► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Education’

Why People Didn’t Trust Obama to Address Their Kids

by tqcincinnatus ( 81 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama at September 8th, 2009 - 6:57 pm

I was going to write a longer post about this earlier today, but Ace over at Ace of Spades HQ already covered it,

A very big part of the resistance to this speech is the double standard. And this is important, and not mere grousing. All conservatives know that there would not only be an opt-out if, say, President Bush the Younger had given this speech, but that it would barley have been shown at all in the first place.

The sensitivities of liberal parents would have been respected. Not just respected — those sensitivities would have been dominant, blocking out coverage except for in a small fraction of schools.

On the other hand — Obama.

Now, what the liberal/governmental establishment wants to tell us here is that we are second class citizens. We have some political rights, but not nearly the full panoply of rights enjoyed by liberals.

And we reject that.

We. Reject. That.

And we’re not “crazy” or “stupid” to do so. We are simply tired of the liberal/bureaucratic establishment treating us like second-class citizens of no importance and no account, and of arrogantly treating us as children in constant need of their sage wisdom, lecturing, and hectoring.

Not having it.

We can’t stop the liberal/bureaucratic establishment from attempting to treat us like sub-citizens. But we sure the hell can refuse to endorse that attempted classification by acquiescing to it.

Compare… Universities receiving federal funds forbidding military recruiters on campus, in direct violation of (IIRC) the Solomon Amendment.

Oh, that’s different. Liberal sensibilities are offended here, so they’re allowed to break the law and continue receiving their federal dollars.

But if the DoE spreads “preparatory materials” which include the suggestion that students write letters to themselves as to how they can “help the President” (not help America; not help themselves or their families; help the president, this president), that’s fine and dandy.

This president created a cult of personality which infected a substantial number of adults as it is. And conservatives are bit reluctant to see that cult of personality imposed on impressionable children? Their own children?

Stupid? Crazy?

How about we, like liberals, jealously guard our rights and wish to be free from the coercive power of the state?

Oh, right — dissent is only patriotic when liberals are dissenting.

Exactly.  The point to all this is not that people thought Obama was going to hypnotise their kids and turn them into zombies or robots or anything.  It’s simply the principle of the matter.  Why do we need the President lecturing our kids, anywise?  PARENTS are the ones who should be determining the course of their childrens’ lives, not the President.  And we certainly don’t need schools training our kids on how we can help “the President.”   The President’s “values” are no better than anyone else’s, and are in fact worse than most.  There’s no reason why parents should be considered “stupid” for not wanting him to impart those values to their kids. 

Face it – there’s just something more than a little bit creepy about President Obama.  He’s the kind of guy that I’d teach my kids not to take candy from.  No robotics.  No zombification.  Just the fact that he’s odd.  And manipulative.  And untrustworthy.  And lies in a bald-faced manner. 

For what it’s worth, the actual speech was plain vanilla.  My main qualm with what Obama actually said is how useless it really was.  We need to have a nationwide Presidential address to tell kids to not drop out of school?  To study hard?  To listen to what adults in authority say?   Great.  People either already have that covered, or they don’t.  This is the same thing Bill Cosby’s been telling inner city kids for years.   If education is so important, than stop wasting the kids’ time and let them get back to learning how to recycle and put condoms on bananas and all the other stuff they’re covering in the publik skools. 

Sorry lefties, the issue isn’t paranoia, but it IS about trust.  And Obama simply hasn’t earned it.

One of the Reasons Why We’ll be Homeschooling

by tqcincinnatus ( 119 Comments › )
Filed under Academia, Education at August 12th, 2009 - 3:37 pm

Because (once again) empirical evidence shows that on average, homeschooled kids blow public schooled kids out of the water.  Check out these results from the latest aggregated analysis of homeschoolers vs. public school kids, with results normed for PSKs.

Drawing from 15 independent testing services, the Progress Report 2009: Homeschool Academic Achievement and Demographics included 11,739 homeschooled students from all 50 states who took three well-known tests—California Achievement Test, Iowa Tests of Basic Skills, and Stanford Achievement Test for the 2007–08 academic year. The Progress Report is the most comprehensive homeschool academic study ever completed.

Overall the study showed significant advances in homeschool academic achievement as well as revealing that issues such as student gender, parents’ education level, and family income had little bearing on the results of homeschooled students.

National Average Percentile Scores
Subtest Homeschool Public School
Reading 89 50
Language 84 50
Math 84 50
Science 86 50
Social Studies 84 50
Corea 88 50
Compositeb 86 50
a. Core is a combination of Reading, Language, and Math.
b. Composite is a combination of all subtests that the student took on the test.

There was little difference between the results of homeschooled boys and girls on core scores.

Boys—87th percentile
Girls—88th percentile

Household income had little impact on the results of homeschooled students.

$34,999 or less—85th percentile
$35,000–$49,999—86th percentile
$50,000–$69,999—86th percentile
$70,000 or more—89th percentile

The education level of the parents made a noticeable difference, but the homeschooled children of non-college educated parents still scored in the 83rd percentile, which is well above the national average.

Neither parent has a college degree—83rd percentile
One parent has a college degree—86th percentile
Both parents have a college degree—90th percentile

Whether either parent was a certified teacher did not matter.

Certified (i.e., either parent ever certified)—87th percentile
Not certified (i.e., neither parent ever certified)—88th percentile

Parental spending on home education made little difference.

Spent $600 or more on the student—89th percentile
Spent under $600 on the student—86th percentile

The extent of government regulation on homeschoolers did not affect the results.

Low state regulation—87th percentile
Medium state regulation—88th percentile
High state regulation—87th percentile

[snip]

In short, the results found in the new study are consistent with 25 years of research, which show that as a group homeschoolers consistently perform above average academically. The Progress Report also shows that, even as the numbers and diversity of homeschoolers have grown tremendously over the past 10 years, homeschoolers have actually increased the already sizeable gap in academic achievement between themselves and their public school counterparts-moving from about 30 percentile points higher in the Rudner study (1998) to 37 percentile points higher in the Progress Report (2009).

As mentioned earlier, the achievement gaps that are well-documented in public school between boys and girls, parents with lower incomes, and parents with lower levels of education are not found among homeschoolers. While it is not possible to draw a definitive conclusion, it does appear from all the existing research that homeschooling equalizes every student upwards. Homeschoolers are actually achieving every day what the public schools claim are their goals—to narrow achievement gaps and to educate each child to a high level.

Let’s keep in mind that what was being compared here was performance on standardised testing that is normative for public school kids at various grade levels.  The homeschooled kids were not taking special or different tests – these numbers are direct comparisons between homeschool and public school academic preparation – this is all apples with apples stuff.

Several choice gems I would pull out from this data:

1) All of the usual excuses used by politicians, bureaucrats, teachers’ union representatives and the like as to why homeschooling should be heavily regulated (with a view towards making it so onerous that no one will do it) appear to be completely bogus.  The parent being a credentialed teacher appears to have no effect on academic performance vs. non-credentialed people teaching their kids.  Government regulation doesn’t seem to affect quality of education at all.  Even the education level of the parents appears to be a very small effect, and a lack of college degrees on the part of both parents still produces homeschooled kids who far exceed public school peers. 

2) Spending per students appears to have minimal impact.  The same can likely be said for public schools, which is why (as decades of experience ought to show us) you can increase public education spending all you want, and reap almost no benefits in increased academic performance.

3) Homeschooled kids, on average, scored at the 86% percentile in science, a little over a full standard deviation better than public school kids.  It must kill the lefties and evolutionuts and whatnot to see all these dumb, ignorant, redneck hillbilly homeschooled kids learning about creation, and blowing away the PSKs being indoctrinated into the Church of Darwin.

Given the religious circles I travel in, I know quite a number of homeschoolers.  Almost without exception, these kids are bright, eager to learn, happy, sociable, and successful.  They stack up very favourably to the public school kids I routinely encounter in my area – and let’s keep in mind that the county I live in is urban/suburban, very liberal, well-educated, spends a ton on schools per pupil, has the reputation of being the best district in the state, etc. etc. 

Homeschooling is superior, in my opinion, because it allows you to tailor education to the child’s strengths, and allows you to better build them up in their weak areas, and can spend one-on-one time with each student.  The public school notion of cramming yea-so-many students into a classroom and educating them like this was still the early industrial age will hopefully go by the wayside sooner rather than later.