► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Jim Crow Laws’

Chris Matthews accuses Republicans of bringing back Jim Crow

by Phantom Ace ( 138 Comments › )
Filed under Cult of Obama, Humor, Marxism, Progressives at January 13th, 2014 - 4:00 pm

I am done writing on politics, but this goes beyond the political realm. Chris Matthews goes on some crazy rant claiming republicans wnat Jim Crow laws and will remove Obama’s name from history.

This man is deranged.

The racist nature of the Progressive movement

by Phantom Ace ( 50 Comments › )
Filed under Multiculturalism, Nazism, Progressives, Socialism at November 14th, 2011 - 11:30 am

Racism is at the heart of Progressivsism. At it’s core the Progressive ideology believes in the supremacy of Northwest Europeans. Slavs, Jews, Mideast Christians, Africans, Indians, Asians, Polynesians, Southern Europeans and their Latin American offspring are all deemed inferior. The most notorious manifestation of Progressive racism was the National Socialist German Workers Party in Germany. However, this Progressive racism has reared its ugly head in America as well. What is not well known is that Jim Crow laws were promoted by the Progressive movement of the late 19th Century. The American Progressives believed in promoting Eugenics to eliminate the undesirable people. In fact, the German Progressives (Nazis) were influenced by their American ideological cousins!

In 1865, amid the final throes of the Civil War, Frederick Douglass worried that the prospect of fulfilling the promise of the Declaration of Independence, by finally securing to blacks “the most perfect civil and political equality,” would founder on the allure of policies that in crucial respects restricted their natural rights — e.g., the rights to acquire property and vote. Such policies, though intended to “prepare them to better handle freedom,” would “practically enslave . . . the Negro, and make . . . the [Emancipation] Proclamation of 1863 a mockery and delusion. What is freedom? It is the right to choose one’s own employment. Certainly it means that, if it means anything; and when any[one] undertakes to decide for any man when he shall work, where he shall work, at what he shall work, and for what he shall work, he or they practically reduce him to slavery.” The right to vote was even more important, because it was the main means for blacks to protect all their other natural rights. “Without this,” Douglass stressed, the black man “is the slave of society, and holds his liberty as a privilege, not as a right.”

Douglass’s concern was prophetic. Although the United States took significant steps toward “the most perfect civil and political equality” for blacks by adding the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments to the Constitution, these gains were short-lived. Beginning in 1890, a wave of disfranchisement swept through Dixie, as every southern state enacted literacy tests, poll taxes, and other restrictions making it virtually impossible for black men to vote. The impact of these restrictions, historian C. Vann Woodward suggests, is well indicated by Louisiana’s experience: In 1896 there were 130,334 blacks registered to vote; by 1904, there were only 1,342. The disfranchisement of blacks was accompanied, he continues, by “the mushroom growth of discriminatory and segregation laws,” intrusively dictating a thoroughgoing separation of the races in transportation, the workplace, hospitals, mental and penal institutions, recreational facilities, voluntary associations, etc. Two states even forbade the members of fraternal societies to address fellow members of another race as “brother.”

At first glance, this might seem odd. Just when post-Reconstruction America appeared poised to fulfill the promise of the Declaration by bringing the law into fuller accord with the equal, natural rights of man, the law became sharply more racial in character, actually rolling back recent gains and adding a host of new restrictions. Scholars frequently attribute this about-face to a resurgence of southern prejudice. The interesting fact that “the high tide of progressive reform coincided with some of the darkest moments of segregation, discrimination, and racial violence,” as historian Axel Schafer puts it, would seem to have been just that — mere coincidence. A classic instance, apparently, of correlation without causation. 

But this was no coincidence. “In the South,” Woodward observes, “the typical progressive reformer rode to power . . . on a disfranchising or white-supremacy movement.” The very same reformers who championed minimum wages, maximum hours, social insurance, and other labor reforms not only generally opposed extending the suffrage to blacks, but also promoted a “policy of segregation” for blacks and various “degenerates,” including the feeble-minded, epileptics, and “unemployables.” And they did so not in spite of the principles animating their economic reforms, but precisely because of them. The progressives’ support for disfranchisement and segregation, in other words, was but one practical expression of their philosophically inspired drive to revolutionize the moral basis of American government — to redefine the very meaning of human freedom and the rights to which individuals are, as a consequence, entitled.

Read the rest: Progressivism, Race, and the Training Wheels of Freedom

The Progressive movement has created a racial caste system. Anyone who refuses to play the role assigned them is smeared and attacked. Progressives are racists and it’s time to call them out on it. Look at the recent smears against Herman Cain and Marco Rubio. The anti-semitism shown to Jewish Conservatives is another example of Progressive racism.

Progressivism in all of its manifestations is evil.