First time visitor? Learn more.

Chuck says Indian slums a model for humanity

by Phantom Ace ( 65 Comments › )
Filed under Environmentalism, UK at October 10th, 2010 - 5:30 pm

Scroll down for the NFL Week 5 Open

He’s back! Crazy Chuck the prince of Wales (Not the blogger), is at it again with his hypocrisy. He claims that Indian shanty towns as portrayed in Slum Dog Millionaire are a model for humanity. This coming from a man who lives in the lap of luxury provided by Bristih tax payers. He thinks himself as above his subjects and seeks to control how they live.

BRITAIN’S Prince Charles has cited the Mumbai shantytown setting for the film “Slumdog Millionaire” as a role model for sustainable living in Western cities, a report said Saturday.

In the book, called Harmony, Prince Charles contrasts the “fragmented, deconstructed” housing estates of Western nations with the “order and harmony” of the dusty potters’ colony featured in the Oscar-winning movie.

The 61-year-old heir to the British throne writes in a new book being published next week that the Dharavi slum is better and more instinctively organised than many Western towns, London’s Daily Telegraph said.

Chuck should sell his family’s royal assets and move into an Indian slum himself. He has no intention to live in the slums himself. He views himself as part of the Tranzi global elite. Chuck wants to go back to the feudal sytem that his ancestors benefitted from. Like his namesake blogger, Chuck preaches what he will never live.
(Hat Tip: mfhorn)

Scroll down for the NFL Week 5 Open

Tags:

This entry was posted on Sunday, October 10th, 2010 at 5:30 pm and is filed under Environmentalism, UK. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

Comments are closed.

Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By All of Us