► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Nukes’

Iran has enough Uranuim for bomb

by Phantom Ace ( 2 Comments › )
Filed under Dhimmitude, Iran at February 19th, 2009 - 7:43 pm

This should be no surprise to anyone. The UN is now saying Iran has enough material fore an Nuclear bomb.

Iran holds enough uranium for bomb

Iran has built up a stockpile of enough enriched uranium for one nuclear bomb, United Nations officials acknowledged on Thursday.

In a development that comes as the Obama administration is drawing up its policy on negotiations with Tehran over its nuclear programme, UN officials said Iran had produced more nuclear material than previously thought.

Iran, the beloved nation of the Left continues to show its true intentions. But the media will find another excuse for this regime.

U.S. Now Sees Iran As Pursuing Nuclear Bomb

by WrathofG-d ( 11 Comments › )
Filed under Democratic Party, George W. Bush, Iran, Nuclear Weapons at February 12th, 2009 - 12:53 pm

It was reported today in the LA Times, that U.S. Intellegence officials are now reversing their previously staunch position regarding the infamous 2007 N.I.E report which claimed that Iran had halted all work on nuclear bombs in 2003.  It seems that they now believe that Iran will reach “developmental milestones” this year!

__________________________________________________________

iran-nuke1

U.S. now sees Iran as pursuing nuclear bomb

In a reversal since a 2007 report, U.S. officials expect the Islamic Republic to reach development milestones this year.

Reporting from Washington — Little more than a year after U.S. spy agencies concluded that Iran had halted work on a nuclear weapon, the Obama administration has made it clear that it believes there is no question that Tehran is seeking the bomb.

In his news conference this week, President Obama went so far as to describe Iran’s “development of a nuclear weapon” before correcting himself to refer to its “pursuit” of weapons capability.

Obama’s nominee to serve as CIA director, Leon E. Panetta, left little doubt about his view last week when he testified on Capitol Hill. “From all the information I’ve seen,” Panetta said, “I think there is no question that they are seeking that capability.”

The language reflects the extent to which senior U.S. officials now discount a National Intelligence Estimate issued in November 2007 that was instrumental in derailing U.S. and European efforts to pressure Iran to shut down its nuclear program.

As the administration moves toward talks with Iran, Obama appears to be sending a signal that the United States will not be drawn into a debate over Iran’s intent.

“When you’re talking about negotiations in Iran, it is dangerous to appear weak or naive,” said Joseph Cirincione, a nuclear weapons expert and president of the Ploughshares Fund, an anti-proliferation organization based in Washington.

Cirincione said the unequivocal language also worked to Obama’s political advantage. “It guards against criticism from the right that the administration is underestimating Iran,” he said.

Iran has long maintained that it aims to generate electricity, not build bombs, with nuclear power. But Western intelligence officials and nuclear experts increasingly view those claims as implausible.

U.S. officials said that although no new evidence had surfaced to undercut the findings of the 2007 estimate, there was growing consensus that it provided a misleading picture and that the country was poised to reach crucial bomb-making milestones this year.

Obama’s top intelligence official, Dennis C. Blair, the director of national intelligence, is expected to address mounting concerns over Iran’s nuclear program in testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee today.

{The Rest of The Article}

__________________________________________________________

It is best summed up by Carl In Jerusalem:

Am I the only one who is wondering whether someone tried to sabotage the Bush administration’s ability to take action against Iran? Why?

The NIE was criticized from the day it came out. Some speculated that it was issued to facilitate a rapprochement with the Iranians at Israel’s expense. Others claimed the CIA had been hoodwinked into issuing the report. Even the US’s senior intelligence officers retreated from it. But the retreat had little effect. Despite specific intelligence presented by Israel, the Bush administration no longer had a military option. And it wouldn’t let Israel have one either.

Now that there’s a new administration in power, whose goal is ‘discussions’ with Iran and not force, the NIE is being discarded into the dustbins of history. Anyone else smell a rat here?

__________________________________________________________

This should be a very interesting development insofar that the MSM, and liberal establishment jumped all over the 2007 N.I.E. report to call President Bush a “war monger”, etc., embarrass him, and otherwise make it impossible for him to take military action against Iran.   Now, although no actual new evidence has been put forth, those same people, now working under the Obama administration, are very quickly backing away from the 2007 report.  At best, it was a mistake; at worst they put the entire security and safety of the United States at risk, and played nuclear Russian roulette just to score political points.

Iran To Have Enough Uranium For Nuke This Year

by WrathofG-d ( 11 Comments › )
Filed under Iran, Nuclear Weapons at January 27th, 2009 - 11:16 am

Iran will have enough enriched uranium to make a single nuclear weapon later this year, the prestigious International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) predicts.

________________________________________________________________________________________

iran-nukeDuring 2009, Iran will probably reach the point at which it has produced the amount of low-enriched uranium needed to make a nuclear bomb; Mark Fitzpatrick of the International Institute for strategic Studies stated.

“But being able to enrich uranium is not the same as having a nuclear weapon.”

However, the survey reports doubts over US Intelligence estimates that Iran halted its work on nuclear weapons six years ago.

This points to Tehran’s continued development of long-range ballistic missiles able to reach targets in Israel and beyond.

The IISS recommends a mixture of carrot and stick as the best international response.

________________________________________________________________________________________

Iran: 32 U.S. Bases Are Within Range of Iranian Missiles

by Kafir ( 5 Comments › )
Filed under Iran, Military, Nuclear Weapons at January 13th, 2009 - 7:27 pm

From Memri
Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei’s Representative in IRGC: 32 U.S. Bases Are Within Range of Iranian Missiles

On January 4, 2009, the Iranian website Khabaronline reported that Hojat-Ol-Eslam Mojtaba Zolnour, representative of Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei in Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC), had told reporters that “in the event of the slightest aggression against Iran, every one of the U.S.’s 32 bases in the region is within range of Iranian missiles.”

:snip saber rattling:

In further remarks to reporters, Zolnour said: “Just like other zealous Iranians, the IRGC sees the defense and support of the oppressed people of Gaza as a [religious] obligation, and will follow this path, by encouraging assistance to the oppressed people of Gaza and by popular protests against the crimes being committed [against them].”

Stating that Hamas was not fighting like a classic army with conventional arms against the occupier, Zolnour said that Hamas understood the history of defeat of the enemy forces … “All Gaza residents, their homes, and the Hamas forces form a barricade…

Hamas is deploying a trained force of 80,000 at least, whose members are dispersed among the people – and the most important thing is that the Gaza people’s culture of resistance and faith ensures the definitive victory of Islam.”

He said that a ground battle “offered the best opportunity for disabling the invading enemy and avenging the martyrs’ blood, especially that of the women and defenseless children of Gaza,” he added, “Surely Hamas and the people of Gaza are able to withstand the most severe pressure – but they cannot withstand the silence of international organizations, which is harming them the most.

“The shameful and traitorous behavior of the leaders of some Islamic countries, in going along with Islam’s primary enemy in the world, is worse than the silence of the international organizations… There is proof and there are witnesses that without such shameful cooperation, the Zionist regime would not dare to commit such an act…”

He concluded by saying that that the reason for the slavish behavior by some Islamic countries’ leaders was the U.S.’s ‘scare Iran’ project and those countries’ panic at the spread of revolutionary Islam.

First he admits that the fighters are “dispersed among the people” as an Islamic strategy, and then goes on to claim he cares about the women and children they put in harms way on purpose to cull world sympathy?

He also admits Israel is “Islam’s primary enemy”. It is not about land. They are a speck of freedom on Dar al Islam and Islamic “pride” just can’t take it.