► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Community Organizers’

Kathy Griffin Says ‘D-Word’

by DJM ( 7 Comments › )
Filed under Open thread at January 3rd, 2009 - 2:01 pm

This is news?

I was going to respond with more, but, hell, I’d have to use d-words and h-words, and r-words…Shit, I’d have to use words starting with all sorts of letters!

Screw it. Instead I’ll just post some pictures of a few DICKS:

(more…)

Obama Campaign Covering Up Involvement with ACORN?

by Phantom Ace Comments Off on Obama Campaign Covering Up Involvement with ACORN?
Filed under Barack Obama, Election 2008 at October 12th, 2008 - 5:03 pm

he Cleveland Leader has a series of posts tracking the Obama campaign’s lies and evasions about the candidate’s long history of connections with ACORN, and their attempts to quietly edit the Obama website as more information leaks out: Obama Campaign Involved in More Cover-Ups in ACORN Scandal.

Wikileaks.org has an article from the Winter 2003 edition of the magazine Social Policy (the full article is here, but requires registration), making it very clear that Barack Obama’s ties to ACORN are extensive.

(Here’s our local copy of the PDF file.)

[Photo caption: “ACORN members meet with Illinois Senate candidate Barack Obama. Photo courtesy Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now.”]

Obama started building the base years before. For instance, ACORN noticed him when he was organizing on the far south side of the city with the Developing Communities Project. He was a very good organizer. When he returned from law school, we asked him to help us with a lawsuit to challenge the state of Illinois’ refusal to abide by the National Voting Rights Act, also known as motor voter. Allied only with the state of Mississippi, Illinois had been refusing to allow mass-based voter registration according to the new law. Obama took the case, known as ACORN vs. Edgar (the name of the Republican governor at the time) and we won. Obama then went on to run a voter registration project with Project VOTE in 1992 that made it possible for Carol Moseley Braun to win the Senate that year. Project VOTE delivered 50,000 newly registered voters in that campaign (ACORN delivered about 5000 of them).

Since then, we have invited Obama to our leadership training sessions to run the session on power every year, and, as a result, many of our newly developing leaders got to know him before he ever ran for office. Thus it was natural for many of us to be active volunteers in his first campaign for STate Senate and then his failed bid for U.S. Congress in 1996. By the time he ran for U.S. Senate, we were old friends.

(Hat tip:Nancy)

Bad Company – The Radical Associates of Barack Hussein Obama

by savage Comments Off on Bad Company – The Radical Associates of Barack Hussein Obama
Filed under Barack Obama, Election 2008 at October 1st, 2008 - 2:34 pm

More reason NOT to vote for Barry, UNLESS you are a stinking Communist….

Hat Tip: livsgrandma

Phillips: Revolution You Can Believe In

by Phantom Ace Comments Off on Phillips: Revolution You Can Believe In
Filed under Barack Obama, Election 2008 at September 9th, 2008 - 5:52 pm

The thin-skinned moonbats screeching about Sarah Palin “mocking and smearing community organizers” in her Republican Convention speech probably aren’t going to like Melanie Phillips’ latest article much: Revolution You Can Believe In.

In her game-changing convention speech, Sarah Palin took a swipe at Obama for having been nothing more in his life than a ‘community organiser’.

This prompted the Obama campaign to issue a pained defence of community organisation as a way of promoting social change ‘from the bottom up’. The impression is that community organising is a worthy if woolly and ultimately ineffectual grassroots activity. This is to miss something of the greatest importance: that in the world of Barack Obama, community organisers are a key strategy in a different game altogether; and the name of that game is revolutionary Marxism.

The seditious role of the community organiser was developed by an extreme left intellectual called Saul Alinsky. He was a radical Chicago activist who, by the time he died in 1972, had had a profound influence on the highest levels of the Democratic party. Alinsky was a ‘transformational Marxist’ in the mould of Antonio Gramsci, who promoted the strategy of a ‘long march through the institutions’ by capturing the culture and turning it inside out as the most effective means of overturning western society. In similar vein, Alinsky condemned the New Left for alienating the general public by its demonstrations and outlandish appearance. The revolution had to be carried out through stealth and deception. Its proponents had to cultivate an image of centrism and pragmatism. A master of infiltration, Alinsky wooed Chicago mobsters and Wall Street financiers alike. And successive Democratic politicians fell under his spell.

His creed was set out in his book ‘Rules for Radicals’ – a book he dedicated to Lucifer, whom he called the ‘first radical’. It was Alinsky for whom ‘change’ was his mantra. And by ‘change’, he meant a Marxist revolution achieved by slow, incremental, Machiavellian means which turned society inside out. This had to be done through systematic deception, winning the trust of the naively idealistic middle class by using the language of morality to conceal an agenda designed to destroy it. And the way to do this, he said, was through ‘people’s organisations’.

Read it all, won’t you?

(Hat tip:Nancy@LGF)