First time visitor? Learn more.

Charles Johnson attacks Rick Perry over his support of Israel

by Phantom Ace ( 88 Comments › )
Filed under Blogwars, Diary of Daedalus, Humor, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, LGF, Progressives at September 20th, 2011 - 8:00 pm

To all those who hate Chucky threads, my apologies, but this has to be brought to light.

The moment we have all called for is almost at hand. In order to be fully accepted by the Far Left, Charles needs to throw Israel under the bus. So far he has formally refrained for doing this. Instead, the Cheetos King has minions like Iceweasal, and jihadi supporters like Pro Life Liberal and Gus802 attack Israel. Like a mafia don who doesn’t want his hands dirty, he just sits back and allows Israel bashing at Little Green Footballs. Well finally, Chuck shows his colors.

Rick Perry recently stated that “I also as a Christian have a clear directive to support Israel. “ This is not a controversial view and one shared by many Christians of all denominations. The Cheetos King decides to attack Rick Perry’s support for Israel. He does this to give the anti-Israel crowd some meat and get in his bash of anything related to Christianity.

This is a backhanded way for Charles to throw Israel under the bus. Chuck can’t bring himself to openly break with that nation. Instead he goes after its supporters as a means of isolating that nation. This is an act of an intellectual coward.

Could you have imagined in 2005 Charles attacking someone for supporting Israel? In 2011 supporting Israel gets you attacked on LGF. Supporting Jihad gets you praised and even guest posting privileges.

The Sage of Culver City’s “Why I break with Israel” thread is probably in draft mode as we speak.

Zuess Krankypants has his take on this over at The Diary of Daedalus.

Tags: , , , ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

Comments are closed.

Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By All of Us