► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘John McCain’

John McCain calls for an Arab Spring in Russia

by Phantom Ace ( 6 Comments › )
Filed under Headlines, Islamic Supremacism, Russia at December 15th, 2011 - 12:42 pm

John McCain hates Slavs. He cheerleader NATO support Islamic militants against the Serbs. he always trashes the Russian people. Now he tweets to Vladimir Putin that the Arab Spring is going to Russia. That’s right. McCain wants an Islamic takeover of Russia!

The Russian prime minister called the former presidential candidate “nuts” in response to Twitter comment about Russia’s parliamentary elections that drew allegations of fraud and triggered large protests.

Mr McCain’s tweet read: “Dear Vlad, The Arab Spring is coming to a neighbourhood near you.”

Mr Putin turned stony faced when asked about the tweet on his annual televised phone-in.

“Mr McCain fought in Vietnam. I think that he has enough blood of peaceful citizens on his hands. It must be impossible for him to live without these disgusting scenes anymore.

“Mr McCain was captured and they kept him not just in prison, but in a pit for several years,” he said. “Anyone [in his place] would go nuts.”

John McCain needs to go away. This man is a supporter of Islamic Imperialists. He wants an Islamic takeover of Russia? This man is deranged and a bigot.

 

 

McCain to endorse fellow Progressive Mitt Romney

by Phantom Ace ( 10 Comments › )
Filed under Elections 2012, Headlines, Mitt Romney, Republican Party at December 7th, 2011 - 11:32 am

The Rockefeller Wing of the GOP is circling the wagons! Rumors are now circulating that Progressive Republican John McCain will endorse Mittens the Kitten.

Arizona Sen. John McCain, the GOP presidential nominee in 2008, is moving toward endorsing a candidate for 2012. 

Republican sources familiar with his thinking say he will probably endorse his onetime political enemy, Mitt Romney.

There is virtually no chance, sources say, that he will pick former House Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.), who has surged into the lead in polls, stoking consternation among his ex-colleagues on Capitol Hill.

Hey birds of a feather flock together.

The Harriet Miers of 2012 is Mitt Romney

by Mojambo ( 82 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Conservatism, Elections 2012, George W. Bush, Mitt Romney at November 9th, 2011 - 11:30 am

The Harriet Miers of 2012  is Mitt Romney. Romney is about as conservative as George H.W. Bush and Colin Powell. I usually give Republicans from blue states some slack (see Scott Brown) because they all need to get reelected and cannot go full bore conservative if they hope to keep their jobs but the Republican Establishment foisting this guy on us four years after the McCain debacle is unforgivable. One of the commenters on Erick Erickson’s Red State has noted that if Obama wins he will replace Ginsburg and Breyer on the Supreme Court with 50-something even more liberal versions of those two who will remain on the court for a quarter century.  Elections have consequences.

h/t – Boker Tov, Boulder!

by Erick Erickson

Mit Romney will not go on Special Report with Brett Baier to answer the tough questions as the other candidates have done. No worries. Conservatives will bitch and moan for a few days and Romney will claim it was a scheduling issue, he’d always meant to go on, and he will go on.

Should Mitt Romney win the Presidency, conservatives will find this pattern play out repeated. Romney will head in a direction conservatives do not like and they will bitch and moan repeatedly and maybe, just maybe, he’ll part his hair in their direction.

We’ve seen this play out over and over. Jon Huntsman comes up with the best economic plan of all the candidates, Herman Cain follows up with 999, Perry comes out with a flat tax, and Romney refuses to do anything. Until he does something.

Mitt Romney is not the George W. Bush of 2012 — he is the Harriet Miers of 2012, only conservative because a few conservative grand pooh-bahs tell us Mitt Romney is conservative and for no other reason.

That is precisely why Mitt Romney will not win in 2012. But no worry, once he loses, Republican establishment types will blame conservatives for not doing enough for Mitt Romney, never mind that Mitt Romney has never been able to sell himself to more than 25% of the GOP voters. It’s not his fault though, it is the 75%’s fault.

[……]

Why Romney Will Be The Nominee

Mitt Romney will be the nominee because the other candidates, right now, are a pretty pathetic lot.

The base will not forgive Rick Perry his immigration sins. In fact, that has hurt him far more than his debate performances, but his debate performances have hurt him badly. Perry, who came out principled and fiery with a record others could only envy, has left others with the impression that he’s a poor man’s version of the village idiot, which in the SEC we call “Aggies”. Maybe he can turn it around.

Newt Gingrich will not be the nominee because, despite his daughter’s rebuttals to the horror stories of how Gingrich divorced his first of three wives, Jackie Gingrich told the Washington Post on January 3, 1985, “He walked out in the spring of 1980 and I returned to Georgia. By September, I went into the hospital for my third surgery. The two girls came to see me, and said Daddy is downstairs and could he come up? When he got there, he wanted to discuss the terms of the divorce while I was recovering from the surgery.”

Gingrich went on to cheat on the second wife with the third. Regardless of the actual facts or even the spin, he won’t win women.

Herman Cain won’t be the nominee because he can’t win women either. Regardless of what you think of the Politico story, Cain’s handling of the story has been an epic disaster. He’s down at least 10 points with women in Iowa. He’s falling even further and doesn’t even realize it. He’s largely been emboldened by a conservative media that is so used to standing by its men that too few are telling Herman that he is now at the point where he must actually sit and answer questions whether he wants to or not and whether he feels maligned or not and whether I think he should have to or not. If he loses women by as big as he is starting to lose the women, he cannot win.

[……]

Why Mitt Romney Will Not Beat Barack Obama

You’d think that given the economy, jobs, and the present angst about the direction of the country that the GOP would have an easy path to victory. You would be wrong.

You forget the electoral college. The vote is coming down to a handful of states and Barack Obama still maintains the advantage of incumbency and not terribly terrible polling in those swing states.

Mitt Romney, on the other hand, is a man devoid of any principles other than getting himself elected. As much as the American public does not like Barack Obama, they loath a man so fueled with ambition that he will say or do anything to get himself elected. Mitt Romney is that man.

[…..]
Republican billionaires have a fantastic track record of getting Republican opinion leaders to support them and an even better track record at losing elections. Mitt Romney will be no different.

To beat Barack Obama, a candidate must paint a bold contrast with the Democrats on their policies. When Mitt Romney tries, Barack Obama will be able to show that just the other day Mitt Romney held exactly the opposite position as the one he holds today.

Voters may not like Barack Obama, but by the time Obama is done with Romney they will not trust Mitt Romney. And voters would rather the guy they don’t like than they guy they don’t trust.

Why Conservatism Will Die

Conservatism is already dying. Republicans on Capitol Hill are about to raise taxes on the American people with this Super Committee, but they’ll say they are just “raising revenue,” not taxes. Conservatives will give them a pass as they have on virtually every other major issue. Conservatives keep giving passes to people who shouldn’t be given passes because conservative in Washington have been there so long, they’d much rather get invited to the cocktail parties and avoid awkward encounters.

Washington, D.C. conservatives will also rally around Mitt Romney, just as they kept doing over and over and over with George W. Bush even after steel tariffs in Pennsylvania, No Child Left Behind, Medicare Part D, the GM Bailout, and TARP. At some point the public will cease taking conservatives seriously when the most prominent conservatives — those in Washington who pose as the faces, voices, and writers of the conservative movement at large, keep throwing their lot in with a guy who keeps selling out the very principles conservatives claim to hold dear.

Some conservatives, of course, will not go all in for Romney. These conservatives will be blamed by major Republican and “conservative” mouth pieces for not doing enough to help Mitt Romney. They will be alienated, blamed, and made the scapegoat for the failures of the establishment GOP.

[…..]

Hell, he can give the base Marco Rubio as the veep nominee, just like McCain did with Palin — a token for the base. But don’t delude yourself into thinking he will seriously take conservatives seriously. He got the nomination without them and he’ll only use them when it is opportunistically convenient for him.

Conservatism itself will not really die. But it might as well be dead as even conservatives in the heartland of the country stop taking Washington conservatives seriously.

The Contrast To Be Drawn

It is striking to me that in 2012 there is broad based popular angst against Wall Street and Washington and the Republican Party is on the verge of nominating a multi-millionaire scion of the Rockefeller Wing of the Republican Party whose closest encounters with the common man are accidentally touching one of the many hired hands in one of the many rooms of one of his many mansions. But then many of the DC-NYC Republican “conservatives” who support Romney are the same, only coming into contact with regular people when they are served their breakfast by a steward in the first class car on the Acela Express.

Neither Romney nor the Washington GOP crowd who loves him have very much at all in common with fly over country conservatives who see the GOP and Democrats both as out to lunch tools of K-Street and Wall Street. The party that could lead a conservative, populist campaign against Wall Street and Barack Obama, the former getting fat off the latter, will instead nominate a guy more at home on Wall Street than Main Street.

[…….]
I’m starting to think I need to walk it back on my rejection of Jon Huntsman. Because I’m starting to think even he would be more faithful in his conservative convictions than Mitt Romney.
Read the rest –  Mitt Romney as the nominee:  Conservatism dies and Barack Obama wins

The Leader of McCain’s Heroes says Islam will be Libya’s path

by Phantom Ace ( 56 Comments › )
Filed under Al Qaeda, Barack Obama, Islamic Supremacism, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Libya, Muslim Brotherhood, Progressives, Sharia (Islamic Law) at October 24th, 2011 - 8:30 am

We here at Blogmocracy were some of the first to call the Al-Qaeda links with the Libyan Rebels. While other so called Conservatives were backing Obama in his attack on Libya, we didn’t jump on the bandwagon. Instead we have been vindicated. The leader of the new Libyan Regime, Abdul-Jalil, has declared Islam will be the basis of Libya’s future.

TRIPOLI, Libya — Libya’s interim rulers declared the country liberated on Sunday after an eight-month civil war, launching the oil-rich nation on what is meant to be a two-year transition to democracy. But they laid out future plans with an Islamist tone that could rattle their Western backers.

[…]

Abdul-Jalil laid out a vision for a new Libya with an Islamist tint, saying Islamic Sharia law would be the “basic source” of legislation and existing laws that contradict the teachings of Islam would be nullified.

He outlined several changes to align with Islamic law, including putting caps on interest for bank loans and lifting restrictions on the number of wives Libyan men can take. The Muslim holy book, the Quran, allows men up to four wives.

Read the rest: Libya’s transitional leader declares liberation, sets Islamist tone for future

We knew this was coming, yet useful idiots like John McCain, Lindsey Graham, Bill Kristol and even Marco Rubio were assuring Conservatives these people were good guys. They now have egg of their faces. Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton are responsible to installing this Islamic regime in Libya.

What troubles me about Libya is the precedent it sets. Col. Qaddafi gave up his WMDs and was helping us against Al-Qaeda. Now we sent a message to the world. If you have WMDs NATO will not attack you. If you don’t or give up the ones you do have NATO will invade.

The Wilsonian spread Democracy at any costs agenda needs to end!