► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Israel’

Obsessive Compulsive Israel Disorder (OCID)

by Eliana ( 121 Comments › )
Filed under Gaza, India, Israel, Media, Palestinians at January 7th, 2010 - 7:00 am

It’s no secret that the media has an unhealthy obsession with Israel. The Free Middle East website has a video about this obsession:

Their Obsessive and Compulsive article explains the mental disorder / global disease:

Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) is a mental disorder that causes repeated unwanted and intrusive thoughts. An OCD sufferer will engage in repetitive behaviors (compulsions) aimed at reducing anxiety caused by these thoughts (obsessions). OCD is a chronic or long-term illness that can take over a person’s life, hurt relationships, and limit the ability to work or go to school.

Scientists have proven that OCD is caused by one part of the brain being unable to receive information from the other.

In the past 20 years the 24/7 cable news, internet and social networking sites have revolutionized the way we receive information. In the shadow of this information revolution lays a disease that has surprisingly not yet received an official diagnosis. The cause is also a restriction of information. The disease is called Obsessive Compulsive Israel Disorder or OCID.

For a country that is thousands of miles away, has a population of just 7 million and speaks a completely different language, the world is obsessively and compulsively focused on Israel.

From the same article, Obsessive and Compulsive:

In January 2009, when Israel launched operation Cast Lead, to root out rocket fire from the Gaza strip, the media covered every minute. There was no shortage of information that often presented Israel as the aggressor and perpetrator of all the violence in the region. Just like OCD stops the flow of information from one part of the brain to the other, OCID, stopped the flow of the rest of the important events going in the world.

While a tiny country was trying to secure its borders from rocket attack the world was going through major challenges.

  • * The Ethiopian military withdrew its troops from the Somalia civil war. This ongoing conflict has killed 300-400 thousand people since 1991.
  • * Indian Army continued to battle Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed militants in the disputed Kashmir region. This ongoing conflict has seen countless civilian massacres and terror attacks.
  • * The Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), a Sri Lanka terrorist group, launched major offensives around the northern part of the country including the bombing the state department of defense. 80 thousand people have been killed in the country’s civil war, including 8000 this year alone.

In another article on Free Middle East, they pose this question: Which is Googled More: Israel or Darfur? Take a look at the graph in this article. The answer isn’t surprising:

This graph shows the relative popularity of the search terms over the last twelve months of world-wide googling. Iran received 60% of the attention that Israel did, Iraq 40%, and AIDS little more than half.

Over the last few years 300,000 people have been killed in Sudan, yet over the last 12 months Darfur was googled a mere 4% as much as Israel!

Going back to Obsessive and Compulsive, this is the media’s problem:

While the media was predominantly reporting only on the conflict in the Gaza Strip as a prime example, the world was going through universal struggle. Their continual criticism and singling out of Israel is baseless in its logic vis a vis its abnormal media coverage. The larger worldly causes of global warming, hunger, aids and genocide have to take a back seat to feed a news aristocracy that clearly suffers from the sociological disease, Obsessive-Compulsive Israel Disorder.

Explaining The Arab-Israeli Conflict: The 1974 PLO Phased Plan

by WrathofG-d ( 78 Comments › )
Filed under Fatah, Gaza, Hamas, Islamic Invasion, Islamic Terrorism, Islamists, Israel, Jihad, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Middle East, Palestinians, Religion, Terrorism, United Nations, World at January 6th, 2010 - 3:00 pm

Much of the Arab-Israeli conflict is “complex”, and misunderstood by a majority of the World.  Based on the complete lack of factual information, and actual historical context presented by the horribly ignorant, and therefore exceptionally biased media, universities, political parties, and some Religious organizations, this really isn’t all that surprising.

One significant aspect of the Arab-Israeli conflict that is never discussed, yet would explain the PLO/”Palestinians” actions perfectly, is an agreed upon PLO/”Palestinian” strategy from 1974 commonly referred to as the PLO Phased Plan.  In the context of the Phased Plan, the practically all steps taken by the Arabs/PLO/”Palestinians” make complete logical sense.   In addition, an understanding of the historical context of this Phased Plan will help rip the mask of a “peace process” off the face of the “moderate” Fatah and show their actions in their true context – a desire and change of method to their ultimate goal of destroying Israel.

In 1974, the PLO outlined their future goals, according to the Phased Plan.  The Phased Plan calls for Palestinians to create a state on any land that is given to them, and to use that land as a launching ground for attacks against Israel, with the end goal, to take over all of Israel. This plan is well documented, and can be found on the Phakestinian Arab-controlled Jerusalem Media and Communications Centre, and even “Palestine’s” official UN website.

To best understand the importance of this 1974 PLO Phased Plan as a switch of tactics, more than a change of heart, however one must understand what historically was taking place around this time. (h/t United Jerusalem)

Just prior to 1974, the Arab-Muslims had just lost their fifth all out traditional military battle against Israel.  The most recent being the Yom Kippur War which was begun by the Arabs in October 1973.   In this war, the Arab states launched a surprise attack against Israel on the holiest day of the Jewish calendar,  once again attempting to destroy Israel.  In addition, because of their humiliating defeat in the 1967 Six-Day-War, the Arabs had the additional goal of attempting to redeem their honor.  Though Israel was initially caught off guard, it then regrouped and repelled the Arab attack, but not before incurring heavy casualties.

This loss finally convinced the Arabs that they would not be able to destroy Israel militarily within its post-1967 boundaries, but because of the previously unheard of successes raised their moral, and reinvigorated their zeal for destroying Israel.  Accordingly, instead of accepting that their desire to destroy Israel was unattainable, they instead switched gears, embraced the tactic of Terrorism over full military attacks, and embarked upon a new three-stage strategy for Israel’s destruction: The PLO’s 1974 decision commonly known as the Phased Plan.

The Phased Plan, Adopted at the 12th Session of the Palestinian National Council in Cairo, on June 9, 1974, is summed up as follows:

PHASE 1. Through the “armed struggle” (i.e., terrorism), to establish an “independent combatant national authority” over any territory that is “liberated” from Israeli rule. (Article 2)

PHASE 2. To continue the struggle against Israel, using the territory of the national authority as a base of operations. (Article 4)

PHASE 3. To provoke an all-out war in which Israel’s Arab neighbors destroy it entirely (“liberate all Palestinian territory”) (Article 8 )

Full text of the Plan can be found here, and again here at “Palestine’s” official UN website.

The Phased Plan remains the basis of PLO actions to this day, even despite the naive folly of the Oslo Accords.

Speaking on September 1, 1993, just after the announcement of the 1993 Israel-PLO agreement, PLO Chairman Yasser Arafat announced on Radio Monte Carlo that the Oslo agreement:

will be a basis for an independent Palestinian state in accordance with the Palestine National Council resolution issued in 1974… The PNC resolution issued in 1974 calls for the establishment of a national authority on any part of Palestinian soil from which Israel withdraws or which is liberated.

(More at “Palestine Facts“)

As is noted by “Middle East Facts“:

It is worth noting that the PLO’s term for the self-rule council now in place in Gaza and the West Bank is the “Palestinian National Authority,” echoing the language of the Phased Plan.

But, let’s take this all out of the theoretical, and look at some of the present facts on the ground to see how the 1974 PLO Phased Plan is relevant today.

Additional Sources On This Topic:

Free Middle East

The PLO’s “Phased Plan”
The Phased Plan, Piece by Piece, The Piece Process
PLO’s Aim Continues to be the Destruction of Israel
Israel and “Palestine”

Rabbis to US Ambassador: Time to ‘Go Biblical’ with Arabs

by Eliana ( 154 Comments › )
Filed under Israel at December 31st, 2009 - 10:00 am

Arutz Sheva is reporting that the Rabbinical Congress for Peace (RCP) has met with America’s Ambassador to Israel to request a change in American policy in the Middle East.

This isn’t the first time that the Rabbinical Congress for Peace has sent a message to Obama:

The Rabbinical Congress for Peace (RCP) comprised of over 350 leading rabbis in Israel and 850 abroad has sent a message through a personal contact to President-elect Barack Obama congratulating him on his election and at the same time reminded him of his prayer at the Western Wall and the biblical promise of Jewish sovereignty in the entire Land of Israel.

The RCP wrote that “we appreciate the fact that on your last visit to Israel you prayed to G-d at the Western Wall in Jerusalem, the holiest Jewish site, and according to media the following was the text of your prayer: “Lord-Protect my family and me. Forgive me my sins, and help me guard against pride and despair. Give me the wisdom to do what is right and just. And make me an instrument of your will.”

“Consistent with your focus on the will of G-d we trust that you are aware of the will of G-d when it comes to Jewish sovereignty in the entire Land of Israel. We therefore trust that you will accord the will of G-d concerning all of Israel the same divine importance as you do with regard to other areas of the will of G-d.

“The last 15 years have proven without a shadow of a doubt that the “land for peace” formula, besides being a formula that goes against the Divine will, is ineffective, obsolete, and an exercise in futility. Most of all it is a dangerous policy that only leads to bloodshed and instability in the region…”

Rabbinical Congress for Peace reminds Obama of G-d’s promise

In today’s meeting with America’s Ambassador to Israel, Mr. James Cunningham, the Rabbinical Congress for Peace explained everything to him with a refreshing directness that needs to be promulgated in America on an ongoing basis.

Rabbis to US Ambassador: Time to ‘Go Biblical’ with Arabs
December 31, 2009

(IsraelNN.com) A delegation of the Rabbinical Congress for Peace (RCP) met with U.S. Ambassador to Israel, Mr. James Cunningham, today and called for a reassessment of the entire U.S. policy vis-à-vis the Israelis and Palestinians. The rabbis told Ambassador Cunningham that it was time to try the Biblical approach to the dispute over the Land of Israel.

“The past 17 years have proven without a shadow of a doubt that every square inch ceded by Israel to the Palestinians was transformed into a platform of hatred and terrorism,” RCP Director Rabbi Avrohom Shmuel Lewin told the ambassador. “In other words, the ‘land for peace’ formula in the Israel-Palestinian context, besides being a formula that goes against the Divine will, is ineffective, obsolete, and an exercise in futility. Most of all it is a dangerous policy that only leads to bloodshed and instability in the region and harms vital American interests in the region as well,” Lewin said.

‘Land for peace doesn’t work’

The delegation was headed by Rabbi Joseph Gerlitzky, Chairman of the RCP, who is also the Rabbi of Central Tel Aviv where the US embassy is located. Rabbi Gerlitzky presented the ambassador with the Halachic (Jewish legal) ruling signed by over 350 prominent rabbis in Israel that it is forbidden to give up even one inch of territory controlled by Israel today because it will bring bloodshed and instability to the region.

“In the name of the overwhelming majority of rabbis in Israel,” he said, “we request of you Mr. Ambassador, to convey our Halachic message to President Barack Obama that it is time for a complete reversal and reassessment of U.S. policy in the Middle East. The ‘land for peace’ policy never worked and harms U.S. interests in the region and the world at large.”

Ambassador Cunningham told the rabbis that he does not see how the problem can be solved “without taking into consideration the Palestinians,” to which Rabbi Gold remarked: “Ever since we started taking the Palestinians into consideration the situation only worsened.”

The ambassador asked the rabbis, “So what is your solution to the problem?”

Rabbi Gerlitzky replied: “You must switch the entire approach to the situation. We all believe in the Holy Bible and up until now we tried every formula except for that which is delineated in the Bible. Let’s try it and who knows, Mr. Ambassador, maybe this is your defining moment, that G-d Almighty has placed you in this capacity in order to precipitate a new course which will bring a true peace to the entire region.”

The Bible says that the Land of Israel belongs to the Jewish people exclusively, and commands the Jews to defeat any enemy nation that encroaches on that sovereignty.

Rabbis to US Ambassador: Time to ‘Go Biblical’ with Arabs

The Rabbinical Congress for Peace is right! There is NO Middle East Peace Process and the attempts to pretend otherwise have resulted in nothing but bloodshed and war. Repeating the same mistakes for another 17 years would be monstrous.

It’s time to understand that Israeli sovereignty over the land is the only solution. It doesn’t mean that all Arabs would have to be expelled. Israel has 1.5 million Arabs living inside the green line.

Israel could give some Arabians in Judea, Samaria and Gaza a type of residency permit that would NOT allow them to vote Israel into an Islamic state while also NOT allowing them to have access to all of Israel again (as they had prior to the first and second intifadas).

Israel must have sovereignty over all the land from the Jordan River to the Sea.

Yet another reason why I’m no longer an Episcopalian

by goddessoftheclassroom ( 118 Comments › )
Filed under Progressives, Religion at December 30th, 2009 - 7:00 pm

Just over a year ago, I left the Episcopal Church for a new parish of the Anglican Church in North America.

It was a very difficult decision for me because I loved my parish church. However, the national church was headed in a direction I could not follow.

Today I came across yet another reason why mine was the right choice: anti-Israel sentiment, here expertly skewered by Christopher Johnson:

[quoting Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts-Schori] “Could Mary and Joseph even get into Bethlehem today? Their donkey would undoubtedly be stopped, examined for explosives, and probably turned away because of its subversive cargo. Today Mary would likely give birth in another cave beyond the city and outside the wall, once again forbidden home and the shelter of family. Yet that very wall is an enduring reminder of human fear and the frantic quest for safety, not unlike Mary and Joseph’s search for shelter.”

For pure, unadulterated stupidity coupled with mind-blowing offensiveness, I can’t remember ever reading anything better. Certainly, Frank Griswold needed entire sermons to be as idiotic and insulting as that one, single paragraph.

Kate? If Mary and Joseph, who were both Jews last time I checked, approached Bethlehem today, who would be the ones stopping them? Who would examine their donkey for explosives? Who would end up turning them away and forbidding them “home and the shelter of family?”

You guessed it.

I hate having to keep going over this but Mary and Joseph weren’t “forbidden home and the shelter of family” because they didn’t live in Bethlehem, you dolt. They were only there because a big, centralized government, the kind you seem so enthusiastic about, ordered them to go so that they could be enrolled for tax purposes.

Ironic, isn’t it?

You say “the wall is an enduring reminder of human fear and the frantic quest for safety” like that’s a bad thing, Presiding Bishop. What is wrong with wanting to keep your family or your friends from harm? Don’t you do that yourself? Except that the people wanting to protect themselves are…you got it.

Once again, that wall was a last resort. An understandable last resort given the 60 plus years of your neighbors periodically trying to wipe you off the map or kill as many of your citizens as they possibly can as gruesomely as they possibly can.

Dead Jews don’t matter to you at all, do they, Kate?

at Midwest Conservative Journal