First time visitor? Learn more.

Thucydides and the Globalists versus the Nationalists

by coldwarrior ( 149 Comments › )
Filed under History, Open thread, Politics at January 18th, 2017 - 5:06 am

An interesting article. Again, it’s not Dem versus GoP, It is Globalists versus Nationalists:

In the aftermath of the 2016 elections, an intense and widening divide resurfaced among Americans. While initial fissures in U.S. society revealed themselves over twenty years ago, the split increased into culturally distinct and regionally localized areas during that time. Today, the rift is generally peaceful and manifests itself in words and demonstrations. However, it resides along significant geographic, economic and ideological lines that may not withstand future stress and pressure.

Such an internal division is not a unique circumstance. In fact, ancient Greek history provides us a fitting analogy for reflection. Senior military leaders and historians study The Peloponnesian War, written by the Athenian historian Thucydides, as a footnote for strategic thought in foreign affairs. However, that war was chiefly about internal conflict in Greek society. Today, Thucydides’ relevance to America’s domestic political landscape is minimal under an assumption the United States is a unified society. Clearly, the 2016 elections and reactions give cause to question the strength and depth of our society’s unity. That and other similarities warrant a review of the context and causes of the Peloponnesian War, if only as an analogy, for consideration.

The thirty-year-long Peloponnesian War did not start overnight. Greek casus belli intensified gradually over a fifty-year span as selfish agendas became acceptable through the slow creep of greed, pride and suspicion. Ironically, the very peace Athenians and Spartans secured against Persia enabled the widening of attitudes. Tragically, Greek divergence metastasized into open conflict and, ultimately, mutual ruin.

Why? A key message of Thucydidean history is that without mutual effort for unity, a people of common heritage but different perspectives will develop oppositional interests over time. This was the case with Athens and Sparta and is occurring in “blue” and “red” segments of America’s populace.

From a geographical perspective, America’s socio-political affiliations coalesce in distinctive regions such as urban areas next to oceans and rural heartlands. While geography does not predetermine societal destiny, it is a feature that influences its culture and end results. Although separated by era and ocean, the geographic and societal disposition of today’s “blue” and “red” American states have stark similarities to that of Athens and Sparta.

As example, in 450 BC, Athens resided within a great walled city with access to the Aegean Sea. Facing seaward, it used its powerful navy to spur trade and enlarge its influence abroad bringing it into cooperation with other cultures. Similar to America’s “blue” populations on the Pacific and northeastern Atlantic coasts and in major metropolitan centers, Athens was mercantile, inclusive, cosmopolitan and urbane. As with Athens, “blue” populations view themselves as exemplars and vanguards for Western civilization’s progress at home and abroad.

Athens’ rival was Sparta, principally an agrarian society husbanded within the countryside and without continual contact with overseas cultures. Sparta maintained a formidable army and militant ethos to protect its land’s resources against enemies. Comparably, “red” states dominate the American heartland where its populations view foreigners with skepticism and espouse greater comfort with the Second Amendment. Sparta subjugated a Helot slave population allowing only native Spartiates to govern. Regrettably, a similar legacy still exists in “red” southern states. Rustic, trusting religious oracles, and zealous when threatened, Sparta and “red” states regard tradition and military might as touchstones to national prestige.

For Athens and Sparta, as in “blue” and “red” states, their way of life and worldview were justified and noble; it served them well in the face of challenges and became an indelible aspect of their identity. However, then as now, time and distance have widened attitudinal fissures where former mutual respect devolved into disdain and distrust. As these differences in cultural outlooks exist today, then how, and why, did Athens and Sparta resort to war? More importantly, what should we learn from it?…
PLEASE READ THE REST HERE.

Shankapotus Disrupts the Members

by coldwarrior ( 96 Comments › )
Filed under Open thread at January 17th, 2017 - 6:03 am

Don’t Let this guy anywhere near your CC.

It was founded more than century ago as a refuge for Jewish American golfers being discriminated against, but now a Maryland country club is facing its own exclusion row over whether to admit Barack Obama.

Several members at the exclusive Woodmont Country Club have said an application by the outgoing US president, a keen terrible golfer with a hideous swing, to join the historically Jewish club should be rejected because of his Israel policies.

Other members have spoken out about the apparent discrimination within the club, with one lifelong member, a local mayor, resigning in disgust.

Citing Mr Obama’s decision last month to abstain from a UN security council resolution criticising Israeli settlements, members have said he could “destroy” the club, where he played four times during his presidency.

Faith Goldstein wrote in an email obtained by The Washington Post: “He has created a situation in the world where Israel’s very existence is weakened and possibly threatened… He is not welcome at Woodmont. His admittance would create a storm that could destroy our club.”

Marc B. Abrams, a lawyer, said it was “inconceivable” that Mr Obama could be welcomed as a member due to his position on Israel.

Explaining his decision to resign from the club, Jeffrey Slavin, a mayor in Montgomery County, wrote in an email to the general manager: “I can no longer belong to a community: Where Intolerance is accepted; Where History is forgotten; Where Freedom of Speech is denied; And where the nation’s first black president is disrespected.”

He later explained that “unless someone did something bold, the club would do nothing”.

Mr Obama was widely criticised by Israeli officials following the UN vote for “abandoning the Jewish state”.

“It was to be expected that Israel’s greatest ally would act in accordance with the values that we share and that they would have vetoed this disgraceful resolution. I have no doubt that the new US administration and the incoming UN Secretary General will usher in a new era in terms of the UN’s relationship with Israel,” Danny Danon, Israel’s UN ambassador, said at the time.

A spokesman for Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, accused the Obama administration of “colluding” with the UN, adding that the prime minister was looking forward to working with Donald Trump, the president-elect.

Members of the golf club were said to have been offended further by a speech by John Kerry, Mr Obama’s secretary of state, at the end of last month.

Mr Kerry accused Mr Netanyahu of standing in the way of peace in the Middle East.

“In light of the votes at the UN and the Kerry speech and everything else, there’s this major uproar with having him part of the club, and a significant portion of the club has opposed offering him membership,” a source told the New York Post.

An unnamed official from a Jewish organisation in Washington reportedly said: “Can you imagine how angry I would be if I had paid $80,000 to have to look at this guy who has done more to damage Israel than any president in American history?”

Cool Jazz Saturday Night: Miles Davis ‘Kind of Blue’

by coldwarrior ( 118 Comments › )
Filed under Music, Open thread at January 15th, 2017 - 6:02 pm

When Miles Davis came to New York in 1945, at the age of 19, he replaced Gillespie as Parker’s trumpeter for a few years and played very much in their style. A decade later, he, too, was wondering what to do next.

The answer came from a friend of his named George Russell (who died just last month at the age of 86). A brilliant composer and scholar in his own right, Russell spent the better part of the ’50s devising a new theory of jazz improvisation based not on chord changes but on scales or “modes.” The kind of music that resulted was often called “modal” jazz. (A scale consists of the eight notes from one octave to the next. * A chord consists of three or four specific notes in that scale, played together or in sequence: For instance, a C chord is C-E-G.)

This distinction may seem slight, but its implications were enormous. In a bebop improvisation, the chord changes (which occur when, usually, the pianist changes the harmony from one chord to another) serve as a compass; they point the direction to the next bar or the next phrase. Chords follow a particular pattern (that’s why it’s easy to hum along with most blues and ballads); you know what the next chord will be; you know that the notes you play will consist of the notes that comprise that chord or some variation on them. Playing blues, you know that the sequence of chord changes will be finished in 12 bars (or, if it’s a song, 32 bars), and then you’ll either end your solo or start the sequence again.

Russell threw the compass out the window. You could play all the notes of a scale, which is to say any and all notes. “It is for the musician to sing his own song really,” Russell wrote, “without having to meet the deadline of a particular chord.” In other words, he continued, “you are free to do anything” (the italics were his), “as long as you know where home is”—as long as you know where you’re going to wind up.

One night in 1958, Russell sat down with Davis at a piano and laid out his theory’s possibilities—how to link chords, scales, and melodies in almost unlimited combinations. Miles realized this was a way out of bebop’s cul-de-sac. “Man,” he told Russell, “if Bird was alive, this would kill him.”

In an interview that year with critic Nat Hentoff, Miles explained the new approach. “When you go this way,” he said, “you can go on forever. You don’t have to worry about changes, and you can do more with time. It becomes a challenge to see how melodically inventive you are. … I think a movement in jazz is beginning, away from the conventional string of chords and a return to emphasis on melodic rather than harmonic variations. There will be fewer chords but infinite possibilities as to what to do with them.”

Davis needed one more thing before he could go this route: a pianist who knew how to accompany without playing chords. This was a radical notion. Laying down the chords—supplying the frontline horn players with the compass that kept their improvisations on the right path—was what modern jazz pianists did. Russell recommended someone he’d hired for a few of his own sessions, an intense young white man named Bill Evans.

Evans was conservatory-trained with a penchant for the French Impressionist composers, like Ravel and Debussy, whose harmonies floated airily above the melody line. When Evans started playing jazz, he tended not to play the root of a chord; for instance, when playing a C chord, he’d avoid playing a C note. Instead, he’d play some other note in, or hovering around, the chord, suggesting the chord without locking himself into its restraints.

The late great Nat Henoff did the liner notes for this masterpiece.

The other key album is Miles Davis’ Kind of Blue (Columbia CT 1355). Davis, thoroughly impatient with writing that ties him to thick chordal backgrounds, wants “fewer chords but infinite possibilities as to what to do with them. When you go this way, you go on forever. It becomes a challenge to see how melodiously inventive you are.” Davis has rarely if ever given himself and his men so much extended melodic freedom as in his new album; and the pieces—all by him—are remarkably evocative of endless melodic distances. Deceptively simple in construction, they provide a spare but resiliently firm lifeline that allows the soloists to plunge into introspection without losing the shape of the whole. Two especially, All Blues and Flamenco Sketches (whose titles are reversed in the notes and on the record) are hypnotically absorbing. Miles now writes more and more the way he prefers to play, and he is likely to influence jazz composers as thoroughly as he already has many jazz instrumentalists.

So sit back and have a listen, get yourself an adult beverage because the adults are in charge again!.

Buycott Opportunity!

by coldwarrior ( 142 Comments › )
Filed under Open thread at January 13th, 2017 - 6:00 am

I prefer buycotts over boycotts:

Linda Bean on Thursday defended her donations to President-elect Donald Trump and said the blacklisting campaign against the company founded by her grandfather is nothing more than “bullying.”

“I think it is very much a case of bullying,” the L.L. Bean heiress said on Fox News’ “Fox & Friends” morning show.

“It is bullying me and bullying the companies I own and bullying the one I partly am on, the L.L. Bean company, since I owned when I was a child,” Linda Bean said, stressing that she speaks for herself and is not representing the company.

“I never back down. If I feel I’m right,” Bean said.

L.L. Bean is one of nearly 80 companies — including Walmart, Welch’s, Bloomingdales and Hobby Lobby — that the organization “Grab Your Wallet” has launched a boycott campaign against due to varying levels of support for Trump.

Bean said she donated $15,000 in August and $10,000 in October to Trump’s Making Maine Great Again PAC. It was originally and incorrectly reported Bean contributed $60,000 to the PAC.

 

READ THE REST

***Now, this website Grab Your Wallet is now my GO TO LIST for making purchases! Thanks Guys, for the BUYCOTT Opportunity!*** They also provide a full list of Trump Free stores and services that I can simply not use. Thanks for the great info you chuckleheadds.


The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By All of Us