► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘BP’

Al-Qaeda captures a BP Gas Complex in Algeria

by Phantom Ace ( 10 Comments › )
Filed under Al Qaeda, Islamic Terrorism, Islamists, Special Report at January 16th, 2013 - 4:41 pm

Obama bragged that al-Qaeda was on the run, but no one told them. In their latest act of aggression, they have seized control of a BP gas complex. The worst part is that there are 7 Americans taken hostage and they have surrounded the complex with mines.

ALGIERS, Algeria — In what could be the first spillover from France’s intervention in Mali, Islamist militants attacked and occupied a natural gas complex partly operated by energy company BP in southern Algeria on Wednesday. Two foreigners were killed and dozens of others, including Americans, were taken hostage.

A militant group claimed responsibility for the attack, saying it was in revenge for Algeria’s support of France’s operation against al-Qaida-linked Malian rebels groups far to the southeast. It said it was holding 41 foreigners, including seven Americans.

[….]

Algeria will not respond to terrorist demands and rejects all negotiations,” Interior Minister Daho Ould Kablia said on television. He denied that the militants were from Mali or Libya, possibly suggesting they were from Algeria itself.

In a statement, BP said the site was “attacked and occupied by a group of unidentified armed people,” and some of its personnel are believed to be “held by the occupiers.”

This is a direct result of NATO overthrowing Qaddafi. I wonder what the Obama Regime’s spin will be?

McIntyre Asks a Very Interesting Question

by snork ( 61 Comments › )
Filed under Environmentalism at June 1st, 2010 - 9:00 am

I’ll keep this short and sweet. Steve Mc at ClimateAudit has a post up on the BP cleanup plan. These plans have to be filed as part of the routine paperwork needed to get the final permit to drill. Now much has said about how government has failed us, and the buck is being passed as far back as Reagan (!) as well as to all private parties involved. Nothing surprising there. But Steve also asks this:

I also presume that the BP Oil Spill Response Plan (including prior editions) and Response Plans of other operators have been available not merely to regulators, but to environmental organizations for many years (I don’t know this, I am presuming it.) If effective skimming capacity is insufficient to deal with the present blow out – or whatever else is missing in the remediation capacity – shouldn’t this have been apparent to someone in the environmental movements? Has this been an ongoing topic of controversy for environmental organizations over the past 10 years? Not just in the abstract way of condemning all offshore drilling, but in the practical way of pointing out potential shortfalls in skimming capacity (or other practical defects in the Response Plan)? Just asking.

Very interesting question, indeed. Instead of photoshopping polar bears on to ice, shouldn’t these “watchdog” organizations, many of which have multibillion dollar budgets, be looking over the shoulders of both the oil companies and the government? Or are they really entitled to call themselves “watchdogs”? And while not denying the responsibility that both the private companies and the government have in this, is it not possible that someone in the NGO sector might have been able to prevent this by demanding that the government do its job, and in turn demand that BP produce a serious response plan, and not 500+ pages of platitudes?

Which leads to the next question: are there people at BP and in the government that they didn’t want to piss off? Or did they really secretly want some event of this sort to happen, and didn’t want to prevent BP from stabbing the entire industry in the back like they did?

It seems like questions beget questions. So next time some hippy from Greenpeace comes knocking on your door, these would be some good questions to ask.