► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Debt Crisis’

Federal Reserve to do Operation Twist

by Phantom Ace ( 53 Comments › )
Filed under Economy, Misery Index, unemployment at September 21st, 2011 - 5:00 pm

Ben Bernanke and his gang of criminals called the Federal Reserve still haven’t learned their lesson. QE2 was a slick way of devaluing the US currency, hence our living standards has been a disaster. Now there is word the Fed will do “Operation Twist.”. They plan to move their portfolio from short term securities, into longer term debt. What this will accomplish, I can only dread.

 WASHINGTON (AP) – The Federal Reserve is running out of options to try to boost a slumping economy and lower unemployment. So policymakers are expected to reach 50 years back into their playbook for their next move.

Most economists expect the Fed to announce a plan Wednesday to shift money in its $1.7 trillion portfolio out of short-term securities and into longer-term holdings.

The plan could lower Treasury yields further. Ultimately, it could reduce rates on mortgages and other consumer and business loans, too.

Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke is expected to advocate the move despite criticism from within the Fed and from Republican lawmakers and presidential candidates.

On Monday, the four highest-ranking Republicans in Congress sent Bernanke a letter cautioning the Fed against taking further steps to lower interest rates. Their letter suggested that lower rates could escalate the risk of high inflation.

The plan the Fed is considered most likely to unveil Wednesday has been dubbed “Operation Twist” and dates to the early 1960s. The Fed used a similar program then to “twist” long-term rates lower relative to short-term rates.

Read the rest:  Fed is expected to take new action to lift economy

The best thing for the economy is for the Federal Reserve to do nothing. They have damaged the living standards of the American people. The solution to our problems must be solved by a new President and a more Conservative Congress. Nothing that Ben Bernanke does can solve anything.

Essential VDH: Progressives use WWII as an example to defend Massive Spending

by Phantom Ace ( 118 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Liberal Fascism, Progressives, Socialism, Tranzis, World War II at August 24th, 2011 - 1:00 pm

After a decade of sub par economic growth compared to the 80’s and 90’s, the economy collapsed in 2008. There were many reasons why this occurred. Subprime mortgages that defaulted, the collapse of the housing bubble, outsourcing of good paying jobs, lack of wage increases, deficit spending and the doubling of the debt.  It was a perfect storm and the collapse of Lehman Brothers broke the camel’s back.

When Obama came to power in 2009 he decided we needed to increase the debt via his so called stimulus. In reality this was a payoff to the unions and other Progressive cronies. Where did the money go? No one has a clue although I suspect some bank accounts in the Caymans and Switzerland were stimulated. Progressives defended this boondoggle as the only way to get out of the recession. They used WWII as an example that massive borrowing is not bad. The Left even claims our Post WWII Economic Boom 1945-1973 was due to this. This is nonsense and Victor Davis Hanson debunks their claims.

Since 2009, the example of the economic boom following World War II has been used by Keynesians to justify their record “peacetime” levels of borrowing intended to lift the U.S. out of the doldrums. Indeed, the more the contemporary borrowing fails, the more the vast indebtedness of the war years is invoked to reassure us. On occasion a wry lament follows that if only a spaceship full of dangerous aliens were to appear, we might have the requisite excuse to follow our grandfathers into a new collective frenzy of economic stimulus and public debt.

[…]

For decades the liberal argument was that the New Deal cured the Depression. But in a new twist, the war has suddenly been reinvented to support the current arguments of the new Keynesians — despite the irony in the embrace of the old right-wing argument that it was the World War II defense spending, not FDR’s New Deal, that finally got America out of a near-decade-long depression.

In ingenious fashion, the new argument insists that the second downward spiral of 1937–38 — formerly ostensible proof that five years of the New Deal and of anti-business rhetoric had not worked — should be attributed only to FDR’s lacking the will or political muscle to stay the course and accelerate deficit spending, redistribute more income, and grow far bigger government. Then luckily the war came along. That crisis provided the necessary political landscape, which had been lacking during the supposed Keynesian backsliding of Roosevelt’s second term, to force through the long-awaited New New Deal. At last, the really big scare allowed the really big borrowing, and the result was the really big prosperity for the next half-century.

Read the rest: The False WWII Analogy Obama’s America is more like Attlee’s Britain than Truman’s America.

It’s funny how by claiming that WWII debt based spending got us out of the Great Depression, Progressives are admitting the New Deal failed. With the massive amounts of debt we have incurred the last 11 years, now reaching 100% of GDP, we would be unable to fight another World War.

Our debt and deficit are economically unstable. If we don’t do something about it the US will go the way of other great powers. They all fell due to debt and economic mismanagement. It’s still not too late for America but we are running out of time. As Hanson put it best, we are 1945 Great Britain not 1945 Truman’s America.

Felonious Munk rips Obama

by Phantom Ace ( 108 Comments › )
Filed under Economy at August 13th, 2011 - 11:30 am

Felonious Munk rips Obama a new one. He goes after Obama over the whole debt mess.

(Hat Tip: rightymouse)

Mitt Romney’s 2004 S&P sales pitch included tax increases

by Phantom Ace ( 136 Comments › )
Filed under Economy, Elections 2012, Mitt Romney, Progressives, Republican Party at August 11th, 2011 - 2:30 pm

Mitt Romney brags about how S&P raised Massachusetts credit rating when he was governor.  What Mittens doesn’t say is what his sale pitch was. He used the previous governors tax increases as part of the sales pitch to Standard and Poors. Mitt Romney did cut spending but left the tax increases intact. Clearly he was for in 2004, what he is against now! Sound famailair? It should, another Massachussets politician was known to be for things before he was against him.

The claim was part of a presentation to the ratings agency obtained by POLITICO under a state freedom of information law from the Massachusetts Executive Office of Administration and Finance. The Nov. 4 presentation, stamped “confidential,” helped persuade S&P to raise the state’s grade and handed Romney the perfect talking point for last week’s humiliating national downgrade by the same agency.

But Romney’s case to S&P is a far cry from the anti-tax absolutism of the Republican Party he hopes to lead. Indeed, it bears a far closer resemblance to the right-of-center grand compromise rejected by House Republicans this year — dismissed because it would include new taxes and end tax breaks President Barack Obama described as “loopholes” — or the more modest compromise that passed, than to the Cut, Cap, and Balance plan Romney “applauded.”

The presentation to the ratings agency reveals that Romney’s administration made the case to Standard & Poor’s that his state was creditworthy because of both spending cuts — the current preferred GOP method — and new revenues, including fees he imposed and tax “loopholes” he closed. The presentation also prominently cited a controversial set of tax increases in the summer of 2002, which Romney, then a candidate, had opposed.

Read the rest:  Taxes key to Mitt Romney’s ’04 pitch to Standard & Poor’s 

John Kerry’s flip flopping sure has rubbed off on Mitt Romney. The fact that Romney used tax increases as part of his sale pitch to increase Massachusetts credit rating will be used against him by the Obama Regime. Between Romneycare, his flip flops, Bain Capital and now this S&P sales pich, he’s toast!