► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Federal Reserve’

The Fed goes 3rd World

by Phantom Ace ( 149 Comments › )
Filed under Economy, Socialism at November 3rd, 2010 - 6:30 pm

Barack Hussein Obama is usually called the first 3rd World President of America. Now it seems Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke is also joining the 3rd world bandwagon. He has announced a new plan to buy $600 Billion of US government debt. This is m just really printing money to liquidate debt. This tactic has failed everywhere it was tried. Many Latin American governments did this in the 80’s and the result was a lost decade that lead to increase poverty and hyperinflation. This is dangerous and shows the extent of the stagnant economy.

The Federal Reserve Wednesday unveiled a controversial new plan to buy U.S. Treasurys, hoping to spur growth in a disappointingly slow U.S. economy.

After two days of discussions, Fed officials decided to go ahead with a much anticipated program, saying they will buy $600 billion of U.S. government debt over the next eight months.

[….]

By buying government bonds, the Fed aims to keep long-term interest rates low, hoping it will lead consumers to spend and companies to invest more, thus helping to propel the economy forward. Short-term interest rates were slashed close to zero in Dec. 2008, so the Fed no longer has its traditional weapon to boost the economy.

Read the rest: Fed to Buy $600 Billion of Treasurys

This is 3rd world style economics and de facto currency devaluation. It’s a risky gimmick and one that has failed many times over.

Goldman Sachs Paulson Tourre Obama and Co.

by coldwarrior ( 35 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Economy, Politics, UK at April 21st, 2010 - 11:00 am

I do believe that we have the makings of a little scandal for our 3rd world President et al.

It goes like this:

The bank is accused by America’s financial watchdog, the Securities and Exchange Commission, of not disclosing the full facts about the CDO, which was named ABACUS 2007-AC1. Investors bought the CDO on the basis that the mortgages which made up the underlying investment would continue to perform — that people would make their monthly payments.

While some investors were buying the CDO, Goldman also had a client which was selling it — or shorting it. That was Paulson & Co, a New York-based hedge fund, which took a gloomy view of America’s housing market and therefore expected home owners to default.

Related Links

The fact that Paulson was shorting the CDO is not contentious. What the SEC hopes to prove is that Paulson significantly enhanced its chances of being right by helping to select which mortgages that went into ABACUS 2007-AC1. The SEC believes Paulson got a large chunk of poor quality mortgages put into the CDO. It points out that six months after the deal was concluded, 83 per cent of the underlying mortgage assets had been downgraded by the ratings agencies.

So, the first action from Goldman Sachs is to run away from the employee :

April 21 (Bloomberg) — Goldman Sachs Group Inc. said the U.S. fraud case against the firm hinges on the actions of the employee it placed on paid leave this week.

Fabrice Tourre, the 31-year-old Goldman Sachs executive director who was accused of misleading investors about a mortgage-linked investment in 2007, will also be de-registered from the Financial Services Authority, a spokeswoman at the firm in London said yesterday.

“It’s all going to be a factual dispute about what he remembers and what the other folks remember on the other side,” Greg Palm, Goldman Sachs’s co-general counsel, said in a call with reporters yesterday, without naming Tourre. “If we had evidence that someone here was trying to mislead someone, that’s not something we’d condone at all and we’d be the first one to take action.”

By characterizing the case as a dispute involving a single employee, Goldman Sachs may be taking its first steps to publically distance itself from Tourre in the case, some lawyers said. That could reduce bad publicity and ultimately make it easier for the company to settle the case.

Goldman Sachs may also want to separate itself from Tourre if it’s concerned he will cooperate with the SEC or implicate more senior employees, said Onnig Dombalagian, a professor at Tulane University Law School in New Orleans and former attorney fellow at the SEC.

Byron Georgiou, a member of a U.S. panel that’s investigating the financial crisis, said he doubts Goldman Sachs could make a convincing case that Tourre acted alone and without the full support of his superiors.

“It’s hard to imagine that there wasn’t some supervision of a 27-year-old, at that time, trader structuring a billion- dollar transaction on which Goldman made a $15 million fee,” Georgiou, who serves on the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, said in a Bloomberg Television interview.

(more…)

Union thug named Chairman of NY FED

by Phantom Ace ( 47 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Communism, Democratic Party, Liberal Fascism, Progressives at August 25th, 2009 - 6:57 am

Good morning everyone. I hope you all slept better than I did.

In a move showing the power and infiltration the Transnational Totalitarian Progressive Movement, a union leader has been appointed to head the NY Federal Reserve! This makes no sense. What does a union leader know about markets, other than blackmailing them? This is the equivalent of naming an Italian mobster or Colombian drug lord to the FBI.

The Federal Reserve chose a labor leader to succeed a former Goldman Sachs executive as the chairman of the Federal Reserve Board of New York’s private-sector board of directors.

Denis Hughes, president of the New York state branch of the AFL-CIO, had been serving as acting chairman of the New York Fed board since May, when Stephen Friedman stepped down from the position.

Read the rest.

This shows the stranglehold the Neo-Feudal Progressives have over our nation. Not only do they control the government, media, entertainment industry, education and corporations, but they also have a presence on the Federal Reserve. This cancer continues to expand in our nation and we must confront it!

DeMint Proposes Amendment to Audit the Federal Reserve

by tqcincinnatus ( 56 Comments › )
Filed under Economy, Politics at July 7th, 2009 - 6:31 pm

In a move that will surely have the Magnificent Idiot who runs LGF 1.0’s head exploding, conservative South Carolina Senator Jim DeMint has signed onto the movement in Congress to audit the federal reserve.

With well over 230 co-sponsors on both sides of the aisle in the House of Representatives, Texas Congressman Ron Paul’s effort to force an audit of the Federal Reserve is being led in the Senate by none other than South Carolina conservative Sen. Jim DeMint.

Last month, DeMint became the first Republican senator to support Senate Bill 604, the Federal Reserve Sunshine Act of 2009, and since then has talked extensively on radio and television about the importance of transparency with regard to the Fed. Yesterday, however, he took it a step further, attempting to attach the full text of S. 604 as an amendment to an appropriations bill, but the effort was blocked by Democratic Party leadership in the Senate, which refused to even allow a vote on the amendment.

Such a refusal was rationalized by the argument that DeMint was essentially attempting to legislate on an appropriations bill, a no-no which violates Senate Rule 16, which governs appropriations and amendments to general appropriations bills. DeMint, however, did not waver. He was prepared with a list of several other similar Government Accountability Office audits contained in the appropriations bill, rattled them off one-by-one, and pointed out that using the same argument advanced and embraced by Senate Democratic leadership moments earlier, each and every one of the GAO audits would also run afoul of Senate Rule 16.

By doing so, he forced Senate Democrats to essentially acknowledge that their objection to the amendment was not at all about procedure or Senate rules, but rather about an overt refusal to permit an audit of the organization so graciously and mysteriously assisting the elected left with the advancement of their agenda.

The Federal Reserve has failed to account for nine trillion dollars–that’s $9,000,000,000,000, or approximately $30,000 for every single living man, woman and child–but has never in its history been subject to an audit.

The American people deserve to know what’s going on, and how this opaque institution has squandered our currency and our future. I am delighted to know that Jim DeMint is spearheading this effort in the Senate, and I hope that Republicans ensure that the very same amendment is proposed alongside each and every piece of legislation possible until it is passed.

Click the link to see the video of Sen. DeMint on the floor of the Senate blasting the Democrats on this!

Now, I’m not a big fan of Ron Paul in the least.  I tend to look upon him as a largely benign whacko who keeps to himself mostly, but occasionally has an outburst that makes you wonder who forgot to put the padlock back on his door down in the basement.  Like he’s America’s Crazy Uncle, if you will.  On this issue, however, Ron Paul is absolutely, positively, dead-aim on the money, and I’m glad to see that this movement is actually gaining steam in our legislature.  It’s past time that the Fed was audited, and held accountable for the damage that it has systematically done to the US economy and the US dollar through its profligate monetary policy.

Of course, Charles over at 1.0 is sure to try to make hay of this, but I would really like to ask him: what rational person wouldn’t be in favour of auditing the Federal Reserve?   I mean, come on, the blasted thing is only America’s central bank, responsible for things like setting our interest rates, controlling the money supply, and influencing the rate of inflationary devaluation of our currency.  What right-minded person doesn’t think that a standing triennial audit of the Fed would simply be sound fiscal and public policy?  After all, the IRS can audit you and I for things a lot less shady than what the Fed routinely does with our money supply.   Why shouldn’t the Fed be held to at least some regulatory oversight?