First time visitor? Learn more.

Global Warmists push benefits of a small nuclear war

by Phantom Ace ( 92 Comments › )
Filed under Climate, Liberal Fascism, Nuclear Weapons, Progressives, Tranzis at February 28th, 2011 - 8:30 am

Progressives don’t care about human life. To them it’s all about pursuing their agenda. Global Warming has turn out to be a scam. Progressives  are still pushing the AGW lie. Now they are even pushing the benefits of a small nuclear war.

Even a regional nuclear war could spark “unprecedented” global cooling and reduce rainfall for years, according to U.S. government computer models.

Widespread famine and disease would likely follow, experts speculate.

Reversing Global Warming?

The global cooling caused by these high carbon clouds wouldn’t be as catastrophic as a superpower-versus-superpower nuclear winter, but “the effects would still be regarded as leading to unprecedented climate change,” research physical scientist Luke Oman said during a press briefing Friday at a meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in Washington, D.C.

Earth is currently in a long-term warming trend. After a regional nuclear war, though, average global temperatures would drop by 2.25 degrees F (1.25 degrees C) for two to three years afterward, the models suggest.

Read the rest: Small Nuclear War Could Reverse Global Warming for Years

Wow, so a small nuclear war would be a positive since it stops global warming. Is this the reason the Tranzi Progressive elite have no problem with a nuclear Iran or has made plans to secure Pakistan’s nukes? The thought that a small group of fanatics want a nuclear war to improve the earth, is just stomach twisting.

Tags: , ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

Leave a Reply

Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By All of Us