► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘immigration’

(In)Justice Department Sues Sheriff Joe Arpaio

by 1389AD ( 159 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama at September 5th, 2010 - 10:00 am

Photo of Sheriff Joe Arpaio

Just. Plain. Wrong.

I would be the first to admit that, both now and in the past, I’ve had mixed feelings about Joe Arpaio, the high-profile sheriff of Maricopa County, Arizona.

Be that as it may, this lawsuit is just plain wrong. It is a federal government attack, not only on the sheriff himself, but also on the state and people of Arizona.

F wrote:

FNC just had breaking news that the Justice Department is suing AZ Sheriff Arpaio in a civil rights case.

Fox News: Justice Dept. Sues Arizona Sheriff in Civil Rights Probe

Published September 02, 2010 | Associated Press

The U.S. Justice Department sued Sheriff Joe Arpaio on Thursday, saying the Arizona lawman refused for more than a year to turn over records in an investigation into allegations his department discriminates against Hispanics.

The lawsuit calls Arpaio and his office’s defiance “unprecedented,” and said the federal government has been trying since March 2009 to get officials to comply with its probe of alleged discrimination, unconstitutional searches and seizures, and having English-only policies in his jails that discriminate against people with limited English skills.

Arpaio had been given until Aug. 17 to hand over documents it first asked for 15 months ago.

Arpaio’s attorney, Robert Driscoll, declined immediate comment on the lawsuit, saying he had just received it and hadn’t yet conferred with his client.

Arpaio’s office had said it has fully cooperated in the jail inquiry but won’t hand over additional documents into the examination of the alleged unconstitutional searches because federal authorities haven’t said exactly what they were investigating.

It’s the latest action against Arizona by the federal government, which earlier sued the state to stop its strict new immigration law that requires police officers to question people about their immigration status.

“The actions of the sheriff’s office are unprecedented,” said Thomas Perez, assistant attorney general for the department’s civil rights division. “It is unfortunate that the department was forced to resort to litigation to gain access to public documents and facilities.”

The lawsuit was filed in U.S. District Court in Phoenix and names Arpaio, the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office and the county.

Arizona’s new law — most of which a federal judge has put on hold — mirrors many of the policies Arpaio has put into place in the greater Phoenix area, where he set up a hot line for the public to report immigration violations, conducts crime and immigration sweeps in heavily Latino neighborhoods and frequently raids workplaces for people in the U.S. illegally.

Arpaio believes the inquiry is focused on his immigration sweeps, patrols where deputies flood an area of a city — in some cases heavily Latino areas — to seek out traffic violators and arrest other offenders.

The sheriff’s office has said half of the 1,032 people arrested in the sweeps have been illegal immigrants.

Last year, the federal government stripped Arpaio of his special power to enforce federal immigration law. The sheriff continued his sweeps through the enforcement of state immigration laws.

In a separate investigation, a federal grand jury in Phoenix is examining allegations that Arpaio has abused his powers with actions such as intimidating county workers by showing up at their homes at nights and on weekends.

Read it all.

But wait, there’s more…

Obama Justice Dept. Files Another Lawsuit Against Arizona Authorities

August, 31, 2010 — nicedeb

…This time, the lawsuit is against Phoenix area Maricopa Community Colleges for (if you can believe this) requiring noncitizens to provide their green cards before they could be hired for jobs.

No I’m not making this up.

This is from The Washington Post, okay?

The Justice Department filed another lawsuit against immigration practices by Arizona authorities, saying Monday that a network of community colleges acted illegally in requiring noncitizens to provide their green cards before they could be hired for jobs.

The suit against the Phoenix area Maricopa Community Colleges was filed less than two months after the Justice Department sued Arizona and Gov. Jan Brewer (R) over the state’s new immigration law. It also comes as the department is investigating Joe Arpaio, the sheriff in Maricopa County, who is known for tough immigration enforcement.

In Monday’s lawsuit, Justice officials said the colleges discriminated against nearly 250 noncitizen job applicants by mandating that they fill out more documents than required by law to prove their eligibility to work. That violated the federal Immigration and Nationality Act, the department said.

The law’s anti-discrimination provision “makes it unlawful to treat authorized workers differently during the hiring process based on their citizenship status,” said Thomas E. Perez, assistant attorney general for Justice’s Civil Rights Division.

He said the government “is acting now to remedy this pattern or practice of discrimination.”

***

The government is asking a judge within the Justice Department unit to order the Maricopa colleges to pay a civil penalty of $1,100 for each of the 247 non-U.S.-citizen job applicants it says were required to produce the additional documents. It says the colleges ended the practice in January.

As Doug Ross notes, this lawsuit will intimidate employers into more permissive hiring practices:

A quarter of a million dollar fine will definitely have employers thinking twice about checking job candidates’ bonafides. And that is the intent.

And it’s but one step among many.

Keep reading. Among other things, the Justice Dept is investigating Joe Arpaio for enforcing immigration laws.

Up is down, black is white, night is day…I’m not sure how much more of this the country can take….

Read it all.

And more…

As nicedeb also reminds us:

And, of course, they’re suing the State of AZ for enforcing immigration laws with SB1070.

Last week, the Obama State Dept handed in its first ever report to the UN Human rights council, and besides being sickeningly self-congratulatory about it’s own wonderful accomplishments in the area of human rights, it singled out the State of AZ’s new immigration law as a human rights deficiency “that is being addressed in a court action.”

In response, Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer rightly blasted Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the Obama administration for succumbing to “internationalism run amok.”

An AZ Sheriff recently opined, “Our own government has become our enemy”.

It sure looks that way.

Read the rest.


Also see:


This Could Never Happen Here

by snork ( 71 Comments › )
Filed under Politics, Progressives, Tranzis at February 10th, 2010 - 8:00 am

From the UK, we have a report, and hackneyed as this word may be, I’ll call it disturbing. Labour’s ‘secret plan’ to lure migrants

The release of a previously unseen document suggested that Labour’s migration policy over the past decade had been aimed not just at meeting the country’s economic needs, but also the Government’s “social objectives”.

The paper said migration would “enhance economic growth” and made clear that trying to halt or reverse it could be “economically damaging”. But it also stated that immigration had general “benefits” and that a new policy framework was needed to “maximise” the contribution of migration to the Government’s wider social aims.

So what would these wider social aims be?

The Government has always denied that social engineering played a part in its migration policy.

However, the paper, which was written in 2000 at a time when immigration began to increase dramatically, said controls were contrary to its policy objectives and could lead to “social exclusion”.

Last night, the Conservatives demanded an independent inquiry into the issue. It was alleged that the document showed that Labour had overseen a deliberate open-door ­policy on immigration to boost multi-culturalism.

But is multiculturalism an end or a means to another end?

Voting trends indicate that migrants and their descendants are much more likely to vote Labour.

That seems to answer that.

The existence of the draft policy paper, which was drawn up by a Cabinet Office think tank and a Home Office research unit, was disclosed last year by Andrew Neather, a former adviser to Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett.

He alleged at the time that the sharp increase in immigration over the past 10 years was partly due to a “driving political purpose: that mass immigration was the way that the Government was going to make the UK truly multi-cultural”.

As Glenn Reynolds said, if the ruling elites don’t like the people, they’ll try to replace them. This literally seems like what they’re attempting here. In our case, the Democrats’ visceral hatred for the white untermenchen is beyond any question; they pine for the day when whites are a minority, and they hate the guns, religion, and pickup trucks that traditional Americans value. Indeed, replacing the people is exactly what they’re trying to do, and many make no bones about it.

And just like the primarily Muslim immigrants into England are going to be beholden to Labor, guess which party they expect the (in our case illegal) newcomers to be beholden to?

Labour has overseen an unprecedented rise in immigration, which has led to a rise of about three million in the UK population since 1997. Until recently, it accused opponents who called for tougher controls of playing the “race card”. Labour was forced to change its rhetoric amid concerns that the economic and social reality of immigration had alienated voters in its heartlands.

Different continents, same playbook.

Read the entire article, and then ask yourself one simple question: is there a counterpart document floating around the lower circles of the DNC?

European Nationalist make gains because of Islam

by Phantom Ace ( 34 Comments › )
Filed under Europe, Islamic Invasion, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Liberal Fascism, Multiculturalism at June 10th, 2009 - 10:50 am

Nationalists parties are gaining ground in Europe. This is due to the fact that the left openly supports Islam and conservatives are to scared to take them on. This is opening up space for Nationalist/Traditionalist parties that view Islam as a threat.

BLANKLEY: Europe asks: Does tomorrow belong to us?

The weekend’s European Parliament and British local county council elections were not only a victory for the center-right over the center-left. More significantly, they were indications of the growing rejection of the last 60 years of denationalized and consolidating European history. They were, particularly, a sharp assertion by many indigenous Europeans that they will not put up with losing their culture to overly assertive Islamic or other immigrants in Europe.

The issue isn’t all immigrants. In Italy and Spain for example, no one is complaining about Filipinos, Romanians or Latin Americans. It’s North Africans, Arabs and Albanians no one wants. These groups are Muslims while the others are not culturally different than the host nations. Although some Nationalist Parties are Racialist and I reject those, most are about preserving their culture.

Americans need to wake up and realize Islam is not compatible with our society. Islam is an Arabic imperialistic culture that imposes its will. People may not like that but it is the truth.

Ramos And Compean Sentences Commuted

by DJM ( 9 Comments › )
Filed under Crime, Politics at January 19th, 2009 - 12:12 pm

It’s about time, but Bush should be ashamed for waiting so long. To wait until the last day of his Administration wreaks of politics rather than justice.

Breitbart News reports:

WASHINGTON (AP) – In his final acts of clemency, President George W. Bush on Monday commuted the prison sentences of two former U.S. Border Patrol agents whose convictions for shooting a Mexican drug dealer ignited fierce debate about illegal immigration.

Bush’s decision to commute the sentences of Ignacio Ramos and Jose Compean, who tried to cover up the shooting, was welcomed by both Republican and Democratic members of Congress. They had long argued that the agents were merely doing their jobs, defending the American border against criminals. They also maintained that the more than 10-year prison sentences the pair was given were too harsh.

Rancor over their convictions, sentencing and firings has simmered ever since the shooting occurred in 2005.