► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Economic Conservatism’

Colombia’s GDP grows at 5.2% in Q2

by Phantom Ace Comments Off on Colombia’s GDP grows at 5.2% in Q2
Filed under Business, Columbia, Conservatism, Economy, Headlines at September 22nd, 2011 - 4:59 pm

Colombia continues to boom thanks to its improved security and it’s Free market economic reforms.

Colombia‘s economy grew 5.2 percent in the second quarter compared with the same period a year ago, fueled by a boom in the mining and oil sectors.

While the United States struggles with high unemployment and the risk of falling back into recession, resource-rich emerging market countries such as Colombia have seen their economies expand briskly since the global credit crisis.

Colombia’s 5.2 percent year-over-year GDP growth reported by the DANE statistics agency on Thursday was in line with the 5.21 percent average expected by 34 analysts in a Reuters poll.

Colombia’s fast-growing mining and oil sectors drove much of the growth in the second quarter with transport and commerce also pushing it up.

Colombia, like Chile is proof Conservative/Libertarian economics work. This is something the US needs to learn again.

Shadegg warns New Republicans: don’t betray the people

by Phantom Ace ( 109 Comments › )
Filed under Economy, Elections 2010, Elections 2012, George W. Bush, Republican Party at December 30th, 2010 - 8:30 am

1994 was supposed to have ushered in a new era of Conservatism. Analysts at the time said this was the Congress Reagan never had. Unfortunately, they were lead by Newt Gingrich who saw himself as Prime Minister and was out maneuvered by Bill Clinton. Then in 1998, instead of going after Clinton for giving China military technology, they went after him for a blow-job. In the 200’s the Republicans went along with Bush’s big government Rockefeller Republicanism. The result was that in 2006 and 2008, the GOP was  slaughtered at the polls. Luckily, the Democrats went Far Left and thanks to the tea party, the Republicans won a huge victory in  2010.

John Shadegg who in 2006 challenged The weak willed Rockefeller Republican John Boehner, but lost to him. He warns the newly elected Republicans to stay true to fiscal conservatism and don;’t make the same mistakes the 1994 class did.

If the Tea Party movement had come along four years ago, John Shadegg might now be the incoming Speaker of the House.

The Arizona Republican ran for majority leader in 2006 but was beaten by John Boehner, the Ohio Republican who has been minority leader since the fall of 2006 and is now set to take the gavel from Democrat Nancy Pelosi in one week’s time.

Shadegg, who in 2006 was the choice of National Review magazine and the conservative blog Redstate, is going home to Arizona. He decided to retire after 16 years in office.

Shadegg, 61, has a unique perspective on conservative Republican politics. He came to Washington as part of the Republican Revolution of 1994 that swept the GOP into control of the House for the first time since 1954.

Read the rest: Shadegg warns House GOP newcomers: Don’t ‘betray’ grassroots like we did

It’s a shame that John Shadegg didn’t defeat the cry baby John Boehner. He would of been a more effective leader and one who would go toe to toe with Barack Hussein Obama. Unfortunately, with the metro-sexual Rockefeller whiner Boehner, Obama will eat the Republicans lunch. If this occurs, The Tea Party Republicans should launch a coup and get rid of that loser and send him home crying and replace him with Eric Cantor. I will never understand why the GOP since Regan selects elitist left of center pushovers like the Papa Bush, Bush Junior, Bob Dole, John McCain and Mitch McConnell as their representatives.
The GOP should heed Shadegg, he has seen how Republicans blow it. If they don’t come through and revert to Rockefeller style Progressive-lite, a new party will emerge.For too long they have used Economic and Social Conservatives as playthings. The time for this must cease and either they come through and fight, or its time for  party purge.

America: The economic sick man of the Global economy

by Phantom Ace ( 113 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Economy, Politics, Progressives, Socialism at November 10th, 2010 - 11:30 am

The United States of America was once a dynamic flourishing nation with economic opportunities for those who came here to strive hard. However over time, various Progressive Presidents of both parties began to implement the government redistribution policies. These policies have culminated under Barack Hussein Obama and the result is a stagnant anemic economy. Nations like China, India, Chile, Russia, Israel, Colombia, Panama and Germany are currently cleaning our clocks economically. These nation’s economies are dong good, while we are struggling. When you have a nation like Germany, who once had a stagnant economy and now has embrace free market reforms  lecturing us,  you know the world is upside down. China which is set to overtake us economically now lectures us about our fiscal policies, which they help support by buying our debt.  In short, America has become the economic sick man of the Industrial world.

What worries me about President Obama is really one general issue: his very concrete enjoyment of the good life as evidenced by his golf outings, Martha’s Vineyard vacations, and imperial entourages that accompany him abroad, and yet his obvious distrust of the private sector and the success of the wealthy. Yet my discomfort here is not even one that arises from an obvious hypocrisy of, say, a Michelle on the 2008 campaign trail lecturing the nation about its meanness or her own previous lack of pride in her country, juxtaposed with her taste for the publicly provided rarefied enjoyments of a Costa del Sol hideaway at a time of recession

[…]

We all accept, of course, that the question is not one of a laissez-faire, unchecked robber baron arena, versus a Marxist-Leninist closed economy, but rather in a modern Western liberal state the finer line between a Greece and a Switzerland, or a California and a Texas.

In the former examples, the desire to achieve an equality of result through high taxes, generous public employment, and lavish entitlements destroys incentive in two directions — creating dependency on the part of the more numerous recipients of government largess, and despair among the smaller but more productive sector that sees the fruits of its labor redistributed to others — with all the obligatory state rhetoric about greed and social justice that legitimizes such transfers.

In the latter examples, an equality of opportunity allows citizens to create wealth and capital on the assurances that the incentives for personal gain and retention of profits will result in greater riches for all.

Read the rest: Stay Worried

My Generation (Generation X) really got screwed over. We entered the workforce in the late 90’s when the economic was on booming. Great starting salaries, bonuses and raises. In the 2000’s, the job market became stagnant and although unemployment was low, wages were lower than they were in the 80’s and 90’s. Raises were not keeping up with cost of living and due to outsourcing, we couldn’t demand better wages. Then the economic collapse hit in 2008 and then Obama’s fiscal recklessness has screwed over any opportunity we had to advance. When compared to the Boomers ate a similar age, Generation X is nowhere near their living standards. What we see happening occurred in Argentina. A once great vibrant nation, turned into a 3rd World economic basket case.

America needs massive economic reform in order to attract capital which leads to job creation and upward mobility. If this doesn’t occur, expect to see talented young Americans immigrate to other nations that will provide economic opportunity. The American dream is rapidly turning into the American nightmare.

Update: MacDuff has aa great comment that needs to be added to this post.

As a Boomer, life was great in the 80s and 90s, now I look back on it as if it were a dream, wondering “how did it all go so badly, so quickly?”. Alas, the 90′s were a mirage. Everyone (including myself) were trading stocks online finding that you could actually make some money with little effort. It seemed that it would never end, but we didn’t know that we were building on sand; not only individuals, but businesses as well. All it would eventually take was a tremor to bring it all down.

On 9/11, the tremor came. The ripples that went through the economy revealed the shallow, and speculative nature of our “bubble economy” and those ripples became waves that toppled the castles of sand that we thought was a stable economy. The upshot for me was that a 30 year career was ended by downsizing in 2004 and, at 50, I had to compete with much younger people who had not yet built a “lifestyle” based upon the “arc of continued success”. The arc, unfortunately, was an assumption based upon what proved to be a flawed vision of the American Dream.

Yeah, I made it for a few years, starting over in a new industry and using what I had left of my youthful ambition, combined with a bit of wisdom and experience. Nothing turned out as planned and, in the end, due to having saved some and resisted the urge to indebt myself, I’ll be OK.

I curse those politicians, of both parties, and latter-day robber barons who chose expediency and unrealistic growth projections, funded by debt, over long-term solidity. Their dream has been realized by way of exhorbitant salaries paid for trashing the companies that paid them. I curse the boards of directors who paid these scallywags, and the politicians that put the good of their own career ahead of that of the American economic system. There’s a lot of cursing to go around, and it goes back for more than a half a century.

We need only look to places like Allentown, PA, Detroit and Lansing, MI, to see the ruins of a once great industrial power laid to waste by incompetence and greed.

Internationally, the once grat leader is no more than a follower, being lectured by nations who, just 70 years ago, we decimated in war, then rebuilt. The irony is that their lectures are sound and the message is correct.

WE, and our insatiable thirst for “easy money” has done what no nation has been able to do in our history; it has reduced us to our knees. Many, such as myself, were raised by parents who weathered the Great depression as well as World War II. They told us there was “no free lunch” They told us that the quest for “easy money” was a fool’s errand. But we didn’t listen, we just didn’t listen.

We’re listening now.

This was spot on!

Suburbs set to abandon Democrats and return to the Republicans.

by Phantom Ace ( 192 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Economy, Elections 2010, Healthcare, Politics, Polls, Progressives, Republican Party, Socialism at September 28th, 2010 - 2:00 pm

From the Eisenhower era until the Bill Clinton administration, the Republicans owned the suburbs. Whether it was Westchester County, Long Island, Bergen County or the suburbs of LA, it was GOP territory. The people who reside in these areas were concerned with pocket book issues, anti-Communism/defense and crime. These were guaranteed Republicans areas that help fuel Nixon and Reagan’s victories of a generation ago. Then in the administration of George H.W. Bush it all changed. The Republicans stopped focusing on economic issues and became concerned with family values. Pat Buchanan’s 1992 Republican Convention speech turned off many Suburbanites who didn’t want the government to lecture them on morality.

The Democratic party saw this opportunity and starting with Bill Clinton, began to run as economic and fiscal conservatives. It worked and beginning in 1992, the suburbs began to slip from the Republicans’ grasp. In 1994, the suburbs went back to the GOP but when Monica Lewinsky and morality became what the GOP was about, they swung to the Democrats who ran Blue Dogs. Bush ran on Compassionate Conservatism in 2000 which had little to do with economic conservatism. It was Progressive style government with a focus on morality and family values, issues most suburbanites could care less about. This was part of the reason Bush lost the popular vote in 2000, as districts that went for Eisenhower, Nixon, Ford and Reagan went to Gore. In the 2000’s the Bush administration did nothing to win back these voters. Then in 2008 Barack Hussein Obama won the suburbs and there was talk of a permanent Democratic majority.

That was then, this is now! The mask has come off the Democrats and their Totalitarian Progressive agenda. The Tea Party focus on economic and fiscal issues are resonating for suburbanites. For the first time in nearly a generation, many suburbs are set to come back to the Republican party. The reason, the economy sucks and the Left has no answers!

The Paisley Shop and Genes Urban Baby Boutique sit empty along a stretch of Lancaster Avenue in Wayne, Pennsylvania, where the median home price is more than $600,000.

The vacant storefronts in the Delaware County town serve as a reminder that not even the affluent Main Line suburbs by the Schuylkill River northwest of Philadelphia are immune to the economic pressures afflicting the rest of the U.S.

“It’s hard to get business,” said Donna Martella, 46, who owns Beethoven Wraps, a gift and gourmet food shop down the street from the two shuttered stores.

Philadelphia’s once reliably Republican suburbs, which have shifted course in recent years to provide decisive support for Democrats, from Governor Ed Rendell to President Barack Obama, are in play again this year.

Read the rest: Suburban Voters Sour on Obama, Threatening Democrats’ Hold on U.S. House

A bad economy is making many suburbanites come back to their ancestral home in the Republican party. These are people who are economic and fiscal conservatives. They are soccer moms, Reagan Democrats and small businessman. Their main concerns are economic opportunity, strong national defense, Islamic colonization, crime and good governance. Suburbanites are people who just want to be left alone and don’t to be lectured about Family values from the Right or the Left’s cultural transformative Progressive agenda. In other words, it’s all about the economy and safety for these voters.

This is not a Social Conservative vs. Economic Conservative argument. Candidates like Marco Rubio and Portman are Pro Life, but their focus is on economic and security issues. To keep the suburbs, the GOP should focus on economic and fiscal issues. A good economy solves many social ills as more money in people’s pockets means less stress.  A good economy leads to more families staying intact and a better society. As Carville said, “It’s the economy stupid”! He was right and we need to remember this. The Suburbs are the GOP’s for the taking. The question is, can we keep them? We can if we focus on pocket book issues.

Election Update:  The senate is now back in play despite the fact that Fiorina is fading in California and Coon’s lead in Delaware. Republican John Raese now leads Gov. Joe Manchin in the West Virginia Senate race. In an example of the Suburbs returning to the GOP, Linda McMahon is now within 3 of AG. Richard Blumenthal in Connecticut . Republicans used to own this state back in the Eisenhower, Nixon and Regan days. They can win here again and Linda might just pull it out.

Keep your fingers crossed and vote!