► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Healthcare’

Open Government Directive, except when its not.

by bar ( 45 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party at August 10th, 2009 - 1:29 pm

From the evil Whitey House. (Hat tip to Rev. Wright)

My Administration is committed to creating an unprecedented level of openness in Government.  We will work together to ensure the public trust and establish a system of transparency, public participation, and collaboration. Openness will strengthen our democracy and promote efficiency and effectiveness in Government.

Did I read that right, does that say “Public participation” and openness will only strengthen our democracy?

Public engagement enhances the Government’s effectiveness and improves the quality of its decisions. Knowledge is widely dispersed in society, and public officials benefit from having access to that dispersed knowledge.

Hey, there it is again, “public engagement” will only strengthen, yada, yada, yada…. I have a feeling that President Obama was only speaking about those who support his wacky ideas, all others just need to shut up and get out of the way.

Obama to Critics: Stop ‘Talking’ and ‘Get Out of the Way’ (around minute 4:25)

Related links:

Nancy Pelosi and Steny Hoyer call Anti-Obamacare Protests Un-American.

Talk About Astroturfing..

Neil Cavuto to Obama: Stop whining about criticism.

Right now we are taxed more heavily on items the government finds unhealthy, like tobacco and alcohol. It’s a form of behavior control called a “sin” tax.
With government healthcare you can be guaranteed higher taxes on those items and then food items the government finds unhealthy. Maybe even an over weight tax on over weight folks, like we do with trucks.

Adam Brodsky at the New York Post has a good article about the coming “health cops”.

Georgia Democrat Demonstrates his Aversion to Democracy

by tqcincinnatus ( 70 Comments › )
Filed under Democratic Party, Healthcare, Politics at August 9th, 2009 - 11:09 am

Uh oh, yet another crazy Democrat elected official goes off the deep end when questioned about the ObamaCare proposals currently before Congress.  And, as is getting to be typical for these Democrats, while going crazier than a rodent residing in an outdoor water closet, he still manages to try to make it look like it’s the doctor who’s out of line,

Tensions are running so high at town hall meetings that Rep. David Scott, a Georgia Democrat, yelled at a local doctor concerned about health care after mistaking him for an “astroturf” political operative looking for a fight.

Mr. Scott became visibly agitated when one of his constituents, a practicing doctor, asked a few questions about health care reform during a town hall meeting. The meeting was held to discuss a road project, but was opened up for questions near the end. That’s when Dr. Brian Hill stood up to speak.

Dr. Hill asked Mr. Scott why he was going to vote for a health care plan similar to that implemented in Massachusetts “that is shown not to work” and if he supported a government-provided health care insurance option.

The congressman replied by accusing the doctor of “hijacking” his event.

“I’m listening to my constituents, OK?” Scott said, “These are people who live in the 13th Congressional district, who vote in this district. That’s who I’ve got to respond to … So what you’ve got to understand, those of you who are here, who have taken and came and hijacked this event we dealing with here, this is not a health care event.”

“You chose to come and to do it on your own,” he yelled. “Not a single one of you had the decency to call my office and set up for a meeting.” He went on, in a threatening voice, “You want a meeting with me on health care, I’ll give it to you!”

The outburst is yet another example of how confrontational town hall meetings have become over recent weeks, as constituents are becoming more forthright in asking their elected representatives challenging questions. These actions and other forms of protest have been encouraged by limited government advocacy groups opposed to the stimulus package, the Democrats favored health care reforms and other big spending government proposals.

The White House has labeled these efforts “astroturf”, shorthand for fake grassroots. To combat these efforts, groups supporting these plans — such as Service Employees International Employees Union — have been appearing at these town halls as well, effectively creating local “showdowns” between opposing political powers.

Mr. Scott’s public tirade against the doctor was filmed by WXIA-TV News, a local NBC affiliate that confirmed the doctor lived in the congressman’s district in a follow-up interview.

The doctor told WXIA he wasn’t working for any outside causes and had called Mr. Scott’s office repeatedly, asking to speak with the congressman.

“I did not go to a meeting to create any problems, I went to the meeting to literally ask a question that I thought was very, very important for my patients,” he said.

Despite all the nonsense being peddled around by the MSM and left-wing bloggers, this is usually the way these town hall meetings work.  Concerned citizens show up, ask questions, and get shouted at by elected officials, when they’re not being beaten up by SEIU thugs. 

It must be a tremendously frustrating time to be a Democrat right now.  See, the plan was for all 1,000+  pages of Obamacare to have been rammed through the Congress and to the President’s waiting pen before the August recess.  This was supposed to be over and done by now.  It was all supposed to go so smoothly – write the bill and vote on it before anybody read it, before anybody had time to raise any opposition, before the people had time to figure out what was being shoved down their throats.   Obama wasn’t supposed to take any heat for this or lose points in the polls.  Congressmen weren’t supposed to actually have to answer any questions about the stupid thing.  No, it was perfect, until the wheels came off. 

And the Democrats’ response to all this has been – as is typical for those on the Left – whiny, petulent, childish, and completely inappropriate.

Yes, you heard me right – it’s the LEFT that has been completely inappropriate in all this, not the town hall protestors.

Obama and the Democrats, apparently believing their own propaganda, are in a state of disbelief that there could really be this much opposition to the nationalisation and destruction of our health care system.  So, in their narrow little minds, it’s obviously “astroturf” – fake grassroots opposition being ginned up by a few well-financed special interest groups.   Because the American people would never oppose the things that Obama and Co. know are best for them, like waiting lists, taxpayer-funded abortion, and “end of life” counselling.  It’s obviously all fake.

Except that it’s not.  The polls are showing how deeply unpopular ObamaCare is, and how it is becoming more so over time.  I’ve talked to people who I know were never political, and others who are generally center-left, and they’re vociferously against this thing.   People who I didn’t even know voted are majorly angry about this bill.  The anger level about ObamaCare is palpable, and it’s real.  If the Dems want to stay inside their self-contained fact space and ignore the reality out there on the ground, then they will suffer the consequences at the polls in November 2010 – and they’ll probably whine about “vote fraud” when it happens, too. 

Apparently, these Democrat Congressmen are still unclear on the concept of “representative government.”  And they obviously don’t have a clue what a town hall meeting is supposed to be.  Town hall meetings are for the citizens to air their concerns to their duly-elected representatives, not for the representatives to talk down at their constituents and lecture them on what they can and cannot think and speak about.  In that sense, it’s absolutely idiotic to talk about ObamaCare protestors “hijacking” these events.  Supposedly, the whole point to these events is for citizen protestors to air their grievances to their elected officials.  It’s that little thing called “freedom of assembly.”  It’s in the First Amendment.  You might have heard of it. 

But let’s face it, “democracy” and “freedom” have never been strong points for those on the Left, and it’s showing as their frustration level mounts.  Responding to Obama’s recent call to “get in their faces,” we see SEIU union thugs beating up American citizens in St. Louis and Tampa for having the temerity to oppose ObamaCare.  And of course, you have nimrods on the Left who are defending this, saying the protestors “were out of line” since they were being louder than usual.  Of course, that is typically not the case.  Usually, the protestors are simply asking the Lefties questions they don’t want to answer, and doing so in a  reasoned manner not unlike this doctor in Georgia.  But even in cases where protestors are being loud and raucous, guess what?  That’s part of free speech.  The First Amendment doesn’t guarantee the right only to speech for which you approve of the content and tone.  My goodness, you want raucous, try reading some of the things that were written and said by our Patriot forefathers back before the Revolution.  It makes anything done today look like a Quaker prayer meeting. 

But I guess only those on the Left are allowed to loudly protest something that has their blood boiling.  Which leads us back to the hypocrisy that characterizes the Left. 

And now, we see the President of the United States and his staff actually creating a website and email address to which other lefties can “snitch” on people who won’t get with the program.   In other words, they can send an email in to the White House to narc on people who are spreading “disinformation” about the health care proposals before Congress, a setup which is not unlike the anonymous snitching that people were encouraged to do in Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union.   To date, the White House has defended this program, despite the fact that it is completely illegal under the US Code.   It is telling that, to date, the Administration has been completely unforthcoming about what the “disinformation” being turned in even is. 

So no, I don’t think that the town hall protesters are at fault.  Who is at fault?  The Left.  The people who think being asked questions they don’t want to answer is “undemocratic.”  The people who think that citizen participation in the democratic process is “hijacking.”   The people who think that it’s perfectly legitimate to send in union thugs to bust heads on senior citizens concerned about the direction their health care will be taking.  The people who think they ought to be the only ones allowed to protest the actions of their government.  They people who think we’re “selfish” for wanting to keep our own hard-earned money instead of seeing it wasted on a health care boondoggle that will result in waiting lists, reduced quality of care, “end of life” counselling for grandma, and full funding of elective abortion with public funds.  The people who think that it would be even remotely acceptable to create a website encouraging citizens to anonymously “turn in” other citizens who hold differing political views. 

They – the Left – are the ones who ought to be ashamed of themselves.

Will Republicans snatch defeat from the jaws of victory?

by tqcincinnatus ( 46 Comments › )
Filed under Healthcare, Politics, Republican Party at July 28th, 2009 - 8:04 am

I can’t help but imagine that it’s tough being a Republican on Capitol Hill these days. After losing two elections in a row, the GOP found itself below 200 members in the House for the first time since 1994. In the Senate, the GOP has been reduced once again to super-minority status. A good deal of acrimonious commentary has been written back and forth within the conservative punditariat as to why this happened, but regardless, the GOP finds itself in the unenviable position of being not only a minority Party, but a completely powerless minority Party at that.

I happen to be one of those who think that the GOP lost the past two elections because it got away from its basic, foundational principles — principles that are represented by both fiscal and social conservatism. In short, the GOP drifted too far to the center and was punished by the voters for it. The GOP took its base and conservative-leaning independents for granted, and they did not come out in the numbers needed this time around to put McCain over the top. Eight years of massive social spending, prescription drug programs, No Child Left Behind, mounting deficits, etc. etc. destroyed the Republican Party’s reputation for fiscal responsibility. By driving off a portion of its core of most committed voters, the GOP sealed its own fate in 2008. If nothing else, we would hope that the Republican Party learned an important lesson from all of this.

The evidence is readily available to substantiate this reasoning. After all, we can all see the results from last November’s election — while McCain (the centrist) lost, socially conservative ballot initiatives on issues ranging from gay marriage to affirmative action to adoption by unmarried parents (understood to be about gays as well) won handily all across the country, even in neon Blue states like California. Poll after poll after poll taken since last November show increasing numbers of Americans self-identifying as conservative, supporting pro-life positions, opposing Obama’s economic policies across the board, and supporting common sense measures to end illegal immigration. The further Obama goes with his Marxist agenda of government nationalization of industry, increased taxation via Cap-and-Tax, and socializing our health care system, the lower his approval ratings drop.

None of this is a surprise — Obama didn’t win the election so much because the majority of people in this country really, really fell in love with socialism and thought it’d be great to go for it with both barrels blazing. Obama won for two reasons. One, he was able to deceptively portray himself a fiscal moderate-conservative, promising tax cuts to “95% of all Americans” and streamlining wasteful government spending — something which McCain, who had poo-pooed tax cuts until around the September before the election when he finally realized that the issue plays well, was unable to parry. Secondly, many people just didn’t like McCain. He didn’t appeal to crossover voters, and he especially didn’t appeal to the conservative base and likeminded independents who wanted less government and a stronger country. Post-election analyses seem to suggest that McCain actually drove off white voters — who tend to be the most conservative, and who still make up the large majority — especially in states like Ohio and Pennsylvania, where he could have really used them.

The short and simple interpretation of the data that we have on hand is that the majority of the people in this nation don’t want the left-wing agenda. They don’t want the government picking their pockets. They don’t want government destroying economic recovery. They don’t want the government facilitating the left-wing in imposing its radical social agenda onto us. They don’t want the government sliding in yet another tax under the radar, using the spurious notion of “man-made global warming” as an excuse. They don’t want the government destroying the health care system so that we have to ration care and so that our senior citizens will be denied the care that they disproportionately need.

Especially the last. By even bringing up the issue of socializing health care and establishing a “single-payer” system where health care resources suddenly become a much scarcer commodity overall, the Democrats and Obama are playing with political fire. Lest we forget, HillaryCare was one of the catalysts that gave the Republicans control of both houses of Congress in 1994. We’re already seeing opposition to the bill before Congress grow to such levels that support for it will be political suicide for many “Blue Dog” Democrats — and the bill’s barely two weeks old. The polls already show that a majority are against this health care “reform.” The longer the legislative process takes, the more people will read this bill, learn what it contains, and start hammering their Congressmen to vote “Nay” on it.

But this is where the typical Republican tin ear towards what is politically best for themselves — and us — could come into play. See, the Republicans in Congress, especially in the Senate, have a problem with maintaining control over their own Party. There are too many Republicans who like to play the “go-along-to-get-along” game, though the only place they typically go with the Democrats is over a barrel. Too many GOP elected officials pay far too much attention to what a hostile mainstream media says, and not enough to what their own base and to what the American people are saying. If they do this with respect to the health care bill before Congress, they will destroy a golden opportunity to get back into the good graces of the voters.

As Voice of America reports, Kent Conrad, the Democrat from North Dakota who chairs the Senate Budgetary Committee, has publicly admitted that the President’s Party does not have the votes needed to clear this bill through the Senate, despite holding a 60-seat supermajority. To pass it, they are acknowledging that they will need votes from the Republican minority. What does this mean? It means that there is at least one clown-car load of Democrats in the Senate who realize this bill is a loser, and who aren’t voting for it. It also means that — yet again — the Democrat leadership is hoping that enough Republican dupes will go along with the bill to save their bacon, as has already happened a number of times this session.

Politically speaking, that would be a tremendously bad thing for the Republican leadership to allow to happen. The Republican Party already has a (well-earned) “branding” problem that makes the public skeptical of its claims to fiscal responsibility. Being involved in passing a bill that will both socialize as well as destroy the best health care system in the world would not do anything to improve that image. Helping ObamaCare to become a reality would also give the Democrats impeccable political cover. After all, four years down the road when people are on three-year waiting lists to get heart surgery and the average life expectancy has dropped to the high 60s because senior citizens can’t get the care they need, why would the voters punish the Democrats specifically when it was Republicans who also helped to make the blasted thing a reality in the first place? Rather than blaming the Democrats and voting for the Republicans, voters will just despise both parties, but then vote their normal patterns.

The GOP needs to learn that you don’t earn political capital just because voters hate the other guy. You need to present a clear alternative and a clear program that makes you the attractive alternative. In today’s political climate, this should be a no-brainer for the GOP. Even if the Party won’t do the right thing because it’s the right thing to do, they should at least do it because it’s politically advantageous for them to do so. But it won’t happen unless the GOP leadership can get a handle on folks like Senators Collins, Snowe, Murkowski, and other Senate GOP “moderates.” They cannot let a few “mavericks” continue to destroy the image of the Party in the eyes of the people at large. This upcoming health care “reform” bill, so despised by the actual American people, will be a very important “make or break” opportunity for the GOP to show that it has turned from its wicked ways and gotten back onto the strait path of smaller government and fiscal responsibility.

AMA opposes Government Health Plan

by Phantom Ace ( 50 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Economy, Healthcare, Liberal Fascism at June 11th, 2009 - 6:34 am

The American Medical Association is opposing the idea of a government insurance plan. They are opposed to this because a government will lead to a collapse of private plans which will actually increase costs as taxpayers will absorb the blow.

Doctors’ Group Opposes Public Insurance Plan

WASHINGTON — As the health care debate heats up, the American Medical Association is letting Congress know that it will oppose creation of a government-sponsored insurance plan, which President Obama and many other Democrats see as an essential element of legislation to remake the health care system.

The opposition, which comes as Mr. Obama prepares to address the powerful doctors’ group on Monday in Chicago, could be a major hurdle for advocates of a public insurance plan. The A.M.A., with about 250,000 members, is America’s largest physician organization.

If the AMA opposes this plan, we should listen. These are doctors who work in the Health Care field, not in Washington that live in a theoretical world. The government will drive out doctors and nurses with this plan, thus leading us to have a 3rd World health-care industry.

Is health-care too expensive? Yes, absolutely, and reform is needed, but this is not the solution. I oppose it because if Obama wrecks the system, this will destroy the last industry in America where wages are still good and that gives people a middle class lifestyle. Then again, this might be the progressive-fascists real agenda. Destroy an industry so more people rely on government assistance. The march to Feudalism continues!