► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Economy’

Gas Pump Activism: Print This Poster!

by 1389AD ( 42 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Economy, Regulation, Technology, Transportation at April 29th, 2011 - 4:30 pm

Disrupt the Narrative: Gas Pump Activism

(h/t: Ed Driscoll)

Do you have to take these gas prices in silence? I don’t think so.

All you have to do is download this pdf, print out a few copies and put them, along with a roll of Scotch tape, into your car.

The next time you fill up, instead of watching in horror as the dollar amount on the pump races by as the gallons trickle into your tank, affix one of these to the pump.

Take care to not cover vital information regarding safety, etc. and don’t cover any advertising.

Then drive off with a smile on your face, knowing that when the next person drives up to the pump they’ll either agree with you and be pleased to know that they’re not alone, be better informed by your message or if it’s an Obamabot, you’ll have thrown water on their circuitry and ruined their day.

Obama Gas Prices graph poster

Here’s the pdf you can download for a better quality image for printing purposes…

ObamaGasPrices.pdf

…As for the artwork, such as it is, feel free to share it with whomever. We need to pin the gas price tail on this Donkey.

…Here’s a great rework of the original [in small format] from botnet.

Read it all here (with rolling updates).

Tech Tips

  • Color laser copies provide the strongest visual impact and the best resistance to outdoor weather. But if your budget doesn’t allow for color copies, by all means, use black-and-white laser copies or color ink-jet printouts. If you use ink-jet printouts, try to post them where they won’t be directly exposed to rain.
  • You can even print the .pdf image on full-page self-stick labels. Read the package; some labels are removable by peeling and some are permanent. I do not recommend that you stick anything to someone else’s gas pump that might damage the paint. If you plan to run adhesive label sheets through a laser printer or copier, be sure to buy labels that are designed for laser printing. Otherwise, the adhesive could melt and damage the laser device. The package will clearly indicate whether the label sheets are for laser, ink-jet, or both.
  • Are you a gas station owner? You can easily make a large-format banner or sign from the .pdf image, to show your customers the real source of their predicament at the pumps.

Also posted on 1389 Blog.


The folly of Obama’s energy policies

by Phantom Ace ( 61 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Economy, Fascism, Progressives, Socialism at April 27th, 2011 - 2:00 pm

Energy prices have skyrocketed in recent months. Some of it is due to rising demand in China, India and other countries who are the winners in the globalization game. Some of it is supply disruption from Libya. Another factor is Wall Street speculators who are driving up the price because of the declining dollar and Middle East turmoil. The factor that is really decisive is Obama’s policies.

The regime of Barack Hussein Obama had ordered moratorium on offshore drilling. They haven’t pursued a policy of encouraging domestic production of not just oil, but natural gas as well. Instead they have spent billions pushing fantasies such a windmills and solar panels. Technologies that don’t result in a reliable supply of energy. Hence these are the factors why oil prices are rising. Another unspoken factor is that the regime wants exactly that!


Skyrocketing gasoline prices have sent President Obama’s public-approval ratings plummeting. The White House is searching for someone to blame, but the problem rests not with the pumps but with the president.
Mr. Obama maintains that lack of supply is not driving up prices. However, domestic demand is not the issue either, since U.S. energy use per capita has been on the decline. So the White House has formed an interagency working group to root out the “traders and speculators” whom he says are responsible for America’s gasoline woes. This type of populist blame-game is typical of the Obama administration’s approach to policy challenges, and diverts attention from the true proximate causes of the oil spike, such as the crises in the Middle East.
If prices are being manipulated, perhaps Mr. Obama should take it up with the OPEC potentates who are the most direct beneficiaries. Mr. Obama also said he wants to end what he says is a $4 billion annual taxpayer subsidy to oil and gas companies, though how removing a subsidy will lower gasoline prices has yet to be explained.

Read the rest: Obama running on empty

Barack Hussein Obama is engaged in demagoguery on this issue. He refuses to come up with solutions. Instead he tells people to get new cars and blames the oil companies. He is in full 3rd World Liberation rhetoric mode on this issue.  Obama probably also likes the fact that Islamic and 3rd World Liberation regimes are making out and until a comprehensive energy policy is developed and production encouraged at home the high prices will continue to hurt America’s purchasing power.

Budget resolution addresses wrong EPA regulations

by 1389AD ( 68 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Climate, Economy, Environmentalism, Republican Party at April 20th, 2011 - 2:00 pm

Cartoon of man with tape over mouth: 'Warning EPA CO2 Pollutant!'

Animated wooden email box From the 1389 Blog Mailbox:

Guest Article by Scott P.:

The Federal budget has been the subject of debate all over the country for the past few weeks and months. With a proposal finally pushed through last week, there remains some controversy in the republican realm over the EPA’s budget after the resolution. The choice to only cut about 16 percent of the EPA’s budget, as well as reduce only a few programs has continued to ruffle the feathers of outspoken republicans who see many EPA regulations as costly and unneeded, primarily those that allow the EPA to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. GOP reps and business leaders have connected the regulations with reduced revenue and no employment growth.

With the resolution providing less than stellar results for the republicans, it will remain to be seen if they will continue their assault on the EPA throughout 2011. If one had to bet, look for them to continue. The republicans have built up too much time and effort to stop simply because the budget proposal didn’t come to their own liking. It would be one thing if the proposal included cuts to any of the EPA programs that have constricted business owners and industry recently, instead the resolution simply cuts down on some of the EPA’s local projects and water infrastructure plans. Conspicuously left off the cuts was any reference to the greenhouse gas regulation, the Clean Air Act, or the cap and trade taxes that are hindering industry revenue and employment growth.

Given the misfire by President Obama, it’s likely that the GOP will have to adjust its plan of attack on the EPA. They have already introduced the Energy Tax Prevention Act of 2011, which is guided to take power away from the Clean Air Act and to eliminate the cap and trade agenda, which levies costly taxes against businesses. It’s likely that more acts such as this one will continue to be levied by GOP reps in what little effort they can put forth to reduce the EPA’s power, primarily because they’ve been continually rejected. One plan of attack that may work well against the EPA is to point out their inability to promote, invest, and defend the proper initiatives, such as ones that are served to cut down directly on environmentally related health risks, instead of defending rather useless initiatives. Every year the EPA does work with little resources on programs such as asbestos removal which cuts down on mesothelioma cases, as well as limiting water contamination levels, public water problems and its associated health risks.

A better use of the EPA’s current resources should be the GOP’s reference point. The EPA’s work in water contamination allows the agency to regulate and monitor public water sources and local water rules in an effort to cut back on the associated health problems. Their work in asbestos abatement does wonders all over the country every year ridding schools and older buildings of potentially hazardous materials. In some cases, their work in removing asbestos can even be considered a direct life saving initiative, seeing as mesothelioma life expectancy is on average, lasts only a year after diagnosis. Considering the direct impact that some of the EPA’s initiatives can have, it should be pointed out and exploited that there has been a recent failure in promoting and diverting resources to the right programs.

Given the fact that the EPA has spent the bulk of the year defending the Clean Air Act and the cap and trade agenda, two controversial issues, they could stand do divert some of their attention to more important programs. Hopefully republicans and business owners will continue to point out the ineffectiveness in some areas of the EPA’s structure, in a way that can get back revenue and employment growth, while still looking to serve the environment in the proper way.


Previously published on 1389 Blog.


Another Rosey Jobs Report, Another Lie.

by Flyovercountry ( 5 Comments › )
Filed under Economy, government, Headlines, Healthcare, Politics, Progressives, Special Report at April 4th, 2011 - 3:07 pm

Last week we were fed some very Rosy employment numbers. Where do you think most of those newly employed workers are being hired?  for those who would argue that it doesn’t really matter that our public sector is very quickly going to be larger in both number and volume than the private sector, take a look at Greece.  What do you believe is happening there.  Part of the problem, and it is huge to be sure, is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.  When the public sector becomes larger than the private sector, there is no way that the productive members of society will ever be able to produce enough to support those who suckle on the public teet. 

Don’t expect a reversal of this trend anytime soon. Surveys of college graduates are finding that more and more of our top minds want to work for the government. Why? Because in recent years only government agencies have been hiring, and because the offer of near lifetime security is highly valued in these times of economic turbulence. When 23-year-olds aren’t willing to take career risks, we have a real problem on our hands. Sadly, we could end up with a generation of Americans who want to work at the Department of Motor Vehicles.

Looking at the above snippet, it appears as though America’s youth gets it.  It is far better to be one of the chosen elites of a society than one of the people tasked for doing the actual lifting.  Our nation was founded on the belief that human beings not only had an inalienable right to self determination and self reliance, but that they would be better off as a whole by being afforded the ability to participate in their own destinies.  A scant 223 years later, thanks to the liberal tripe that the Constitution is in fact a flexible living, breathing document, we are morphing into a nation divided into 3 distinct groups.  One group are the elites, who feel that we are all better off surrendering our liberties and decision making capabilities to their more enlightened bureaucratic control.  They wish to tell the rest of us what our standard of living is allowed to be, and which activities are in our best interests.  The next group is peopled with folks who would be content to allow themselves to be cared for by the first.  Their vision for themselves is to live off of the government, accepting whatever lifestyle the benevolent elites would allow.  The third group are the people who wish to see the government be limited in its scope and size.  They want the governments activities limited to those activities expressly stated in the Constitution, complete with the checks and balances system originally established.  They want to freedom to earn what ever standard of living they would be capable of earning for themselves. 

I often hear from people that I should hate the rich and that the progressives are looking out for the little guy.  I must protest this on two grounds.  One, despising the rich is nothing more than a destructive class warfare.  If we punish the rich, how does that help me at all.  If I am missing out on the lifestyle that I want to lead, what difference will it make in my life at all if others are not able to enjoy those things.  I’ll explain a little further.  I like going to the Ocean.  I do not get to go every year.  Other people can go every year.  Telling other people that they can not go to the Ocean every year will not help me at all.  I still would not have gone.  The answer for me is to work harder in my daily life to earn that ability.  My lifestyle is independent of the lives of others.  Getting me to hate rich people in order to push their political agenda is nothing more than encouraging my jealously, which anyone above the age of 5 should realize is a self destructive behavior. 

My next objection has to do with this.  Are the elites actually looking out for the little guy?  You would have to be a complete imbecile or just plain not paying attention to believe the answer to be yes.  This wonderful new health care entitlement created is massively expensive.  It is adding a crippling expense of $10,000 per employee for my company.  I am a little guy.  The big guys, with political connections like GE, (you don’t come much bigger than GE,) have all found exemptions from paying their fair, or any share for this debacle.  Now, we learn that they will actually be receiving funds from the Obama Administration that the rest of us are being forced to pay. 

The ruling class elites are only concerned with taking care of themselves, and making sure that they always remain in power to ensure that they will always be afforded the standard of living appropriate for those who rule.  I truly do not care what their living standard is, I just want the opportunity to determine what mine will be also.

Hat tip to Vagabond Trader.

Crossposted at Musings of a Mad Conservative.