► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Marco Rubio’

The opening shots of 2016: Jeb Bush Jr. takes aim at Marco Rubio

by Phantom Ace ( 115 Comments › )
Filed under Elections 2016, Progressives, Republican Party, Socialism, Theocratic Progressives, Tranzis at November 21st, 2012 - 11:00 am

I know the Bush family is popular with some on this blog, but Marco Rubio is my Senator and I have a right to speak out and defend him. Far Left Progressives like Charles Johnson have attacked Marco Rubio for his answer to a question in a GQ magazine interview. Rubio basically said its irrelevant to government policies how old the Earth is. But now he is being attacked from another source, the Bush political mafia.

It’s no secret that Jeb Bush is the favorite of the Republican establishment and elements of the base for 2016. Marco Rubio is mentioned as a potential 2016 candidate. He is view as a threat to  Jeb’s aspiration. In a typical mob like act, he send his son; Jeb Bush Jr. to go after Rubio. Using Progressive talking points that would make Charles Johnson proud, the Bush family prince says Rubio’s answer makes the GOP appear anti-science.

 On CNN Tuesday morning, Jeb Bush Jr. — the son of former Florida governor Jeb Bush — said Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) gave “kind of a head-scratching type of answer” to a recent question about the age of the Earth.

[….]

Asked about the comment, Bush called it a “strange question” but also “kind of a strange response.” He suggested Rubio’s support for science did not come through in the interview.

“We’ve got to be a kind of pro-science and pro-technology party. And I think Marco Rubio is just that,” Bush said. “On the Earth question, I guess I have to read more closely in terms of getting a better understanding, but, yeah, kind of a strange response, I guess.”

Bush also said he’s hoping his father will run for president in 2016.

Jeb Bush Jr.’s final answer lets the cat out of the bag. The attack on Marco Rubio by using leftist talking points is about attacking a potential rival to Jeb Bush in 2016. Although they are push overs for Progressives, the Bush political mafia is ruthless with Conservative Republcians. This attack on Rubio is actually pure treachery since Rubio was a political ally of Jeb Bush in Florida politics. But he is in the way and must be destroyed.

Should Rubio run in 2016 and challenge Jeb Bush, expect to see negative stories about him on Conservative blogs and even his citizen status questioned.  Unlike the Democrats, Republcian destroy their up and coming talent if they are not from the correct families. Constitutional Liberty minded Conservatives and Libertarian must stand behind Marco Rubio and fight back against the Bush political mafia and their allies’ upcoming charterer assassination campaign. I will stand behind Rubio or any other Republican attacked by this cabal. I have a 1st Amendment right to speak out and will utilize it.

Rubio’s RNC speech and my thoughts on Romney’s speech!

by Phantom Ace ( 127 Comments › )
Filed under Elections 2012, Mitt Romney, Republican Party at August 31st, 2012 - 8:00 am

Marco Rubio gave one of greatest convention speech I have seen in years. He gave the story of America being exception and that we are moire than a nation. America is an idea unique in  the history of the world. It was a deep and powerful speech that reminded me of being a young kids in the 1980’s and seeing Reagan speak.

TAMPA — Marco Rubio introduced the leader of his party to the nation Thursday night, but judging by the roar of the crowd, some initially wished it was the other way around at the Republican National Convention.

The freshman Florida senator had just 15 minutes as the warm-up act for Mitt Romney, and Rubio made the most of them.

Speaking occasionally in Spanish, Rubio’s address served three purposes: It branded him as a national Hispanic leader in the Republican Party. It played up the best parts of Romney’s biography. And it kept the focus on President Barack Obama.

[….]

Rubio said his father, a bartender, worked 16-hour days and that his mother, a maid and K-Mart stock clerk, often worked overnight shifts.

“My Dad used to tell us: ‘ En este pais, ustedes van a poder lograr todas las cosas que nosotros no pudimos,’ ‘In this country, you will be able to accomplish all the things we never could,’ ” Rubio said.

Rubio compared his family’s struggles with those of Romney’s family, which had briefly fled to Mexico.

“His family came to America to escape revolution. They struggled through poverty and the Great Depression. And yet he rose to be an admired businessman, and public servant,” Rubio said.

“And in November, his son, Mitt Romney, will be elected President of the United States,” Rubio said.

Obama is thanking his lucky stars that Marco Rubio is not his opponent this year. This election would be over, because Rubio can speak better than Obama any day. He doesn’t even need a teleprompter!

As for Romney’s speech, I like most of it. I disagreed with his Wilsonian spread Democracy/nation building nonsense, but it was a good speech. My favorite part was when Romney talked about the relationship his parents had. I also loved it hen he mocked the god-king theme by referencing Obama’s promises to lower ocean levels and heal the plant. This is the key to defeating Obama, destroy the false godhood that has been created.

 

Marco Rubio is a Natural Born Citizen, just like John Fremont and Chester Arthur

by Mojambo ( 2 Comments › )
Filed under Elections 2012, Headlines, Republican Party at April 29th, 2012 - 8:01 am

I hope this puts the rest to the nonsense I see all too often that Rubio is not a natural born citizen. Some how though I doubt it.

by Michael Zak

According to the Constitution, to be eligible for the presidency (or vice presidency), a person must be a “natural born citizen” of the United States. The purpose of this restriction is to prevent a foreigner from becoming the nation’s chief executive.

How can people become U.S. citizens? There are just two ways; either they are born citizens or they become citizens later in life. In the first case, anyone who is a citizen by nature of his birth is a “natural born citizen.”  In the second case, anyone who is a citizen of another country at birth, but is granted U.S. citizenship sometime afterward, is a naturalized citizen.

For example, John McCain, though born in Panama, is eligible for the presidency, because he became a citizen at birth.  Similarly, had Gen. George Meade sought the presidency, he would have been eligible because, though born in Spain, he was a U.S. citizen by nature of his birth.  Any non-naturalized U.S. citizen over the age of thirty-five with fourteen years of residence can be President of the United States.

Sadly, this common-sense, logical approach does not dissuade some conservative pundits from inventing a new constitutional requirement for the presidency.  Despite the plain meaning of the text, they claim that, to be eligible, a person’s parents must also be U.S. citizens. A few even assert that one’s parents must also be natural born citizens. I’ll spare you a recitation of their nonsense about “native born” or Emerich de Vattel or whatnot.  Finding things in the Constitution that are not there is for Democrats!

Now that Mitt Romney has become the presumptive Republican nominee, there is speculation that the junior senator from Florida will be his running mate. Marco Rubio’s parents were from Cuba and did not become U.S. citizens until he was four years old. Voices from the fringe are claiming that this means Rubio is not eligible – and they’re wrong.

Marco Rubio was born is Miami, Florida. He is, therefore, a natural born citizen of the United States.  Per the Constitution, the citizenship status of his parents (or grandparents or anyone but himself) is irrelevant.

Let’s look at U.S. political history for more proof. Were there other instances of a presidential or vice presidential nominee with a foreign-born parent?  You betcha!

The first presidential nominee of the Republican Party, in 1856, was John Charles Fremont.  He was born in South Carolina to an American mother and a French father.  Jean Charles Fremon was born a French citizen, near Lyon, France.  He was not a U.S. citizen at the time of his son’s birth and never did become a citizen. Abraham Lincoln campaigned for Fremont. All the founders of the Republican Party campaigned for Fremont.  One would be hard-pressed to find any suggestion at the time that Fremont’s birth made him ineligible for the presidency.

John Charles Fremont, the first Republican presidential nominee

The seventh vice presidential nominee of the Republican Party, Chester Arthur, was born in Vermont to an American mother and a foreign-born father. William Arthur was born a British citizen – in County Antrim, Ireland – who did not become a U.S. citizen until his son was fourteen years old.

John Fremont, George Meade, Chester Arthur, John McCain, Marco Rubio – all eligible for the presidency.  Republicans should not allow themselves to be distracted away from contesting the 2012 presidential campaign on the real issues.

Marco Rubio’s Foreign Policy Speech

by Phantom Ace ( 3 Comments › )
Filed under Conservatism, Headlines, Progressives, Republican Party, Tranzis at April 25th, 2012 - 7:48 pm

Sen. Marco Rubio addressed the Liberal Brookings Institute today. He gave a foreign policy address there. Let me just say, I am extremely disappointed. He attacks Republicans who are tired of endless wars for Muslim Democracy. Rubio defends the Arab Spring, despite the fact its an Islamic uprising and Christians are being killed. Rubio preached a foreign policy that is not Conservative. It was a Wilsonian Progressive speech based on an ideology that would lead to more war.

To be fair there are elements of the speech I agree with. I do feel its time for the US to forge closer relations with Latin America. They have resources are economically growing. By pivoting towards our South, it would mean less involvement in the Islamic world.

On the energy front, the Western Hemisphere needs to establish itself as a democratic, peaceful and stable alternative to the Middle East in global energy production. An energy alliance made up of the U.S., Canada, Mexico, Colombia, Brazil and a post-Chavez Venezuela would help accomplish this goal. Building the Keystone pipeline and implementing the trans-boundary energy agreement being negotiated with Mexico are also crucial steps toward that goal.

Other areas I agree with Rubio is on China. We do need to treat China with respect. But the rest of speech which calls for intervening in Syria and supporting Islamic movements is madness. The US is broke and lets be frank, the Islamic world don’t like us. We are infidels of the Dar al Haab (House of War).

Rubio’s attacks on fellow Republicans was despicable and should disqualify him from the VP slot. It will also come to back to haunt him should he seek the Presidency. Rubio will quickly viewed as another John McCain. Someone who attacks his own side to win favor from the Left. Rubio should ask McCain how that turned out when he ran for President.

I agree with Marco Rubio on many positions. But foreign policy is where I vehemently disagree. America needs peace and prosperity, not war and bankruptcy. Rubio vision would lead American down the same path his (and mine) Roman and Spanish ancestors took. I love America and I don’t want us to go down the route of those other nations. Marco Rubio needs to read history to realize the disaster his ideas will lead this nation.