► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Islamo-Fascism’

Democracy in Islamic world enables Islamo-Fascism

by Phantom Ace ( 3 Comments › )
Filed under Al Qaeda, George W. Bush, Hezballah, Islamic Supremacism, Islamists, Sharia (Islamic Law), Taliban at May 3rd, 2009 - 8:54 am

This article is spot on. Caroline Glick rightly points out that when there are free elections in Muslim countries, Islamists win. This clearly shows that confrontation with non Muslims is popular in these nations.

One civilization clashing

On June 7 Hizbullah will likely take over Lebanon and formally bring the oldest Arab democracy into the Iranian axis.

Iran’s stalking horse will not become the ruler of the largely pro-Western, non-Shi’ite majority country through a violent revolution. Lebanon will become yet another Iranian vassal state through ballots, not bullets. On June 7, Hizbullah and its allied parties are set to win a smashing popular victory in Lebanon’s parliamentary elections.

Hizbullah’s projected victory in these elections is of course not an isolated event. It is part of an Islamist electoral sweep in democratic elections throughout the region. Indeed, Islamists have won every free or partially free election in the region for the past six years.

This is another of Bush’s failed legacies, his insistence on democracy in the Muslim world has enabled our enemies. If there is any doubt the intentions of Islam just look at election results from these nations. No matter how much Obama apologizes, it doesn’t matter. When given a chance to vote Muslims vote for Islamo-Fascists and not secularists. The West is naive and blind, Islam is not peaceful it is an Arabic Imperialistic cult.

Obama squandering ties with India

by Phantom Ace ( 19 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Dhimmitude, Leftist-Islamic Alliance at April 13th, 2009 - 6:53 pm

President is undoing one of the biggest changes in American policy. During the Cold War India although a Democracy was allied with the Soviet Union. This changed under the Bushes and Clinton. India opened up its economy and we began to see eye to eye on the Islamic threat. Obama eager to please Islam has decided to turn its back on India.

Barack Obama’s India-Pakistan Mess

The Indian alliance is an almost perfect lynch-pin for American strategy in Asia. India’s population is growing, which means that they will actually be there for decades to come. While hardly Westerners in culture and outlook, they share more in common with the West than do the other regional powers, including even Japan. Its military, while not yet on the level of South Korea’s, is professionalizing and learning the bluewater trade. Aside from a few breakaway regions left to go and the odd round of interfaith violence, India is a fairly stable State beset on its West by a terrorist breeding ground, and to its North by a power-hungry China. In other words, it is an Anglophonic, common law democracy beset by tyrannies and lunatics, and so naturally inclined to ally with other Anglophonic, common law democracies facing the problems attendant with tyrannies and lunatics. American foreign policy has always been about American priorities — and rightfully so — but it is a rare and wonderful thing when American Realpolitik priorities and the moral imperative to stand next to young democracies align.

Or rather, it was a rare and wonderful thing. It’s rapidly becoming a fading memory, as the Indians are finding to their dismay.

India which has come a long way is now being ignored. India’s sin, it stands against Islamo-Fascism and that is a no no in Obama’s mind. Like Israel, India now is considered a nuisance.

Much as with Obama’s turn at “Make Peace In The Holy Land” (a game American Presidents play too often as if the Israelis are unhelpful opponents instead of an old, democratic ally), Obama’s India policy has all the signs of being confused, amoral fantasizing disguised as hard-nosed realism. On the one hand are repeated, pointless sleights, like not calling the world’s largest democracy after being elected; neglecting to include India in Hillary Clinton’s first trip abroad as Secretary of State; and subtly letting India know that the Obama Administration sees India’s nuclear development as out of place in the world. On the other hand are gentle — ultimately probably futile — attempts to have Pakistan divulge detail on which faction of its intelligence services perpetrated the Mumbai massacre.

India is getting the Israel treatment. As always, Non Muslims must make painful concessions while Islamic nations don’t. This is a double standard. As much as I detested Bush he at least had it right when it comes to India. They are a growing nation of 1 Billion people and a Democracy. They should be our friend. Instead Obama wants to be friends with islamo-Fascists and Sino-Fascists. This sickens me as an American and we will regret this.

Fears about the result of Lebanon’s upcoming elections

by Phantom Ace ( 4 Comments › )
Filed under Hezballah, Islamists, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Middle East at April 9th, 2009 - 2:07 pm

Lebanon faces elections in June and people are nervous. The 2 main opponents are the March 14th movement which is made up of C hristians, Druzes and Sunnis. On the other side is Hizballah the Shia Islamo-Fascist movement supported by Iran, Syria and Western Leftists.  This article explains the differences of both sides.

Lebanon on Tenterhooks

The public display of feminine beauty remains impermissible in most of the Middle East, but Lebanon—with its unique role as the meeting point of the Muslim and Western worlds—has long been the exception. And today, women dressed in tight jeans and flattering blouses, and with smiles visible thanks to the lack of the niqab, are in abundance. Surely this freedom, along with democracy, secularism, and a Lebanon independent of foreign control, is something worth preserving.

Now read about the Left’s beloved Hizballah

 Before gaining entrance to the rally, I had first to meet with an abaya-clad woman at Hezbollah’s press office, located in the Dahiyeh, a Shi’ite slum in Beirut’s southern suburbs.

In ways large and small, the Hezbollah rally could not have been more different from the March 14th one. Here, men and women sat separately (and entered and exited through separate doors), and the majority of women wore black abayas. A group of uniformed men (Iranian military officers, I was told) sat in the front row.

Does anyone not see the difference. I bet Obama will back Hizballah since the Left loves Totalitarians. If Hizballah wins, expect Israel to hit Lebanon. The Left will back Hizballah, it’s the Progressive thing to do!

Obama Abandons Afghan Women

by Phantom Ace ( 25 Comments › )
Filed under Afghanistan, Barack Obama, Dhimmitude, Islamic Supremacism, Islamists, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Military, Multiculturalism, Political Correctness, Taliban at April 2nd, 2009 - 10:55 am

What is the point of the Afghan surge if their government allows women to be raped by their husbands. Is this what we are fighting for? If so I am not for helping these people.

Silence Meets Despair of Afghan Women

That was then. This is now: Afghan President Hamid Karzai has just signed a law that forces women to obey their husbands’ sexual demands, keeps women from leaving the house — even for work or school — without a husband’s permission, automatically grants child custody rights to fathers and grandfathers before mothers, and favors men in inheritance disputes and other legal matters. In short, the law again consigns Afghan women to lives of brutal repression.

We wasted American lives for this?  I thought Obama, who is a Progressive, believes in Women’s rights?  Where is Hillary on this? This is another example of the hypocrisy of the Left.  They will sell out their own beliefs to appease Islam.  It is time to leave Afghanistan, let the Taliban have it.  The people there want them.  I say we just firebomb for every terror attack.  Terror should be met with Terror.  Not invading and setting  up democracies.  America needs to stop helping Muslims; screw them, and let them help themselves.