► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Guantanamo’

President Obama channels his inner “Dorothy”

by Mojambo ( 237 Comments › )
Filed under Al Qaeda, Barack Obama, Hezballah, Islam, Islamic Terrorism, Islamists, September 11, Taliban at May 31st, 2013 - 2:30 pm

In 2008 President Bush spoke in front of the Israeli Parliament and told the story of a Republican Senator who said right after World War II broke out in 1939 “If only I had a chance to talk to Hitler”. Well Obama’s image of himself and ability in his abilities would make that Senator seem rather modest. For the record I always hated the John Lennon song “Imagine”.

by Charles Krauthammer

This war, like all wars, must end. That’s what history advises . . .”

— Barack Obama, May 23

Nice thought. But much as Obama would like to close his eyes, click his heels three times and declare the war on terror over, war is a two-way street.

That’s what history advises: Two sides to fight it, two to end it. By surrender (World War II), by armistice (Korea and Vietnam) or when the enemy simply disappears from the field (the Cold War).

Obama says enough is enough. He doesn’t want us on “a perpetual wartime footing.” Well, the Cold War lasted 45 years. The war on terror, 12 so far. By Obama’s calculus, we should have declared the Cold War over in 1958 and left Western Europe, our Pacific allies, the entire free world to fend for itself — and consigned Eastern Europe to endless darkness.

John F. Kennedy summoned the nation to bear the burdens of the long twilight struggle. Obama, agonizing publicly about the awful burdens of command — his command, which he twice sought in election — wants out. For him and for us.

[……..]

He admits that the AUMF establishes the basis both in domestic and international law to conduct crucial defensive operations, such as drone strikes. Why, then, abolish the authority to do what we sometimes need to do?

Because that will make the war go away? Persuade our enemies to retire to their caves? Stop the spread of jihadism?

This is John Lennon, bumper-sticker foreign policy — Imagine World Peace. Obama pretends that the tide of war is receding. But it’s demonstrably not. It’s metastasizing to Mali, to the Algerian desert, to the North African states falling under the Muslim Brotherhood, to Yemen, to the savage civil war in Syria, now spilling over into Lebanon and destabilizing Jordan. Even Sinai, tranquil for 35 years, is descending into chaos.

It’s not war that’s receding. It’s America. Under Obama. And it is precisely in the power vacuum left behind that war is rising. Obama declares Assad must go. The same wish-as-policy fecklessness from our bystander president. Two years — and 70,000 dead — later, Obama keeps repeating the wish even as the tide of battle is altered by the new arbiters of Syria’s future — Iran, Hezbollah and Russia. Where does every party to the Syrian conflict go on bended knee? To Moscow, as Washington recedes into irrelevance.

But the ultimate expression of Obama’s Dorothy Doctrine is Guantanamo. It must close. Must, mind you.

Okay. Let’s accept the dubious proposition that the Yemeni prisoners could be sent home without coming back to fight us. And that others could be convicted in court and put in U.S. prisons.

[……..]

Well, yes. That’s always been the problem with Gitmo. It’s not a question of geography. The issue is indefinite detention — whether at Gitmo, a Colorado supermax or St. Helena.

Can’t try ’em, can’t release ’em. Having posed the central question, what is Obama’s answer? “I am confident that this legacy problem can be resolved.”

That’s it! I kid you not. He’s had four-plus years to think this one through — and he openly admits he’s got no answer.

Because there is none. Hence the need for Gitmo. Other wars end, at which point prisoners are repatriated. But in this war, the other side has no intention of surrender or armistice. They will fight until the caliphate is established or until jihadism is as utterly defeated as fascism and communism. [……….]

Obama’s fantasies are twinned. He can no more wish away the detention than he can the war.

We were defenseless on 9/11 because, despite Osama bin Laden’s open written declaration of war in 1996, we pretended for years that no war against us had even begun. Obama would return us to pre-9/11 defenselessness — casting Islamist terror as a law-enforcement issue and removing the legal basis for treating it as armed conflict — by pretending that the war is over.

It’s enough to make you weep.

Read the rest – Obama’s Dorothy Doctrine

Obama’s Guantanamo obsession

by Mojambo ( 182 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Politics, Terrorism at January 8th, 2010 - 10:00 am

On today’s “Friday’s with the ‘hammer’”, Dr. K. examines Obama’s almost pathological obsession with closing Guantanamo. Obama’s decision to close it is based purely on left-wing politics and has nothing to do with the reality on the ground. If Guantanamo is a recruiting rally for jihadists around the world, then following the same  logic we never would have had the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, the U.S.S. Cole, the East African embassy’s bombings, the second World Trade Center bombings and scores of other Islamic attacks against the West since they all preceded Guantanamo.  Of course the Mumbai terror attacks in 2008 were due to Guantanamo right? /not. This desire to close Guantananamo is our government adopting the enemy’s narrative of what the battle is all about –it is about detention facilities, prisoners rights, water boarding,  and “why do they hate us?” foreign policy. We are no longer in the business of asserting America’s national will  and defeating our enemies no matter what the cost – instead we are international social workers dealing with the ”feelings” of our maniacal enemies. Elections have consequences!

by Charles Krauthammer

On Wednesday, Nigerian would-be bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab was indicted by a Michigan grand jury for attempted murder and sundry other criminal charges. The previous day, the State Department announced that his visa had been revoked. The system worked.

Well, it did for Abdulmutallab. What he lost in flying privileges he gained in Miranda rights. He was singing quite freely when seized after trying to bring down Northwest Flight 253 over Detroit. But the Obama administration decided to give him a lawyer and the right to remain silent. We are now forced to purchase information from this attempted terrorist in the coin of leniency. Absurdly, Abdulmutallab is now in control.

And this is no ordinary information. He was trained by al-Qaeda in Yemen, and just days after he was lawyered up and shut up, the United States was forced to close its embassy in Yemen because of active threats from the same people who had trained and sent Abdulmutallab.

This is nuts. Even if you wanted ultimately to try him as an ordinary criminal, he could have been detained in military custody — and thus subject to military interrogation — without prejudicing his ultimate disposition. After all, every Guantanamo detainee was first treated as an enemy combatant and presumably interrogated. But some (most notoriously Khalid Sheik Mohammed) are going to civilian trial. That determination can be made later.

————————————————————

Imagine that Guantanamo were to disappear tomorrow, swallowed in a giant tsunami. Do you think there’d be any less recruiting for al-Qaeda in Yemen, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, London?

Jihadism’s list of grievances against the West is not only self-replenishing but endlessly creative. Osama bin Laden’s 1998 fatwa commanding universal jihad against America cited as its two top grievances our stationing of troops in Saudi Arabia and Iraqi suffering under anti-Saddam sanctions.

Today, there are virtually no U.S. troops in Saudi Arabia. And the sanctions regime against Iraq was abolished years ago. Has al-Qaeda stopped recruiting? Ayman al-Zawahiri, al-Qaeda’s No. 2, often invokes Andalusia in his speeches. For those not steeped in the multivolume lexicon of Islamist grievances, Andalusia refers to Iberia, lost by Islam to Christendom — in 1492.

Read the rest here.

The Nine Accusations

by Kafir ( 175 Comments › )
Filed under Dhimmitude, Guest Post, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Progressives at December 19th, 2009 - 2:00 pm

Blogmocracy in Action!
Guest post by: NoThreat2U!


Atlasshrugs has posted a copy of “The Islamic Response to the Government’s Nine Accusations” against Khalid Sheikh Mohammed & Co. This is my response to them.

Why the Gitmo detainees should NOT be tried in a civilian court.

First, here is the list of charges:

1. Conspiracy
2. Attacking civilians
3. Attacking civilian objects
4. Deliberately causing grave bodily harm
5. Crimes in violation of the laws of war
6. Destroying property in violation of the laws of war
7. Highjacking and/or endangering an aircraft or vessel
8. Terrorism
9. Material support to terrorism

Now look at that list. Take your time. Read carefully.

When people are charged with crimes that “violate the law of war” should they not be tried by those who are in the know about those “laws of war”, i.e. Military tribunals??? If I were arrested for breaking and entering would it be fine to try me in a military tribunal?

Civilians are not educated in the ways of military law. They do not know what constitutes a violation of military law. I am not a lawyer, but I did play one at one time. There are clear deliniations between crimes that can be tried in Federal court as opposed to local courts.

By using terms like “war” and “civilians” they are clearly stating that this is not just a clear case of mass murder. If this is to be tried in civilian court, the charges should be just that…….Murder in the First. The government is trying to play down the severity of these crimes to make it seems as if it is just a “tiny minority of extremists” that caused it, not a large group involved in global jihad. Many will be fooled by this, I am not.

Also reading through this tripe, they take the time to bash Israel and call Americans terrorists for supporting Israel. This will turn out to be exactly what we feared: The Bush Administration and America herself are being put on trial. Their arguments make no sense what so ever.

This is huge but be sure to read the whole thing.

Detainees Shown CIA Officers’ Photos

by Kafir ( 199 Comments › )
Filed under Crime, Terrorism at August 20th, 2009 - 8:18 pm

Detainees Shown CIA Officers’ Photos
Justice Dept. Looking Into Whether Attorneys Broke Law at Guantanamo

The Justice Department recently questioned military defense attorneys at Guantanamo Bay about whether photographs of CIA personnel, including covert officers, were unlawfully provided to detainees charged with organizing the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, according to sources familiar with the investigation.

The photos were taken by researchers hired by the John Adams Project, a joint effort of the American Civil Liberties Union and the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, to support military counsel at Guantanamo Bay, according to the sources, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitive nature of the inquiry. It was unclear whether the Justice Department is also examining those organizations.

Both groups have long said that they will zealously investigate the CIA’s interrogation program at “black sites” worldwide as part of the defense of their clients. But government investigators are now looking into whether the defense team went too far by allegedly showing the detainees the photos of CIA officers, in some cases surreptitiously taken outside their homes.

Not good.