► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Islamists’

Is Bruce Bawer going Dhimmi?

by Phantom Ace ( 37 Comments › )
Filed under Blogwars, Dhimmitude, LGF at May 6th, 2009 - 2:23 pm

Bruce Bawer is now condemning anyone in the Anti islamo-Fascist movement that supports the Vlaams Belang. Charles then emails him and gets permission to reprint the article on LGF. He takes shots without mentioning names at Robert Spencer, Pamela Geller and others.

memo from europe

Thursday, May 6, 2009, 9:28 P.M. CET:  Recently, Andrew Sullivan posted a link to an article about Charles Johnson, the celebrated blogger who has distanced himself from many other anti-jihadists and called them “a bunch of kooks.”  Though it grieves me to say so, and though I’ve hoped that things would somehow turn around, Charles is, alas, not whistling Dixie: I can testify that in the last couple of years some significant, and lamentable, shifts have taken place on the anti-jihad front.  Writers and bloggers whom, not very long ago, I would unhesitatingly have described as staunch defenders of liberal values against Islamofascist intolerance have more recently said and done things that have dismayed me, and that, in many cases, have compelled me to re-examine my view of them.

Once upon a time, these people made a point of distancing themselves from far-right European parties such as Belgium’s Vlaams Belang – whose most prominent Internet voice, Paul Belien, has declared himself to be fighting for “Judeo-Christian morality” not only against jihadist Islam but also against “secular humanism.”  Belien has made no secret of his contempt for gay people and for the idea that they deserve human rights as much as anyone else.  Now, however, many of the anti-jihadist writers who once firmly rejected Vlaams Belang have come to embrace it wholeheartedly.  In fact, for reasons unknown to me, this regional party in one of Europe’s smallest countries appears to have become, for a number of anti-jihadist writers on both sides of the Atlantic, nothing short of a litmus test: in their eyes, it seems, if you’re not willing to genuflect to VB, you’re not a real anti-jihadist.

Bruce who has written good works obviously isn’t a fan of the Vlaams Belang. But who else in Belgium is standing against Islam? He also doesn’t mention that the VB supports Israel and was the only party in Belgium that supported Israel’s war with Hamas.

My litmus test about being against Islamo-Fascism is Kosovo. If you support the creation of the Islamic Terror state of Kosovo, you are fake. If you support Serbia’s claims to Kosovo, then you are really anti Islamo-Fascist. What is Bruce’s position on Kosovo? Does anyone know since I am at the office and don’t have a chance to email him. Charles is enjoying this and now he feels he has an ally. Better the VB than Al-Qaeda/Hizballah/Muslim Brotherhood any day of the week.

 

Pakistan is focused on India while Taliban makes gains

by Phantom Ace ( 4 Comments › )
Filed under India, Islamic Supremacism, Jihad, Pakistan, Sharia (Islamic Law), Taliban at May 6th, 2009 - 9:01 am

This is a great article and it makes the obvious. Pakistan’s army still views India as the main enemy, not the Taliban. The Taliban is taking advantage of this.

Besieged by the Taliban, but thinking only of India

Today, Pakistan’s President drops in on America’s. There will be forced smiles and fine gifts, but stern words must also be exchanged.

Pakistan’s Asif Ali Zardari seems more interested in demonizing India than in defeating the Taliban. Barack Obama can’t afford to humour such misplaced priorities. How difficult will it be for him to extract serious change out of his Pakistani peer, fair-weather ally and duly elected, deeply compromised pain in the neck? I got a taste of the odds stacked against meaningful change myself when I confronted Pakistan’s former president, Pervez Musharraf, at a recent gathering.

Pakistan is a lost cause and I don’t want anymore  of our tax dollars going there. Let India deal with them.

Moqtada al-Sadr is now an Ayatollah

by Phantom Ace ( 10 Comments › )
Filed under Iran, Iraq, Islamic hypocrisy, Islamic Supremacism, Islamic Terrorism, Islamists, Jihad, Sharia (Islamic Law) at May 5th, 2009 - 7:16 pm

This will probably be trouble in Iraq, Moqtada AL-Sadr was in Iran 2 years. He clearly is one of their agents and is up to something.

Iraq: Radical cleric becomes ‘ayatollah

Baghdad, 5 May (AKI) – Radical Iraqi Shia cleric, Moqtada al-Sadr, is reported to have assumed the title of Grand Ayatollah after concluding his studies in the holy city of Qom in Iran. Sources close to the cleric’s faction released the news to the Arab daily, al-Sharq al-Awsat.

Around 70 supporters of al-Sadr on Sunday concluded a conference in the Turkish city of Istanbul where they elected new leaders and mapped out their future.

Al-Sadr, who leads the Mahdi Army militia, also met both Recep Tayyip Erodgan, the Turkish prime minister, and president Abdullah Gul in Ankara on Friday during his visit to Turkey.

So he goes to Turkey and is recieved by their Governemnt. Why are we still giving weapons to Turkey. Any nice religion where a Thug can become a respected  religious leader.

Talking with Iran is a waste

by Phantom Ace ( 24 Comments › )
Filed under Iran, Islamic Supremacism, Leftist-Islamic Alliance at May 5th, 2009 - 8:25 am

This article is very accurate and true. Iran doesn’t want to talk, they view themselves as strong and America as weak. They correctly view Obama’s outreach as a sign of weakness.

U.S. Engagement of Iran Is Futile

However, engaging Iran will turn out to be an outdrawn process with no positive outcomes for either the U.S. or the international community. Such a process will only serve the interests of the theocracy in Tehran. This is a warranted prediction given previous attempts by the U.S. to engage Tehran. The first Bush administration attempted to reach out to the “pragmatic” Ayatollah Hashemi Rafsanjani. The Clinton administration pursued a policy of rapprochement with Tehran when Mohammad Khatami, the “reformist,” was president. None of those efforts bored fruit. Even during the second term of the previous administration, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice tried, on a number of occasions, to reach out to Tehran – but with no result.

We need to pressure and destabilize Iran. There are people there who oppose the government and we should support them. Iran isn’t that strong, its strenght is the support it recieves from Leftist politicians and the Western Media. We need to treat them as the joke of a nation they are.