

      The Barbarian wrote:

      Ask her if she’s willing to submit to polygraph administered by the FBI

      Supposedly, she’s already passed a polygraph administered by an FBI (or former) agent, at the behest of her attorney.

      I want someone to check out her spring break activities. Panama City Beach party girl or Peace Corp in Peru?


    28. 30 | September 17, 2018 9:53 am

      eaglesoars wrote:

      The Barbarian wrote:

      Ask her if she’s willing to submit to polygraph administered by the FBI

      Supposedly, she’s already passed a polygraph administered by an FBI (or former) agent, at the behest of her attorney.

      I want someone to check out her spring break activities. Panama City Beach party girl or Peace Corp in Peru?

      I have heard that assertion but as of yet, I have seen no evidence to corroborate it. An assertion minus corroborating evidence is a baseless and deceptive assertion, nothing more.


    29. 31 | September 17, 2018 9:55 am

      @ eaglesoars:

      The key word is “supposedly.” There are plenty for former LEO’s out there claiming to be polygraph administrators that never looked at a polygraph during their years or service at the Bureau but take a course on administration and use their FBI bona fides to claim expertise they really don’t have.

      Also, when YOU pay for the polygraph, you are, in effect, telegraphing to the administrator the results you want. The questions can be framed in such a way that you “pass.” We have no idea, for instance, how the examination was conducted, the circumstances and what questions were asked. Knowing that such results are not “admissible” per se, in court or probably elsewhere, it’s just a nice tidbit to throw out there.

      Which is why I would say to her. “Are you willing to submit to a polygraph administered at Quantico by the best polygraph examiners in the world?”


    30. eaglesoars
      32 | September 17, 2018 10:17 am

      The Barbarian wrote:

      “Are you willing to submit to a polygraph administered at Quantico by the best polygraph examiners in the world?”

      good points, all.

      My argument is that stipulating the story she tells is true, so what? a 17 yrs old boy gets drunk at a party and acts like an asshole. The sky is blue. What we know about the neurological development of humans shows our brains aren’t mature for several more years and this is not a ‘predictive’ incident.

      My argument for DiFi is if she believed the story to be true from the outset, she had no place withholding it, if she didn’t believe it she has no place releasing it now. Grassley should be looking at some kind of disciplinary action when this is over.


    31. 33 | September 17, 2018 10:21 am

      Everyone knows that Finkelstink held back psycho professors accusation until the very last second for the express purpose of delaying a vote on Kavanaugh until after the mid terms in the hope that the Democrats would pick up a Senate seat or two enabling them to block his conformation.

      Flake and Conway know this and #Resist #NeverTrump assholes that they are, they are cooperating with the Democrats to achieve this end goal.


    32. 34 | September 17, 2018 10:23 am

      What I find intriguing is that this liar (and I really believe she’s lying her ass off) can remember that it was Brett Kavanugh and Mark Judge who attacked her but absolutely NO details of the party – when it was or where it was. This, of course, will preclude investigators from going back and confirming one iota of her story. She remembers it was a house “near the country club.”

      Funny, but a detail like that would be something I’d remember. Not the names of two people who say categorically that they NEVER heard of the bitch.


    33. 35 | September 17, 2018 10:28 am

      @ eaglesoars:
      @ The Barbarian:

      And considering the seriousness of the charge, why didn’t she turn it over to the Committee and/or FBI for part of their vetting process? Supposedly, she’s turned over this woman’s marriage counselor’s notes from 2012, which claims it was FOUR men and mentions no names. She blames the counselor as writing it down wrong. Horse manure.

      “I didn’t tell anyone.” Why the hell not? If these guys are acting like sexual predators, shouldn’t you warn the party’s host to get them to leave? Shouldn’t you tell your parents so that they can have these boys DEALT with?

      She made the whole thing up.


    34. 36 | September 17, 2018 10:31 am

      The Barbarian wrote:

      What I find intriguing is that this liar (and I really believe she’s lying her ass off) can remember that it was Brett Kavanugh and Mark Judge who attacked her but absolutely NO details of the party – when it was or where it was. This, of course, will preclude investigators from going back and confirming one iota of her story. She remembers it was a house “near the country club.”

      Funny, but a detail like that would be something I’d remember. Not the names of two people who say categorically that they NEVER heard of the bitch.

      Oh, she remembers the Kavanugh name alright. Apparently her parent’s lost a home foreclosure adjudication and Brett Kavanugh’s mother was the judge the case went before. A straight up case of “conflict of Interest” if ever there were one. That information all by its self should be enough to place her assertions in the “shall not be considered as reliable without physical evidence” file.


    35. eaglesoars
      37 | September 17, 2018 10:35 am

      The Barbarian wrote:

      but absolutely NO details of the party – when it was or where it was.

      speaking as a ‘victim’ (I hate that word) of both rape and an attempted sexual assault, I can tell you it’s surprising how memory works. But place and time – unless there are drugs involved – are not malleable. It’s possible that she NEVER knew whose house she was at. Open house parties when the parents aren’t home are not unknown and she could have gone with friends of friends. But not to remember WHEN is a stumbling block for me.


    36. eaglesoars
      38 | September 17, 2018 10:39 am

      doriangrey wrote:

      Flake and Conway know this and #Resist #NeverTrump assholes that they are,

      Trump would not have been elected w/o Conway. You may question her judgement on this, but to put her in the NeverTrump category is beyond a stretch


    37. 39 | September 17, 2018 10:49 am

      https://twitter.com/zerohedge/status/1041699698518704129

      Who is BETH WILKINSON?


    38. 40 | September 17, 2018 10:49 am

      eaglesoars wrote:

      doriangrey wrote:

      Flake and Conway know this and #Resist #NeverTrump assholes that they are,

      Trump would not have been elected w/o Conway. You may question her judgement on this, but to put her in the NeverTrump category is beyond a stretch

      You will know a tree by its fruit.


    39. 41 | September 17, 2018 10:52 am

      Turns out those “Rate My Professor” rankings were for a different Christina Ford. Or so they SAY….but the scrubbed them anyway.


    40. 42 | September 17, 2018 11:01 am

      The Barbarian wrote:

      Turns out those “Rate My Professor” rankings were for a different Christina Ford. Or so they SAY….but the scrubbed them anyway.

      A different Christian Blasely Ford, teaching the same subjects that the “Real” Christia Blasely Ford taught. With the same Ph.D. at the same university. Yea… right


    41. eaglesoars
      43 | September 17, 2018 11:05 am

      The Barbarian wrote:

      Turns out those “Rate My Professor” rankings were for a different Christina Ford.

      bullshit


    42. 44 | September 17, 2018 11:06 am

      @ doriangrey:

      Oh….okay, there was stuff on Twitter saying they were reporting on the wrong one. I didn’t see anything that gave the University. Which is why I added the caveat “Or so they SAY”…


    43. eaglesoars
      45 | September 17, 2018 11:06 am

      doriangrey wrote:

      https://twitter.com/zerohedge/status/1041699698518704129

      Who is BETH WILKINSON?

      I know that name. I think she’s married to one of the DOJ guys, forget which one. Rosenstein?


    44. 46 | September 17, 2018 11:06 am

      eaglesoars wrote:

      The Barbarian wrote:

      Turns out those “Rate My Professor” rankings were for a different Christina Ford.

      bullshit

      Here’s one time I am SOOOO happy to be wrong, I can’t tell ya!


    45. eaglesoars
      47 | September 17, 2018 11:07 am

      doriangrey wrote:

      You will know a tree by its fruit.

      correct. In this case PRESIDENT Donald J. Trump


    46. 48 | September 17, 2018 11:07 am

      An amusing story for Coldwarrior… (took place in his backyard)

      https://www.weaselzippers.us/397070-pennsylvania-boy-celebrates-birthday-with-pizza-party-for-local-police/


    47. eaglesoars
      49 | September 17, 2018 11:10 am

      eaglesoars wrote:

      I think she’s married to one of the DOJ guys, forget which one. Rosenstein?

      wrong.

      She’s married to David Gregory, the news anchor. She has also done work for Hillary, I believe.


    48. eaglesoars
      50 | September 17, 2018 11:52 am

      a psychologist/neuro guy is on the phone to Chris Plante. He says it stinks to high heaven.

      That she has therapist notes is extraordinary. She has a right to them, technically they are her property but he said he’d put up a fight before turning them over. (And I note that she’s providing PARTIAL notes, I’d like to see the rest of them)


    49. 51 | September 17, 2018 12:16 pm

      @ eaglesoars:

      She is also now claiming she WANTS to testify. Second Act of the script. I’m sure she’s been told by the Democrats that there is no way on earth she will be put under oath and have to testify before the Committee. This way she can look earnest in her desire to tell the truth! Script….script….script.

      Make her reveal the name of the polygraph examiner she used. Has she? They’re trying to say she was polygraphed “by the FBI.”


    50. eaglesoars
      52 | September 17, 2018 12:25 pm

      The Barbarian wrote:

      Make her reveal the name of the polygraph examiner she used.

      Even better – ask her the name and get her refusal to provide it on the record.

      saw an AP report that Kavanaugh arrived at the WH this morning


    51. 53 | September 17, 2018 1:21 pm

      @ eaglesoars:

      I’m hoping that it isn’t to ask Trump to withdraw his nomination. DiFi is stalling attempts by the Committee in contacting her.


    52. eaglesoars
      54 | September 17, 2018 1:31 pm

      The Barbarian wrote:

      I’m hoping that it isn’t to ask Trump to withdraw his nomination.

      It isn’t. He put out a statement this morning that resolves to BRING IT


    53. 55 | September 17, 2018 1:38 pm

      @ eaglesoars:

      GOOD. Looks like DiFi is doing some serious backpedaling now – Grassley says Feinstein is refusing to cooperate in setting up calls re Ford and Kavanaugh. I think she promised her that because the hearings were closed, there was no way she was going to have to testify, so in fact Ford made bravado statements through her lawyer that she WANTS to testify. Meanwhile, it would not surprise me that frantic calls are being made to DiFi’s office saying that she was promised she’d never be put under oath.


    54. eaglesoars
      56 | September 17, 2018 1:39 pm

      eaglesoars wrote:

      He put out a statement this morning that resolves to BRING IT

      On Monday, Kavanaugh said he was willing to make his statement under oath:

      “This is a completely false allegation. I have never done anything like what the accuser describes—to her or to anyone. Because this never happened, I had no idea who was making this accusation until she identified herself yesterday. I am willing to talk to the Senate Judiciary Committee in any way the Committee deems appropriate to refute this false allegation, from 36 years ago, and defend my integrity.”

      https://www.dailywire.com/news/35934/kavanaugh-accuser-willing-testify-kavanaugh-im-james-barrett


    55. coldwarrior
      57 | September 17, 2018 1:50 pm

      I’m sure kavanaugh and trump were well prepared for this stunt.


    56. coldwarrior
      58 | September 17, 2018 1:51 pm

      Difi needs to be made an example of.


    57. eaglesoars
      59 | September 17, 2018 2:19 pm

      coldwarrior wrote:

      I’m sure kavanaugh and trump were well prepared for this stunt.

      did they do this with Gorsuch?

      Trump and Kellyanne can certainly help him gut it thru, they’ve been there


    58. 60 | September 17, 2018 2:25 pm

      eaglesoars wrote:

      coldwarrior wrote:

      I’m sure kavanaugh and trump were well prepared for this stunt.

      did they do this with Gorsuch?

      Trump and Kellyanne can certainly help him gut it thru, they’ve been there

      Gorsuch? Hmmm, that name sounds familiar, is he related to Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch?


    59. coldwarrior
      61 | September 17, 2018 2:25 pm

      @ eaglesoars:
      The GOP rolls over and gladly votes for an unqualified latina.

      The dems go to war. GOP are soy boy wimps.


    60. 62 | September 17, 2018 2:26 pm

      coldwarrior wrote:

      The GOP rolls over and gladly votes for an unqualified latina.

      And an even less qualified Bull Dyke.


    61. coldwarrior
      63 | September 17, 2018 2:27 pm

      It will never end until the GOP makes the dems pay for nonsense like this


    62. coldwarrior
      64 | September 17, 2018 2:30 pm

      @ doriangrey:
      Yep.


    63. eaglesoars
      65 | September 17, 2018 2:30 pm

      doriangrey wrote:

      And an even less qualified Bull Dyke.

      she’s a provable liar. She altered some medical group’s stance on Obama care w/o their knowledge or permission. I suspect her SCOTUS appt was payment


    64. 66 | September 17, 2018 3:58 pm

      @ coldwarrior:

      This is where I’m calling on all of Red California to vote for Feinstein’s opponent in the November election. Another Democrat but at least it will get this damned smarmy harridan out of the Senate.


    65. 67 | September 17, 2018 3:59 pm

      @ eaglesoars:

      Her appointment was to be a vote FOR any policies of Obama and/or the Democrats making its way to the High Court.


    66. coldwarrior
      68 | September 17, 2018 4:46 pm

      In the immortal words of husker du…

      Everything falls apart

      https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/09/judge-kavanaughs-high-school-and-college-girlfriends-speak-out-in-his-defense/


    67. eaglesoars
      69 | September 17, 2018 4:56 pm

      I have a question.

      There’s a lot of talk about breaking up or regulating Google, especially after that video leaked talking about how they tried to influence the elections, etc. It’s as tho Google has some mysterious magic power over how people think.

      My question is: Were you influenced by anything Google did? Or twitter or youtube?

      I honestly don’t think I was, but maybe there’s something insidious I wouldn’t recognize.


    68. coldwarrior
      70 | September 17, 2018 5:17 pm

      @ eaglesoars:
      It’s not about us. It’s about those who don’t pay attention most of the time.

      Each side has 35% solid. There are 30% that the war is fought over


    69. eaglesoars
      71 | September 17, 2018 5:24 pm

      @ coldwarrior:

      Ah. The LIV crowd. They’re like the poor, always with us.


    70. eaglesoars
      72 | September 17, 2018 5:43 pm

      John Roberts is about to report that Trump is going to declassify the FISA docs
      today

      https://twitter.com/johnrobertsFox/status/1041799995400187904


    71. 73 | September 17, 2018 5:46 pm

      @ eaglesoars:

      My, My, My……I guess Rosenweasel is going to get the sweats now. Because he’s been holding up these documents since Day ONE.


    72. eaglesoars
      74 | September 17, 2018 5:57 pm

      The Barbarian wrote:

      I guess Rosenweasel is going to get the sweats now. Because he’s been holding up these documents since Day ONE.

      I’m betting a lot of this stuff is suddenly, mysteriously ‘lost’


    73. eaglesoars
      75 | September 17, 2018 6:09 pm

      At the request of a number of committees of Congress, and for reasons of transparency, the President has directed the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and the Department of Justice (including the FBI) to provide for the immediate declassification of the following materials: (1) pages 10-12 and 17-34 of the June 2017 application to the FISA court in the matter of Carter W. Page; (2) all FBI reports of interviews with Bruce G. Ohr prepared in connection with the Russia investigation; and (3) all FBI reports of interviews prepared in connection with all Carter Page FISA applications.

      In addition, President Donald J. Trump has directed the Department of Justice (including the FBI) to publicly release all text messages relating to the Russia investigation, without redaction, of James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, and Bruce Ohr.

      https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/statement-press-secretary-34/?kek=top

      without redaction. Epic.


    74. 76 | September 17, 2018 6:25 pm

      @ eaglesoars:

      This is going to swamp a lot of boats.


    75. eaglesoars
      77 | September 17, 2018 6:28 pm

      @ The Barbarian:

      yeah, I think I remember some people talking about a big ‘wave’ or something.

      If DOJ starts fucking around with this, Trump had better start firing people. And I mean massacre.


    76. eaglesoars
      78 | September 17, 2018 6:36 pm

      The other thing that happened today and was kind of under the radar – Mueller set the date for Flynn’s sentencing. Nov 28. I don’t know if that’s germane to anything.


    77. coldwarrior
      79 | September 17, 2018 6:38 pm

      @ eaglesoars:

      and so it begins


    78. 80 | September 17, 2018 6:41 pm

      @ eaglesoars:

      @ coldwarrior:

      And I have a feeling it’s going to be glorious. I have a feeling Ted Lieu and Adam Schiff are going to have enough egg on their damn faces to supply your local IHOP.


    79. eaglesoars
      81 | September 17, 2018 6:58 pm

      The Barbarian wrote:

      Ted Lieu and Adam Schiff

      AND the Brits.

      Wouldn’t it be interesting if this lead to Trump shutting down the entire Five Eyes pgm?


    80. 82 | September 17, 2018 7:01 pm

      Both Kavanaugh and Ford have been invited to appear before the Committee on Monday. This may be interesting. Feinstein has been fighting like mad that there needs to be more time.

      Notice the key word is “INVITED”. Kavanaugh has said he’ll be there. I’m still relatively sure that this whole “I want to testify!” from Ford was all scripted, thinking that she was never going to be called by the Committee. If she shows up, well and good. If she DOESN’T, look to those sh*tbird Democrats to disrupt the hearing, claiming unfairness. Or not show up. I think we’ll hear a million excuses, but I would be surprised if she attends.


    81. eaglesoars
      83 | September 17, 2018 7:10 pm

      The Barbarian wrote:

      but I would be surprised if she attends.

      Her lawyer says she wants to testify. But under what circumstances wasn’t clear. Open hearing/close, under oath/not, etc.


    82. eaglesoars
      84 | September 17, 2018 7:16 pm

      Here’s the thread of sundance’s take on the declassification stuff.

      1. The wording of the directive for declassification is important: “At the request of a number of committees of Congress”….

      2. This shifts the legal issues with executive declassification from the Office of the President (who might hold a legal conflict), to executive fulfillment of legislative branch oversight. [Similar to Nunes memo declassification process]

      https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1041809259174998017.html


    83. eaglesoars
      85 | September 17, 2018 8:21 pm

      Question for Barbarian.

      Let’s go back to those notes from her therapist. There is such a thing as doctor/patient privilege. But is that now moot since she used the notes publicly to validate her claim? Can the therapist be called to testify to Congress?


    84. Possum
      86 | September 17, 2018 8:35 pm

      This is bullshit. You CANNOT try to forget something and miraculously you forget.

      https://www.eastbaytimes.com/2018/09/17/metoo-spurred-christine-blasey-ford-to-open-up-about-alleged-attack-year-before-kavanaugh-nomination-friends-say/

      “I’ve been trying to forget this all my life and now I’m supposed to remember every little detail,”

      It does not work that way, you cannot erase memories. All you can do is avoid triggers that make your mind re-play that memory.

      I cannot erase my memory.

      I may be abnormal but I can re-play in my mind every second of my life.

      Well until recent events. I think drink and old age are taking its toll.

      Doing it now. Met someone at an airport once. Fell in love at once. Then realised I lost my glasses. LOL um I needed glasses to drive back home. Can re play that moment over and over forever. Found glasses on the floor at the other side of the terminal.


    85. Possum
      87 | September 17, 2018 8:39 pm

      eaglesoars wrote:

      Question for Barbarian.

      Let’s go back to those notes from her therapist. There is such a thing as doctor/patient privilege. But is that now moot since she used the notes publicly to validate her claim? Can the therapist be called to testify to Congress?

      Unless the notes name Kavanaugh then it is bullshit.


    86. eaglesoars
      88 | September 17, 2018 8:54 pm

      @ Possum:

      they do, that’s why Ford referred to them


    87. eaglesoars
      89 | September 17, 2018 8:58 pm

      Possum wrote:

      “I’ve been trying to forget this all my life and now I’m supposed to remember every little detail,”

      Well, then, I wonder what the hell she was asked for the polygraph if not ‘every little detail’. Because any lawyer worth the powder to blow the bar exam to hell is going to grill her ass until she’s in a coma then keep grilling


    88. AZfederalist
      90 | September 17, 2018 9:29 pm

      eaglesoars wrote:

      oh. I’m confused then. I thought she ran against Cuomo? You think he’s ‘more communist’? I think she makes him look like a parson.

      Maybe I’m confused. I thought this was the person who beat the incumbent. That one is definitely full blown communist.

      /I may have read the wrong race


    89. eaglesoars
      91 | September 17, 2018 9:33 pm

      @ AZfederalist:

      You’re confusing the Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez/Crowley race with the Nixon/Cuomo race.


    90. AZfederalist
      92 | September 17, 2018 9:43 pm

      eaglesoars wrote:

      I have a question.

      There’s a lot of talk about breaking up or regulating Google, especially after that video leaked talking about how they tried to influence the elections, etc. It’s as tho Google has some mysterious magic power over how people think.

      My question is: Were you influenced by anything Google did? Or twitter or youtube?

      I honestly don’t think I was, but maybe there’s something insidious I wouldn’t recognize.

      People who frequent blogs like this are unlikely to be influenced by actions of places like Google because we take politics seriously and realize the impact they can have on our lives and those of future generations. However, the bulk of American citizens are apathetic at best about politics, view the fact that “they voted” as some sort of moral statement, yet pay little attention to the issues being discussed. Those are the ones that the Googles and Fakebooks of the world are after. Get a few recurring memes out there, whisper a few innuendos, ban a few “extremists (all right wing)” and “nazis” publicly. Then when those people go to vote, they swing to the leftist candidate or issue. Doesn’t have to be everyone, just enough to swing the results.


    91. AZfederalist
      93 | September 17, 2018 9:50 pm

      eaglesoars wrote:

      @ AZfederalist:

      You’re confusing the Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez/Crowley race with the Nixon/Cuomo race.

      There was another one like Ocasio-Cortez/Crowley who did the same thing. Even dumber than Ocasio-Cortez/lots o’ names. Can’t recall the race.


    92. eaglesoars
      94 | September 17, 2018 9:57 pm

      AZfederalist wrote:

      Even dumber than Ocasio-Cortez/lots o’ names

      hmmm. There’s a Julia Salazar who flat out lied about her background. She beat the incumbent, a Matt – or Martin – Dilan/Dylan. NY State primary race. She’s not dump, she’s just a pathological liar


    93. AZfederalist
      95 | September 17, 2018 10:02 pm

      eaglesoars wrote:

      AZfederalist wrote:

      Even dumber than Ocasio-Cortez/lots o’ names

      hmmm. There’s a Julia Salazar who flat out lied about her background. She beat the incumbent, a Matt – or Martin – Dilan/Dylan. NY State primary race. She’s not dump, she’s just a pathological liar

      That’s the one. What was dumb about her was the blatant lies that were so easily refuted. … and she is now running unopposed in her district so she will be in Congress.


    94. eaglesoars
      96 | September 17, 2018 10:09 pm

      AZfederalist wrote:

      What was dumb about her was the blatant lies that were so easily refuted.

      And were refuted by her own brother. I think her district does not have English as a first language, if at all, and didn’t see the media that covered it


    95. 97 | September 17, 2018 10:53 pm

      eaglesoars wrote:

      @ Possum:

      they do, that’s why Ford referred to them

      No they do not. Her husband supposedly recalls her mentioning him, but the memo’s recall 4 boys from an “Elitist” prep school who later became big shots in DC.


    96. eaglesoars
      98 | September 17, 2018 10:59 pm

      @ doriangrey:

      lemme check


    97. eaglesoars
      99 | September 17, 2018 11:02 pm

      @ doriangrey:

      You are correct

      The therapist’s notes, portions of which were provided by Ford and reviewed by The Washington Post, do not mention Kavanaugh’s name

      https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/california-professor-writer-of-confidential-brett-kavanaugh-letter-speaks-out-about-her-allegation-of-sexual-assault/2018/09/16/46982194-b846-11e8-94eb-3bd52dfe917b_story.html?utm_term=.1e1e8d442315


    98. eaglesoars
      100 | September 17, 2018 11:04 pm

      @ doriangrey:

      but I still don’t know if Ford’s referral to her therapist’s notes moots the doctor/client privilege.

      Bueller?


    99. 101 | September 18, 2018 7:53 am

      eaglesoars wrote:

      @ doriangrey:

      but I still don’t know if Ford’s referral to her therapist’s notes moots the doctor/client privilege.

      Bueller?

      The Client has the privilege of making those notes public, though most psychologists/therapists would fight tooth and nail in resisting allowing the client to even see those notes, let alone make them public.


    100. coldwarrior
      102 | September 18, 2018 8:47 am

      doriangrey wrote:

      most psychologists/therapists would fight tooth and nail in resisting allowing the client to even see those notes,

      man, is THAT the truth!

      new thread


    101. Aussie Infidel
      103 | September 18, 2018 9:58 pm

      eaglesoars wrote:

      The Barbarian wrote:

      Ted Lieu and Adam Schiff

      AND the Brits.

      Wouldn’t it be interesting if this lead to Trump shutting down the entire Five Eyes pgm?

      Given the antipathy of the MI6 and MI5 wombles to Trump who would blame him. Add to that the British Foreign Office. They have been a nest of Marxist vipers and self serving Masonic ‘Sir Humpheries’ since the 1930s.

      🙂


    Back to the Top

    The Blogmocracy

    website design was Built By All of Us