► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Corruption’

For Sale; 1 Congress, 1 million Dollars or best offer…

by Guest Post ( 172 Comments › )
Filed under Democratic Party, government, Republican Party at October 22nd, 2013 - 4:00 pm

Guest Blogger: Doriangrey


How do you define corruption, is it mere mendacious malfeasance, or is it something more tangible?


Exclusive–Documents: Congress Charges Secret Fee to Land Top Committee Spots

Members of Congress must pay secret fees known as “party dues” to the Democratic and Republican parties to secure and maintain top committee chairmanships and assignments, newly uncovered internal documents reveal.

The never-before-published lists are reprinted inside the new book Extortion: How Politicians Extract Your Money, Buy Votes, and Line Their Own Pockets, written by Government Accountability Institute President and Breitbart News Senior Editor-at-Large Peter Schweizer.

Senior congressional staffers say the committee price lists have long been rumored to exist but that few people on Capitol Hill have seen them, giving them an almost “mythical” quality.

The book contains copies of the Democratic and Republican price lists detailing how much money lawmakers must raise to obtain and keep their seats on congressional committees. The so-called “party dues” lawmakers must contribute for committee assignments are separate and apart from the fundraising they conduct for their own campaigns. If lawmakers fail to make their tribute payment to their party, they can lose their place on a powerful committee.

“These party dues are not voluntary,” writes Schweizer. “Members are not asked to pay—they are required to pay.”

In the 2013-2014 election cycle, the going rate for a Democratic assignment as the ranking member on a top committee like the House Ways and Means or Financial Services Committees is $500,000. Schweizer reports that Democrats also use a “members points system” that rewards its members for attending party fundraisers.

Prices on the Republican House committee list are higher due to the GOP’s House majority—a fact that creates even greater opportunities for lawmakers to extract donations from the industries a committee oversees. According to Schweizer, the GOP price sheet is actually posted on the wall of the Republican Congressional Committee and contains red marks beside the names of lawmakers who fall behind on their party dues.

GOP prices for committee posts vary widely. For example, Rep. Fred Upton (R-MI), who is the chairman of the influential Energy and Commerce Committee, is expected to extract $990,000 from donors for the GOP. The chairman of the less powerful House Judiciary Committee, Rep. Lamar Smith, is required to bag just $405,000.

When a woman (or a man) sells their sexual favors, society pretty much as a whole calls them whores. It’s not a pretty word, and it carries a very ugly stigma. But what both the Democrats and the Republicans are doing is so vile it makes being called a whore seem downright respectable.

These committees that various members of Congress are buying their way unto are the very same committees that decide which laws get passed, what taxes get levied, and how much spending the United States Federal Government engages in. More importantly, these are the exact same committees that decide that members of Congress shall be exempted from the very laws that they saddle the entire rest of the nation with. Like exempting themselves from Obamanationcare, or from Insider Trading Laws.

These committees include the utterly and totally corrupt House Ethics Committee which is tasked with ensuring that members of Congress obey the nations laws.

Let be honest here and face reality, nobody pays millions dollars to get a job that pays $150,000 a year if they don’t think they are going to get those millions back. Look at how many Congressmen and Senators are straight up multimillionaires. Harry Reid made millions by buying land cheap, that he knew was going to be purchased by the Federal Government. Dianne Fienstien illegally funneled hundreds of BILLIONS of federal dollars to her husbands company.

Through the use of Continuing Resolutions Congress has made in excess of 7 TRILLION DOLLARS vanish into thin air. No one in the entire Federal Government can account for where that money went. This is corruption and pure outright theft on a scale so massive even people who KNOW that it is taking place can’t believe that it is just that, corruption and theft.

The Department of Injustice has been bought off and compromised, even the SCOTUS, the Highest Court in the Land does not have clean hands in this. This is corruption beyond anything ever seen anywhere or when in human history. This is a genuine case of not just the Foxes guarding the Hen-house, but the Foxes Mother writing them a note asserting that the Foxes had nothing to do with the Chickens disappearance, and the Courts accepting her note as factual evidence.

Congress has the lowest approval rating in the entire history of Congress, yet these crooks continue to get reelected, and they keep getting reelected because despite their abysmal approval rating, nearly everyone insists on believing the painfully obvious lie, that their Congressperson or senator is the one good Congressperson or Senator. when the truth is, that the only ones who are complete and total crooks, liars and thieves, are the ones who haven’t been in Congress long enough to buy important positions of power and authority yet.

The system is literally designed to ensure that every person elected to office becomes a criminal. More importantly, the ones tasked with ensuring that this does not happen, are the very ones that guarantee that not only does it happen, but that nothing is ever done to reform the system.

The Most Transparent Administration Evah!

by Flyovercountry ( 13 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Cult of Obama, Democratic Party at July 21st, 2013 - 4:00 pm

On September 11, 2012, our nation suffered the death of members of our diplomatic mission for the first time since the Pedecaris assassination in 1904. As with everything else that has happened during his time as our nation’s chief executive that requires some explanation for what went disastrously wrong, Barack Obama, a man who has earned my nickname for him, “The Zero,” self righteously promised, “to get to the bottom,” of what went wrong. What you may not have known is that you and I would probably define getting to the bottom of something a little differently than The Zero. I personally might define it as an earnest attempt, and subsequent success in, determining the pertinent facts that will explain what ever circumstance the subject spoke to. President Zero on the other hand defines that phrase as meaning having anyone who might have the slightest knowledge of such circumstances sign nondisclosure agreements and threaten them with legal action should they answer subpoenas to testify in front of our duly elected Congress. Hopefully, the difference between these two definitions is not too thoroughly nuanced for those of you who are not brain dead.

I do not believe that anyone in the known universe would define transparency in such a manner. Only the hard core minions would even attempt to defend such a blatant and probably illegal obstruction of an ongoing investigation into the death of four American Citizens. Far from the most transparent Presidential Administration promised by Candidate Obama who blamed the grass being green on George W. Bush, he has matched a level of paranoia and corruption that makes one remember the Nixon Administration as the good ole days of honesty in government. Watergate has become the modern day defacto standard for measuring scandal, but the fact is that in those halcyon days of running our crooked leaders out of town ahead of pitch forks and torches, nobody died, and our embassies in foreign nations were not set ablaze. The dead bodies, those not fallen in battle by the way, that have been accumulated due to either incompetence or some cold political calculus on the part of our current President has reached triple digits so far, (I have included the hundreds of Mexican Nationals who died south of our border due to, “Fast and Furious.”)

Such is the danger of electing a man who feels that he must inflict pain as a means to tweak the desires of the populace that he has been elected to govern. As to the moral superiority of the political left in terms of caring for those who can not care for themselves, meaning the permanent victim class upon who’s shoulders all central planners derive their power, I have this to say. That ethical bus has left long ago by the time one wonders whether the act of killing innocent people should be considered an acceptable form of pain to inflict upon we little people. When the ends are allowed to justify the means, the lives of others become a mere matter of utility, and cheapening those lives is far to easy for the monsters who are capable of thinking in such a manner. What I find ironic, is that it is specifically this group who are so capable of shedding such huge crocodile tears with the claim of caring in a morally superior way.

Cross Posted from Musings of a Mad Conservative.

Mitt Romney Is Corrupt

by 1389AD ( 74 Comments › )
Filed under Elections 2010, Elections 2012, Mitt Romney, Tea Parties at January 25th, 2012 - 12:00 pm

Pay To Play

Mitt Romney’s organization contributed to GOP candidates in 2010 to buy their endorsements in 2012. That means everyone who ran in 2010 as a Tea Party candidate and then endorsed Mitt Romney in 2012 is a sellout, a political prostitute, a turncoat, and a fraud.

And that’s just the beginning.

Not Romney

(h/t: no2liberals)

Uploaded by on Jan 17, 2012

***WARNING – SOME FOUL LANGUAGE***
http://nebraskattitude.blogspot.com/2012/01/not-romney-video.html

If you still support Mitt after watching this, you should be stripped of your right to vote.

Conservatives will not vote for this FRAUD. Anyone who thinks that the FRAUD that is Willard “Mitt” Romney is a Conservative, is ignorant. TEA Partiers who ever supported this FRAUD should be embarrassed by their support of him. You are not a TEA Partier if you vote for Mitt.

Mitt should not be president. Ever. No matter how bad he wants to be.

Ann Barnhardt is the gal in the video. She was the driving force behind the making of this video.
Here’s the link to her original video: Barnhardt – Romney Go Home
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KBXe3Kvg-qU (41,175 views as of right now.)
Ann Barnhardt’s YouTube Channel:
http://www.youtube.com/user/AnnBarnhardt
Ann’s Blog:
http://barnhardt.biz/
About Ann:
“‘Going Galt’: Hedge Broker Shuts Down Firm With Chilling Letter About The Market”
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/going-galt-hedge-broker-shuts-down-firm-with-…
[…]
Get to Know Mitt Romney
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rJzrZX528nQ
PROOF: Mitt Romney Is As Liberal As OBAMA!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1fThdWagJ4
Romney vs. Romney on Campaign Finance Reform
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MCyYStcXEfw
Report: Short-Lived Firm Dissolves After $1 Million Pro-Romney Donation
http://www.npr.org/blogs/itsallpolitics/2011/08/04/138989269/report-short-liv…
Firm gives $1 million to pro-Romney group, then dissolves
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/44011308/#.TxELKm9STux
35 Romney endorsers received contributions first
http://www.salon.com/2012/01/07/35_romney_endorsers_received_contributions_fi…
2 more fake companies donated millions to Romney
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/08/05/1003620/-2-more-fake-companies-donat…
2 Utah companies donate $1 million apiece to Romney PAC
http://www.fox13now.com/news/local/kstu-mitt-romney-2-utah-companies-donate-1…
“WhichMitt” YouTube channel
(19 videos of Romney’s flip-flops over the years)
http://www.youtube.com/user/whichmitt
Sarah Palin’s Indianola, IA speech – full transcript:
http://conservatives4palin.com/2011/09/transcript-of-governor-palins-septembe…
Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s8Pg_1i53_Y
Get to Know Mitt Romney
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rJzrZX528nQ
Ultimate Dog Tease
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGeKSiCQkPw
http://www.youtube.com/user/klaatu42
Randall’s Wild Wild World of Animals + CZG123
http://www.youtube.com/user/czg123
Tickling Slow Loris
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g9f-6jygRJk
The OMG Cat
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_S5cXbXe-4
Bizkit the Sleep Walking Dog
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z2BgjH_CtIA
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/
http://www.cato.org/
http://www.thebostonchannel.com/index.html
http://abcnews.go.com/
http://www.foxnews.com/
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/


TAKE ACTION: America’s Job Creators Are About to Be Sucker Punched & You Have Until Wednesday to Comment

by 1389AD ( 4 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Business, Democratic Party, Economy, Headlines, Regulation, unemployment, Unions, Unions at September 19th, 2011 - 9:15 pm

Big Government has the story:

(h/t: Bumr50)

You need to act before Wednesday. At a time when the Obama Administration is clamoring to save or create jobs, his Department of Labor is about to sucker punch America’s job creators with an unprecedented regulatory overreach—all to curry more favor with union bosses.

Obama in front of a UNION sign

On Wednesday, the public comment period will be closing on a Department of Labor proposal that the majority of America knows nothing about and even fewer understand.

If enacted as drafted, the union cronies within the Department of Labor will require every private-sector employer and service provider (whether or not they ever talk directly to employees) to file financial statements with the Obama Labor Department if the service provider’s services indirectly affect employees’ choice to unionize or not.

Unless you act by commenting here, this rule change will likely take affect. [See link to a downloadable sample comment below.]

Once the financial information—which includes the service provider’s entire company (or firm’s) receipts (even from other clients)—are submitted, it will become public information. It will then be published on the Department of Labor’s website and available to union bosses. What’s more, willful failure to file the financial information is a criminal violation, punishable by either imprisonment, a fine, or both.

In June, when the Department of Labor, at the behest of union bosses, issued a 160-page proposal to expand the interpretation of “advice” under a little-known law called the Labor-Management Reporting & Disclosure Act, few understood just how deeply the DOL’s proposed rule change could affect employers and consultants of all stripes–not just those involved in labor relations. Most still don’t understand it.

In addition to companies who hire attorneys to assist them with union issues, the Department of Labor’s broad expansion into areas that most would not consider remotely connected to unions, but because it could indirectly affect [read deter] employees’ choice to unionize, the Department of Labor will likely call this “persuader activity.”

Here are the types of vendors (and the employers that hire them or purchase goods from them) who will likely be caught up in the DOL’s new proposed rules:

  • Writers (or authors) who may write a website, publication, sell a book, or other material that may promote a positive employee relations culture, thereby dissuading employees from unionizing
  • Website designers who may be contracted to design and build a website to be used for internal communications with employees
  • Consultants who coach management on how to structure and effectively manage employee teams
  • Employee engagement consultants who help companies and employees with positive employee relations
  • Productivity consultants who design and implement quality, or any other type of teams that may give employees a voice in the success of their companies’ products
  • Safety consultants who help establish safety committees that give employees the ability to voice safety concerns to their employer to resolve safety issues
  • Human resources consultants that design, write, or implement employee handbooks or policies
  • Compensation and benefit consultants who design and administer any type of benefit, pay or incentive plans for companies
  • Consultants who conduct surveys to determine employee satisfaction at their jobs

Since the Department of Labor’s phraseology is: “…activities that have as a direct or indirect object to, explicitly or implicitly, influence the decisions of employees with respect to forming, joining or assisting a union, collective bargaining, or any protected concerted activity (such as a strike) in the workplace,” the type of activity that an employer and consultant may be required to report to the Department of Labor is almost endless.

Again, the public comment period closes on Wednesday, September 21, 2011. All comments must be received on or before Wednesday.

If you do not act by submitting a comment, it is likely this rule change will go into effect causing many job creators, instead of focusing on job creation, to spend more time and resources on more paperwork, or risk going to jail. Moreover, it will cause many unsuspecting service providers who currently do not know they will fall into the Department of Labor’s trap to either violate the law, or open their personal, company or firm earnings to the Department of Labor, the public and union bosses.

Here is a sample comment provided courtesy of the Labor Relations Institute. It is suggested that you download, individualize or personalize it before sending to the Department of Labor, then submit your comments to the Department of Labor here.

The choice is yours: You can act by submitting a comment, or you can give union bosses what they want–the ability to target more employers.


“I bring reason to your ears, and, in language as plain as ABC, hold up truth to your eyes.” Thomas Paine, December 23, 1776

Cross-posted on LaborUnionReport.com, RedState.com, and BigGovernment.com.