From the UK, we have a report, and hackneyed as this word may be, I’ll call it disturbing. Labour’s ‘secret plan’ to lure migrants
The release of a previously unseen document suggested that Labour’s migration policy over the past decade had been aimed not just at meeting the country’s economic needs, but also the Government’s “social objectives”.
The paper said migration would “enhance economic growth” and made clear that trying to halt or reverse it could be “economically damaging”. But it also stated that immigration had general “benefits” and that a new policy framework was needed to “maximise” the contribution of migration to the Government’s wider social aims.
So what would these wider social aims be?
The Government has always denied that social engineering played a part in its migration policy.
However, the paper, which was written in 2000 at a time when immigration began to increase dramatically, said controls were contrary to its policy objectives and could lead to “social exclusion”.
Last night, the Conservatives demanded an independent inquiry into the issue. It was alleged that the document showed that Labour had overseen a deliberate open-door policy on immigration to boost multi-culturalism.
But is multiculturalism an end or a means to another end?
Voting trends indicate that migrants and their descendants are much more likely to vote Labour.
That seems to answer that.
The existence of the draft policy paper, which was drawn up by a Cabinet Office think tank and a Home Office research unit, was disclosed last year by Andrew Neather, a former adviser to Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett.
He alleged at the time that the sharp increase in immigration over the past 10 years was partly due to a “driving political purpose: that mass immigration was the way that the Government was going to make the UK truly multi-cultural”.
As Glenn Reynolds said, if the ruling elites don’t like the people, they’ll try to replace them. This literally seems like what they’re attempting here. In our case, the Democrats’ visceral hatred for the white untermenchen is beyond any question; they pine for the day when whites are a minority, and they hate the guns, religion, and pickup trucks that traditional Americans value. Indeed, replacing the people is exactly what they’re trying to do, and many make no bones about it.
And just like the primarily Muslim immigrants into England are going to be beholden to Labor, guess which party they expect the (in our case illegal) newcomers to be beholden to?
Labour has overseen an unprecedented rise in immigration, which has led to a rise of about three million in the UK population since 1997. Until recently, it accused opponents who called for tougher controls of playing the “race card”. Labour was forced to change its rhetoric amid concerns that the economic and social reality of immigration had alienated voters in its heartlands.
Different continents, same playbook.
Read the entire article, and then ask yourself one simple question: is there a counterpart document floating around the lower circles of the DNC?
Tags: immigration
