► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Huckfunn’

Pros & Cons of Rick Perry

by Kafir ( 276 Comments › )
Filed under Blogmocracy, Elections 2012, Republican Party at June 20th, 2011 - 8:30 pm

via Huckfunn

The national spotlight has recently been shining on Texas Governor, Rick Perry, as the GOP field of presidential candidates continues to evolve. Perry has not yet thrown his hat into the ring, but his recent high-profile appearances and speeches lead many to believe that he will announce in the near future that he will run. We’ve seen some debate here as to whether or Perry is a true conservative or just another RHINO so I look forward to our discussion. Here is a video of his speech at the Republican Leadership Convention:

Here is the Wikipedia profile of Rick Perry.

The highlights of his career are:
-Served in the Air Force for 5 years as C-140 pilot.
-First elected to the Texas Legislature as a Democrat in 1984.
-Served as Al Gore’s Texas campaign chairman in the 1988 presidential primaries.
-Elected as Texas Agricultural Commissioner in 1990 and served in that position until 1998.
-Elected as the first Republican Lieutenant Governor in Texas history.
Interesting note; John Sharp, who was Perry’s democrat opponent in this election, was Perry’s roommate at Texas A & M.
-Became Governor of Texas in 2000 upon George Bush’s resignation in order to run for president.
-Re-elected Governor in 2002.
-Re-elected Governor in 2006.
-Re-elected Governor in 2010.
-Currently the long serving Governor in the U.S.

Due in part to the pro-business policies of the 3 Perry terms, 37% of all of new the jobs created in the U.S. since 2009 were in Texas.

As we can see, Perry has a long record of service as a legislator, a department chief and chief executive. Those familiar with Texas politics will argue that the real seat of power in Texas is the lieutenant governor and the governor is little more than a figurehead. That is true to some extent; however the governor has the power of appointment and the power to drive legislation. The following important legislation was signed into law during his terms.

Tort Reform; 2003 – Constitutional amendment to cap medical malpractice awards. That amendment led to a 30% decrease in medical malpractice insurance premiums and a significant increase in doctors seeking to work in Texas.

Tort Reform; 2011 – Loser Pays. Plaintiffs who lose their court cases are now required to pay the court costs and attorney’s fees. Gives greater power for judges to throw out frivolous lawsuits.

Voter ID; 2011 – Voter ID. The legislation requires voters to present one of five acceptable forms of photo ID—a driver’s license, military ID, passport, concealed handgun license or a special voter ID card provided free of charge by the state.

“Controversial Issues”
Trans-Texas Corridor (TTC): Governor Perry proposed a $145 billion initiative to build highways, rail lines and data lines which would cross Texas from Mexico to Oklahoma and from Arkansas to New Mexico. The project would be paid for by converting many highways to toll roads rather taxes. Critics characterize the initiative as a “land grab” and stealth tax hike.

Here is a fairly good summary of the TTC

It appears that the TTC initiative will be defeated in the legislature.

I actually like the toll roads. I put on between 2000 and 3000 business miles per month and they save me time and money over sitting in long lines on the non-toll highways.

Gardasil: Real Clear Politics has a good write up on this issue several weeks ago. Perry’s Gardasil Problem.

“Gardasil was developed to prevent the human papillomavirus (HPV), the most commonly transmitted sexual disease in the United States. In June 2006, the Food and Drug Administration approved the drug, which is made by the pharmaceutical giant Merck Co. The treatment was initially hailed as a breakthrough in protecting against four strains of HPV that are responsible for 70 percent of cervical cancer cases and 90 percent of genital warts.

In January 2007, Gardasil was put on the “recommended” immunization schedule issued by the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Centers for Disease Control. Merck immediately mounted a massive lobbying effort of state legislatures around the country to get Gardasil added to their respective lists of state-mandated vaccines.

But in Texas, Gov. Perry chose to bypass the legislature and on Feb. 2, 2007, he issued an executive order making Texas the first state in the country requiring all sixth-grade girls to receive the three-shot vaccination series (which cost about $120 per shot). The move generated a fierce public debate. Conservatives slammed Perry for promoting what they saw as an intrusion by the state into private health decisions of parents and their children. Some also complained that the mandate would encourage promiscuity among teenagers.”

…Snip…

I am totally baffled by the Gardasil thing. I hope he learned something from the experience.

“Intelligent Design”
Rick Perry believes in Intelligent Design and feels that it should be taught as science alongside evolution in the public schools.

“I am a firm believer in intelligent design as a matter of faith and intellect, and I believe it should be presented in schools alongside the theories of evolution. The State Board of Education has been charged with the task of adopting curriculum requirements for Texas public schools and recently adopted guidelines that call for the examination of all sides of a scientific theory, which will encourage critical thinking in our students, an essential learning skill.”

link

Rick Perry is a fundamentalist Christian and I have no problem with that. I also have no problem with Catholics, Methodists, Hindus or Buddhists. However, I don’t want religious views taught in taxpayer funded public schools. Intelligent Design is a religious belief, not science and it has no place in public schools.

I hope that Rick Perry runs for president and if he does I will support him. He is a plain-spoken and charismatic campaigner. He is a proven leader who leads from and sticks to his convictions. Having said that, I realize that he’s a career politician and undoubtedly someone will offer an example of something that he’s flip-flopped on. On the issues, Perry is anti-abortion, pro death penalty, strong on states’ rights, pro-business and pro guns. He packs a pistol and I even saw him one time at the indoor shooting range that I go to in Austin.  He is anti-Global Warming and opposes regulation of “greenhouse” gases. I think that he and Michelle Bachmann would be a terrific team. However, if he runs, I hope that he’ll put the social agenda on the back burner until after the election and sticks with the economic message. He can win as the jobs candidate. Rick Perry is the Anti-Obamney.

-Huckfunn

And in this corner…

via Dolphin

Perry the Progressive

He was a Democrat before changing to the R when he decided that it fit his agenda.

Perry supported Al Gore in the 1988 Democratic presidential primaries and was chairman of the Gore campaign in Texas.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rick_Perry

Trans Texas Corridor was Perry’s idea for solving a non-existent traffic issue and promoting the NAFTA treaty making it easier from travel from Mexico through Texas (and beyond). The Corridor would have used eminent domain to take private land, land that was, possibly owned by families for a hundred years or more.

Trans-Texas Corridor -Fact Sheet

Contention: The state will use eminent domain to take private land.

Reality: Under any scenario, the state will need to purchase land to build more roads over the next 50 years. The 5th amendment of the U.S. Constitution, and state law, require the state to pay fair market value when purchasing private land for public purposes. If a landowner doesn’t believe an offer to purchase is fair, the law provides they can appeal to special commissioners, and even a district judge, who will decide what is fair.

Several other protections exist in state law to ensure that landowners are fairly compensated. Landowners may retain the development rights of any property purchased by the state, and state law also allows landowners to accept an equity interest in the road rather than a cash payment for their land. Landowners whose land is severed by the Corridor are required to receive damages caused by the severance, including inaccessibility.

Contention: Huge amounts of private land will be taken by the state through eminent domain for superhighway, train, and utility rights-of-way.

Reality: Over the next 50 years, the state, railroads, and utilities, will all need to purchase private land for expansion. By using the Trans Texas Corridor to combine many of these rights of way into one corridor, less total land will be needed. The Corridor will ultimately result in the purchase of less public land than would otherwise be needed to keep up with growth, and all the needed land will be purchased during one process, instead of on a piece-meal basis, as we need to build out infrastructure one project at a time.

In 2007 Perry issued an Executive Order that the HPV vaccine be given to all girls entering the 8th grade. He touted that this was about the concern for future generations not to suffer the disease of Cervical Cancer, however upon further investigation, Perry was getting kick backs from the vaccine maker Merck.

Perry tied to Merck
Perry has ties to Merck and Women in Government. One of the drug company’s three lobbyists in Texas is Mike Toomey, Perry’s former chief of staff. His current chief of staff’s mother-in-law, Texas Republican state Rep. Dianne White Delisi, is a state director for Women in Government.

The governor also received $6,000 from Merck’s political action committee during his re-election campaign.

Texas governor orders STD vaccine for all girls

Governor Rick Perry of Texas

Texas Governor’s mansion

Rick Perry Rental Mansion Costs Texas $600,000 Amid $11B Budget Shortfall

-Dolphin



From Calo: Rick Perry disapproved by Texans

The Chevy VOLT; Recipe for disaster

by Kafir ( 181 Comments › )
Filed under Blogmocracy, Cars & Trucks, Guest Post, Politics, Technology, Transportation at March 14th, 2011 - 2:00 pm

Blogmocracy in Action!
Guest post by: Huckfunn!



Take 1 poorly run, bureaucracy-bloated, bankrupt auto company
Add 1 large government takeover
Blend in $50 billion bailout
Add $250 million in Federal Energy Department grants
Add $150 million in Federal grants to the Volt’s Korean battery supplier
Add $1.5 billion in consumer incentives
Shake, bake and voila… the Chevy Volt.

The Volt is supposed to be Government Motors’ wiz-bang automotive transport of the future. Economic to own and spewing a minimal amount of the dangerous pollutant, (insert eyeroll) CO2. So let’s look at the facts as reported by Consumer Reports in their April 1, 2011 issue:

• Cost as tested: $43,700 plus $5,000 dealer markup for a whopping $48,700.

• Electric range: Chevy claims 25 to 50 miles on one full charge but CR only got between 23 and 28 miles due to cold weather. Anyone see a problem here?

• Recharge time: Chevy claims a full charge takes 4 hours on a 240 volt supply and 10-20 hours on a 120 volt supply. CR says that it took them 5 hours to get a full charge.

“When you are looking at purely dollars and cents, it doesn’t really make a lot of sense. The Volt isn’t particularly efficient as an electric vehicle, and it’s not particularly good as a gas vehicle either in terms of fuel economy,” David Champion, senior director of Consumer Reports auto testing center, told the Detroit News.

For all of the hype by GM and the government, Volt sales are as follows:
December – 326; January – 321; February – 281. That’s bound to be a troubling sales trend for the big shots at GM.

In his article “Time to Short GM”, Jonathan Hoenig of the WSJ cites the Volt as one of many reasons to short GM.

“Late last week I traded General Motors ( GM: 31.93, +0.51, +1.62% ) stock one penny off the lowest price in its history. But I wasn’t buying hoping for a rebound. I was selling it short, looking for a collapse, and I’m holding that position today.”

It might seem somewhat counterintuitive. Not only was the stock at an all-time low, but the company recently announced a $4.7 billion profit, its biggest in a decade. Some 45,000 union workers will receive profit-sharing payments averaging $4,300 – a record.

And on that very same day, shares of the company slid below their IPO price of $33 for the first time, a vitally important fact overlooked by most of the enthusiastic media reports. The New York Times didn’t mention it in their story until paragraph 15. But because we trade the stock, not the story, its weakness and corresponding low remain the only relevant plot points in my book.

And not all of GM’s headlines have been as rosy as its recent profit announcement. The company sold just 281 Chevy Volt hybrids in February. Can you imagine Apple introducing a new iPhone, then selling only 500 units? To my knowledge, nobody’s lining up to purchase a $41,000 Volt the way they are for an iPad 2 .”

Peter Flaherty, co-founder of the National Legal and Policy center, recently wrote a series of articles about GM for Breitbart’s Big Government.

In the latest article, Mr. Flaherty says:

“GM and the Feds are betting the farm — and their credibility — on the Volt. As Truth About Cars editor Edward Niedermeyer wrote last year in the New York Times, the history of the Volt was never about making a “best in class” green vehicle, it was always about making the bailout look palatable – whatever the cost. And according to Niedermeyer, it’s quite a cost:
“Start with the $50 billion bailout…add $240 million in Energy Department grants doled out to G.M. last summer, $150 million in federal money to the Volt’s Korean battery supplier, up to $1.5 billion in tax breaks for purchasers and other consumer incentives, and some significant portion of the $14 billion loan G.M. got in 2008 for ‘retooling’ its plants, and you’ve got some idea of how much taxpayer cash is built into every Volt.”
More troubling still is that the average American taxpayer who foot the bill for GM’s massive bailout, isn’t even getting a car they can afford. In 2009, Obama’s Presidential Task Force on the Auto Industry reported that the Volt “will likely be too expensive to be commercially successful in the short term.”

The Chevy Volt, much like Obamacare, is what we get when government attempts to force its socialist agenda on capital markets. Less choice and an expensive, unworkable clunker that nobody wants. The sign should read “The Volt: Over $51 billion spent; under 1,000 sold.” Think they’ll hear from McDonald’s?

-Huckfunn

Hypocritical MSM Ignoring Eric Holder’s Blantant Bigotry

by Kafir ( 244 Comments › )
Filed under Blogmocracy, Guest Post, Politics at March 2nd, 2011 - 6:30 pm

Blogmocracy in Action!
Guest post by: Huckfunn!



Attorney General Eric Holder uttered the following astonishing words yesterday in a House Appropriations subcommittee hearing while being questioned about DOJ’s handling of the New Black Panthers voter intimidation case:

“Think about that,” Holder said. “When you compare what people endured in the South in the 60s to try to get the right to vote for African Americans, and to compare what people were subjected to there to what happened in Philadelphia—which was inappropriate, certainly that…to describe it in those terms I think does a great disservice to people who put their lives on the line, who risked all, for my people,” said Holder, who is black.

“To compare that kind of courage, that kind of action, and to say that the Black Panther incident wrong thought it might be somehow is greater in magnitude or is of greater concern to us, historically, I think just flies in the face of history and the facts.,” Holder said with evident exasperation.

The last time I checked, the Attorney General is supposed to defend the laws of the United States for all of its citizens, not just “his people”. Holder’s statement is illustrative of the bigoted direction the DOJ has taken since he became AG. His handling of the Pigford Settlement and the New Black Panthers case show that he sees himself as leading a movement of reparations and comeuppance for blacks rather than providing equal protection under the law for all U.S. citizens regardless of race.

The other part of this story is the deafening silence of the MSM. I googled the phrase “Eric Holder: Black Panther case focus demeans ‘my people’” and the only news outlet to run the story is Fox where you can see the actual video here:

http://nation.foxnews.com/eric-holder/2011/03/01/eric-holder-black-panther-case-focus-demeans-my-people

There are many blog sites that are carrying the story, notably Politico and Breitbart’s Big Journalism

When the same phrase is entered at Youtube, you get a black screen that says “This video has been removed by the user. Sorry about that”.

ABC, CBS, CNN and MSNBC all have front page stories about Huckabee’s misstatement that Obama was born in Kenya but not a single word about the top cop in the land confirming once and for all that his view of “justice” is utterly bigoted.

-Huckfunn

SUCKERS OF THE UNION ADDRESS, 2011

by Kafir ( 193 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Blogmocracy, Guest Post, Politics at January 24th, 2011 - 4:30 pm

Blogmocracy in Action!
Guest post by: Huckfunn!



On Tuesday, January 25, President Barrak Hussein Obama will deliver his State of the Union address to a joint session of Congress and all the rest of us suckers who care to watch. Obama will try to convince us that he is a centrist who truly cares and strives for job growth and American competitiveness in the world market place. Here is a preview of his remarks.
First of all, be sure and get the “blame Bush” mantra in right from the gitgo.

The economy, when I first was coming in was contracting rapidly, we lost millions of jobs, businesses were shuttered, and I think a lot of people were worried about the future.”

Yeah, Barry; ya gotta keep selling that item. If the saps will believe that then they’ll probably believe this sack of crap, also:

“And so my principal focus, my number one focus, is going be making sure that we are competitive, that we are growing, and we are creating jobs not just now but well into the future.”

We’ve been getting the warm-up for the SOTU since at least Tuesday, January 18, when Obama ordered a review of federal regulations “with the goal of weeding out rules that hurt job growth and creation”. Imagine that when just 5 days earlier the EPA blocked the permit to build one of the largest mountain top coal mines in Appalachian history. Well gee, I wonder how many jobs that cost, and what will be the ultimate cost to the American consumer? The foregoing is but one example of the burden of regulation and taxation that the Obama regime has wrecked upon American business and taxpayers. In fact, the federal regulations that have gone into effect just in FY 2010 stands at $26.5 billion… Here are just some of the new regulations, and their costs, many still not quantified:

January 2010
January 8, 2010, Department of Energy, “Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Certain Consumer Products (Dishwashers, Dehumidifiers, Microwave Ovens, and Electric and Gas Kitchen Ranges and Ovens) and for Certain Commercial and Industrial Equipment (Commercial Clothes Washers)”: $23.4 million annually.
January 11, 2010, Securities and Exchange Commission, “Custody of Funds or Securities of Clients by Investment Advisers”: $125.1 million annually; $1.2 million start-up.
January 15, 2010, Federal Reserve System and Federal Trade Commission, “Fair Credit Reporting Risk-Based Pricing Regulations”: $252.1 million annually.
January 15, 2010, Department of Transportation, Federal Railroad Administration, “Positive Train Control Systems”: $477.4 million annually.
January 28, 2010, Department of the Treasury, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency; Federal Reserve System; Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation; Department of the Treasury, Office of Thrift Supervision, “Risk-Based Capital Guidelines; Capital Adequacy Guidelines; Capital Maintenance: Regulatory Capital; Impact of Modifications to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles; Consolidation of Asset-Backed Commercial Paper Programs; and Other Related Issues”: cost not quantified.
February 2010
February 9, 2010, Environmental Protection Agency, “Primary National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Nitrogen Dioxide”: cost not quantified.
February 17, 2010, Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, “National Organic Program; Access to Pasture (Livestock)”: cost not quantified.
February 22, 2010, Federal Reserve System, “Truth in Lending”: cost not quantified.
March 2010
March 3, 2010, Environmental Protection Agency, “National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines”: $373.4 million annually; $744.7 million start-up.
March 4, 2010, Securities and Exchange Commission, “Money Market Fund Reform”: $60.2 million annually; $86.9 million start-up.
March 9, 2010, Department of Energy, “Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Small Electric Motors”: $263.9 million annually.
March 10, 2010, Securities and Exchange Commission, “Amendments to Regulation SHO”: $1.2 billion annually; $1.1 billion start-up.
March 19, 2010, Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, “Regulations Restricting the Sale and Distribution of Cigarettes and Smokeless Tobacco to Protect Children and Adolescents”: cost not quantified.
March 26, 2010, Environmental Protection Agency, “Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: Changes to Renewable Fuel Standard Program”: $7.8 billion annually.
April 2010
April 1, 2010, Federal Reserve System, “Electronic Fund Transfers”: cost not quantified.
April 5, 2010, Department of Transportation, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, “Electronic On-Board Recorders for Hours-of-Service Compliance”: $139 million annually.
April 14, 2010, Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, “Use of Ozone-Depleting Substances; Removal of Essential-Use Designation (Flunisolide, etc.)”: $181.9 million annually.
April 16, 2010, Department of Energy: Energy Conservation Program, “Energy Conservation Standards for Residential Water Heaters, Direct Heating Equipment, and Pool Heaters”: $1.3 billion annually.
May 2010
May 6, 2010, Environmental Protection Agency, “Lead; Amendment to the Opt-Out and Recordkeeping Provisions in the Renovation, Repair, and Painting Program”: $419.5 million annually; $552 million start-up.
May 7, 2010, Environmental Protection Agency and Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, “Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards; Final Rule”: $10.8 billion annually (2012–2016).
May 13, 2010, Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service; Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration; Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, “Interim Final Rules for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Dependent Coverage of Children to Age 26 Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act”: $11 million annually.
May 28, 2010, Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, “Automatic Dependent Surveillance—Broadcast (ADS-B) Out Performance Requirements to Support Air Traffic Control (ATC) Service”: $100 million annually.
June 2010
June 4, 2010, Federal Reserve System, “Electronic Fund Transfers”: cost not quantified.
June 17, 2010, Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service; Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration; Department of Health and Human Services, “Interim Final Rules for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act”: $25.2 million annually; $30.2 million start-up.
June 22, 2010, Environmental Protection Agency, “Primary National Ambient Air Quality Standard for Sulfur Dioxide”: $1.6 billion annually.
June 28, 2010, Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service; Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration; and Department of Health and Human Services, “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Preexisting Condition Exclusions, Lifetime and Annual Limits, Rescissions, and Patient Protections”: $4.8 million annually.
June 29, 2010, Federal Reserve System, “Truth in Lending”: cost not quantified.
July 2010
July 14, 2010, Securities and Exchange Commission, “Political Contributions by Certain Investment Advisers”: $85.1 million annually; $22.6 million start-up.
July 16, 2010, Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration, “Reasonable Contract or Arrangement Under Section 408(b)(2)—Fee Disclosure”: $57.7 million annually.
July 19, 2010, Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service; Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration; and Department of Health and Human Services, “Interim Final Rules for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act”: cost not quantified.
July 23, 2010, Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service; Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration; and Department of Health and Human Services, “Interim Final Rules for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Internal Claims and Appeals and External Review Processes Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act”: $75.1 million annually.
July 28, 2010, Department of the Treasury, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, “Registration of Mortgage Loan Originators”: $123.9 million annually; $283.3 million start-up.
August 2010
August 9, 2010, Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, “Cranes and Derricks in Construction”: $151.6 million annually.
August 12, 2010, Securities and Exchange Commission: “Amendments to Form ADV”: $20.5 million annually; $56.4 million start-up.
August 20, 2010, Environmental Protection Agency, “National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines”: $253 million annually.
September 2010
September 9, 2010, Environmental Protection Agency, “National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry and Standards of Performance for Portland Cement Plants”: $1 billion in 2013.
September 16, 2010, Securities and Exchange Commission, “Facilitating Shareholder Director Nominations”: $8 million annually.

One of Obama’s stated policy goals has been to drive up the cost of fossil fuels. In his own words, “Under my plan of a cap and trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket”. Having failed to jam cap and trade through the Senate, Obama seeks to impose the “skyrocket” upon us by virtue of EPA’s take over of the basic element of carbon. If Obama can convince the American people of the idea that he’s a centrist, who wishes to “weed out harmful regulation”, then he can probably talk a pig into a ham sandwich.

-Huckfunn