First time visitor? Learn more.

The Architect of Defeat is on the outs with more and more Republicans

by Mojambo ( 169 Comments › )
Filed under Elections 2012, Elections 2016, George W. Bush, Mitt Romney, Politics, Republican Party at December 27th, 2013 - 7:00 am

My opinions of Karl Rove and the corrupt Republican consulting class has been well documented on this blog. Let this story speak for itself.

by Jon Terbush

A decade ago, Karl Rove was President George W. Bush’s right-hand man and one of the most powerful political figures in America. And even after his fortunes briefly dipped at the end of the Bush era, Rove roared to life again, tapping into and fueling the Tea Party movement through his massive super PAC, American Crossroads.

But today, with a GOP civil war raging between establishment types and upstart conservatives in the mold of Texas Sen. Ted Cruz (R), Rove’s once-strong influence has begun to wane. An embodiment of the Bush-era Republicans who have fallen out of favor of late, Rove, too, has begun to come under fire from the populist right.

In the latest sign of Rove’s diminished standing, a dozen super PACs are challenging his American Crossroads in the GOP money game, and aiming to promote their own preferred candidates in races across the country, according to the New York Times.

[……]

Crossroads was widely criticized for not producing more victories in 2012 despite spending some $300 million. The group had dismal 16.7 percent success rate in the last election, according to OpenSecrets.

And then there’s this bizarre embodiment of Rove’s slipping grasp: While providing live election night analysis for Fox News, he refused to concede that Ohio had gone for Obama and that, as a result, Romney had lost the race.

Rove’s Crossroads spent nearly $100 million just to defeat Obama. That effort failed.

“He has lost his mojo,” a GOP strategist subsequently told the Washington Post of Rove. “He has become total spin, including spinning himself.”

Then at the start of the new year, Rove quickly found himself on the wrong side of the Tea Party.

In February, Rove launched the Conservative Victory Project, a group whose explicit goal was finding and aiding the most electable conservatives, while keeping fringe candidates from blowing winnable general elections. It was a direct response to the epic flameouts of candidates like Todd Akin — of “legitimate rape” infamy — who almost certainly cost the party several crucial seats in Congress.

Rove said the group would ensure GOP money wasn’t wasted on unelectable candidates. But conservatives, furious and feeling marginalized, pushed back, and hard. Rove, they felt, had exposed himself as exactly the kind of establishment Republican they opposed: An opportunist eager to get their votes without truly caring about their grassroots goals.

[……]

Conservative radio personality Mark Levin challenged Rove to “bring it on,” while activist and ForAmerica chairman Brent Bozell accused Rove of waging “gang warfare” on the Tea Party. In a March letter to Crossroads donors, co-signed by other Tea Party groups, Bozell wrote that Rove should “stop blaming conservatives for his disastrous results,” and that he should “stop posturing himself as a conservative: His record supporting wasteful government spending and moderate candidates over conservatives spans decades.”

So began the great conservative money war of 2013.

Rove pushed back against his critics on the right, but Crossroads nevertheless went largely dormant for the remainder of the year, in part because of an unexpected dearth of funds. Through the first half of 2011, Crossroads raised almost $4 million; through the same period in 2013, it raised just $1.86 million.

[…….]

Crossroads, along with Rove’s other ventures, will assuredly pour money into next year’s races. But this time, unlike years past, they’ll have plenty of competition from within their own party.

Read the rest –  How Karl Rove went from GOP mastermind to the right’s political punching bag

 

Tags: ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

Comments are closed.

Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By All of Us