► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Guns’

The Joys of Capitalism

by Iron Fist ( 90 Comments › )
Filed under Patriotism, Second Amendment, Weapons at February 20th, 2010 - 2:30 pm

We all know that the Second Amendment is one of the great bulkworks of freedom, Liberty’s teeth. The Amendment that guarantees the rest, as it were. What is missed in that is that it also has a positive effect on the development of small arms for the military (another necessary defender of freedom). In societies where arms are restricted, arms manufacture is left to the military-industrial complex to devise new weapons and improve on existing ones. A good example of this is how the Kalashkinov family of weapons have developed over the last 60 years or so in the USSR and now Russia.

There have been changes and improvements, but these have been incremental. Stell stampings replaced machined parts for things such as the receiver (a development that mirrored the progress of the MG-34 into the MG-42 in Nazi Germany), a smaller round (mirroring NATO’s adoption of the 5.56 mm cartridge), plastic stocks in place of wood, etc. Notice that many of these “innovations” simply copy designs developed elsewhere and adapt them to the weapon at hand.

Contrast this to the changes in the M-16 family of weapons here in the West. The military does not even begin to have the most advanced variants of this weapon. Development is driven by civilian demand. What caliber do you want your weapon in? There are many, from the 5.56 that the military uses, to 6.8 SPC, to 6.5 Grendel and Creedmore (two different rounds specifically designed for longer range shooting), .300 Whisper (for use with suppressors), to large bore variant s like the .458 SOCOM (one of the few that the military has had a major role in developing), .450 Bushmaster (designed for hunting), and the massive .50 Beowulf (you can shoot whatever you want with a .50).

That is just the available ammunition. Do you want a piston driven weapon, or conventional gas impingement? What kind of stock do you want? Forend with rails? Folding sights, fixed sights, no sights (optical ony)? Optics are too many to begin to list. Would you like a laser with that?

All of this cornucopia of accessories were developed due to civilian demand. Military demand simply isn’t sufficient to drive this level of innovation, but the military benefits. The military can pick and choose what is useful for the mission at had. Even individual soldiers can purchase many of the accessories for their issue weapon, as prices are reasonable due to market competition.

The innovation of capitalism benefits us all. Market driven solutions are usually superior to those developed free of competition’s refining fire. In small arms, this market is protected by the Second Amendment, creating a civilian market for small arms innovation that is unequaled in the world by protecting the right of the individual to own their own small arms.

Master of Arms

by Iron Fist ( 116 Comments › )
Filed under Open thread, Weapons at December 26th, 2009 - 7:30 pm

That would be me. The good Admins have invited me to be a full contributor so that I can be master of arms to this rabble in arms peaceful, Unicorn-loving group of fine young people (and some old ones like me). I’m honored. The question is, what would you all like to hear about? My main area of expertise is in unarmed and primitively armed combat (karate and related disciplines, Filipino martial arts, and just plain nasty), but I am conversant with most small arms up to general purpose machineguns or there about (some of our military vets may know more than me. I’m not ex-military so I’ve learned what I can where I can).

Above all, this should be fun. Our love of the military and things martial sets us apart from the Left and drives them crazy. I find that highly amusing.

Let me know what you want to see. If I don’t know, I can do research, and I’m not afraid to ask for help. You shouldn’t be afraid of speaking up if you know something I don’t (or even if I made a mistake! That’ll never happen). We can all learn here, and that is, as Federal Felon Martha Stewart says, a good thing.

Come out and Play!

What Gun Should I Own?

by Iron Fist ( 116 Comments › )
Filed under Open thread, Weapons at December 19th, 2009 - 6:30 pm

That is a question one of the Netizens put to me a couple of weeks ago. Rather than give a canned answer (everyone needs a 1911 .45, after all), I’d like to use the question as a starting point for a discussion among us. I don’t think that I can tell you what gun to own. There are too many variables from your size (small women probably don’t want a 12ga), to personal tastes. A gun is a tool, a toy, a fashion accessory, and more. Let’s start with general recommendations.

In general, I would advise that everyone own at least three firearms and one good knife. You should have a handgun (pistol or revolver), a rifle, and a shotgun. Each of these has a role to play in self-defense and, more generally, your contribution to the defense of liberty as a full participant in your own God-given rights.

What do you need a handgun for? Are you going to get a permit and carry the weapon? Are you going to use a handgun as your primary home defense weapon? As a backup weapon? Just for target practice? All of these questions will impact what kind of handgun you want to buy. A full-size combat handgun like a Government model 1911 is an excellent choice for home defense or as a backup weapon for your shoulder arms (rifle or shotgun), but it probably isn’t the optimal choice for concealed carry. It also has moderately heavy recoil, something that you should consider. I recommend going to a gun range that provides rentals and firing a number of calibers before you make a purchase (9mm, .45, .38, .357 Mag. at least, more, of course, if you want to branch out). Decide what you want it for and shop accordingly.

A rifle is a different animal. It is an intermediate range weapon, and, as such, is not well suited to home defense. Why have one, you may ask? That is in some ways a philosophical question, but my answer is you need a rifle for personal defense where range is beneficial. Excellent examples are the LA Riots of 1992, or New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina. This role lends itself to semi-automatic rifles with large magazine capacities, but a good lever-action rifle or scoped bolt gun would still be useful if the semi-automatic makes you uncomfortable or is illegal in your area.

A shotgun fills a third role, that of a short to medium range self-defense weapon with more power than a handgun, but fewer side-issues than a rifle. A shotgun is legal in almost all jurisdictions in the United States, and even overseas where they don’t have a Second Amendment to protect their right to keep and bear arms. Many people insist on a 12 gauge shotgun as the only gauge worth having, but I find that a 20 gauge is also acceptable with the right loads if the substantial recoil from a 12 ga. is an issue. I favor pump shotguns. They are a reliable, tested technology.

A word about self-defense. Self-defense is almost always at close range. In the street, it is often close enough to touch. At home, the longest range you can shoot is the length of the longest hall or largest room in your house. Practice accordingly. It is possible that you will need to be able to engage longer-range targets. The recent shooting at Ft. Hood, for example, could have been a scenario where an armed citizen might would have had to take a longer shot to take down someone that wasn’t necessarily a direct threat to them, but was engaged in violence towards others, and the riot scenario will require intermediate range capabilities so you can engage the threat before it is able to overwhelm you with numbers. Again, practice accordingly.

That is my philosophy on the issue. Certainly it is desirable to own more than just the three basic weapons, but not everyone can afford that or has the desire to do so. But having the basic three-gun compliment can prepare you for most self-defense situations that you are likely to encounter.

Give Me Liberty…

by savage ( 99 Comments › )
Filed under Blogmocracy, Guest Post, Open thread, Weapons at November 27th, 2009 - 12:00 pm

Blogmocracy in Action!

Gun Post from JeremyR

liberty1 480

liberty3 480

Or at least, give me a Liberty 100. The Liberty, produced by Calico Arms (California Instrument Company) is one fine carbine. Chambered in 9mm, and also offered in a 22LR rimfire, this is an above grade gun for military or police use. Calico first developed their fine line in the 1980’s, before the insult weapons ban. No misspelling either, all it did was make a bunch of crap polyticks feel good. That congressional act almost ruined the company by eliminating the civilian market. The calico is revolutionary. It has a top mounted helical magazine in either 50 or 100 round versions. The mag is loaded, then charged by cranking the handle at the rear. It has bottom ejection for easy policing of brass, and also eliminates the pesky hot cartridge down the collar for left handed situations. Yes, I said left handed situations not shooters. I’ll talk more about that later.

The Calico line of 9mm weapons uses a roller delayed block blowback system. Two links pivot out to secure the bolt in place while firing, then slip back once chamber pressure drops. It is an excellent system and is used on H&K submachine guns as well as others. It has a good ergo grip and is angled nicely like our AR-15 M-4 arms.

A nonmoving rear sight is built into the magazine, and all adjustments are made at the front sight which is at the front of the mag. This is a slight problem as it limits your sight radius, but it also protects the sight from potential damage when carried in a vehicle. A scope mount is also available which fits on top of the mag. It somewhat impedes mag changes, but with a 100 round mag, how often is that a problem?

The Calico has several advantages over most carbines and subs I have fired. The design limits muzzle climb. If you look at the lines of any standard rifle, you will note that the line of the barrel is well above the line of the shooters arm. With the calico, the barrel and wrist align so that kick is directed back at the wrist rather then over it. That reduces twisting of the hand and therefore muzzle climb. This is important in full auto situations. Many years ago I had the opportunity to fire a M-951A full auto. It was like having a supersoaker that spit lead instead of water. That day fueled my desire to eventually own a Calico. Today, I own two.

A kelly grip is also optional and gives it that gangster look so many crave. The Liberty comes with either a fixed stock, or a collapsing stock. I have one of each. The collapsing stock has an extra long setting for folks with long arms. Original Calico’s had an optional flash supressor muzzle arrestor, the current crop are straight barrel post ban style weapons.

Calico also produces a pistol version, the M-950 as well as the their M-100 22 carbine and M-110 22 pistol. They are a good solid gun in my opinion.

The company was originally headquartered in California, but wise hands shifted their base of operations to Hillsboro, Oregon. Fruits, nuts and guns don’t mix very well, and Cali’s horrid treatment of companies, means that desertion is the game of the day if you want to thrive.

Regarding left handed shooting, I’m left handed. I principally shoot right handed as I have no eye dominance. It gives me the advantage of using all common fire arms, plus the benefit of having my strong arm supporting the muzzle. Only on the range can you be assured of control of your shooting stance. Whether hunting elk In the mountains, or bad guys on the streets of Afghanistan, there are times when the south paw stance is preferable. You may not be able to get into any other position without compromising your position, or you may have a shot that is so off balance that a left hand position is the only option. I can and do shoot both ways.

Practice practice practice.

-JeremyR