► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Saul Alinsky’

Progressives use Race Card to deflect Criticism

by Phantom Ace ( 228 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Free Speech, Hate Speech, Liberal Fascism, Multiculturalism, Political Correctness, Progressives at September 16th, 2009 - 6:33 am

Good Morning Blogmocracy Netizens! As you have seen, we are experiencing some Technical difficulties. This is due to the tremendous support you have shown us and this has resulted in increase traffic! I would like to thank you all and bear with us. We will soon be moving to a new Host and will have a new design. We are planning on De-LGFing our site, so we can move forward into the future.

The Progressives, don’t want to move into the future. They want to live in the past by using one of their main weapons, The Race Card! With Obama being exposed as a failure and a pathetic nasty individual, his minions are now crying racism! This is desperation and divisive, but they don’t care. For the Totalitarian Progressive Movement, it’s all about control and they will do anything to maintain it.

C’mon, everyone knows the hullabaloo surrounding President Barack Obama is bigotry in action. The administration’s policy initiatives couldn’t possibly provoke any authentic anger or protest.

Proving this dastardly motive, on the other hand, has been problematic. But there are ways around this dilemma. Unearth some crazy outliers. Create caricatures. Recognize “code” words. Reduce to absurdity.
And presto!

“Surrounded by middle-aged white guys — a sepia snapshot of the days when such pols ran Washington like their own men’s club — Joe Wilson yelled ‘You lie!’ at a president who didn’t,” declared Maureen Dowd in her Saturday New York Times column. “But, fair or not, what I heard was an unspoken word in the air: You lie, boy!”

Of course, it’s fair. If inserting a racial epithet into a quote is wrong, I don’t wanna know what’s right. It is, moreover, common knowledge that middle-aged white men are bigots. If there’s a problem with Dowd’s premise, it’s that Wilson likely lacks the intellect to string together more than two words per sentence. He is from South Carolina, after all.

Read the rest.

This article is very sarcastic in tone, but it’s truthful. Progressives love to pigeon hole their opponents and stereotype them. This comes from the tactics of Saul Alinsky of  defining your enemy. The Race Card is their last defense, because their whole ideology is based on a false premise. They believe that the elite know what is better rfo the masses. When the people reject Progressivism, they use racism as an excuse.They just can’t concieve that people really just don’t agree with their Ideology.

This is another sign of weakness on the part of Progressives, that is why we must keep up the attacks on them. Alinsky himself, would advise “keep up the Pressure.” The Left is cracking and we must keep it up!

Update: Now Jimmy “The Dhimmi’ Carter chimes in. He claims any opposition to Obama is based on race!

Former President Jimmy Carter said Tuesday that U.S. Rep. Joe Wilson’s outburst to President Barack Obama during a speech to Congress last week was an act “based on racism” and rooted in fears of a black president.

“I think it’s based on racism,” Carter said in response to an audience question at a town hall held at his presidential center in Atlanta. “There is an inherent feeling among many in this country that an African-American should not be president.”

Read the rest.

Yeah Carter should know about Racism, he hates Jews.

(Update Hat Tip:Ed Mahmoud)

(Picture Update: Macker)

Carter

John Voight recommends reading Alinsky to Understand Obama

by Phantom Ace ( 56 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Progressives at August 21st, 2009 - 12:39 pm

Veteran actor and father of Angelina Jolie, Jon Voight is worried about how Obama is dividing this nation.  He goes on to recommend that everyone opposed to the Progressive movement read Saul Alinksy’s rules for Radicals. I have read it and as I have stated, Alinksy is a political genius. To defeat the Left, we must study and employ their tactics. This is what Scipio Africanus did to Hannibal at the Battle of Zama.  Scipio used Hannibal’s own tactics against him at Zama and Rome won the 2nd Punic War as a result.

“Do not let the Obama administration fool you with all their cunning Alinsky methods. And if you don’t know what that method is, I implore you to get the book ‘Rules for Radicals,’ by Saul Alinsky . Mr. Obama is very well trained in these methods,” he continues, citing a television campaign critical of the Republican Party and contentious town-hall meetings about health care reform.

Read the rest.

We must be Rightwing Scipios to The Progressive Hannibals in order to defeat the Transnational Totalitarian Progressive Movement.

This is an Open Thread as well.

Saul Alinsky Open Thread

by Phantom Ace ( 141 Comments › )
Filed under Election 2008, Liberal Fascism, Progressives at August 18th, 2009 - 2:03 pm

Saul Alinsky was a Totalitarian Progressive  and a community organizer in the 1960’s. His book, Rules for Radicals, laid the blueprint of the Progressive Movement’s takeover of America in the 2000’s. After September 11th the Progressives seized that moment and went on to assist the Islamists and destroy Bush and the Republican Party. Now many on the Right, like me, are adopting those tactics and turning the tables. The Tea Party protests and the Town hall protests are examples of the Right using Leftists.

I have read Rules for Radicals and admit,Saul Alinsky was a genius. His ideas are evil and anti-American, but his tactics work. Progressive blogs like Think Progress, Daily Kos, Talking Points Memo, Huffington Post and Little Green Footballs all use his tactics. They ridicule, smear and mock their enemies. They use simple slogans and turn their enemies labels against them. It works and I have no qualms using my enemies tactics against them! I recommend all on the Right use and adopt these tactics


Like Patton said: ““Rommel, you magnificent bastard! I read your book!” !”

Hey Progressives, I read you book!

(Hat Tip: Defenseman)

This is an Open Thread.

Phillips: Revolution You Can Believe In

by Phantom Ace Comments Off on Phillips: Revolution You Can Believe In
Filed under Barack Obama, Election 2008 at September 9th, 2008 - 5:52 pm

The thin-skinned moonbats screeching about Sarah Palin “mocking and smearing community organizers” in her Republican Convention speech probably aren’t going to like Melanie Phillips’ latest article much: Revolution You Can Believe In.

In her game-changing convention speech, Sarah Palin took a swipe at Obama for having been nothing more in his life than a ‘community organiser’.

This prompted the Obama campaign to issue a pained defence of community organisation as a way of promoting social change ‘from the bottom up’. The impression is that community organising is a worthy if woolly and ultimately ineffectual grassroots activity. This is to miss something of the greatest importance: that in the world of Barack Obama, community organisers are a key strategy in a different game altogether; and the name of that game is revolutionary Marxism.

The seditious role of the community organiser was developed by an extreme left intellectual called Saul Alinsky. He was a radical Chicago activist who, by the time he died in 1972, had had a profound influence on the highest levels of the Democratic party. Alinsky was a ‘transformational Marxist’ in the mould of Antonio Gramsci, who promoted the strategy of a ‘long march through the institutions’ by capturing the culture and turning it inside out as the most effective means of overturning western society. In similar vein, Alinsky condemned the New Left for alienating the general public by its demonstrations and outlandish appearance. The revolution had to be carried out through stealth and deception. Its proponents had to cultivate an image of centrism and pragmatism. A master of infiltration, Alinsky wooed Chicago mobsters and Wall Street financiers alike. And successive Democratic politicians fell under his spell.

His creed was set out in his book ‘Rules for Radicals’ – a book he dedicated to Lucifer, whom he called the ‘first radical’. It was Alinsky for whom ‘change’ was his mantra. And by ‘change’, he meant a Marxist revolution achieved by slow, incremental, Machiavellian means which turned society inside out. This had to be done through systematic deception, winning the trust of the naively idealistic middle class by using the language of morality to conceal an agenda designed to destroy it. And the way to do this, he said, was through ‘people’s organisations’.

Read it all, won’t you?

(Hat tip:Nancy@LGF)