First time visitor? Learn more.

The Toyota Gas Pedal – Finally a Good Media Article

by snork ( 61 Comments › )
Filed under Media, Technology at March 3rd, 2010 - 4:30 pm

Most media articles about technical matters are junk. This isn’t just true of technology; lawyers have the exact same complaint regarding media reporting of court decisions; they have a way of generating paragraph after paragraph of mind-numbing verbiage without even stating exactly what the decision was, and what the arguments were.

So leave it to – one more time – Popular Mechanics to do this right. Recall that shortly after 9/11, PM was the only media outlet to publish a thorough, detailed debunking of the Van Jones truther conspiracy theories. This is the kind of actual, you know, information that helps separate fact from fiction.

Specifically, the sensors are a magnetic Hall-effect type, and there are two separate sensors within the assembly housing that the computer checks against each other. What they didn’t say, but would make sense is that the sensors are mounted with opposing polarity so that a stray magnetic field (if some idiot dropped a magnet) would flag an error. So their conclusions are:

– Cell phones can’t have anything to do with it.
– Magnets can’t cause a problem without flagging an error in the computer.
– The thing that that auto shop “professor” did was extremely artificial, and virtually impossible in real life.
– The most likely problem, as the author suggests, is the loose nut behind the wheel.

I think most engineers would agree.

As for who stands to gain by sensationalizing all of this, once again, it’s hard to know where ignorance stops and malice starts.

Tags:

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

Leave a Reply

Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By All of Us