► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Marco Rubio’

Marco Rubio voted against the Debt Ceiling deal

by Phantom Ace ( 7 Comments › )
Filed under Economy, Headlines at August 3rd, 2011 - 3:32 pm

Many Tea Party Conservatives/Libertarians were disappointed in Rubio supporting the Libyan war and having a Wilsonian interventionist foreign policy. Although I still have issues with his foreign policy views, he’s spot on on economic and fiscal issues. Unlike other Tea Party heroes like Allen West who agreed to this boondoggle, Marco Rubio held firm and voted against it!

 “I cannot support this plan because it fails to actually solve our debt problem, fails to diminish the risk of a credit rating downgrade and is not a long-term solution to avert a debt crisis,” Rubio wrote in a news release on his website.  “This plan still adds at least $7 trillion to our debt over 10 years.  It fails to immediately start downsizing government, leaving 98 percent of deficit reduction until after the 2012 election.  By not addressing the biggest driver of our debt, health care spending, this plan ensures Medicare’s looming bankruptcy, while protecting Obama Care’s $2.6 trillion blank check.”

It also could lead to a tax hike, Rubio wrote.

Marco Rubio is at this pioint the odds on favorite for the VP slot in 2012. He gets it on economic and fiscal matters. Now if only he would channel his inner Rightwing Latin self and reject Wilsonian nation building!

Read more:

Non Story of the day: Marco Rubio’s Brother in Law was a drug trafficker

by Phantom Ace ( 24 Comments › )
Filed under Democratic Party, Media, Progressives, Republican Party, Special Report at July 12th, 2011 - 10:26 am

Anyone who is familiar with Miami back in the 1980’s knows it was the central hub of Cocaine shipment. Colombians would bring it in, then Cubans, Dominicans and Italians would distribute it.  A good documentary on this is Cocaine Cowboys. What the media didn’t explain was one of the reasons for the drug trafficking. Many Colombian land owning families were being harassed by the FARC Guerrillas. Growing Coffee and other crops didn’t make enough money to pay off or defend their land from the Communists. So many turned to Cocaine as a means of getting money.

Marco Rubio came from an honest hard working Cuban-American family. His sister married a Colombian who was involved in dryg trafficking. Something many families in the Miami area was involved in. Back in 1987, he was arrested in a huge drug raid. Now the quislings at Univision have brought this fact out into the open. The reason, to smear Rubio at the behest of their White Progressive masters.

Senator Marco Rubio has provided generous details about his family, expressing time and again during his successful 2009 U.S. senate campaign that he was proud of his parents’ efforts to build a better future for their four children in this country.

But there is one family episode that the Senator does not want to talk about. Univision Investiga has learned that in 1987, Rubio’s older sister Barbara was caught up in the year’s most significant antinarcotics operation in South Florida.

According to public records, federal prosecutors in Miami ordered the seizure of the home where Barbara Rubio lived with her husband Orlando Cicilia. Prosecutors suspected the home was being used for activities that violated drug laws. Another property owned by the couple, located in what today is an office building, was also subject to seizure for the same reason.

It’s hypocritical that the Mayor of LA Antonio Villaraigosa is given a pass for his gang membership in his youth. Yet, Marco Rubio is being smeared for something that he had nothing to do with. The next target will be his wife’s family. Many of whom back in Colombia had ties to the AUC back in the 90’s. Why the difference in the treatment between Rubio and the LA Mayor? Well the answer is simple.

Antonio Villaraigosa has the La Raza wannabe Aztec mentality.  They pride themselves atbeing descended from vicious savages who were conquered. Marco Rubio is proud of his Iberian heritage via Cuba. He is proud his ancestors were conquerors. Hence he doesn’t have the victimchip and the feeling of inferiority towards whites. Hence Rubio represents a threat to the plan White Progressives and their La a Kapos have in making Hispanics low self esteem slaves. The Nativist Republicans will use this against him as well and portray him as some Hispanic bogeyman.

Expect more of these attacks.

The Rubio Doctrine

by Phantom Ace ( 29 Comments › )
Filed under Elections 2010, Elections 2012, Politics, Republican Party, Special Report at April 20th, 2011 - 12:43 pm

As someone who once was a big fan of Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL.), I must say I am greatly disappointed in him. Here was someone who I could relate too. We came from the same roots of Upper Middle Class landowning Hispanics and we are both Rightwing Latins. During his 2010 campaign he actually called out Islam by name and mentioned it’s historical Imperialism. Now that he is in Washington he has fallen prey to the Wilsonian “spread Democracy” ideology. He actually believes Islamic nations like Afghanistan can have Democracy. Rubio also called for an invasion and occupation of Libya, a war that benefits Al-Qaeda and the French oil interests. He is either naive or the GOP establishment got to him.

Sen. Marco Rubio sailed into office on the tea-party wave, wagging his finger at the Obama administration’s fiscal mischief. But in the Senate, foreign policy has become his passion.

[…]

Rubio has vocally opposed an increase to the federal government’s debtlimit and chastised the president for not being “serious” about deficit reduction. He has also thrown cold water on Republicans. Before the Senate adjourned for spring recess, Rubio bucked leadership and opposed the Boehner–White House deal to keep the government running, since he found the attached spending cuts insufficient.

But foreign policy is Rubio’s calling. He relishes his spot on the Foreign Relations Committee, where he has been tapped to be a ranking subcommittee member. His portfolio focuses on the Western Hemisphere, building relationships with neighbors on trade and terrorism. His work from that post is piled about the room.

[…]

“Ultimately, if we can provide a level of security there, the Afghans have a chance to build a functional state for themselves,” Rubio says. “You can read about these things, but I think when you visit these places, you get to interact with people and see things firsthand.”

Read the rest: Rubio’s Foreign Policy

Clearly Marco Rubio is being misled. As someone who grew up in the same type of family as I did, he should know Democracy is not compatible with Islamic societies. He knows the history of our ancestors very well and their 700 year fight with Arabic Islamic aggression. Clearly he has naively bought into the so called “freedom agenda” and is blind to the consequences of it in Iraq and Egypt.

On Economic policy, Rubio is spot on and I’m with him 100%. On foreign policy him and I have to part ways. As he said himself, no politician is a Messiah. Rubio is no savior and although I would vote for him as President or his Senate re-election, I would do so with without my previous enthusiasm.

Que Lastima!

The GOP has lousy starters but a great bench

by Phantom Ace ( 189 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Elections 2010, Elections 2012, Progressives, Republican Party at March 15th, 2011 - 8:30 am

The Republican class of 2010 was probably the single greatest amount of political talent ever elected at the same time. People like Marco Rubio, Allen West, Pat Toomey, Rand Paul, Kristin Noem, Niki Haley, Raul Labrador, Scott Walker and many others are the new face of the GOP. They come from a generation that influenced by Ronald Reagan style Conservatism in the 1980’s. The regime of Barack Hussein Obama opened the way for this flood of fresh blood. They have joined liked minded Conservatives like Paul Ryan and Eric Cantor. The sad part is, this talented pool was not elected a few cycles ago and are not ready for 2012. Instead the possible GOP Presidential candidates for next year are retreads and damaged goods.

It’s not just that the starting lineup is weak.  Their backups are incredibly strong.  The names bandied about as attractive vice presidential options impress more than the presidential candidates who might select them.  Might the party be better served by a sort of political double-promotion?

Republicans won in 2010 not by carting out retreads, but by infusing fresh blood into the party.  Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, and Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal—to name just four from a deep Republican bench—exhibit charisma, vigor, and likeability largely absent from those visibly seeking the presidency.  Of greater importance, they have shown fidelity to the limited-government principles currently animating the Republican Party.

They are flawed.  They lack experience.  But remember that Romney served just one term as governor, Palin, not even that.  And, as evidenced by the thin curriculum vitae of the 2008 Democratic nominee, voters, at least outside of GOP primaries, don’t cast ballots on experience.  What the new bloods truly lack is familiarity.  But even familiarity isn’t an unmitigated blessing.  To know Newt or Sarah, particularly after the New York Times gets through with them, isn’t necessarily to love them.

Read the rest: Republicans Need New Blood to Win the Presidency

The Republicans are in a dilemma. Any of the newly elected new bloods, would clobber Obama in an election. However, they promised to serve their constituents and they just were elected. The current crop might be able to beat Obama, but it will be tough. I have said that I might sit 2012 out. I’m talking junk any way, I despise the Obama regime. I just want to vote for someone I like and not against I don’t like. None of the current front runners are offering anything different than the Post Reagan era GOP. Most of them are Rockefeller Republicans or would be manipulated by advisers with agendas.

Obama must be defeated, but I want it to be someone who will turn this nation around. Let’s keep our fingers cross that someone arises who can bring back the Reagan era optimistic Conservatism. The future of our nation depends on it.