► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Finance’

Place these Two Wikileaks Side by Side

by coldwarrior ( 164 Comments › )
Filed under Al Qaeda, Islam, Saudi Arabia, Terrorism at December 6th, 2010 - 12:00 pm

Lets take a moment and place these two leaks side by side.

WikiLeaks cables portray Saudi Arabia as a cash machine for terrorists

AND

Saudi Prince Turki bin Faisal on WikiLeaks

Prince Turki bin Faisal, 65, the former intelligence chief and ambassador of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in Washington.

The interesting thing about all of these leaks is that sometimes a few of them can be placed side by side and we can see inside the minds of our enemies, and our so called friends.

In this case of wikileak pairs, the Saudi kingdom is tagged, as we all knew, as the major funding for terrorists:

Saudi Arabia is the world’s largest source of funds for Islamist militant groups such as the Afghan Taliban and Lashkar-e-Taiba – but the Saudi government is reluctant to stem the flow of money, according to Hillary Clinton.

“More needs to be done since Saudi Arabia remains a critical financial support base for al-Qaida, the Taliban, LeT and other terrorist groups,” says a secret December 2009 paper signed by the US secretary of state. Her memo urged US diplomats to redouble their efforts to stop Gulf money reaching extremists in Pakistan and Afghanistan.

“Donors in Saudi Arabia constitute the most significant source of funding to Sunni terrorist groups worldwide,” she said.

Three other Arab countries are listed as sources of militant money: Qatar, Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates.

There has been some progress. This year US officials reported that al-Qaida‘s fundraising ability had “deteriorated substantially” since a government crackdown. As a result Bin Laden’s group was “in its weakest state since 9/11” in Saudi Arabia. (I want details on the “deteriorated substantially” adverbs.)

And then a member of the Saudi Royal Family says this:

Turki also called upon the United States to renew the search for Osama bin Laden, which was discontinued because of the Iraq war. “Only when bin Laden is eliminated one way or another can the US and the rest of the world declare victory. Once you can declare victory, withdrawing your troops from Afghanistan becomes legitimate.”

Only a muslim could pull that comment off with a straight face given  the evidence brought forward above. Even after is revealed that the Saudi’s are the major source for funding of terrorism including al-Quaida and bin Laden, then they turn around and say that “Only when bin Laden is eliminated one way or another can the US and the rest of the world declare victory. Once you can declare victory, withdrawing your troops from Afghanistan becomes legitimate.”

With friends like the Saudis…

Breaking…The Contagion in the EU.

by coldwarrior ( 132 Comments › )
Filed under Economy, Europe at November 30th, 2010 - 11:30 am

The Sovereign Debt contagion continues in Europe. The bond investors in Europe are not buying the EU/IMF Irish bailout. These investors rightly see the issue of sovereign debt as so risky that they are losing confidence rapidly in the sovereign debt (aka bond) markets.

.

When this occurs, yields on the bonds rise to attract investors, this gives the investor an incentive to risk his money. The riskier the debt is, the higher the yield hast to be to attract investors. The higher the yield the higher the interest rate. The higher the interest rate, the more expensive it is to borrow for everyone, the state and businesses (this causes inflow of foreign capital that might be chasing higher interest rates than in their domestic market). The more expensive it is to borrow, the more costly the sovereign debt. The more costly the sovereign debt, the more money is needed for the economy to pay it back.  The more money used to pay debt is less in the actual economy creating wealth.

The other side of the same coin is capital flight, that’s when the money just up and leaves the market.  In this case, the money is leaving the EU (and Asia after the NORK incident) and piling into the American bond market.  This drives bond yields down in the US, as investors see US sovereign debt as a better risk than Europe and Asia. Lower yield means less expensive debt…the opposite of the above cycle.

Lets look at Monday’s headlines (this is an excellent and very concise article):

Contagion strikes Italy as Ireland bail-out fails to calm markets

The EU-IMF rescue for Ireland has failed to restore to confidence in the eurozone debt markets, leading instead to a dramatic surge in bond yields across half the currency bloc.

Spreads on Italian and Belgian bonds jumped to a post-EMU high as the sell-off moved beyond the battered trio of Ireland, Portugal, and Spain, raising concerns that the crisis could start to turn systemic. It was the worst single day in Mediterranean markets since the launch of monetary union.

The euro fell sharply to a two-month low of €1.3064 against the dollar, while bourses slid across the world. The FTSE 100 fell almost 118 points to 5,550, while the Dow was off 120 points in early trading.

“The crisis is intensifying and worsening,” said Nick Matthews, a credit expert at RBS. “Bond purchases by the European Central Bank are the only anti-contagion weapon left. It needs to act much more aggressively.

“The EU rescue fund cannot handle Spain, let alone Italy,” said Charles Dumas, from Lombard Street Research. “We we may be nearing the point where Germany has to decide whether it is willing take on a burden six times the size of East Germany, or let some countries go.”

Or let some countries go? The cracks in the EU continue to build. Can the EU collapse? Given what happens to any country that leaves the EU, it probably wont.

Some now see the eurozone as effectively operating at two speeds, with Germany, its biggest economy, leading the pack of stronger countries, and the weaker periphery nations failing to keep up – to an unsustainable degree. Having a “one size fits all” monetary policy means stragglers cannot devalue their currency to boost exports and stimulate growth, unlike, say, Iceland…

“Not only do we find it difficult to imagine how a nation could disentangle itself from the single currency (unscrambling the omelette) but we also take seriously the fact that the Maastricht Treaty envisioned entry into the euro as being irrevocable,” says Mr Derrick.

However, he says it is not impossible that a country could withdraw, should the attractions of leaving outweigh the penalties, such as the “inevitable” restructuring needed to offset the sharp fall in the value of the reintroduced currency, since the debt overhang would stay in euros.

That would mean the departing country would face exclusion from the international debt markets for years, he predicted.

And now the Euro is falling against the dollar (part of QE2 was to devalue the dollar, remember…).

The currency fell to $1.2997 against the dollar during trading on Tuesday morning, its lowest point in two months.

Concerns are now focusing on other debt-laden countries, with Spain and Portugal under the most scrutiny.

The agreement of a €85bn emergency aid package for Ireland, felled by the costs of bailing out its banks, has failed to allay market fears over the health of the eurozone.

Is there enough cash to bail out all of these countries?

In practice, the EU may only be able to deploy 255 billion euros of the 440 billion-euro European Financial Stability Facility, according to analysts at Nomura International Plc.

That’s because the rescue fund is financed by issuing bonds and in order to secure a AAA rating, governments agreed to set aside a pool of cash, depleting the total amount available to pump into economies. The rest of the bailout pool consists of 60 billion euros from the European Commission and 250 billion euros pledged by the International Monetary Fund.

“There isn’t enough official money to bail out Spain if trouble occurs,” Nouriel Roubini, the New York University professor who predicted the global financial crisis, said yesterday in Prague. While it’s “quite likely that Portugal” will be next in line for financial assistance, “the big elephant in the room” is Spain, he said.

At 9.3 percent of gross domestic product, Spain will have the largest budget deficit in the euro area this year after Ireland and Greece, the European Commission forecast yesterday. Portugal’s shortfall will be 7.3 percent of GDP.

When Roubini speaks, listen  He is very, very good at seeing well over the economic horizon.

Sometimes inflation is a good thing

by coldwarrior ( 132 Comments › )
Filed under Economy at May 24th, 2010 - 4:00 pm

Yes, that’s right. inflation is not always a bad thing.  Lets get our macroeconomics books out here and take a look.

Inflation is a persistent increase in prices, often triggered when demand for goods is greater than the available supply or when unemployment is low and workers can command higher salaries.

Moderate inflation typically accompanies economic growth. But the US Federal Reserve Bank and central banks in other nations try to keep inflation in check by decreasing the money supply, making it more difficult to borrow and thus slowing expansion (by increasing interest rates)

Hyperinflation, when prices rise by 100% or more annually, can destroy economic, and sometimes political, stability by driving the price of necessities higher than people can afford.

Deflation, in contrast, is a widespread decline in prices that also has the potential to undermine the economy by stifling production and increasing unemployment.

Inflation is, as Milton Freidman said, always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon. His point is that if there are too many dollars chasing too few goods, the price for the goods goes up (the dollar becomes worth less) conversely, he argued that deflation could be fought by dropping money out of helicopters.  Money supply creates/destroys inflation. He would say this: M x V = P x Q: M is the quantity of money in the economy, V is the velocity of money in the economy: Velocity associates the amount of economic activity associated with a given money supply, P is the general price level, and Q is the real value of final expenditures.

Inflation is also a signal that there are not enough of a certain kind of good in a market, this is a signal for more producers to enter the market to chase profit. When there is deflation, or no inflation, there is no incentive to invest in new production. SO, inflation has two components, the first is demand for goods as it relates to money supply and second the velocity in which the money is being spent. The higher the velocity, the higher the inflation; and as inflation rises so does velocity as people make purchases sooner rather than later. When there is very low velocity, there is low inflation, and low incentive to invest in new factories or hire new employees. Each factor, money supply and velocity can effect each other. If interest rates go up, the flow of money is slowed and in effect the money supply goes down.

So, without some inflation, we don’t have growth. I don’t think we are going to see any appreciable inflation in the foreseeable future because of two things. First, is that Europe and maybe the rest of us are entering a liquidity crisis. A liquidity crisis is described as this:

This is a quintessential liquidity crisis,” said William Cunningham, head of credit strategies and fixed-income research at Boston-based State Street Corp.’s investment unit, which oversees almost $2 trillion. “It’s not inconceivable to imagine a situation where the markets behave so poorly, the liquidity behaves so badly, and risk-tolerance just evaporates that — particularly in Europe — consumers contract, businesses stop hiring and stop investing, and economic activity halts.”(my emphasis)

There is a flight to quality, that is helping the debt/finance problem in the US:

The dollar has strengthened 8.74 percent this year while the euro has weakened 5.92 percent, according to Bloomberg Correlation-Weighted Indices. The euro dropped to $1.2144 on May 19, the lowest level since April 2006.Global purchases of U.S. equities, notes and bonds totaled $140.5 billion in March, more than double economists’ estimates, after net buying of $47.1 billion in February, the Treasury said May 17. Purchases of Treasuries rose by the most since June as China, the largest lender to the U.S., added to its holdings for the first time since September.Demand for Treasuries and dollar-based assets is helping cap borrowing costs as President Barack Obama finances the economic recovery by selling record amounts of bonds to finance a budget deficit that exceeds $1 trillion. More Americans filed applications for unemployment benefits in the week ended May 15 than economists forecast, showing firings remain elevated even as employment rises.

Second, the STRIPS (Separate Trading of Registered Interest and Principal Securities), and the Bond Market as a whole are back with a vengeance.  STRIPS were created to win back investors after the Fed had to raise interest rates to almost 20% to halt the 14.8% inflation in 1980.  Increase demand for Treasuries of any kind cause the interest rates (the risk premium of the note) to go down as the flight to quality continues. Higher demand for US Treasuries worldwide means lower interest rates in the US which means lower cost to finance the debt and these lower rates mean less chance for inflation.The US may have dodged a debt bullet, and this debt must be paid and spending must be brought under control or we will become Greece. Meanwhile, we may be moving to deflation as the contagion from Europe expands and economic activity stops or slows.  Anytime there is a large gain in Treasuries, that money was probably in corporate bonds and stocks. These are what companies use to buy new stuff and expand.

May 24 (Bloomberg) — Corporate bond sales are poised for their worst month in a decade, while relative yields are rising at the fastest pace since Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.’s collapse as the response by lawmakers to Europe’s sovereign debt crisis fails to inspire investor confidence.

In Final:

So, back to velocity on money. The crisis in Europe and the continual rise of the LIBOR pushes investors from the EU to the US, making the interest rates go down as they move to quality in the Bond Market.  This movement also increases the value of the dollar against the Euro. Increase the value of a currency and you import unemployment and export jobs. More money flowing into the Treasury from the risk in Europe(Ted Spread) makes the Treasuries look more attractive and siphons money out of the private market (its called ‘crowding out’) while the companies that actually create jobs and pay people cant expand, wont hire and the unemployment problem continues while people quit spending which causes a lack of inflation as the economy goes stagnant and looking for a hint from somewhere other that the Bond Market. The economy cant expand on FedGov Bonds.

US clout down, risks up by 2025 -intel outlook

by Phantom Ace Comments Off on US clout down, risks up by 2025 -intel outlook
Filed under Economy at November 20th, 2008 - 10:23 pm

This doesn’t shock me. Thanks to the Free Trade/Globalist policies of Bush I, Clinton and Bush II that have gutted our industrial base, outsourced good paying jobs and stagnated our wages this was inevitable . Obama  will put the nail in the coffin with his Neo-Marxism policies. What a shame, hopefully the GOP can get its act together and become the party of Economic Strength and policies that benefit the Middle Class. One can have hope, it took a Carter to get Reagan. But 4 bad presidents in a row, It will be tough.

US clout down, risks up by 2025 -intel outlook

WASHINGTON, Nov 20 (Reuters) – U.S. economic and political clout will decline over the next two decades and the world will be more dangerous, with food and water scarce and advanced weapons plentiful, U.S. spy agencies projected on Thursday.

The National Intelligence Council analysis “Global Trends 2025” also said the current financial crisis on Wall Street is just the first phase of a global economic reordering.

The U.S. dollar’s role as the world’s major currency would weaken to become a “first among equals,” the report said.

The outlook is intended to inform U.S. President-elect Barack Obama of factors that will influence global events. It is based on a year-long global survey of experts and trends by U.S. intelligence analysts.

I hope this analysis is wrong.