First time visitor? Learn more.

New York Times & David Brooks: Intellectuals Я Us

by Mojambo ( 136 Comments › )
Filed under Media at January 12th, 2010 - 10:00 am

David Brooks is living proof that once Bill Safire retired, any semblance of  political balance in the op-ed section of The New York Times retired with him. David Brooks (like Peggy Noonan, David Gergen, Kathleen Parker and Christopher Buckley) is a pseudo conservative who will sell his own mother out in order to get an invite to all the right parties on the Upper West Side (where he lives), Georgetown, Cambridge or Bel Air. He is a prototypical progressive who thinks that we fools who actually have to work for a living ought to shut up and listen to our betters (like all those Ivy League MBA grads who ran Wall Street into the ground). There is nothing better that I would like to do then wipe that smirk off of his nerdy face.

Speaking of Christopher Buckley – someone wrote in 2008 that he has the soft and flabby face of a well fed appeaser“.

by Stuart Schwartz
David Brooks is upset.
And when the New York Times columnist, this Obama-designated conservative intellectual, the National Public Radio/MS-NBC-anointed voice for America’s conservative masses, is upset, he does what comes naturally to those who regard themselves as born and educated to lead the rest of us.
He screams. A trendy, effeminate, New York Times scream. A spotlight-hugging, power-seeking, northeast corridor scream. The high-pitched kind that bounces off the glass-paneled bar at Le Cirque and shakes the Wedgewood water goblets. It’s not fair, whines Brooks — we “should have the power to implement programs to solve the country’s problems” by virtue of “intellect” and “expertise.”

“We” are “big government, big business, big media, and the affluent professionals” who comprise the “educated class.” Obama and his Ivy League appointees, The New York Times and legacy media elites, the newly progressive Democratic Party — a regular Intellectuals  Я Us.

Brooks rages at the “fringe” Americans who are so stupid as to deny the wonder of a nation run by its elite, “educated” betters. “Every single idea associated with the educated class has grown more unpopular over the past year,” he laments, tears dripping onto his University of Chicago diploma.
Educated? Does that mean that Sarah Palin, with her University of Idaho degree and best-selling book, is a member of the “educated class”? Or the millions of Tea Party sympathizers who can count to twenty without using their toes? No, Brooks says, Sarah Palin is “a joke,” a “fatal cancer,” and the Tea Party movement is simply an ugly fourth for the Three Stooges: Moe, Larry, Curly…and Adolf.

Read the rest

Tags:

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

Comments are closed.

Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By All of Us