► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Sudan’

Islamic ‘Racism’ (or rather, totalitarianism): Muslim Blood Superior to Infidel Blood

by 1389AD ( 90 Comments › )
Filed under Islamic Supremacism, Sharia (Islamic Law) at November 25th, 2013 - 7:00 am

Raymond Ibrahim has the story at Frontpage:

Arguing that Muslim blood is more precious than infidel blood, Muslim clerics in and out of Sudan are outraged because a Sudanese court has condemned a Muslim man to death—simply because he murdered American Diplomat John Granville on January 1, 2008.

A 2009 report offers context:

The court had sentenced the men [originally four] to death in June for killing Granville and his driver in January 2008, but the sentence was cancelled in August after [his Muslim driver] Abbas’s father forgave the men.

Under Islamic law, the victim’s family has the right to forgive the murderer, ask for compensation (fedia) or demand execution.

Granville’s mother, Jane Granville, at the time had asked for the men’s execution, but her letter was rejected because it was not notarized.

The judge said the sentence was confirmed because Granville’s family, from Buffalo, in northern New York State, had requested it.

Then, in 2010, the four men convicted of murder, in the words of the U.S. State Department, “escaped from a maximum security prison” in Khartoum. One of the men, Abdul Ra’uf Abu Zaid Muhammad Hamza, was recaptured and is currently in prison awaiting execution.

Finding the punishment unjust, several international Islamic organizations, most recently, the London-based Islamic Media Observatory, have been trying to commute the death sentence, mostly by arguing for Abdul Ra’uf’s “human rights.”

However, the Legitimate League of Scholars and Preachers in Sudan (an influential body of Muslim clerics) issued a statement last month titled “Let no Muslim be killed because of an infidel”—a verbatim quote, in fact, from Islam’s prophet Muhammad—revealing the true reason why so many Muslims are trying to overturn the death sentence.

The Arabic language statement begins by asserting that “Allah has honored human beings over creation and multiplied the Muslim’s honor over the infidel’s, because Islam elevates and nothing is elevated above it. The value of the blood of Muslims is equal, or should be, but not so the value of the blood of others.” (The Koran itself, e.g., 2:221, confirms this idea that even the lowliest Muslim is superior to any non-Muslim.)

Next, the statement quotes the clear words of Islam’s prophet, Muhammad, as recorded in a canonical hadith: “Let no Muslim be killed because of an infidel.” It then elaborates on the meaning of this statement by quoting from “the consensus of Islamic scholars,” or ijma‘, a legitimate source of Islamic jurisprudence.

Continue reading…

Why do we even have diplomatic relations with Muslim countries? What good is it doing us?

Independent South Sudan Round-up and SITREP.

by coldwarrior ( 66 Comments › )
Filed under Africa, Islamic Supremacism, Military, Sudan and South Sudan at March 4th, 2011 - 8:30 am

The situation that is playing out in Southern Sudan has been repeated throughout history over and over again. The South Sudanese people voted overwhelmingly to leave the country proper and start their own nation; The Nation of South Sudan is to be declared in July. Do note that there is a difference in definition and reality between country and nation. A country is more or less set by political boundaries on a map that are recognized by other countries. A nation is something very different, a nation is a homogeneous culture defined by a shared set of beliefs and mores that define the individual that makes up the nation. A nation can be spread across many countries.

Please Refer to this map of Sudan for this post, it is far too detailed to display here.

A quick look at the map linked above reveals two nations in one country, often this leads to failure except where an over-riding sense that the nations in the country are similar enough and the nations are mature enough to get along in a situation where the nations make the country stronger. In that case, differences are celebrated and enjoyed by all. The map of Sudan shows an impossibility though. Note the names of the towns in the north, then note the names of the towns in the south. The names in the north are Arabic, the names in the south are Sudanic. There was a program of Arabization occurring, driven by the ruling 40% self identified ‘Arabs’ against the 50% Native Blacks. Sudan is a microcosm of the result of Arab expansion using Islam as the weapon to bring populations to heel. Another factor of this forced Arabization is that there is still a slave trade in Sudan, Black non-Muslims are taken by Muslims for forced labor and sexual exploitation. South Sudan is on the ever violent edge of the Muslim world. It is and will be a war zone.

There was a recent mass migration of non-Muslims to South Sudan both out as refugees in neighboring countries returned and non-Muslims in the north ethnically cleansed themselves and left the north.  This ‘nation’ of Christians and Animists then voted on a referendum to split from Arab controlled Sudan and carve out a nation and a country in the south.  Well, as always occurs on a border with Muslims, there is war and violence.

The main players of this fight are the SLPA (Sudan People’s Liberation Army, South Sudan) versus northern Muslim nomad tribes that are , of course, armed and funded by the north. The most recent clash was in the Abyei region. Oddly, the Misseriya tribe ‘nomads’ had jeeps with mounted machine guns at their disposal that are exactly like the jeeps used by the Army in the North. The pretense for the fighting is that the Muslim nomads are ‘concerned’ that they wont be able to use the grazing lands, the real reason is that there is oil in the South. and that one cannot live in peace with Muslim neighbors.

Deng Arop Kuol, the top government official in the disputed border region of Abyei, alleged the attackers were supported by the northern Sudanese government. Tribesman involved in the attack said the southern government provoked the attack.

The violence underscores the volatility between Sudan’s north and south ahead of the south’s independence in July. The two sides fought for more than two decades and the civil war claimed around 2 million lives before it ended in 2005.

Seven police officers and three attackers from the nomadic Misseriya tribe were killed in Sunday’s attack, and fighting continued on Monday, Kuol said. The fertile area is claimed by both north and south Sudan and is near several large oil fields.

Kuol said the Misseriya fighters were using jeeps that belonged to the northern Sudanese Armed Forces when they attacked a police post at Todach.

So the newest nation of South Sudan has some very nasty neighbors and has a long way to go to be secure. They also have a renegade group from the SPLA that backs a former commander:

Abyei was a battleground in the decades-long civil war between north and south Sudan that ended in the 2005 Comprehensive Peace Agreement — the accord that promised the southern secession referendum. Abyei residents were supposed to have their own referendum on whether to join north or south Sudan in January. The vote never took place amid disputes over who was qualified to vote. The south regularly has accused north Sudan of arming Athor’s forces and Misseriya fighters to destabilise the region and keep control of its oil, an allegation dismissed by Khartoum.

The violence has cast a shadow over mass celebrations after southerners overwhelmingly voted to declare independence from the north in a referendum in January. The referendum was promised in a 2005 peace deal that ended decades of civil war with the north. Rebel leader George Athor accused the southern army (SPLA) of starting the fighting in Jonglei on Sunday and earlier last month, breaking the terms of a ceasefire agreed in January. “They attacked us early in the morning on Sunday. We dispersed the SPLA forces and we captured a big number of arms. Also we managed to kill 86 soldiers. We lost 12 of our comrades,” he said. Athor insisted he was ready to return to negotiations with the southern leadership. “I am really worried because the new country will be like a baby born dead. If you start with a guerrilla force fighting the government, I don’t see any development that can happen.” Athor was a senior member of the rebel southern army during the civil war. He took up arms after saying he was cheated out of the Jonglei governorship in last year’s general elections. The SPLA accused Athor of breaking the truce by massacring more than 200 people in Jonglei mid February. Northern Misseriya nomads and allied militias attacked the village of Maker on Wednesday in Abyei, killing at least six southern police, said the speaker of Abyei’s administration Charles Abyei.

Will the nation of South Sudan survive? We can watch, and pray for them. They have one difficult future.

Background reading:

http://www.fox40.com/news/crimealert/sns-rt-international-us-sudtre7211iw-20110302,0,1456668.story

http://www.reliefweb.int/rw/rwb.nsf/db900sid/ADGO-8EKMQE?OpenDocument&RSS20&RSS20=FS

http://www.cnbc.com/id/41870745

http://www.philly.com/philly/wires/ap/news/world/20110228_ap_10killedduringclashesindisputedsudanregion.html

Modern Day Slavery and Genocide

by Kafir ( 201 Comments › )
Filed under Blogmocracy, Guest Post, Islamic hypocrisy, Islamic Supremacism, Islamic Terrorism, Islamists, Leftist-Islamic Alliance at November 15th, 2010 - 8:30 pm

Blogmocracy in Action!
Guest post by: NoThreat2U!



A heartfelt Thank You to Pam Gellar at Atlas for all this information. I asked her permission to share this with you here and anyone else who may drop by The Blogmocracy. She has tons of information about Simon Deng and about what is happening in Sudan. As long as she allows me, I will continue to share this information with anyone interested. This is the first nail in the coffin for the racebaiters. Slavery is alive and well people, and it is being perpetrated by Muslims against the Blacks of Africa. Spread the word.

Simon Aban Deng is a Sudanese human rights activist living in the United States. He is a victim of child slavery. A native of the Shilluk Kingdom in southern Sudan, Deng spent several years as a domestic slave in southern Sudan.

A Sudanese refugee enslaved at the age of nine. He was enslaved when his neighbor asked Simon to accompany him on a trip. Simon was given as a gift to the neighbor’s family. Having escaped slavery and emigrated to the United States, he travels the country addressing audiences which range from the United Nations to middle school students. His speeches focus on education and the anti-slavery movement. Deng works as a lifeguard at Coney Island.

This is his account of his capture and subsequent abduction: “… I was a slave. … When I was nine year’s old, my village was raided by Arab troops in the pay of Khartoum. As we ran into the bush to escape I watched as childhood friends were shot dead and the old and the weak who were unable to run were burned alive in their huts. I was abducted and given to an Arab family as a “gift”.”

To wit:

The Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court in The Hague has again publicly alleged that the Government of Sudan is engaged in an ongoing genocide against non-Arab tribes of Darfur. The Sudanese authorities prevented the flow of food to the camps for internally displaced persons (IDPs) and disrupted relief operations, said an aide of the chief prosecutor. …
Islam Shalaby said the government changed its tactics from directly attacking people with weapons to creating difficult conditions for them to survive in. Shalaby said that what is happening in Darfur are not isolated events but consistent government policy that is well thought out and implemented systematically.

Yet:

The United Nations on Saturday rejected calls by south Sudan to send peacekeepers and set up a buffer zone along the country’s tense north-south border ahead of a southern vote on independence next year.

Sudan’s oil-producing south is just days away from the scheduled start of a politically sensitive referendum on whether to secede or stay part of Sudan, a vote promised in a 2005 peace deal that ended decades of civil war with the north.

The sillies in Hollywood speak out against the genocide in Darfur, yet remain silent as to the murderers and their ideology.

Simon Deng has said this is Obama’s Rwanda moment:

“… whether they’re going to remain under the islamization and arabization, under enslavement, or they’re going to choose freedom for the first time. I, for one, don’t want to go back to being a slave again. I’ve tasted freedom. I’m proud today to stand in this country, as a free man, speaking to free people.

Of course they’re going to chose freedom. Because freedom is a God given right to all human beings. That being said, we, the people of South Sudan, for sixty years we went through a lot at the hands of the sitting governments in Khartoum. They slaughtered three and a half million South Sudanese. They enslaved thousands. They turned their arms and guns on the people in the Nuba Mountains. They turned their arms and guns on the people in the Blue Nile. And the world came to their senses by saying what happened in western Sudan in Darfur region is genocide.”

“The Secretary of State, a month ago, Hillary Clinton, said that the problem in South Sudan is a “ticking time bomb”. We don’t want to go back. We don’t want to go back to Islam. We don’t want to go back to enslavement. We don’t want to go back to arabization. We are proud as Africans in that continent. Sudan is the land of the blacks.

And that is why we don’t want to turn our backs to our brothers in Darfur. … after southern Sudan becomes independent next year we’re still going to be their voice because they’re being victimized the way we’re being victimized in that country. We’re going to Washington to ask our (United States) government that CPA that we talk about it is the legacy of the American government and, I’m speaking directly to President Obama, he was there with me when we talked about the issue in the South Sudan as a senator, shoulder to shoulder, when we talked about the Southern Sudan. I’m asking you, why are you distancing yourself from me, why are you distancing yourself from the issue of Sudan? Why are you putting heavyweights to be envoys here and envoys there, and you’re sending someone who has to learn on the job to be the envoy, knowing the magnitude of the problem in the Sudan?

Wrenching disagreements within the Obama administration are reinforcing the impression that our president is not willing to confront the Khartoum government. Mr. Obama’s “open hand” policy toward rogue states, which has failed so notably with Iran and North Korea, is similarly failing in Sudan. Mr. Obama’s special Sudan envoy, retired Air Force Gen. Scott Gration, has essentially cuddled up to Mr. Bashir, hoping he can thereby persuade Khartoum not to use military force.

Observers think Mr. Bashir’s government will do almost anything, including resorting to military force, to prevent losing the South and its huge oil and other natural resources.

This and much more can be found at AtlasShrugs.

NoThreat2U

Update:

Addendum by Miss Trixie:

I’ve more info from Vlad’s blog http://vladtepesblog.com/?cat=352 that’s absolutely sickening. Just click on each story in the search stream to see the vids/stories and there’s more if you click on “older posts” at the bottom.

Muslim Slavery Resurgent

by Kafir ( 169 Comments › )
Filed under Christianity, Islam, Islamic Supremacism, Islamic Terrorism, Islamists, Sharia (Islamic Law) at November 10th, 2010 - 2:00 pm

Right now. In this century.


Video above from a report filed fifteen years ago, showing that the practice of Muslim slavery had never really gone away – and is now once again on the rise

Muslim Slavery Resurgent as Sudan Arabs Kidnapping Black Africans

From the people that pretty much invented it, the taking of slaves is happening again in the benighted, failed state of Sudan:

Nairobi — Officially, [the] slave trade ended 200 years ago after abolitionists in Britain and the US banned the oppressive enterprise. Before the end of that dark era, millions of Africans had been ferried across the Atlantic and sold into servitude across the Americas.

But history has a way of repeating itself, and it is doing just that in Sudan, where thousands of black Africans from the south are abducted and sold as slaves in the Arab north.

According to reports from non-governmental organisations and human rights agencies, a black slave goes for between $10 and $100 (Sh800 and Sh8,000), and various sources claim there are more than 10,000 people living in slavery and servitude in Sudan today, most of them abducted from their villages by government-backed Arab militia.

The motivation for this, the sources say, is a desire for the northern rulers to terrorise their southern subjects and, in the process, distract rebel forces from attacking government targets.

Northern rulers = muslim
Southern subjects = Christians

‘Thousands of slaves in Sudan’ -BBC 2003
Slavery, Abduction and Forced Servitude in Sudan (pdf 2002)
Slavery and Slave Redemption in the Sudan (HRW)

.



BLOGMOCRACY UPDATE:

HAPPY BIRTHDAY, USMC!