► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Iran’

U.S.A: United States Of Appeasement?

by WrathofG-d ( 5 Comments › )
Filed under Ahmadinejad, Barack Obama, Iran, North Korea, Nuclear Weapons, Saudi Arabia, United Nations at April 14th, 2009 - 10:43 am

President Obama has decided to lead the free world in an “everything opposite from G. W. Bush” approach to foreign affairs.  Although in many instances this could be a good idea, like most unprepared, naive President’s of our past, President Obama seems to be throwing out the good with the bad.  This has included numerous public displays of submission, moral infirmity on a global scale including, but not limited to bowing to the king of Saudi Arabia, fecklessness as to Iran’s nuclear ambitions, and a world groveling tour where he went from country to country begging forgiveness from dictators and despots.  It has long been the Conservative view that such overt displays of weakness, and complete lack of resolve will not engender peace and cooperation from our enemies, but instead only invite further dangerous behavior.

Barack Chamberlain: Peace In Our Time

____________________________________________

N. Korea To Boycott Talks & Restart Nuclear Weapons Plant

TOKYO, April 14 — Fuming at the U.N. Security Council for condemning its recent missile launch, North Korea said Tuesday it will restart its plutonium factory, junk all its disarmament agreements and “never participate” again in six-country nuclear negotiations.

North Korea had warned before launching a long-range missile on April 5 that it would tolerate no U.N. criticism of what it insisted was a peaceful attempt to put a satellite into orbit.

When the 15-member Security Council unanimously condemned that launch on Monday and demanded a halt to all future missile launches, the North’s reaction was swift, vitriolic and surprisingly substantive.

It called the Security Council’s statement a “brigandish,” “wanton” and “unjust” infringement of its sovereignty.  It said that six-party nuclear talks with the United States, South Korea, Japan, Russia and, even its closest ally, China, had “turned into a platform” for forcing the North to disarm itself and for bringing down its system of government.

“We have no choice but to further strengthen our nuclear deterrent to cope with additional military threats by hostile forces,” North Korea’s Foreign Ministry said in a statement released by its state news agency.

If it follows through on Tuesday’s bluster, North Korea will walk away from six years of slow, fitful but sometimes productive negotiations that have led to substantial disablement of the North’s main nuclear reactor and partial disclosure of the scale of its weapons program.

The talks, in turn, have rewarded the government of Kim Jong Il with food, fuel and removal from a U.S. list of countries that sponsor terror.  The Obama administration has repeatedly said that it wants to resume the talks, which stalled last year in a dispute about how to verify the North’s past nuclear activity.

That nuclear activity, judging from the North’s statement on Tuesday, is soon to increase.

“We will actively consider building our own light-water nuclear reactor, will revive nuclear facilities and reprocess used nuclear fuel rods,” the ministry said. Experts have said the North does not have the equipment or skills to make an advanced light-water reactor.

China, host of the six-party talks, called for restraint and calm on Tuesday, asking all countries to return to the discussions, even after North Korea announced it would never do so.

“We hope the relevant parties could proceed from the perspective of the overall interest of the region, so as to work together to safeguard the progress of the six-party talks,” Chinese foreign ministry spokeswoman Jiang Yu said at a news briefing.

Japan also urged North Korea to return to the talks and the Russian government said it regretted Pyongyang’s decision.

Analysts in Seoul said that North Korea, with its threat to pull out of the six-party talks, appeared to be up to its familiar tactics of brinkmanship — creating a crisis in order to be rewarded for helping to solve it.

“North Korea can use today’s walkout as a negotiating chip with the United States in the future,” said Koh Yu-whan, a professor of North Korean studies at Dongguk University in Seoul.

North Korea outraged the world three years ago by exploding a small nuclear device. But less than a year later, as it turned brinkmanship into remuneration, it pledged to abandon its nuclear weapons in return for aid from the United States and other countries.

“North Koreans have learned from past experience that when they create worst-case scenarios they get closer to solving their problems,” said Chun Hyun-joon, a North Korea specialist at the Korea Institute for National Unification.

{The Rest of The Article}

____________________________________________

U.S. May Drop Key Condition For Talks With Iran

WASHINGTON – The Obama administration and its European allies are preparing proposals that would shift strategy toward Iran by dropping a longstanding American insistence that Tehran rapidly shut down nuclear facilities during the early phases of negotiations over its atomic program, according to officials involved in the discussions.

The proposals, exchanged in confidential strategy sessions with European allies, would press Tehran to open up its nuclear program gradually to wide-ranging inspection.  But the proposals would also allow Iran to continue enriching uranium for some period during the talks. That would be a sharp break from the approach taken by the Bush administration, which had demanded that Iran halt its enrichment activities, at least briefly to initiate negotiations.

The proposals under consideration would go somewhat beyond President Obama’s promise, during the presidential campaign, to open negotiations with Iran “without preconditions.” Officials involved in the discussion said they were being fashioned to draw Iran into nuclear talks that it had so far shunned.

{The Rest Of The Article}

____________________________________________

Peace in our time!

Think Progress supports Iran against Israel

by Phantom Ace ( 15 Comments › )
Filed under Dhimmitude, Iran, Leftist-Islamic Alliance at April 13th, 2009 - 7:58 am

The Leftists and Islamists propaganda mouth piece Think Progress condemns Israel. They attack Israel because Israeli President Shimon Peres said that if Obama’s talks with Iran don’t work, they might hit Iran.

Israeli president hints that Israel will attack Iran if Obama’s overtures fail.

ast month, Israeli President Shimon Peres contradicted President Obama’s groundbreaking message to Iran by urging the Iranians to overthrow their government. Meanwhile, Obama emphasized his willingness to work with the current Iranian leaders and underscored his view that regime change is not a goal. Now, Peres is ratcheting up more bellicose rhetoric. During a radio interview yesterday, he said that Israel is poised to attack Iran if Obama’s “overtures to the Islamic republic fail to bear fruit”:

Those evil Israelis are at it again! Iran can threaten Israel all it wants, but if Israel even threatens back, Think Progress gets mad and bashes them. This is yet another example of the Leftist-Islamic alliance and Think progress being it’s voice. Why doesn’t Think progress ever condemn the Iranian regime? Their silence on that shows their support.The Leftists-Islamic Axis is the most powerful alliance right now in world politics.

(Cross Posted at TPWatch)

Keep Your Enemies Close & Your Friends….Eh, Forget ‘Em!

by WrathofG-d ( 6 Comments › )
Filed under Ahmadinejad, Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Iran, Islamic hypocrisy, Islamic Supremacism, Islamists, Israel, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Middle East, Politics, Religion at April 8th, 2009 - 12:02 pm

While criticizing, warning, and threatening to coerce our allies, such as Israel, the Obama administration is doing everything within their power to cozy up to our enemies apologizing for their imagined slights, and promising that the United States will change.   I fear that there is a  sea change taking place in America and it doesn’t bode well for the security of the United States or our values.

__________________________________

Iran mastering final stage of nuclear cycle

TEHRAN (Reuters) – President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is expected to announce Iran has mastered the final stage of nuclear fuel production when the Islamic state celebrates its National Nuclear Day on Thursday.

“I will have good nuclear news for the honored Iranian nation tomorrow (April 9),” Ahmadinejad said on Wednesday in a televised speech at the central city of Isfahan.

Foreign nuclear analysts believe Tehran has yet to prove it has mastered industrial-scale enrichment of uranium, the key to making fuel in large, usable quantities and the most technically difficult aspect of churning out nuclear energy.

Tehran has slowly expanded its Natanz enrichment plant in defiance of U.N. resolutions demanding it stop over concerns Tehran’s goal is atomic bombs, something it denies.

But analysts expected Ahmadinejad to say that Iran has perfected the last of several phases of fuel output.

{The Rest of The Article}

__________________________________

US To Attend Direct Group Nuclear Talks With Iran

WASHINGTON (AP) – The Obama administration said Wednesday it will participate directly in group talks with Iran over its suspect nuclear program, marking another shift from former President George W. Bush’s policy.

State Department spokesman Robert Wood said the United States would be at the table “from now on” when senior diplomats from the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council and Germany meet with Iranian officials to discuss the nuclear issue. The Bush administration had generally shunned such meetings.

Wood said the decision was conveyed to representatives of Britain, China, France, Germany, Russia by the third-ranking U.S. diplomat William Burns at a Wednesday meeting in London. That group, known as the “P5+1,” announced earlier that it would invite Iran to attend a new session aimed at breaking a deadlock in the talks.

“The U.S. remains committed to the P5+1 process, what is different is that the U.S. will join P5+1 discussions with Iran from now on,” Wood told reporters, adding that Washington was hopeful Iran would attend.

“If Iran accepts, we hope this will be the occasion to seriously engage Iran on how to break the logjam of recent years and work in a cooperative manner to resolve the outstanding international concerns about its nuclear program,” he said. “Any breakthrough will be the result of the collective efforts of all the parties, including Iran.”

“If Iran accepts the invitation we look forward to that direct engagement,” Wood said.
{The Article}

__________________________________

Iran charges American journalist with espionage

TEHRAN, Iran – An American journalist jailed for more than two months in Iran has been charged with spying for the U.S., a judge said Wednesday, dashing hopes of a quick release days after her parents arrived in the country seeking her freedom.

The espionage charge is far more serious than earlier statements by Iranian officials that the woman had been arrested for working in the Islamic Republic without press credentials and her own assertion in a phone call to her father that she was arrested after buying a bottle of wine.

Roxana Saberi, who grew up in Fargo, North Dakota, and is a dual citizen of the U.S. and Iran, has been living in Iran for six years. She has reported from there for several news organizations, including National Public Radio and the British Broadcasting Corp.

{The Rest of The Article}

__________________________________

Obama Supports Saudi Plan

Obama reportedly expressed support for the 2002 Saudi Initiative upon winning the presidential election in November of 2008. In his first meeting with PA Chairman Mahmoud Abbas, Obama had been quoted as saying of the plan, “The Israelis would be crazy not to support this initiative.”

In January of 2009, Saudi officials warned that the U.S. would need to “drastically revise” its Middle East policy, particularly towards Israel, if it wanted to maintain influence in the region.

“If the U.S. wants to continue playing a leadership role in the Middle East and keep its strategic alliances intact – especially its ‘special relationship’ with Saudi Arabia – it will have to drastically revise its policies vis-a-vis Israel and Palestine,” former Saudi ambassador Prince Turki al-Faisal said at the time.

Turki referred to the Middle East policy of former U.S. President George Bush as “sickening,” and accused America of “contributing to the slaughter of innocents” by supporting Israel.

Bush expressed strong support for the creation of a PA state, but supported the 2003 Road Map initiative over the Saudi Plan. The Road Map plan calls for the Israel-PA negotiations process to take place in stages, with Israel dismantling Jewish towns in Judea and Samaria only after the PA begins to fight terrorism.

The Saudi Plan calls on Israel to cede Gaza and all land east of the 1949 armistice line, including much of Jerusalem and the Temple Mount, to the Palestinian Authority. Israel would also be required to cede the strategic Golan Heights region to Syria.

In addition, the plan requires Israel to release all terrorists currently in its prisons, and to offer citizenship to millions of foreign Arabs who say they are descended from Arabs who fled pre-state Israel during the War of Independence.

In exchange, Arab states would normalize their ties with the Jewish State.

In Israel, the plan has met with little support. Enacting the plan would force roughly 600,000 Israelis from their homes. In addition, senior defense officials have warned that the plan would compromise Israel’s security.

{The Rest of The Article}

__________________________________

Biden warns Israel off any attack on Iran

Reporting from Washington — Vice President Joe Biden issued a high-level admonishment to Israel’s new government Tuesday that it would be “ill advised” to launch a military strike against Iran.

While the Obama administration has made a series of recent overtures to Tehran, the Israelis have grown more confrontational out of concern that the Islamic Republic’s increasing nuclear know-how could one day become an existential threat.

Netanyahu signaled several times during his election campaign that he would not tolerate a nuclear-armed Iran. “I promise that if I am elected, Iran will not acquire nuclear arms,” he said in one appearance, “and this implies everything necessary to carry this out.”

With his brief comment Tuesday, Biden became the highest-ranking administration official to caution the Jewish state against a military strike. In the interview, Biden was asked whether he was concerned that Netanyahu might strike Iranian nuclear facilities.

“I don’t believe Prime Minister Netanyahu would do that. I think he would be ill advised to do that,” Biden said.

{The Rest of The Article}

__________________________________

Thousands chant “death to America” in Iran.

__________________________________

We the people need to get ahead of this dastardly change, and let President Obama know that we will not remian silent and just take it.  Our Government should be more fearful of its citizens then foreign entities.  They represent us, not middle eastern Arab/Muslim kings!

Contact the Whitehouse and let them know that we do not want our Country to betray our allies, and our values just to be loved by despotic tyrants.

With all due respect President Obama…..it isn’t the United States that needs to change!

Iran Backed Hiz’b’allah Using Mexico To Break Into United States

by WrathofG-d ( 2 Comments › )
Filed under Crime, Hezballah, Iran, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Multiculturalism, Political Correctness, Terrorism at March 30th, 2009 - 1:36 pm

To those who have been paying attention to the illegal invasion, and resulting deterioration on our streets, there really isn’t a need for another great reason to seal, and protect our border with Mexico. However, just because we might not need one, that doesn’t mean that they do not exist.

_____________________________________

http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/0705/feature5/images/gallery.5.8.jpgHezbollah is using the same southern narcotics routes that Mexican drug kingpins do to smuggle drugs and people into the United States, reaping money to finance its operations and threatening U.S. national security, current and former U.S. law enforcement, defense and counterterrorism officials say.

The Iran-backed Lebanese group has long been involved in narcotics and human trafficking in South America’s tri-border region of Paraguay, Argentina and Brazil. Increasingly, however, it is relying on Mexican narcotics syndicates that control access to transit routes into the U.S.

Hezbollah relies on “the same criminal weapons smugglers, document traffickers and transportation experts as the drug cartels,” said Michael Braun, who just retired as assistant administrator and chief of operations at the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA).

“They work together,” said Mr. Braun. “They rely on the same shadow facilitators. One way or another, they are all connected.

“They’ll leverage those relationships to their benefit, to smuggle contraband and humans into the U.S.; in fact, they already are [smuggling].”

His comments were confirmed by six U.S. officials, including law enforcement, defense and counterterrorism specialists. They spoke on the condition that they not be named because of the sensitivity of the topic.

(The Rest of The Article)

_____________________________________

This is a gigantic problem that cannot continue to be ignored.  There have been warnings about regarding Hiz’b’allah setting up shop in Mexico since at least 2006.  But, hey…maybe I’m wrong and Hiz’b’allah is just sneaking their agents into our Country to do the jobs that American’s won’t do.