► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘obama’

Latin Leaders Bash America While Obama Just Sits There

by Phantom Ace ( 15 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama at April 19th, 2009 - 8:22 pm

Obama is a fool. Various leaders of Latin America bashed the US, he sat there and said nothing.

Obama Gets History Lesson From Latin American

April 18 (Bloomberg) — Latin American leaders railed against the U.S. during President Barack Obama’s first trip to the region, turning what was intended to mark a new direction in relations into a history lesson that chastised “Yankee troop” interventions and U.S.-dictated economic policies.

Obama arrived at the Fifth Summit of the Americas in Trinidad and Tobago yesterday promising to “listen and learn” from regional leaders. He got an earful.

Obama is a sucker and it is plain for all the world to see.

Georgetown covers name of Jesus for Obama

by Phantom Ace ( 18 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Dhimmitude, Leftist-Islamic Alliance at April 16th, 2009 - 8:06 am

Obama can praise Islam and Mohamed but Jesus is offensive. Georgetown University is a Catholic University. It is ran by the Jesuit Order so it has Catholic symbols. the monogram IHS stands for Jesus. Obama found this offensive and had it covered up.

Georgetown Says It Covered Over Name of Jesus to Comply With White House Request

(CNSNews.com) – Georgetown University says it covered over the monogram “IHS”–symbolizing the name of Jesus Christ—because it was inscribed on a pediment on the stage where President Obama spoke at the university on Tuesday and the White House had asked Georgetown to cover up all signs and symbols there.
 
As of Wednesday afternoon, the “IHS” monogram that had previously adorned the stage at Georgetown’s Gaston Hall was still covered up–when the pediment where it had appeared was photographed by CNSNews.com.

 

If it said Mohamed I bet he would point it out as a symbol of American tolerance. But it said Jesus and that is not an accepted name in this Tolerant society. Obama is once again proving that the Leftist-Islamic alliance is intolerant. Jesus is now offensive, who next Moses?

U.S.A: United States Of Appeasement?

by WrathofG-d ( 5 Comments › )
Filed under Ahmadinejad, Barack Obama, Iran, North Korea, Nuclear Weapons, Saudi Arabia, United Nations at April 14th, 2009 - 10:43 am

President Obama has decided to lead the free world in an “everything opposite from G. W. Bush” approach to foreign affairs.  Although in many instances this could be a good idea, like most unprepared, naive President’s of our past, President Obama seems to be throwing out the good with the bad.  This has included numerous public displays of submission, moral infirmity on a global scale including, but not limited to bowing to the king of Saudi Arabia, fecklessness as to Iran’s nuclear ambitions, and a world groveling tour where he went from country to country begging forgiveness from dictators and despots.  It has long been the Conservative view that such overt displays of weakness, and complete lack of resolve will not engender peace and cooperation from our enemies, but instead only invite further dangerous behavior.

Barack Chamberlain: Peace In Our Time

____________________________________________

N. Korea To Boycott Talks & Restart Nuclear Weapons Plant

TOKYO, April 14 — Fuming at the U.N. Security Council for condemning its recent missile launch, North Korea said Tuesday it will restart its plutonium factory, junk all its disarmament agreements and “never participate” again in six-country nuclear negotiations.

North Korea had warned before launching a long-range missile on April 5 that it would tolerate no U.N. criticism of what it insisted was a peaceful attempt to put a satellite into orbit.

When the 15-member Security Council unanimously condemned that launch on Monday and demanded a halt to all future missile launches, the North’s reaction was swift, vitriolic and surprisingly substantive.

It called the Security Council’s statement a “brigandish,” “wanton” and “unjust” infringement of its sovereignty.  It said that six-party nuclear talks with the United States, South Korea, Japan, Russia and, even its closest ally, China, had “turned into a platform” for forcing the North to disarm itself and for bringing down its system of government.

“We have no choice but to further strengthen our nuclear deterrent to cope with additional military threats by hostile forces,” North Korea’s Foreign Ministry said in a statement released by its state news agency.

If it follows through on Tuesday’s bluster, North Korea will walk away from six years of slow, fitful but sometimes productive negotiations that have led to substantial disablement of the North’s main nuclear reactor and partial disclosure of the scale of its weapons program.

The talks, in turn, have rewarded the government of Kim Jong Il with food, fuel and removal from a U.S. list of countries that sponsor terror.  The Obama administration has repeatedly said that it wants to resume the talks, which stalled last year in a dispute about how to verify the North’s past nuclear activity.

That nuclear activity, judging from the North’s statement on Tuesday, is soon to increase.

“We will actively consider building our own light-water nuclear reactor, will revive nuclear facilities and reprocess used nuclear fuel rods,” the ministry said. Experts have said the North does not have the equipment or skills to make an advanced light-water reactor.

China, host of the six-party talks, called for restraint and calm on Tuesday, asking all countries to return to the discussions, even after North Korea announced it would never do so.

“We hope the relevant parties could proceed from the perspective of the overall interest of the region, so as to work together to safeguard the progress of the six-party talks,” Chinese foreign ministry spokeswoman Jiang Yu said at a news briefing.

Japan also urged North Korea to return to the talks and the Russian government said it regretted Pyongyang’s decision.

Analysts in Seoul said that North Korea, with its threat to pull out of the six-party talks, appeared to be up to its familiar tactics of brinkmanship — creating a crisis in order to be rewarded for helping to solve it.

“North Korea can use today’s walkout as a negotiating chip with the United States in the future,” said Koh Yu-whan, a professor of North Korean studies at Dongguk University in Seoul.

North Korea outraged the world three years ago by exploding a small nuclear device. But less than a year later, as it turned brinkmanship into remuneration, it pledged to abandon its nuclear weapons in return for aid from the United States and other countries.

“North Koreans have learned from past experience that when they create worst-case scenarios they get closer to solving their problems,” said Chun Hyun-joon, a North Korea specialist at the Korea Institute for National Unification.

{The Rest of The Article}

____________________________________________

U.S. May Drop Key Condition For Talks With Iran

WASHINGTON – The Obama administration and its European allies are preparing proposals that would shift strategy toward Iran by dropping a longstanding American insistence that Tehran rapidly shut down nuclear facilities during the early phases of negotiations over its atomic program, according to officials involved in the discussions.

The proposals, exchanged in confidential strategy sessions with European allies, would press Tehran to open up its nuclear program gradually to wide-ranging inspection.  But the proposals would also allow Iran to continue enriching uranium for some period during the talks. That would be a sharp break from the approach taken by the Bush administration, which had demanded that Iran halt its enrichment activities, at least briefly to initiate negotiations.

The proposals under consideration would go somewhat beyond President Obama’s promise, during the presidential campaign, to open negotiations with Iran “without preconditions.” Officials involved in the discussion said they were being fashioned to draw Iran into nuclear talks that it had so far shunned.

{The Rest Of The Article}

____________________________________________

Peace in our time!

Obama squandering ties with India

by Phantom Ace ( 19 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Dhimmitude, Leftist-Islamic Alliance at April 13th, 2009 - 6:53 pm

President is undoing one of the biggest changes in American policy. During the Cold War India although a Democracy was allied with the Soviet Union. This changed under the Bushes and Clinton. India opened up its economy and we began to see eye to eye on the Islamic threat. Obama eager to please Islam has decided to turn its back on India.

Barack Obama’s India-Pakistan Mess

The Indian alliance is an almost perfect lynch-pin for American strategy in Asia. India’s population is growing, which means that they will actually be there for decades to come. While hardly Westerners in culture and outlook, they share more in common with the West than do the other regional powers, including even Japan. Its military, while not yet on the level of South Korea’s, is professionalizing and learning the bluewater trade. Aside from a few breakaway regions left to go and the odd round of interfaith violence, India is a fairly stable State beset on its West by a terrorist breeding ground, and to its North by a power-hungry China. In other words, it is an Anglophonic, common law democracy beset by tyrannies and lunatics, and so naturally inclined to ally with other Anglophonic, common law democracies facing the problems attendant with tyrannies and lunatics. American foreign policy has always been about American priorities — and rightfully so — but it is a rare and wonderful thing when American Realpolitik priorities and the moral imperative to stand next to young democracies align.

Or rather, it was a rare and wonderful thing. It’s rapidly becoming a fading memory, as the Indians are finding to their dismay.

India which has come a long way is now being ignored. India’s sin, it stands against Islamo-Fascism and that is a no no in Obama’s mind. Like Israel, India now is considered a nuisance.

Much as with Obama’s turn at “Make Peace In The Holy Land” (a game American Presidents play too often as if the Israelis are unhelpful opponents instead of an old, democratic ally), Obama’s India policy has all the signs of being confused, amoral fantasizing disguised as hard-nosed realism. On the one hand are repeated, pointless sleights, like not calling the world’s largest democracy after being elected; neglecting to include India in Hillary Clinton’s first trip abroad as Secretary of State; and subtly letting India know that the Obama Administration sees India’s nuclear development as out of place in the world. On the other hand are gentle — ultimately probably futile — attempts to have Pakistan divulge detail on which faction of its intelligence services perpetrated the Mumbai massacre.

India is getting the Israel treatment. As always, Non Muslims must make painful concessions while Islamic nations don’t. This is a double standard. As much as I detested Bush he at least had it right when it comes to India. They are a growing nation of 1 Billion people and a Democracy. They should be our friend. Instead Obama wants to be friends with islamo-Fascists and Sino-Fascists. This sickens me as an American and we will regret this.