First time visitor? Learn more.

How did Faisal Shahzad board the UAE Flight?

by Phantom Ace ( 102 Comments › )
Filed under Al Qaeda, Islamic Invasion, Islamic Terrorism, Taliban, Terrorism at May 5th, 2010 - 8:30 am

Hats off to the NYPD and Federal Agents on the arrest of Islamic Imperialist, Faisal Shahzad. However the question remains, how did he even get past security? The Federal government is blaming Emirate Airlines for not checking the updated no fly list. Regardless, this man should never had made it pass security checks let along be on a plane.

WASHINGTON – The no-fly list failed to keep the Times Square suspect off the plane. Faisal Shahzad had boarded a jetliner bound for the United Arab Emirates Monday night before federal authorities pulled him back.

The night’s events, gradually coming to light, underscored the flaws in the nation’s aviation security system, which despite its technologies, lists and information sharing, often comes down to someone making a right call.

As federal agents closed in, Faisal Shahzad was aboard Emirates Flight 202. He reserved a ticket on the way to John F. Kennedy International Airport, paid cash on arrival and walked through security without being stopped. By the time Customs and Border Protection officials spotted Shahzad’s name on the passenger list and recognized him as the bombing suspect they were looking for, he was in his seat and the plane was preparing to leave the gate.

But it didn’t. At the last minute, the pilot was notified, the jetliner’s door was opened and Shahzad was taken into custody.

Read the Rest: Security slip let suspect on plane, near takeoff

We got the suspect this time, but we may not next time. Better security please!

Tags: ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

Leave a Reply

Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By All of Us