First time visitor? Learn more.

More liberal stupidity- You’ll need a valid photo ID to see Eric Holder denounce asking voters to show a valid photo ID to vote

by Bob in Breckenridge ( 124 Comments › )
Filed under Cult of Obama, Democratic Party, Elections 2012, Eric Holder, immigration, Politics, Progressives at July 11th, 2012 - 3:00 pm

You just can’t make up this stuff…Actually, I could, but I don’t need to, since the libs’ ignorance needs no help from any of us to make them look, well, stupid.

Hey, they can’t let just anybody in: Proper ID needed to see Eric Holder speech denouncing voter ID laws

In a delicious irony, media expecting to see Attorney General Eric Holder’s speech before the NAACP in Houston, Texas, today attacking voter ID laws were obliged to show proper credentials to get in the room. That included, yes, government-issued photo identification.

Here was the alert sent to reporters, prior to Holder’s appearance:

All media must present government-issued photo I.D. (such as a driver’s license) as well as valid media credentials. Members of the media must RSVP to receive press credentials at http://action.naacp.org/page/s/registration. For security purposes, media check-in and equipment set up must be completed by 9:45 a.m. CDT for a 10:00 a.m. CDT security sweep.

Versions of this alert were sent out by both the NAACP and the Justice Department. The language on the ID section was identical.

It is ironic of course because both groups have been at the forefront of attacking voter ID laws, calling them racist efforts at voter suppression. In fact, the Justice Department has sued Texas, the very state Holder was speaking in regarding the issue.

In his speech, Holder said:

In our efforts to protect voting rights and to prevent voting fraud, we will be vigilant and strong. But let me be clear: we will not allow political pretexts to disenfranchise American citizens of their most precious right.

If wanted to hear him say that in person, and didn’t have a proper government photo ID, you were outta luck.

Granted, in this particular case these ID requirements were not about voting and there are legitimate security issues at work whenever a top federal official appears at an event.

Still, you’d think if the Justice Department could say there are genuine circumstances when photo IDs are necessary for security, they might realize that could extend to other areas as well.

Tags:

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

Comments are closed.

Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By All of Us