First time visitor? Learn more.

Outrageous: Obama regime gives almost one billion taxpayer dollars to repair mosques in the middle east!

by Bob in Breckenridge ( 26 Comments › )
Filed under Al Qaeda, Barack Obama, Cult of Obama, Democratic Party, Economy, government, Islam, Islamic Terrorism, Islamists, Jihad, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Multiculturalism, Muslim Brotherhood, Political Correctness, Politics, Progressives, Sharia (Islamic Law), Terrorism at March 16th, 2012 - 4:51 pm

Watch the video from WSB-TV news in Atlanta. I guess the regime thought they could quietly slip this “under the radar” and no one would notice. This shouldn’t won’t surprise any of us.

The Obama regime, through the State dept.’s USAID program, has funneled almost $1 billion of our dollars to Egypt and other terror-supporting or sponsoring 7th century muzz countries hellholes to repair mosques. This is happening as the grand muffin of saudi arabia, or whatever they call the wicked, vile POS, called for the destruction of all churches in muzz countries hellholes.

And of course, the regime is doing all this in the name of “winning the hearts and minds” of the muzz scum in the middle east so they don’t commit terrorist attacks against us, which we all know is hopeless, idiotic and a waste of our tax money (See related story below).

Problem is we all know that the muzz swine’s “hearts and minds” are filled with nothing but evil and hatred for us and our way of life.

The muzz swine love killing infidels and see this “aid” as just another sign of American weakness and are laughing at us as they cash our checks and plan bigger and better ways to kill more infidels.

Here’s more proof, as if we need it, that we’ll NEVER win the “hearts and minds of these 7th century savages (a tip o’ the hat to waldensianspirit this St. Patrick’s day weekend)

Saudi Arabia’s Grand Mufti Calls For “Destruction of All Churches In The Region”

Saudi Arabia’s Grand Mufti confirms Islamic hostility for churches.

by Raymond Ibrahim
Jihad Watch
March 14, 2012

http://www.raymondibrahim.com/11358/saudi-mufti-destroy-churches

According to several Arabic news sources, last Monday, Sheikh Abdul Aziz bin Abdullah, the Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia, declared that it is “necessary to destroy all the churches of the region.”

The Grand Mufti made his assertion in response to a question posed by a delegation from Kuwait, where a parliament member recently called for the “removal” of churches (he later “clarified” by saying he merely meant that no churches should be built in Kuwait): the delegation wanted to confirm Sharia’s position on churches.

Accordingly, the Grand Mufti “stressed that Kuwait was a part of the Arabian Peninsula, and therefore it is necessary to destroy all churches in it.”

As with many grand muftis before him, the Sheikh based his proclamation on the famous tradition, or hadith, wherein the prophet of Islam declared on his deathbed that “There are not to be two religions in the [Arabian] Peninsula,” which has always been interpreted to mean that only Islam can be practiced in the region.

While the facts of this account speak for themselves, consider further:

Sheikh Abdul Aziz bin Abdullah is not just some random Muslim hating on churches. He is the Grand Mufti of the nation that brought Islam to the world. Moreover, he is the President of the Supreme Council of Ulema [Islamic scholars] and Chairman of the Standing Committee for Scientific Research and Issuing of Fatwas. Accordingly, when it comes to what Islam teaches, his words are immensely authoritative.

Considering the hysteria that besets the West whenever non-authoritative individuals offend Islam—for instance, a fringe, unknown pastor—imagine what would happen if a Christian counterpart to the Grand Mufti, say the Pope, were to declare that all mosques in Italy must be destroyed; imagine the nonstop Western media frenzy that would erupt, all the shrill screams of “intolerance” and “bigot,” demands for apologies if not resignation, nonstop handwringing by sensitive politicians, and worse.

Yet the Grand Mufti—the highest Islamic law authority of our “friend-and-ally” Saudi Arabia—gets a free pass when he incites Muslims to destroy churches, not that any extra incitement is needed (nary a month goes by without several churches being bombed and destroyed throughout the Islamic world). In fact, at the time of this writing, I have not seen this story, already some three days old, translated on any English news source, though “newsworthy” stories are often translated in mere hours.

Likewise, consider the Grand Mufti’s rationale for destroying churches: it is simply based on a hadith. But when non-Muslims evoke hadiths as authoritative—this one or the countless others that incite violence and intolerance against the “infidel”—they are accused of being “Islamophobes,” of intentionally slandering and misrepresenting Islam, of being obstacles on the road to “dialogue,” and so forth.

Which leads to perhaps the most important point: Islam’s teachings are so easily ascertained; there is no mystery in determining what is “right” and “wrong” in Islam. The Grand Mufti based his fatwa on a canonical hadith, which Muslims and (informed) non-Muslims know is part of Islam’s sources of jurisprudence (or usul al-fiqh). All very standard and expected. And yet the West—with all its institutions of higher learning, including governmental agencies dealing with cultural and religious questions—is still thoroughly “confused” as to what Islam teaches.

All of this is nothing short of a scandal—a reminder of just how deep the mainstream media, academia, and most politicians have their collective heads thrust in the sand.

Meanwhile, here is the latest piece of evidence of just how bad churches have it in the Muslim world, for those who care to know.

Tags: , , ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

Comments are closed.

Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By All of Us