First time visitor? Learn more.

Fareed Zakaria, the one Charles Johnson shows so much respect for, is suspended for plagiarism

by Daedalus ( 160 Comments › )
Filed under Blogwars, Diary of Daedalus, Elections 2012, LGF, Mitt Romney, Republican Party at August 11th, 2012 - 8:12 pm

Posted at The Diary of Daedalus by Hercales


The aging, self abusing creep has nothing to say about it but can you imagine if it were Charles Krauthammer, Laura Ingraham, or Jonah Goldberg who did the plagiarising – he would do 20 threads in three days on it. The thought that Zakaria (a Muslim) was considered to be a potential Secretary of State to replace Mrs. Clinton is enough to make you reach for the barf bag.

Fareed Zakaria pays the price for plagiarising

Washington, Aug 11 — Celebrated Indian-American journalist Fareed Zakaria paid the price for what he himself called “a terrible mistake” and “a serious lapse” as Time magazine and CNN suspended him for plagiarism.

Mumbai-born Zakaria, 48, who became editor-at-large of Time in 2010 and hosted CNN’s flagship foreign affairs show GPS, was suspended by the two media, both owned by Time Warner, after he apologised for plagiarising sections of his column on gun control in the Aug 20 issue of Time.

While Time’s suspension of Zakaria was for a month “pending further review”, CNN put no time limit on its removal of its celebrated host from its airwaves.

Zakaria, who was a columnist for Newsweek and editor of Newsweek International from 2000 to 2010, was even talked about as a potential secretary of state, with Esquire Magazine calling him “the most influential foreign policy adviser of his generation,” as his website proudly proclaims.

But the reaction to the fall of the celebrated journalist, who was honoured by India with the Padma Bhushan for his contribution towards journalism in 2010, was swift. Noted TV critic and author David Zurawik said, “Plagiarism used to be a deadly journalistic sin from which there often was no redemption.”

“Given the lack of values and ethics in journalism today, however, who knows what will happen to Zakaria,” Zurawik wondered in The Baltimore Sun, but he for one didn’t care “how smart someone is supposed to be, if they steal others’ ideas and words, they are dead to me as a source of intellectual or moral discourse”.

Zakaria’s suspension came as bloggers spotted similarities in some passages in his Time column, “The Case for Gun Control”, to those in a longer article on guns in America by the historian Jill Lepore, which appeared in the April 23 issue of The New Yorker.

Starting with the conservative website NewsBusters, the story quickly spread across the internet after appearing on the media blog JimRomenesko.com.

Zakaria responded with an abject apology, saying: “Media reporters have pointed out that paragraphs in my Time column this week bear close similarities to paragraphs in Jill Lepore’s essay in the April 23 issue of The New Yorker.”

“They are right. I made a terrible mistake. It is a serious lapse and one that is entirely my fault. I apologize unreservedly to her, to my editors at Time, and to my readers,” he admitted.

[…….]

CNN followed suit, saying: “We have reviewed Fareed Zakaria’s Time column, for which he has apologized. He wrote a shorter blog post on CNN.com on the same issue which included similar unattributed excerpts. That blog post has been removed and CNN has suspended Fareed Zakaria while this matter is under review.”

Earlier this year, Yale and Harvard educated Zakaria was criticised for giving a commencement speech at Harvard that was very similar to the one he had earlier given at Duke.

Read the rest – Fareed Zakaria pays the price for plagiarism

Daedalus Addendum: The Corpulent Creep’s main worry with Paul Ryan is not his fiscal stances. He’s worried about Ryan’s stance on abortion!

Charles Johnson is not worried about a bad economy or dire fiscal situation.  All Paul Ryan did was vote against funding abortions. Charles wants to pay for dead babies. He’s a psychopathic creep.

Tags: , , ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

Comments are closed.

Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By All of Us