First time visitor? Learn more.

New US battle rule: No fighting near Afghan homes

by tqcincinnatus ( 73 Comments › )
Filed under Afghanistan, Military, Political Correctness at June 22nd, 2009 - 2:07 pm

I can’t think of a better way to guarantee that more Afghan civilians will be taken as hostages by Islamofascist terrorists.

The top U.S. general in Afghanistan will soon formally order U.S. and NATO forces to break away from fights with militants hiding in Afghan houses so the battles do not kill civilians, a U.S. official said Monday.

The order would be one of the strongest measures taken by a U.S. commander to protect Afghan civilians in battle. American commanders say such deaths hurt their mission because they turn average Afghans against the government and U.S. and NATO forces.

Civilian casualties are a major source of friction between Afghan President Hamid Karzai and the U.S. The U.N. says U.S., NATO and Afghan forces killed 829 civilians in the Afghan war last year.

Gen. Stanley McChrystal, who took command of international forces in Afghanistan this month, has said his measure of effectiveness will be the “number of Afghans shielded from violence,” and not the number of militants killed.

McChrystal will issue orders within days saying troops may attack insurgents hiding in Afghan houses if the U.S. or NATO forces are in imminent danger and must return fire, said U.S. military spokesman Rear Adm. Greg Smith.

“But if there is a compound they’re taking fire from and they can remove themselves from the area safely, without any undue danger to the forces, then that’s the option they should take,” Smith said. “Because in these compounds we know there are often civilians kept captive by the Taliban.”

I’m against collateral civilian casualties as much as the next guy, but this is one of the best ways I can imagine to cause even more Afghan civilians to be put into harm’s way by the Taliban.  This move basically rewards bad behaviour and will encourage even more of the same.   

Taliban – “The Americans won’t shoot at us because we have these civilian hostages with us?  Great!  We’ll take more, and take them with us everywhere we go!  Allah be praised!”

Maybe a better way to win the hearts and minds of the Afghan people is to remind them that the hostage-taking is why civilians are endangered in the first place?

Tags: , ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

Comments are closed.

Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By All of Us