► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Amir Taheri’

Iran’s secretive Qods Corps is making trouble all around the world

by Mojambo ( 32 Comments › )
Filed under Ahmadinejad, Al Qaeda, Gaza, Hamas, Hezballah, Iran, Islamic Terrorism, Islamists, Israel, Jihad, Lebanon, Palestinians, Saudi Arabia, Terrorism at October 17th, 2011 - 11:30 am

Obama’s appeasement of the Iranian regime of butchers has been a massive failure. The Mullah’s have taken his measure and correctly have come to the conclusion that since Obama (and his overrated Secretary of State Hillary Clinton),  has the spine of a jelly fish, they face no consequences for their murderous actions.

by Amir Taheri

Thanks to an accident of official schedules, last Tuesday, almost at the same time that President Obama was charging the Islamic Republic with plotting to kill the Saudi ambassador in Washington, Iran’s “Supreme Guide” Ali Khamenei was announcing “the imminent end of America.”

The coincidence was uncanny because Khamenei was unleashing his lava of hate against the American “Great Satan” at the headquarters of the Qods Corps, the very body named by Obama as the architect of the alleged plot. Standing by Khamenei in suitably solemn attitudes was Qods Corps Commander Gen. Qassem Suleimani, flanked by some of his closest associates, all named in connection with the plot.

The Qods Corps, or “The Jerusalem Army,” is an autonomous unit of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps under the direct supervision of the Khamanei. Created by the late Ayatollah Khomeini in 1984, its stated task is to help “ export the revolution” throughout the world.

The new force’s slogan was “ On Our Way to Jerusalem, via Baghdad!” The idea was that once Jerusalem had been “ liberated” and Israel wiped off the map, the Khomeinist revolution would spread beyond the Middle East with the ultimate aim of destroying the United States as “ the principal manifestation of Satan’s power” in the contemporary world.

Iran’s Khomeinist rulers have always been fascinated by the idea of “exporting revolution.” Initially, this was limited to propaganda and financial support for radical groups friendly to the Islamic Republic.

In 1982, however, Khomeini decided to create a network of foreign radical groups, known under the generic term “Hezbollah” ( Party of Allah) directly controlled by Tehran.

Very quickly, Hezbollah branches were set up in more than a dozen Muslim countries, with sub-branches among Shiite communities across the globe.

Over the years, the Qods Corps absorbed these various organizations, along with the foreign intelligence department of the Revolutionary Guard.

Initially focused on Islamic radical groups alone, the Qods Corps gradually extended its ideological span to cover a range of non-religious groups such as the Japanese Red Army, the Peruvian Shining Path, the Colombian FARC, the Nicaraguan Sandinista, the Armenian Secret Army and the Turkish Kurdistan Workers’ Party, and the People’s Front for the Liberation of Palestine, among others.

The Qods Corps is believed to employ around 12,000 people and runs a number of training centres inside and outside Iran.

Abroad, the corps maintains training camps in Afghanistan, Iraq, Lebanon and the Sudan. Last August, Qods opened a new center in Syria, led by Brig. Gen. Muhammad-Reza Zahedi, to train Syrian forces in crowd control and the terrorization of President Bashar al-Assad’s opponents.

[…]

For Qods commanders, Iraq and Afghanistan are special targets. The unit operating in Iraq is led by Gen. Hussein Mussavi and controls a number of armed groups including the Mahdi Army, the Ramadan Corps and the Brigades of the Right, with the aim of killing as many Americans as possible and, eventually, driving the US out of Iraq “in humiliation.”

Qods has a similar strategy in Afghanistan, where it operates through the Ansar (Companions) Corps. It also provides the Taliban with money, a range of weapons, including IEDs and, more importantly perhaps, safe haven.

Qods is a strong supporter of the Palestinian Hamas movement both in terms of cash support and arms deliveries. However, divisions within the Hamas leadership have so far prevented it from offering Qods a direct presence in Gaza. While Hamas has maintained a degree of independence from Qods, another Palestinian group, the Islamic Jihad, has developed into an arm of the Iranian regime in all but name.

Qods Commander Gen. Suleimani advertises his commitment to “liberating Jerusalem” by wearing a checkered scarf of the Palestinians. He also carries a rosary of beads supposedly molded from soil taken from Jerusalem.

[…]

Serving in Qods is a fast track to the top of the Iranian leadership. A former Qods commander, Brig. Ahmad Vahidi, is now the defense minister. The Revolutionary Guard Commander Gen. Muhammad-Ali Aziz-Jaafari is also a former Qods officer. Commanders of three of the six army corps that constitute the Revolutionary Guard are former Qods officers.

Qods officers have also penetrated the diplomatic service. Today, at least a dozen of them work as ambassadors across the globe, including such sensitive postings as Russia.

Qods has been behind the assassination of more than 100 Iranians dissidents in exile and is suspected of involvement in dozens of terrorist operations in more than 20 countries.

Its sleeper cells are believed to be present across the globe, often operating within Shi’ite communities of Lebanese and Syrian origins as well as Palestinians.

Relations between the Qods Corps and al Qaeda have always been problematic. Until 9/11 al Qaeda stood firmly with the Taliban in a campaign against Iran as a heretic Shiite power. With the fall of the Taliban in Kabul, however, al Qaeda has had to court Iran as an alternative escape route and safe haven. One of Osama bin Laden’s sons, Sa’ad, has been hosted by Iran along with one of the terrorist leader’s wives.

[…]

Read the rest: Iran’s Shadow Army

Giving a murderous tyrant the benefit of the doubt

by Mojambo ( 232 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Egypt, Iran, Syria at March 30th, 2011 - 6:30 pm

We have seen this movie before. In 2009 as brave young Iranians rioted in the street, Barack Obama sat on his hands. Yet he had no problems in saying that  a friend such as Mubarak ought to go and is now intervening against  Khadafy (who for all his faults is less a threat then the al-Qaeda backed rebels). Now with Syrians rioting, Obama and his ineffectual Sec. of State Hillary Clinton, is giving the horrible Assad Alawite clan the benefit of the doubt and has pronounced them to be “reformers”! What is it about Arab/Islamic  tyrannies that appeals so much to that man? Recently, to show their hatred of George W. Bush,  a whole slew of liberals have trekked to Damascus to give the seal of approval on the Assad family (an organized crime family if there ever was one0 – Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Hagel, John Kerry and Arlen Spector.

by Amir Taheri

Facing nationwide uprisings, Syrian despot Bashar al-Assad appears to be on the same trajectory of other Arab tyrants brought down by popular revolt in recent weeks.

With the regime’s security forces having killed more than 170 demonstrators in 14 cities over the last week, Assad yesterday tried to calm the situation by making four promises.

First, he said he’d lift the state of emergency the Ba’athist regime imposed in 1964. But it isn’t clear when and how that might be done — and Assad made the same promise almost 11 years ago, when he succeeded his father as Syrian president.

Sources in Damascus tell me that the emergency may be phased out in some provinces but would remain in force in major cities, including the capital.

Second, Assad vowed that he’d form a new Cabinet to replace that of Naji al-Atri, who has been forced to resign. Syrians, however, know that the prime minister and his Cabinet count for little: Power is concentrated in the hands of the president and his shadowy security services.

Third, he’s promising constitutional amendments to forbid anyone from becoming president for life. But he’s making it clear that any such reform wouldn’t apply to him. At age 45, he hopes to remain in power at least as long as his father did — 30 years.

Most opposition groups, however, are demanding a reform that Assad hasn’t mentioned: to drop Article 8 of the Constitution, which makes Syria a one-party system with the Ba’ath holding a monopoly on political power. (In practice, the Ba’ath has created a number of “partner parties,” including Communists, to give the impression that a coalition exercises power.)

Fourth, Assad promises to release more political prisoners. Last week, the regime tried to defuse unrest by announcing the freeing of 102 prisoners. Amnesty International estimates that Syria is holding more than 3,000 political prisoners, the largest number of any Arab country.

Opposition sources claim that most of those released last week were “ordinary criminals” and that for every prisoner set free, at least two are being arrested. The government admits it has recently arrested more than 400 people in eight cities on charges ranging from public disorder to high treason.

On top of all that, the state-owned media have been doing a song and dance about alleged “conspirators,” including a Syrian-American, trying to overthrow the regime with support from Saudi Arabia and America.

In fact, the United States has recently gone out of its way to court the Assad regime.

[…]

Read the rest: Syrian showdown

Taheri: Obama 101

by Phantom Ace Comments Off on Taheri: Obama 101
Filed under Barack Obama, Election 2008, Iraq at September 19th, 2008 - 3:16 pm

Amir Taheri has a piece about his article on the Obama campaign’s discussions with Iraqi leaders: Obama 101.

At a meeting with Senator Hillary Clinton in Washington, I asked what she thought of the Bush administration’s negotiations with the Iraqis concerning security cooperation. She said she would not second-guess the president and would wait for the outcome of the negotiations. In a statesmanlike manner, Senator Clinton reminded me of the golden rule—one that is common to all mature democracies where the opposition is loyal and constitutional.

Today, Senator Obama is the leader of a loyal opposition in the United States, not the chief of an insurrection or a revolutionary uprising. What we are witnessing in the U.S. is an election, not an insurrection or a coronation, even less a regime change.

Obama should not have discussed the government-to-government negotiations with the Iraqis. That he did, surprised the Iraqis no end. Raising the issue with them, especially the way he did, meant that he was telling them that he did not trust his own government. The Iraqis could not be blamed for wondering why they should trust a government that is not trusted by the leader of its own loyal opposition. (There was also no point in raising the matter, because Obama did not know the content of the negotiations.)

An opposition leader’s foreign trips are useful as fact-finding missions. This means that the opposition leader listens to the locals, asks questions, and tries to get the political feel of the place. He is not there to lecture the natives or bad-mouth his own government back home

(Hat tip:Our #1 Contributor Charles)

Redefining Denial

by Phantom Ace Comments Off on Redefining Denial
Filed under Barack Obama, Election 2008, Iraq at September 16th, 2008 - 1:23 pm

Many were skeptical of Amir Taheri’s report that Barack Obama had asked Iraqi officials to delay a security agreement until after the elections, and the Obama campaign denied it—but their denial is actually a confirmation of Taheri’s article.

Obama’s national security spokeswoman Wendy Morigi said Taheri’s article bore “as much resemblance to the truth as a McCain campaign commercial.”

In fact, Obama had told the Iraqis that they should not rush through a “Strategic Framework Agreement” governing the future of US forces until after President George W. Bush leaves office, she said.

Also see: Pajamas Media: Obama’s Questionable Diplomacy in Iraq.

(Hat tip:Chucky the LGF Cult leader)