When I first saw the picture above, I had not initially read the headline. I thought the guy was wearing red gloves. Sadly, this was not the case. It seems that the man in the picture above, for a reason we’ll discuss in a bit, decided along with an accomplice, to attack a complete stranger and cut his head off. The, “red gloves,” he sported turned out to be the blood of his victim. He committed this act of pure barbarism in broad daylight, on a busy London street, and felt no impulse to flee the scene ahead of local police, who by the way took 20 full minutes to arrive, There is an added importance to this fact, which we’ll also discuss in later. They strutted about like rock stars afterwords, granting interviews to people with cell phones. During the times when citizen journalists weren’t recording their rants, they gloated over their accomplishment, taunting the government and the citizens of the nation in which they live.
The motivation for our murderous thugs is not something that requires a psychic. It was not a random act of disaffected youths acting in response to some desperate societal depression. The thought, “I can’t find a job so maybe I’ll kill someone,” was not racing through the otherwise innocent minds of Britain’s future. They quite clearly were shouting, “Allah hu akhbar.” as they severed their victim’s head in front of shocked witnesses. During their many spontaneous interviews, they described in detail that this was their contribution to jihad, Islam’s very visible war with the West, our culture, and our principle of freedom. They strutted around like proud peacocks, not worried about the consequences of their actions, because they were convinced that 72 virgin somethings await them in the grand traditional Islamic afterlife, in which every selfish base desire man kind is capable of having will be satisfied as a reward for those who kill infidels in the most gruesome manner possible.
Until yesterday, Britain and the people in charge of her have pretended that terrorism and Islam have no connection. That changed yesterday, as their Prime Minister, David Cameron, for the first time connected those dots in an official manner. Britain it seems is tired of paying the price for appeasement. Their problem of course is that with decades worth of Muslims who have already established deeply entrenched pockets of Sharia throughout England, they’re in for one hell of a bad time ahead. They are infested with this cancer upon their society, and it was their willful blindness that did it to them.
We have the same problem here. We have the same pockets of deeply entrenched Sharia existing here. Those same sleeper cells that have infested England, have infested us here, and have already made their presence known. There is a price to pay for pretending that there is no connection between Islam and terrorism. That price was paid in Boston most recently. The politically correct and their police force are going to get the rest of us killed, or worse. Handling acts of terror as police matters, and offering empty platitudes as our weapon to combat them will prove as in effective in the future as those methods have been in the past.
This next point I wish to say while you keep a little piece of personal disclosure in mind. While in High School, and through part of my college experience, many years ago, I was one of these people. So believe me when I tell you this. When you see one of these bumper stickers on the back of a car,
you are in the presence of museum grade stupidity. You may wish to get your camera out, and take pictures of who belongs to the sentiment, and place that photo with your collection of other curios. The owner of that sticky backed messaging performed a miracle simply by placing their pants on correctly during the morning hours, let alone driving a car without a brain.
This politically correct message of unbridled appeasement makes at its core a dangerously naive assumption. It combines an asinine level of moral equivalence with a willful blindness that guarantees the annihilation of all societies that follow its advice.
It assumes that all societies are equal, with none being morally superior or even preferable to others. It equates the acts of groups where public beheadings and honor killings are considered acceptable behavior with those who’s acts of barbarism include cutting off the hair and shaving off the beards of any the guilty seek to intimidate. For the liberals reading this, blowing yourself up on a school bus and taking 40 children with you to meet Allah is not on the same level morally speaking as those who spray paint insulting messages on buildings thought to be bars with patrons seeking an, “alternative,” lifestyle.
The other glaring problem with this bumper sticker is that it assumes, quite moronically, that all of the referenced groups have equal amounts of trouble getting along with the others in that collection. Coexisting would be no problem for any of the last five groups, if the first one did not feel that world domination was its duty to their Deity. The message of this idiocy is that the remaining five groups referenced are unwilling to coexist, while ignoring that the first group actually is unwilling to coexist.
There is another aspect to this story. The two assailants were armed, not only with knives and cleavers, but with guns also. In England, guns are not legal to possess, even for police. Somehow, the criminals found a way to break that law, and why shouldn’t they. Clearly, obeying the laws of the land was not one of their priorities. The Police took longer to arrive, because they were tipped that they would be facing a situation where the bad guys had guns. They were able to strut around for 20 minutes unchallenged, precisely because they knew that no one passing by on the street would be armed. When the police arrived, they opened fire on the cops.
