First time visitor? Learn more.

~Open Thread: Friday “Bungle In The Jungle” Shabbat Edition~

by WrathofG-d ( 286 Comments › )
Filed under Judaism, Music, Open thread, Religion at December 11th, 2009 - 1:00 pm

In the mindset of attempting to provide something for everyone this Friday evening,  I present the following.  Hopefully, it is both spiritual, and jovial for all your Friday evening needs… (it is sort of like those “choose your own adventure” books)

For the frivolous you can stop reading here, and enjoy this as your Friday Night drinking thread.  If however you wish to delve deeper in to the song (and potentially your soul/existence) continue reading.

When researching for a topic for this Friday, I found the following article that explains the deeper meaning of Jethro Tull’s popular song “Bungle In The Jungle” by Mois Navon .  Hopefully, the following explanation will cause you to think, and otherwise inspire a deeper, more spiritual discussion.

More than just a catchy rock flute song,  Ian Anderson intended the composition of his Jethro Tull hit single, Bungle in the Jungle, to be a study of the human condition.  Speaking on this subject, he stated, “…I was writing an album that was exploring people, the human condition, through analogies with the animal kingdom.  And that particular song was perhaps the more obvious and the more catchy of the tunes.”1

As Mois Navon states, a close analysis of the lyrics reveals both deep existential and eschatological motifs.2 which through delving into the song’s words, phrases and concepts teach us about of man, his world and destiny.

Walking through forests of palm tree apartments —

This verse sets up the analogy of animal kingdom to human world that will be used throughout the song. Man’s jutting apartments make for a cityscape akin to a forest of palm trees – a jungle – through which one makes his way with great effort and difficulty.3 By starting with the verb “walking,” we are informed from the outset that we are not here to sit in passive observation but rather to actively embark on an adventure. Indeed, we are going on the excursion of our very lives.

Scoff at the monkeys who live in their dark tents

Monkeys represent people who take everything as a joke, oblivious to the serious nature of reality. Darkness is a metaphor for ignorance, so living in “dark tents” emphasizes the uneducated nature of these people. Darkness is also a metaphor for evil, so living in “dark tents” further implies an ignorance that begets immorality.4 Witnessing such base living evokes a contempt that is given expression as “scoffing”.

Down by the waterhole — drunk every Friday —

A “waterhole” is a well-worn euphemism for a bar or pub; and so it is that these “monkeys” – these people who choose to mock reality – do so by inebriating themselves. This occurs particularly at the weekend when, being of the working class, they are finally left to themselves.

Eating their nuts — saving their raisins for Sunday.

The workday week is lived humbly off of staple foods and staple thoughts, while the consumption of sweets that tantalize the senses is reserved for the “Sabbath” day.5 Though this alludes to a religious ethic of celebrating the “Sabbath day as holy”6, it is here mentioned disparagingly as an addendum to the drunken Friday. For the “monkeys,” their religiosity is merely part of the rote of life, disconnected from reflection and thought needed to reach a higher consciousness.

Lions and tigers who wait in the shadows —

There are other people – predators – who take advantage of the oblivious masses. These people are dishonest, seeking to take unfair advantage, as is denoted by their waiting in the shadows.

They’re fast but they’re lazy, and sleep in green meadows.

These “lions and tigers” are not greater than the “monkeys” in any spiritual sense; they are merely endowed with the asset of physical prowess. “Fast but lazy” implies that they have an advantage but do not employ it to make use of their true potential.

“Green meadows” are symbolic of wealth which often gives rise to “sleep” – a rejection of one’s higher calling through oblivion.7 The Bible expresses the phenomenon as, “Jeshurun waxed fat and kicked … and he forsook God who made him, and contemned the Rock of his salvation” (Deut. 32:15).8

Let’s bungle in the jungle — well, that’s all right by me.

The world is a jungle, a lush paradise, but at the same time a place fraught with potential danger – indeed a fitting metaphor for a world created with the possibility of both great good as well as frightening evil. The world being what it is, we are called upon to “bungle”, to “struggle”, to rise above the monkeys, lions and tigers. Indeed this is the very task of life.9

I’m a tiger when I want love, but I’m a snake if we disagree.

These are personal reflections of an individual struggling to “bungle” in the “jungle” just depicted. This line, together with those that immediately follow, describes an attempt to cope in a world of destructive competition. The individual is aggressively passionate about his selfish – “I want” – desires;10 he is conniving and dangerous when opposed.11 These traits are less than ideal and are, we realize by the end of the song when tigers and snakes are no more, to be shunned.

Just say a word and the boys will be right there:
with claws at your back to send a chill through the night air.
Is it so frightening to have me at your shoulder?
Thunder and lightning couldn’t be bolder.
I’ll write on your tombstone, “I thank you for dinner.”
This game that we animals play is a winner.

Here we have a description of a competitive life made of politics and deal-making – a merciless “game” in which one may be taken advantage of without remorse. This is strikingly conveyed in the burying of one’s dinner guest: opportunism at its worst, man as animal. His “divine image” lost, he honors no code of morality, but only the code of the jungle.12

The rivers are full of crocodile nasties

The world is a place where things are not what they appear to be on the surface. The nature of the world is such that good and evil are often intermingled – rivers, which supply essential water, are nevertheless also inhabited by life-threatening dangers. It is incumbent upon man to distinguish between the two in his struggle to perfect the world. Man must realize the world’s potential for good, while being ever cautious of its latent potential for evil.13

And He who made kittens put snakes in the grass.

Indeed, God by design created the good, the sweet, the innocent, and the vulnerable, along with the evil, the malevolent, the crafty, and the predatory – as the Bible states, “I form the light and create darkness, I make peace and create evil; I, the Lord, do all these things” (Isaiah 45:7).

While the kitten is the picture of sweet innocence, the snake is the ultimate icon of evil. Placed in the grass, the snake denotes an evil which is not readily discernable. Indeed, evil is difficult to overcome precisely because it often “sneaks” up on man, taking advantage of his vulnerabilities. As such, the Bible describes the snake, who plotted the first sin of man, as “crafty” (Gen. 3:1) and “deceiving” (Gen. 3:13).

He’s a lover of life but a player of pawns —

Here is a reference to the existential dialectic of fate and free will. On the one hand, God loves life. Indeed, He created man to live through the exercise of his free will, for without it one has not “life”.14 On the other hand, God maintains complete control over his world, maneuvering people like pieces on a chessboard.

Expressed in this verse then is the notion that there is indeed free will, yet there is also a guiding hand that moves history in the direction God deems fit.15 Man has free exercise of his will, yet he cannot alter God’s destiny for His creation. This truth is confirmed emphatically in the following line which starts with the word “yes”.

Yes, the King on His sunset lies waiting for dawn

The King, God, waits expectantly for history to reach its destiny. He gives man his “day”16 to perfect himself through the use of free will, but just as the day ends, so too does man’s opportunity.17 Here “sunset”, which denotes the day’s end, is a metaphor for the end of days, the eschatological destiny of mankind.18

The prophecies of the end of days indicate that there will be a great war known as Armageddon (i.e., Gog U’Magog) during which God does not actively participate but “lies waiting”.19 However, there will then come a day, the “day of the Lord”, at which point “the Lord shall go forth and fight against those nations, as when He fighteth in the day of battle. …” (Zechariah 14:3).

Following this “day of the Lord” there will “dawn” a new day, a new era: the messianic era20 – when the light of peace and truth shines forth, as reflected in the next line.

To light up His Jungle

Light, as the ultimate metaphor for knowledge and truth, was sorely lacking prior to the “dawn” of redemption. In contradistinction, the messianic era will be a time when the knowledge of God will pervade the earth and, as a result, peace and harmony will extend throughout all of nature, indeed, lighting up “His Jungle”:

There shall come forth a rod out of the stem of Ishai [i.e., the Messiah] … And the wolf shall dwell with the lamb, and the leopard shall lie down with the kid; and the calf and the young lion and the fatling together; and a little child shall lead them. And the cow and the bear shall feed; their young ones shall lie down together; and the lion shall eat straw like the ox. And the sucking child shall play on the hole of the asp snake, and the weaned child shall put his hand on the adder snake’s den. They shall not hurt nor destroy in all My holy mountain; for the earth shall be full of the knowledge of the Lord, as the waters cover the sea. (Isaiah 11:1-9)

{Seriously, Read The Rest}

To those who celebrate/keep Shabbat have a wonderful and meaningful one.  For those who do not, have a spiritual and G-d filled weekend!

Tags: , , , , ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

Comments are closed.

Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By All of Us