First time visitor? Learn more.

White House staffers get raises while most Americans don’t

by Phantom Ace ( 82 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Economy, Progressives, unemployment at July 7th, 2011 - 8:30 am

Very few Americans were lucky enough to get raises last year. Despite this, the Obama regime displays a Neo-Feudal attitude. White House staffers got raises higher than the normal American worker. Keep in mind, the US government is 14 Trillion in debt and Obama is calling for sacrifices. Well he should start with his own staff.

The White House released its annual salary report last week, and as usual, it’s nice to work for Barack Obama: Most staffers who were there for more than a year got a salary bump. A bigger one than you did.

The last time we checked in on White House salaries, we found that an astonishing 75% of continuing staffers got raises from 2009 to 2010—a huge number given the fact that, according to compensation experts, most companies had skipped routine raises that year in reaction to the economic crisis that the White House was busy failing to solve. This time around—from 2010 to 2011—the ratio is a little less dramatic. Of the 270 White House staffers who have been there for more than a year, 146—or 54%—received raises. The average salary increase was 8%. If you look at only staffers who got raises, the average increase was twice that.

Read the rest: White House Staffers Got a Raise Last Year, And You Did Not

This is just a smack in the face to US taxpayers. At a time of wage freezes and government debt, White House workers shouldn’t be getting extravagant raises. This is Neo-Feudalism on pure display.

Tags: , ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

Leave a Reply

Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By All of Us