► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Neo-Feudalism’

The Progressive Tax Code is about Control

by Phantom Ace ( 123 Comments › )
Filed under Communism, Economy, Liberal Fascism, Progressives at April 6th, 2010 - 12:00 pm

Our current tax code is outdated and needs reform. This has not occurred because Progressives in both the Republican and Democratic Parties love the concept of manipulation. Our code is called the Progressive Tax Code for a reason. It was designed by the Progressive Movement and implemented by Radical Totalitarian Progressive Woodrow Wilson.

The Wilsonian Legacy has harmed America in many ways. Our foreign policy is based on the naive notion of spreading Democracy, not using American power to pursue our National interests. The concept of the government manipulating economic behavior through the tax code is another legacy which has done much to reduce Americans’ economic freedom. But, that is the goal of the Progressive tax code!

Congratulations! This is your last week working for the man — at least for this year. The Tax Foundation calculates that Tax Freedom Day for 2010 is April 9, which means that by Friday, Americans will have spent nearly 100 days working just to pay their taxes. If Democrats have their way, Tax Freedom Day will keep getting later and later.

 Hold that thought. Imagine for a moment that Tax Freedom Day was Dec. 31. In other words, picture working 365 days a year for the government. Now, the government would “give” you a place to sleep, food to eat and clothes to wear, but all your income would really be Washington’s income to allocate as it saw fit. Some romantics might call this sort of arrangement “socialism” or “communism.” But another perfectly good word for it is “slavery” or, if you prefer, involuntary servitude.

Read the rest: How much taxation is enough?

Jonah Goldberg nails it in his column. The amount of taxes dictates the amount of control the governmnet has over the individual. The more in taxes, the more control the elites have. That was one of the goals of Obamacare (the other being Eugenics), to redistribute wealth as the government seems fit. What is needed to alleviate this is not tax cuts, but a total tax overhaul and a new code that promotes investments and entrepreneurship. This is a Neo-Feudalist means to control on the part of the Progressives and Americans are not having it. Our nation is a rejection of Feudalism and as we have rejected it in the past, the future will be no different!

Update: The Regime of Barack Hussein Obama has suffered a blow in its attempt to control the Internet.

(Hat Tip: vapig)

The Tea Partiers are the Mainstream

by Phantom Ace ( 104 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Elections, Elections 2010, Polls, Progressives, Republican Party, Tea Parties at April 5th, 2010 - 2:00 pm

The Totalitarian Progressive Movement has smeared the Tea Party Movement over and over again. They attack them as Fascists, Nazis, Racists and Christian extremists. However, this is clearly far from reality. A new survey by Gallup shows exactly what I have observed, the Tea Party Movement is mainstream America. These are average Americans who are tired of the elitesin both parties imposing their views on the public. They are sick of the Democrats with their Neo-Feudalist Ideology of elitist control and their transnationalist, One World foreign policy. They are also tired of the Republicans lying by claiming they are Conservatives when the elites of the party are Neo-Wilsonian Progressives who believe in Big Government and wars to impose Democracy in the Middle East. The Tea Partiers want their country back from the Elites and are a powerful voice.

PRINCETON, NJ — Tea Party supporters skew right politically; but demographically, they are generally representative of the public at large. That’s the finding of a USA Today/Gallup poll conducted March 26-28, in which 28% of U.S. adults call themselves supporters of the Tea Party movement.

Affiliation With Tea Party Movement

Read the rest: Tea Partiers Are Fairly Mainstream in Their Demographics

Americans are tired of Academics and their discredited economic and foreign policy theories. We want a government that represents the true will of the people. We will achieve this goal and the elites of the Republican and Democratic Party will be footnotes in history.

Update: Here’s the crowd reaction towards Obama as he throws the 1st pitch.

Wyle E. Obama, Genius-In-Chief

by snork ( 122 Comments › )
Filed under Economy, Technology at April 4th, 2010 - 10:30 am

From a speech in North Carolina on April 2, 2010. “Bob” is the manager of the plant that he’s speaking at, that makes some sort of polymeric battery insulators. Spaketh the GIF:

So it is a huge need for us to increase our fuel efficiency on cars now.  And that’s why one of the things that I did last year — it’s actually taking effect this week — is to raise a national fuel efficiency standard, first time we’ve done it in a very long time.  But, frankly, even with us raising those standards, I think consumers just in terms of their pocketbook interests are going to be even more interested in buying hybrids and electric cars.

So he made the cars use less gas. Last year. No wonder the earth isn’t warming any more. I didn’t even notice that he saved us already.

Two things that we can do that would make a big difference right now:  Number one, we’ve got to make sure that those cars are made here in the United States of America.  And so part of the reason why it’s so important for us to develop the battery technology here is if we’re developing battery technology that helps us leverage more auto production here in the United States.  […]

[He never gets around to mentionong the second “thing” -ed]

But one thing we need to do is make sure that those cars are made here in the United States.  [Didn’t he already say that? – ed] The second thing we need to do is to create the electricity grid, what we’re calling the smart grid, which is — think about it, part of the reason that we can drive our cars is because there’s a gas station every so often.  There are roads.  There are gas stations.  We know how to fuel up our automobiles.  Now, if we want to have everybody getting maximum use out of an electric car or a hybrid car, part of what we have to do is to create a similar distribution mechanism for electricity.  And one of the exciting things about these hybrids is we want to get to the point where you’ve got what’s called a plug-in hybrid, where you essentially have a gas station at your house — called your electric socket.  And you’re going to be able to plug in your car at night.  Some of the energy that was stored in the car can actually go back into the house, and then when you’re ready to go, you can get that energy and use it to drive.

WTF is this guy blathering about? #1, we don’t have any kind of electricity distribution grid right now? That’s news to me. Last time I checked, this computer was running on electricity, and so is my fridge, and I know it’s working because my beer is cold.

Secondly, (and yes, I’m actually going to follow up on this clause), when in the past has the federal government ever created a utility distribution network? They created the TVA and Bonneville and Hoover systems of generators as make-work projects in the 1930s, but never the distribution network to actual point-of-use consumers.

Thirdly, he seems to have swallowed a mouthful of buzzwords and associated snippets of information without any real understanding of what they really are all about. The “Smart Grid” isn’t a grid at all; it’s a completely stand alone system of internet connections to the utility central operator that allows the utilities to do some clever things that might save some money, but really amounts to a form of high-tech rationing. The “Smart Grid” is a topic for a whole post by itself.

But to do all that you need a better electricity grid. [I just explained why that isn’t true. -ed] We’ve got kind of a creaky infrastructure when it comes to electricity, and that’s one of the major investments that we want to start making. [Bullshit, Mr. President. – ed] And that, by the way, is an investment that only government, working with the private sector, can help to make. [More bullshit, Mr. President. The utilities should be able to finance all of that if it makes economic sense, using the conventional return on investment form of financing, Mr. President. There’s no need for the government to be involved in any of this infrastructure at all. – ed]

That was a great paragraph, aside from being 100% USDA approved grade AAA bullshit.

You’re hearing a lot of talk these days about government, and government is terrible, and bureaucrats, and they’re taking over and all this stuff.  Look, I don’t want government any more than is necessary, [Copious bullshit, Mr. President. -ed] but there are some things that Bob or any CEO can’t invest in.  Bob is not going to build the roads to get to Celgard.  [Neither is the federal government, Mr. President, but it’s not without precedent for a private company to actually build its own roads and connections to the interstate highway system). -ed] No company is going to make investments for a public good. [Excuse me, Mother…Mr. President??? And the federal bureaucrats work for free? -ed] None of you would expect a private company to fund our military or our firefighters. [Who TF do you think is paying for them??? -ed] There are just some things that you can’t do on your own, and the private sector is not going to do — it’s not profitable because if Bob was the guy who had to build the road, he’d have a whole bunch of other people driving on that road that weren’t paying for it.  So it’s not a good investment for him.

Oy. I’m sure glad we gots the smartestest Harvard genius in charge. Aren’t you?

Related: President Obama Gives 17-Minute, 2500 Word Answer to Woman Who Says “We Are Overtaxed”

Where do I go to get those 17 minutes back?

Roger Simon has some interesting (and disturbing) comments on the 17-minute ramble:

I know some conservatives think Obama is a socialist or a closet Alinskyite or whatever, but I think the problem is yet more complicated. No matter his ideology, this man is not fit to rule psychologically. Or, more properly, govern — but you know what I mean. He doesn’t have the temperament. He was elected with people knowing almost nothing about him. Despite that the facts are still masked, his history still obscure, we may now know too much, have seen too much. These things just leak out around the edges. They do for all of us, like it or not. And yet, he will be with us until 2012 at least.

Good luck to us.

Indeed.

Obama to propose Offshore Drilling

by Phantom Ace ( 95 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Climate, Elections 2010, Progressives at March 31st, 2010 - 8:30 am

Barack Hussein Obama finally makes a decision I agree with. He is proposing opening up areas of the Atlantic and Gulf coasts to offshore drilling. Before we celebrate and dance in the streets, remember that the Bush Administration proposed the same thing and it went nowhere. This most likely is a trick on Obama’s part to get Republicans to support his Neo-Feudalistic Cap-N-Trade scam.

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration is proposing to open vast expanses of water along the Atlantic coastline, the eastern Gulf of Mexico and the north coast of Alaska to oil and natural gas drilling, much of it for the first time, officials said Tuesday.

The proposal — a compromise that will please oil companies and domestic drilling advocates but anger some residents of affected states and many environmental organizations — would end a longstanding moratorium on oil exploration along the East Coast from the northern tip of Delaware to the central coast of Florida, covering 167 million acres of ocean.

Read the rest: Obama to Open Offshore Areas to Oil Drilling for First Time

Make no mistake about this, although it’s a great idea it’s really a trick. Political eunuch, Lindsey Graham (R-SC), is working with Marxist radical, NY Senator Charles Shumer on a Cap-N-Trade Bill. This proposal is a fig leaf so Graham can get some quisling Republican support behind the energy bill. That is the real reason behind this proposal.

The American people will not be fooled by this move on the part of Barack Hussein Obama. He is a snake oil salesman and his act is wearing thin.