► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘History’

The Hunyani attack: “A Deafening Silence” –from The Osprey

by coldwarrior ( 89 Comments › )
Filed under Africa, African Liberation Movements, Assassinations, Crime, Guest Post, History, Terrorism at September 4th, 2010 - 2:00 pm

BLOGMOCRACY IN ACTION! This is a guest post form our own Osprey. Pamwe Chete!

The Hunyani attack: “A Deafening Silence”

Yesterday was the anniversary of the Hunyani disaster. On September 3rd, 1978, Rhodesian Airways flight 825, the 52 passenger Vickers Viscount Hunyani, flying from the popular Kariba Lake resort to Salisbury was shot down by ZIPRA guerillas with a Soviet-made Strela anti-aircraft missile. Most of those who survived the crash, including several children, were shot to death and bayonetted by the guerillas. 8 crash survivors, adults and children, were lucky enough to escape into the bush and were rescued by Rhodesian police and military forces the following day.

With the sole exception of the International Airline Pilots Association, there was no condemnation by the “international community” for this vicious attack on a civilian aircraft by the African Marxist “liberation forces”. Even from those who should have spoken out in the Western democracies, Britain and the United States, cowed by political correctness against giving what could be considered support of Ian Smith’s white minority government. Instead, there was only what the Dean of the Anglican Church in Rhodesia, the Very Reverend John da Costa, in a sermon to an overflow crowd memorial service at the Anglican Cathedral in Salisbury a few days later, termed “a deafening silence”.

“Nobody who holds sacred the dignity of human life can be anything but sickened at the events attending the crash of the Viscount Hunyani. Survivors have the greatest call on the sympathy and assistance of every other human being. The horror of the crash was bad enough, but that this should have been compounded by the murder of the most savage and treacherous sort leaves us stunned with disbelief and brings revulsion in the minds of anyone deserving the name “human”. This bestiality, worse than anything in recent history, stinks in the nostrils of heaven. But are we deafened by the voice of protest from nations which call themselves “civilised”? We are not. Like men in the story of the good Samaritan. They ‘pass by on the other side’. One listens for condemnation by Dr David Owen, himself a medical doctor, trained to help all in need. One listens, and the silence is deafening. One listens for loud condemnation by the President of the United States, himself a man from the Bible-Baptist belt , and once again the silence is deafening. One listens for condemnation by the Pope, by the Archbishop of Canterbury, by all who love the name of God. Again the silence is deafening. I do not believe in white supremacy. I do not believe in black supremacy either……The ghastliness of this ill-fated flight from Kariba will be burned upon our memories for years to come. For others far from our borders, it is an intellectual matter, not one which affects them deeply.”
A complete recording of Rev. da Costa’s sermon can be heard here.

In his own reaction to the attack, the Rhodesian folk singer John Edmond recorded the song, “You Ain’t No Hero”. (Warning:graphic images in youtube link of African Christian villagers maimed or killed by the “liberation forces” for “collaboration”.) While the song was specifically about the Hunyani attack, the lyrics could be applied anywhere, from Belfast to Sderot to the World Trade Center, that terrorists attack innocent civilians to advance their “cause”:

You ain’t no hero
When you kill a child and cannot cry
You ain’t no hero
When you shoot a liner from the sky
You ain’t no hero
When you’re preaching fear and hate
And you shy away from battle
With the soldiers of our state

Retaliation from the Rhodesian military was soon forthcoming, a daring cross border combined air and ground attack against the terrorist camps in Zambia, the storied “Green Leader” raid. We will examine that event in a future post.

*ADMIN addition: Background on Rhodesia/Zimbabwe*

Islam and Genetic Damage

by 1389AD ( 190 Comments › )
Filed under India, Islam, Pakistan, Science, Spain, UK at August 27th, 2010 - 2:00 pm

Islam may be harmful to your health…

Back in February, 2008, I blogged about Islam and Brain Damage. I offered evidence that the Islamic custom of proving one’s piety by slamming one’s head into the floor is dangerous to one’s mental and physical health. That blog post continues to draw occasional comments and considerable traffic.

Smiley bashing head against wall

The unwisdom of this activity should be so obvious as to need no explanation, but apparently those who have already spent their lives bashing their heads into the floor may be impervious to further attempts at reason.

…and to the health of your offspring

In a nutshell, the problem is that both the cultural traditions in Islamic lands, and Islam itself, encourage inbreeding.

Suffice it to say that there are excellent reasons why the descendents of the royal families of Europe no longer intermarry as they once did, and why some States in the USA ban first-cousin marriage. The Orthodox Christian Church takes it further, prohibiting marriage between first or second cousins. Yet cousin marriage remains customary, not only within Muslim countries, but also among expatriate Muslim populations elsewhere.

Portrait of Charles II of Spain by Juan de Miranda Carreno

Charles II of Spain, mentioned in the article below, suffered throughout his short life from severe mental and physical disabilities.

Discover: The individual & social risks of cousin marriage

Genealogy of Charles II of Spain - click for larger image

…What’s the negative? Pedigree collapse. I’ve been talking about marriages between first cousins throughout this post, but that’s really a small issue next to this. Even first cousin marriages produce individuals with a fair amount of inbreeding. I ran a test for runs of homozygosity in my 23andMe genetic profile and I got 3 hits, while a friend whose parents are first cousins got ~70 (the parameters for the test aren’t important, just giving a relative sense). For inbred clans it gets much worse because people are related in many different ways, and genetically are far closer than first cousins. That is what happened to the Spanish Hapsburgs. As you can see from the pedigree of Charles II his parents were closer than typical first cousins. The Samaritans of Israel are a religious sect which seems to be going through pedigree collapse. Some of them are proactively marrying outsiders to prevent their extinction through high infant mortality rates. Others, “traditionalists,” oppose exogamy because intermarriage within the group is the custom, and diseases are God’s will.

The Samaritans are an extreme case. But we may be seeing a thousand Samaritan flowers blooming across the Middle East. From what I know cousin marriage in the Middle East is not limited to Muslims, Christians and Jews practice it as well. But among many Muslims it has some cachet because of particular hadiths which point to this practice as preferred. Setting religion aside, there are also social reasons why this practice is common. As I noted above sex segregation means that you may not know women outside of your family well, and in some societies where veiling is practiced it may be that you do not see many women you are not related to (even if veiling occurs at puberty, you may have seen your cousin at a younger age). Marriages are bonds which may tie a family into one operational social unit, and so produce a powerful inbred clan. This illustrates the cross-purposes of a cultural unit of selection vs. the individual unit of selection. In a society where clan vs. clan competitions are critical sorting mechanisms consanguineous marriages may serve as beneficial cross-linkages. Balanced against this of course are marriages across clans. On an individual level a first cousin marriage reduces the reproductive fitness, but higher potential reproductive fitness of two individuals who have no social support because of ostracism may be a moot point.

Read the rest.

A scandalous documentary

The greatest taboo: One woman lifts the lid on the tragic genetic consequences of when first cousins marry

By Tazeen Ahmad
Last updated at 11:11 AM on 23rd August 2010

Sitting in the family living room, I watched tensely as my mother and her older brother signed furiously at each other. Although almost completely without sound, their row was high-octane, even vicious.

Three of my uncles were born deaf but they knew how to make themselves heard. Eventually, my uncle caved in and fondly put his arm around his sister.

My mum has always had a special place in her family because she was the first girl to live beyond childhood. Five of her sisters died as babies or toddlers. It was not until many years later that anyone worked out why so many children died and three boys were born deaf.

Today there is no doubt among us that this tragedy occurred because my grandparents were first cousins.

My grandmother’s heart was broken from losing so many daughters at such a young age. As a parent, I can’t imagine what she went through.

My family is not unique. In the UK more than 50 per cent of British Pakistanis marry their cousins – in Bradford that figure is 75 per cent – and across the country the practice is on the rise and also common among East African, Middle-Eastern and Bangladeshi communities.

Back when my grandparents were having children, the med­ical facts were not established. But today in Britain alone there are more than 70 scientific studies on the subject.

We know the children of first cousins are ten times more likely to be born with recessive genetic disorders which can include infant mortality, deafness and blindness.

We know British Pakistanis constitute 1.5 per cent of the population, yet a third of all children born in this country with rare recessive genetic diseases come from this community.

Despite overwhelming evidence, in the time I spent filming Dispatches: When Cousins Marry, I felt as if I was breaking a taboo rather than addressing a reality. Pakistanis have been marrying cousins for generations.

Read the rest.

The documentary itself cannot be embedded here on Blogmocracy.
Click here to view it on Gates of Vienna.

Widespread effects of inbreeding

The effects of inbreeding are not limited to the incidence of obvious birth defects. Even those offspring who do not have overt congenital defects will, on the average, have lower intelligence and less ability to deal with life in the modern world.

Muslim Inbreeding: Impacts on intelligence, sanity, health and society

EuropeNews 9 August 2010
By Nicolai Sennels

Massive inbreeding within the Muslim culture during the last 1.400 years may have done catastrophic damage to their gene pool. The consequences of intermarriage between first cousins often have serious impact on the offspring’s intelligence, sanity, health and on their surroundings

The most famous example of inbreeding is in ancient Egypt, where several Pharaonic dynasties collapsed after a couple of hundred years. In order to keep wealth and power within the family, the Pharaohs often married their own sister or half-sister and after a handful of generations the offspring were mentally and physically unfit to rule. Another historical example is the royal houses of Europe where royal families often married among each other because tradition did not allow them to marry people of non-royal class.

The high amount of mentally retarded and handicapped royalties throughout European history shows the unhealthy consequences of this practice. Luckily, the royal families have now allowed themselves to marry for love and not just for status.

The Muslim culture still practices inbreeding and has been doing so for longer than any Egyptian dynasty. This practice also predates the world’s oldest monarchy (the Danish) by 300 years.

A rough estimate shows that close to half of all Muslims in the world are inbred: In Pakistan, 70 percent of all marriages are between first cousins (so-called “consanguinity”) and in Turkey the amount is between 25-30 percent (Jyllands-Posten, 27/2 2009 More stillbirths among immigrants”

Statistical research on Arabic countries shows that up to 34 percent of all marriages in Algiers are consanguine (blood related), 46 percent in Bahrain, 33 percent in Egypt, 80 percent in Nubia (southern area in Egypt), 60 percent in Iraq, 64 percent in Jordan, 64 percent in Kuwait, 42 percent in Lebanon, 48 percent in Libya, 47 percent in Mauritania, 54 percent in Qatar, 67 percent in Saudi Arabia, 63 percent in Sudan, 40 percent in Syria, 39 percent in Tunisia, 54 percent in the United Arabic Emirates and 45 percent in Yemen (Reproductive Health Journal, 2009 Consanguinity and reproductive health among Arabs.).

A large part of inbred Muslims are born from parents who are themselves inbred – which increase the risks of negative mental and physical consequenses greatly.
…
Low intelligence

Several studies show that children of consanguineous marriages have lower intelligence than children of non-related parents. Research shows that the IQ is 10-16 points lower in children born from related parents and that abilities related to social behavior develops slower in inbred babies:

“Effects of parental consanguinity on the cognitive and social behavior of children have been studied among the Ansari Muslims of Bhalgapur, Bihar.

IQ in inbred children (8-12 years old) is found to be lower (69 in rural and 79 in suburban populations) than that of the outbred ones (79 and 95 respectively). The onset of various social profiles like visual fixation, social smile, sound seizures, oral expression and hand-grasping are significantly delayed among the new-born inbred babies.” (Indian National Science Academy, 1983 Consanguinity Effects on Intelligence Quotient and Neonatal Behaviours of nsari Muslim Children“).

The article “Effects of inbreeding on Raven Matrices” concludes that “Indian Muslim school boys, ages 13 to 15 years, whose parents are first cousins, were compared with classmates whose parents are genetically unrelated on the Raven Standard Progressive Matrices, a nonverbal test of intelligence. The inbred group scored significantly lower and had significantly greater variance than the non-inbred group, both on raw scores and on scores statistically adjusted to control for age and socioeconomic status.” (Behaviour Genetics, 1984).

Another study shows that the risk of having an IQ lower than 70 goes up 400 percent from 1.2 percent in children from normal parents to 6.2 percent in inbred children: “The data indicate that the risk for mental retardation in matings of normal parents increases from 0.012 with random matings to 0.062 for first-cousin parentage.” (Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 1978 Effect of inbreeding on IQ and mental retardation“). The study A study of possible deleterious effects of consanguinity concludes, that “The occurrence of malignancies, congenital abnormalities, mental retardation and physical handicap was significantly higher in offspring of consanguineous than non-consanguineous marriages.”

Read it all.


Also see:

The Mountain of Names (Geneology)


Grover C. Shaible’s Contribution to the World

by Bunk Five Hawks X ( 278 Comments › )
Filed under History, Humor, Open thread, Technology, Weapons at August 8th, 2010 - 10:00 pm

I hope that I shall never see
A raygun as in Figure 3;
For if I do I must decide,
To laugh at him, or run and hide.

I wouldn’t want this to be aimed in my direction. I don’t want my atoms dispersed and rearranged as little stinky catfood pellets, but Mr. Shaible scoffed at all the naysayers and went ahead to patent this evil Weapon of Mass Destruction in 1953.

Previously posted here. More fascinating patents are archived in the Patent Room. Other captivating information will undoubtedly be revealed in tonight’s Overnight Open Thread.

Saturday Morning Lecture: Tropical Disease Guides the Hand of History.

by coldwarrior ( 11 Comments › )
Filed under History, Open thread, saturday lecture series, Transportation at July 31st, 2010 - 8:00 am

This was a lecture that i delivered some years ago at a local university for 20th Century America:

In the late 19th century and early 20th Century America was standing on the edge of becoming a World Power. War with Spain and American expansion into the Gulf of Mexico and Pacific Ocean was driven by the Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine, a belief in Manifest Destiny, and, in a historical twist of fate, a plasmodium and a flavivirus epidemic. The Malaria and Yellow Fever that stopped the French from building the Panama Canal were in turn stopped by the Americans who finished the projects and controlled the Canal Zone for 70 plus years thereby controlling rapid access between the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans.

President T Roosevelt was an Imperialist to the core. He saw American foreign policy as activist. He viewed the World in two ways. The first was the civilized world. These were industrial and were predominantly white. Then there was the uncivilized world. These produced raw materials and were non-white, Latin, or Slavic. Japan was considered civilized because they were industrial. The civilized world had the right to intervene with the uncivilized nations in order to preserve order and stability.

This attitude can be seen in the Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine. This states that America had the right and the duty to not only oppose European intervention in the American hemisphere (aka the American Lake) but to also intervene when a country proved unable to maintain order and national sovereignty on their own.

This came out of the German, English, and Italian blockade on Venezuela in 1902. Venezuela was having problems paying back international loans so they sent their navies. The US Navy convinced the Europeans to leave. The Corollary was used again and again as justification for action. However, the most creative use of the Roosevelt Corollary was over the Panama Canal.

The geography of Central America combined with the time it takes to sail around South America to get from the Atlantic to the Pacific made an all water canal on the Isthmus of Panama the obvious choice to Charles V, HRE and King of Spain as early as 1534. He ordered a survey of the area so that perhaps a canal could be built so that the Spanish ships could bet from Spain to Peru more rapidly. This would give the Spanish a great tactical and military advantage over the Portuguese.

Other attempts and surveys continued until the French began a serious dig in 1880. The plan was driven by the success of the Suez Canal. The French had control of a strip of land on the Isthmus of Panama. Unfortunately for the French, Panama is a jungle. The Suez canal is in a desert. The Panamanian jungle diseases would stop the French in their tracks.

The French did not have an adequate understanding of disease vectors, nor did they study the geography and hydrology of the area enough to ensure success. Malaria, Yellow Fever, and cave-ins form rain hampered and eventually halted French operations in Panama. The hos[pitals themselves were aiding the diseases. The French had the posts of the be sitting in bowls of water to keep the crawling insects away from the patients. These bowls of water were the perfect breeding ground for the mosquitos that carry Yellow Fever and Malaria. The French abandoned Panama in 1893 leaving 22,000 dead workers, almost all of the deaths were from Malaria and Yellow Fever..

“The basic elements of the life cycle are the same for all Plasmodium sp. transmission begins when a female Anopheles mosquito feeds on a person with malaria and ingests blood containing gametocytes. During the following 1 to 2 wk, gametocytes inside the mosquito reproduce sexually and produce infective sporozoites. When the mosquito feeds on another human, sporozoites are inoculated and quickly reach the liver and infect hepatocytes. The parasites mature into tissue schizonts within hepatocytes. Each schizont produces 10,000 to 30,000 merozoites, which are released into the bloodstream 1 to 3 wk later when the hepatocyte ruptures. Each merozoite can invade an RBC and there transform into a trophozoite. Trophozoites grow and develop into erythrocyte schizonts; schizonts produce further merozoites, which 48 to 72 h later rupture the RBC and are released in plasma. These merozoites then rapidly invade new RBCs, repeating the cycle. Some trophozoites develop into gametocytes, which are ingested by an Anopheles mosquito. They undergo sexual union in the gut of the mosquito, develop into oocysts, and release infective sporozoites, which migrate to the salivary glands. Manifestations common to all forms of malaria include fever and rigor—the malarial paroxysm, anemia, jaundice, splenomegaly, epatomegaly The malarial paroxysm coincides with release of merozoites from ruptured RBCs. The classic paroxysm starts with malaise, abrupt chills and fever rising to 39 to 41° C, rapid and thready pulse, polyuria, headache, myalgia, and nausea. After 2 to 6 h, fever falls, and profuse sweating occurs for 2 to 3 h, followed by extreme fatigue. Fever is often hectic at the start of infection. In established infections, malarial paroxysms typically occur about every 2 to 3 days depending on the species; intervals are not rigid. Splenomegaly usually becomes palpable by the end of the first week of clinical disease but may not occur with P. falciparum. The enlarged spleen is soft and prone to traumatic rupture. Splenomegaly may decrease with recurrent attacks of malaria as functional immunity develops. After many bouts, the spleen may become fibrotic and firm or, in some patients, becomes massively enlarged (tropical splenomegaly). Hepatomegaly usually accompanies splenomegaly”1.

“Yellow fever is a mosquito-borne flavivirus infection endemic in tropical South America and sub-Saharan Africa. Symptoms may include sudden onset of fever, relative bradycardia, headache, and, if severe, jaundice, hemorrhage, and multiple organ failure. Diagnosis is with viral culture and serologic tests. Treatment is supportive. Prevention involves vaccination and mosquito control. Infection ranges from asymptomatic (in 5 to 50% of cases) to a hemorrhagic fever with 50% mortality. Incubation lasts 3 to 6 days. Onset is sudden, with fever of 39 to 40° C, chills, headache, dizziness, and myalgias. The pulse is usually rapid initially but, by the 2nd day, becomes slow for the degree of fever (Faget’s sign). The face is flushed, and the eyes are injected. Nausea, vomiting, constipation, severe prostration, restlessness, and irritability are common. Mild disease may resolve after 1 to 3 days. However, in moderate or severe cases, the fever falls suddenly 2 to 5 days after onset, and a remission of several hours or days ensues. The fever recurs, but the pulse remains slow. Jaundice, extreme albuminuria, and epigastric tenderness with hematemesis often occur together after 5 days of illness. There may be oliguria, petechiae, mucosal hemorrhages, confusion, and apathy. Disease may last > 1 wk with rapid recovery and no sequelae. In the most severe form (called malignant yellow fever), delirium, intractable hiccups, seizures, coma, and multiple organ failure may occur terminally. During recovery, bacterial super-infections, particularly pneumonia, can occur2.”

In 1898, 5 years after the French quit Panama, with the United States and Spain on the brink of war, the Oregon — the U.S. Navy’s first true battleship — took 67 days to rush back from San Francisco to the Caribbean. That event stuck in the mind of Theodore Roosevelt. When William McKinley’s assassination made TR president in 1901, he vowed to build a canal — not for commerce, like the French, but to ensure that U.S. naval power could dominate two oceans. He favored Nicaragua at first but abruptly changed his mind to Colombian-owned Panama when the French made it known they were willing to unload their partly dug ditch at a bargain price of $40 million. A skeptical Congress was eventually swayed with a high-powered lobbying campaign by France’s former chief engineer Philippe Bunau-Varilla, who’d made it his mission to see the project completed. At the last moment, Colombia nearly threw a wrench in the deal by insisting that the United States pay for the right to dig on Colombian soil, but the White House and the Panama Canal lobby were not to be stopped. The Columbian diplomats in Washington under great pressure agreed to a $10 million dollar payment and an annual rent of $250,000. The Columbian Senate refused to ratify this agreement. They wanted $20 million plus. However, at the time the isthmus was part of Columbia. What the Columbians did not realize was that they were on the uncivilized list and the Roosevelt Corollary would soon be visited upon their country.

“We were dealing with a government of irresponsible bandits,” Roosevelt stormed. “I was prepared to . . . at once occupy the Isthmus anyhow, and proceed to dig the canal. But I deemed it likely that there would be a revolution in Panama soon.”

Teddy was right. The chief engineer of the New Panama Canal Company, Philippe Bunau-Varilla organized a local revolt in November 1903. Roosevelt immediately sent the battleship Nashville and a detachment of marines to Panama to support the new government. 1 Person and one donkey were killed in the ‘prevention’. The new, independent nation of Panama quickly gave the United States the go-ahead. The rebels gladly accepted Roosevelt’s $10 million offer, and they gave the United States complete control of a ten-mile wide canal zone. The Americans, however, could only use a portion of what the French had excavated. Over 48,000,000 cubic yards of earth moved through French back-breaking labor was useless as the Americans began to dig.

At first it was to be built in the lowlands in Nicaragua, this would cost $109 million. This would have prevented the need for a lock system but would require a much longer channel. The French had attempted to dig through Panama some years earlier but yellow fever and malaria proved too much for the laborers, the French sold the holdings for $40 million. To fix that situation, TR sent down Dr. William Gorgas to drain the swamps thereby getting rid of the mosquitoes; the mosquitoes Aedes aegypti and Anopheles are the carriers of yellow fever and malaria respectively.

In 1900, U.S. Army tropical disease expert Walter Reed proved what previous scientists had suspected — that the fever was transmitted not by poor sanitation or contact with infected people, but by certain species of female mosquitoes. The following year, in fever-ridden Havana, a Reed protégé named Col. William C. Gorgas staged a successful campaign to eradicate the mosquitoes; yellow fever disappeared.

Gorgas was assigned to Panama but ran into stiff resistance at first from budget-conscious bureaucrats — who thought, incredibly, that he wanted tons of old newspapers, which he needed to seal windows for fumigating, as reading material for fever patients. Finally, in April 1905, after the fever outbreak had killed 47 workers, Gorgas got the go-ahead and funding he needed. Over the next few months, he installed $90,000 worth of wire screens on windows and sent teams of health workers on a door-to-door search for mosquitoes and their eggs. They fumigated houses — several times if necessary — and enforced a ban on the old Panamanian custom of keeping water indoors in uncovered containers. They traced the movements of victims to determine where they’d been infected. By December, yellow fever had vanished from the Canal Zone And Malaria, as well as other tropical diseases, were greatly reduced.

The American canal builders started out almost as badly as the French: the first wave of laborers had to drive railroad spikes with axes because they hadn’t been given sledgehammers. The Roosevelt administration appointed the illustrious John Findley Wallace as head engineer. This former president of the American Society of Civil Engineers was accustomed to building low-stress projects in urban areas, and he left after just a year to take a job in the private sector.

His successor, John Stevens, lacked a college degree, but he was a rough-hewn outdoorsman who’d extended the Great Northern Railroad through the Rockies, using a mountain pass he himself had discovered. Stevens stopped digging and spent two years methodically building the infrastructure needed to stage the massive project — everything from sewers for Panama’s two cities to a bakery to supply his workers with bread. By early 1907, when Stevens was ready to resume digging, the effort was so well-organized that before long the workers were excavating 500,000 cubic yards of soil a month; more than double the French’s best performance. Stevens astutely realized that a sea-level canal would be too difficult, and convinced Roosevelt to opt for a canal with locks instead.

In 1907, chief engineer Stevens, tough as he was, began to crack under the pressure; he wrote a stinging letter to President Roosevelt accusing bureaucrats and politicians of stabbing him in the back and complaining that, “to me, the canal is only a big ditch.” Roosevelt quickly replaced him with Army officer Col. George W. Goethals, who led the project through its most arduous stages, including the excavation of the mountainous Culebra Cut. During this stage of excavation workers had to brave massive landslides that sometimes set work back for months at a time.

Even so, Goethals took the efficient system that Stevens had built and pushed it to ever-astonishing levels of performance. From 1907 to 1914, Goethals’ work force excavated nearly 215,000,000 cubic yards of earth, nearly three times what the French had accomplished. Goethals also supervised the construction of the locks advocated by Stevens, the biggest and most technologically advanced devices of their kind ever built. In Aug

August 1914, a cement boat, the Cristobal, made the first actual passage from the Atlantic to the Pacific, with Philippe Bunau-Varilla onboard. Two weeks later, on August 15, a ship named Ancon sailed on the first official interocean transit through the Panama Canal. Estimated height of earth excavated if it were piled: one city block wide by 19 miles high

“The canal,” Roosevelt said, “was by far the most important action I took in foreign affairs during the time I was President. When nobody could or would exercise efficient authority, I exercised it.”

Roosevelt was true to his word. He said he would no accept a third term, he would probably have not one the nomination because of the way he completely alienated the Conservatives in his party. So, in true TR form he went to Africa to go big game hunting.

As explained above, the path of history can be changed by the smallest of organisms. Had the French been able to control the Yellow Fever and Malaria mosquito vectors, they would have had control over the Panama Canal. The United States would not have had the opportunity to expand as rapidly as they did without the Canal. Eventually, the situation between the US, France, and Panama would have probably come to violence over use and control of the Canal. For instance, a Vichy or German controlled Canal during WW2 would have been totally unacceptable; invasion would be necessary. In this case, tropical disease guides the hand of history.

1http://www.unboundmedicine.com/merckmanual/ub/view/Merck-Manual-Pro/504083/all/Malaria?q=malaria

2http://www.unboundmedicine.com/merckmanual/ub/view/Merck-Manual-Pro/504111/all/Yellow_Fever?q=yellow%20fever