It seems Medaura got in trouble with Charles. All her ass kissing and his reciprocity in return did not change a cardinal rule. Don’t mess with Dianna.
Here are the events.
332  |
Dianna 11/18/2008 9:45:42 am PST |
| 410 |
Dianna 11/18/2008 10:07:08 am PST |
re: #363 medaura18586
Woooo! You reported that… I’m so scared! Yeah, it shows really good sense in taking issue with that.
Wasn’t Pat Buchanan’s economic platform one of protectionism and anti-immigration rhetoric and still is?
I thought you didn’t like me and you would ignore me. Take your own advice for once.
You attacked someone vilely, and most unfairly.
Then the Cult Leader comes to the defense of Dianna!
441  |
Charles 11/18/2008 10:18:45 am PST |
medaura18586: It’s way over the line to accuse Dianna of being a nativist. Turn down the rhetoric, please.
Wow! It seems Meduara who was the leading Cult Member attacked Robert Spencer and convinced Charles and company to support the Albanian Islamic Emirate , is not yet a member of the elite!
Here is her response!
456 |
medaura18586 11/18/08 10:26:14 am reply quote | -2    |
re: #441 Charles
medaura18586: It’s way over the line to accuse Dianna of being a nativist. Turn down the rhetoric, please.
I didn’t accuse her of any such thing! That’s her intervening on behalf of someone else, whom I called a nativist for taking issue with McCain’s lax stance on immigration “because Americans are losing their jobs as it is”.
But it didn’t work with Charles Manson
| 466 |
Charles 11/18/08 10:30:58 am reply quote | 18 |
re: #458 medaura18586
It is doppelgander whom I accused of being a nativist for scapegoating unemployment on immigrants.”
Still over the top. There are a lot of people concerned about America’s immigration policies, and they aren’t all nativists or Pat Buchanan fans.
The Cult Leader has spoken, lay off Dianna!
My question is to the former lizards, who is Dianna and what’s her connection to Charles? I was banned because I had a running feud with her and Killgore over Serbia. So what’s her connection, is she his mistress?
Inquiring minds want to know!
re: #318 medaura18586
That is a long way out of line. I’ve reported it. I hope a lot of others have the good sense to do so as well.
re: #332 Dianna
Woooo! You reported that… I’m so scared! Yeah, it shows really good sense in taking issue with that.
Wasn’t Pat Buchanan’s economic platform one of protectionism and anti-immigration rhetoric and still is?
I thought you didn’t like me and you would ignore me. Take your own advice for once.