► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘children’

Spanking Children Could KILL Them!

by DJM ( 2 Comments › )
Filed under Political Correctness at January 4th, 2009 - 1:54 pm

Apparently, I was a lucky one. I was spanked as a child, but I somehow managed to survive.

If you spank your children, THEY COULD DIE! Don’t do it! Let them become liberal pansies instead!

CHILD homicide rates could be slashed if parents are banned from smacking their children, according to new research by Australian doctors.

If you still think spanking is okay, watch this video:

If that isn’t a case to stop spanking, I don’t know what is…

A Case For The Death Penalty

by DJM ( 7 Comments › )
Filed under Crime at December 26th, 2008 - 5:50 am

There are three things that make me angry enough to want to see certain people suffer:

Men who abuse women.

Men and women who abuse children.

People who abuse animals.

Any person who purposely harms something or someone weaker is the lowest of the low, in my opinion. There is no place in humanity for such disgusting filth. (As some of you might have guessed, this is one of the reasons I hate Islam so much.)

I read this story this morning and how I want to see these two meet a similar fate as their daughter:

TUCSON, Ariz. (AP) — The parents of a starved 6-week-old Tucson girl are facing one count each of first-degree murder and child abuse.

A Pima County grand jury indicted Terri Sullivan, 26, and Scott D. Sullivan, 27, Monday.

Does anyone want to bet one of these two is a fat cow? There is a special place in hell for parents who gorge themselves while their child dies of starvation. At least, I can hope there is.

Yes Virginia, there is a Santa Claus

by savage ( 2 Comments › )
Filed under Open thread at December 24th, 2008 - 1:21 am

This editorial was written by Frank Church and printed in the New York Sun in September of 1897.

“DEAR EDITOR: I am 8 years old.
“Some of my little friends say there is no Santa Claus.
“Papa says, ‘If you see it in THE SUN it’s so.’
“Please tell me the truth; is there a Santa Claus?

“VIRGINIA O’HANLON.
“115 WEST NINETY-FIFTH STREET.”

VIRGINIA, your little friends are wrong. They have been affected by the skepticism of a skeptical age. They do not believe except [what] they see. They think that nothing can be which is not comprehensible by their little minds. All minds, Virginia, whether they be men’s or children’s, are little. In this great universe of ours man is a mere insect, an ant, in his intellect, as compared with the boundless world about him, as measured by the intelligence capable of grasping the whole of truth and knowledge.

Yes, VIRGINIA, there is a Santa Claus. He exists as certainly as love and generosity and devotion exist, and you know that they abound and give to your life its highest beauty and joy. Alas! how dreary would be the world if there were no Santa Claus. It would be as dreary as if there were no VIRGINIAS. There would be no childlike faith then, no poetry, no romance to make tolerable this existence. We should have no enjoyment, except in sense and sight. The eternal light with which childhood fills the world would be extinguished.

Not believe in Santa Claus! You might as well not believe in fairies! You might get your papa to hire men to watch in all the chimneys on Christmas Eve to catch Santa Claus, but even if they did not see Santa Claus coming down, what would that prove? Nobody sees Santa Claus, but that is no sign that there is no Santa Claus. The most real things in the world are those that neither children nor men can see. Did you ever see fairies dancing on the lawn? Of course not, but that’s no proof that they are not there. Nobody can conceive or imagine all the wonders there are unseen and unseeable in the world.

You may tear apart the baby’s rattle and see what makes the noise inside, but there is a veil covering the unseen world which not the strongest man, nor even the united strength of all the strongest men that ever lived, could tear apart. Only faith, fancy, poetry, love, romance, can push aside that curtain and view and picture the supernal beauty and glory beyond. Is it all real? Ah, VIRGINIA, in all this world there is nothing else real and abiding.

No Santa Claus! Thank God! he lives, and he lives forever. A thousand years from now, Virginia, nay, ten times ten thousand years from now, he will continue to make glad the heart of childhood.

Islam & The Age of Consent

by DJM ( 17 Comments › )
Filed under Islamists at November 29th, 2008 - 5:44 am

Invented in the 7th Century, Islam is a cult that should have become obsolete along with the Dark Ages. Sadly, however, the death cult continues to thrive as Muslims around the world do their best to copy their perfect example, Muhammad. (Surah 33:21)

If you ever needed a new reason to hate Muhammad’s cult, here it is:


Is there a MINIMUM age of consent?
Find everything you ever wanted to know about Islam, and more:

http://the-koran.blogspot.com
http://www.youtube.com/AhmadsQuran3
http://inthenameofallah.org

Hide your daughters.

SILENCE = CONSENT

Bukhari, Volume 9, Book 86, Number 98:

Narrated Abu Huraira:

The Prophet said, “A virgin should not be married till she is asked for her consent; and the matron should not be married till she is asked whether she agrees to marry or not.” It was asked, “O Allah’s Apostle! How will she(the virgin) express her consent?” He said, “By keeping silent.”

Bukhari, Volume 9, Book 86, Number 101:

Narrated ‘Aisha:

Allah’s Apostle said, “It is essential to have the consent of a virgin (for the marriage). I said, “A virgin feels shy.” The Prophet; said, “Her silence means her consent.”

FATWA APPROVING SEX WITH CHILDREN

From Ayatollah Khomeini:

“A man can marry a girl younger than nine years of age, even if the girl is still a baby being breastfed. A man, however is prohibited from having intercourse with a girl younger than nine, other sexual acts such as foreplay, rubbing, kissing and sodomy is allowed. A man having intercourse with a girl younger than nine years of age has not committed a crime, but only an infraction, if the girl is not permanently damaged. If the girl, however, is permanently damaged, the man must provide for her all her life. But this girl will not count as one of the man’s four permanent wives. He also is not permitted to marry the girl’s sister.”

Notice the penalty if the girl is permanently (physically – there is no recognition of emotional damage) damaged. The man must care for her, but does not have to count her as a wife. Essentially, she becomes his SLAVE. He can do to her anything he wants, and she is bound to obey because he is her provider. That is his punishment for physically damaging a BABY.